Jump to content

Sources: Peters to Eagles for three picks


Recommended Posts

Malta, I would say there's a big difference between the 21st and the 28th pick...which are both first rounders.

I agree with you San jose. I'd much rather have had the 21st pick than the 28th pick. We probably can't get Pettigrew with the 28th pick. *sigh*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My only concern is that the #21st pick would have gotten Pettigrew. No way he falls to us now. With so many draft picks and so many holes to fill at least we can actually draft the best player available. We have options now:

 

11: DL (Orapko, Raji, Brown)

28: OT (Britton, Oher (if he falls))

42: TE (Nelson, Cook, Coffman)

 

or:

11: OT (Oher, Britton (too early though)

28: TE (Pettigrew, Ingram, Nelson)

42: DE (Sidbury, Barwin, Johnson)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We lost a LT who screwed us last year, was unhappy, no dedication to team.. statistically among the worst LT in sacks allowed. Many false starts, holding calls . . He was a FA pick up right ? ...so from nothing we got 3 good picks . I applaud the Bills for this move. They offered him good money but I wouldn't throw the bank at him with the stunt he pulled on the team last year.

 

Your opinion fits mine the best, so you are brilliant. :wallbash:

 

Throw in the fact that we'll get 3 picks for an UDFA tight end...

We did all right. Let's move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the worst trades of all time. Trading an all pro LT tackle in his prime? Horrible. Oh yeah, here is the other bad news: the current front office will be selecting the players for these draft choices. Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only concern is that the #21st pick would have gotten Pettigrew. No way he falls to us now. With so many draft picks and so many holes to fill at least we can actually draft the best player available. We have options now:

 

11: DL (Orapko, Raji, Brown)

28: OT (Britton, Oher (if he falls))

42: TE (Nelson, Cook, Coffman)

 

or:

11: OT (Oher, Britton (too early though)

28: TE (Pettigrew, Ingram, Nelson)

42: DE (Sidbury, Barwin, Johnson)

 

You know what would be even better?

 

Peters

11: Ayers

42: Ingram

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abbey Road. The first thing that I did when I went to London was have my picture taken walking across Abbey Road (as many other tourists have).

 

Very cool. It certainly has nothing to do with the Bills, but I always liked the Beetles myself. I watched Paul McCartney doing a recent concert on some cable station the other night. He has to be in his mid 60's at least, by now. You could never tell, he cranked out hit after hit and sounded awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the worst trades of all time. Trading an all pro LT tackle in his prime? Horrible. Oh yeah, here is the other bad news: the current front office will be selecting the players for these draft choices. Good luck.

 

 

 

In his prime that quit on his team last year and when he was gone the Bills were 5-1. :wallbash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the worst trades of all time. Trading an all pro LT tackle in his prime? Horrible. Oh yeah, here is the other bad news: the current front office will be selecting the players for these draft choices. Good luck.

 

 

lol. very true.

 

there is no such thing as fair value when you get unproven draft picks for a proven NFL starter w 2 pro bowls. Bills Lose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only concern is that the #21st pick would have gotten Pettigrew. No way he falls to us now. With so many draft picks and so many holes to fill at least we can actually draft the best player available. We have options now:

 

11: DL (Orapko, Raji, Brown)

28: OT (Britton, Oher (if he falls))

42: TE (Nelson, Cook, Coffman)

 

or:

11: OT (Oher, Britton (too early though)

28: TE (Pettigrew, Ingram, Nelson)

42: DE (Sidbury, Barwin, Johnson)

 

So now do we keep the 11th overall due to a huge need for an OT? If Oher's still there, we have to take him, but if not, listen to offers for teams to trade up for our 11th? Thoughts anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't wait to watch Peters get destroyed against the NYG twice a year. Then sprinkle in a little Dallas 3-4 pass rush a couple of times. Sorry Jason the probowl handouts are over.

 

I only wish you knew what the hell you are talking about. I'd feel better. Unfortunately you are wrong and he is a dominant player and we got shafted. This sux!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody ... Just wanted to let you know things are happening so fast and my phone is ringing so much I won't be able to post every link today. Please check the AFC East blog for updates as I learn them.

 

Damn, what else is going on???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now do we keep the 11th overall due to a huge need for an OT? If Oher's still there, we have to take him, but if not, listen to offers for teams to trade up for our 11th? Thoughts anyone?

What huge need? We have Walker, he'll step right in! Chambers to RT McKinney at LG. I'm looking for a 4th round interior OL, that will be fine. Let's go get a WR and TE in the first so Trent will have plenty of weapons. Actually, I think Moreno and Pettigrew will be the best draft! That way we can trade Freddie too! And then in the second we can take a DB that has "great value"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In his prime that quit on his team last year and when he was gone the Bills were 5-1. :wallbash:

Peters started the last five games of that 5-1 stretch. The Bills' record in games he missed the last two seasons, including his first-half injury against the Giants: 2-3.

 

2007: Giants 38, Bills 21; Eagles 17, Bills 9.

2008: Bills 34, Seahawks 10; Bills 30, Broncos 23; Pats 13, Bills 0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you would have rather just paid the guy that burned his team LAST year and the guy that still have two years on his contract who would have probably sat out even though the Bills were offering him around $9 million a year? Makes sense to me. And people thought T.O. was a cancer.

 

 

My belief is that an organization that is striving for greatness would have recognized Peters importance and would not have driven this car off the road.

This organization's lack of leadership and vision is glaring,and will result in continued mediocity (at best) in the coming years.

 

 

Hmm....maybe if they didn't make such a HUGE mistake and overvalue and overpay Dockery, the Bills could have paid Peters like the All-Pro that he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only concern is that the #21st pick would have gotten Pettigrew. No way he falls to us now. With so many draft picks and so many holes to fill at least we can actually draft the best player available. We have options now:

 

11: DL (Orapko, Raji, Brown)

28: OT (Britton, Oher (if he falls))

42: TE (Nelson, Cook, Coffman)

 

or:

11: OT (Oher, Britton (too early though)

28: TE (Pettigrew, Ingram, Nelson)

42: DE (Sidbury, Barwin, Johnson)

Maybe we can trade our 3rd and Philly's third back to them in order to jump to 21? How does that work on the ol' draft value chart?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody ... Just wanted to let you know things are happening so fast and my phone is ringing so much I won't be able to post every link today. Please check the AFC East blog for updates as I learn them.

 

The link: http://myespn.go.com/blogs/afceast

 

And this should tell us all we need to know about the relationship between Peters and the Bills:

Peters likes what he's hearing from Eagles

Peters is meeting with the Philadelphia Eagles sans agent Eugene Parker, and talks are going extremely well. So well, in fact, that the deal could be announced Friday. The initial expectation was it could take until Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...