Greg Rousseau has turned out to be a complete slug.

[Mikie2times]

Just now, Simon said:

 

At what point will you figure out that I simply do not give a shlt about pretend math? 

Good grief....  

The moment you understand your thoughts aren't objective

[TheBeaneBandit]

2 hours ago, Kelly to Allen said:

 

His tape vs KC was dominant imo. 

They were down to 3rd string tackles....from tackles who aren't good. 

[Simon]

1 hour ago, boyst said:

I don't get it. I really don't get it. 

 

I honestly think that 90% of it is simply about personal experience.

A lot of folks haven't been lucky enough to spend a lot of time on a field and learn what really counts. It doesn't make them stupid; it's just that the more experience you have working any particular complex problem, the more you come to understand what's actually important in those complexities and what's just tlts on a bull.

It's like an accountant from Raleigh looking to buy a tractor; he doesn't have much experience so the first thing he's going to look at is the paint job. When the reality is that even some farmbilly from the red clay hills of Central Caroline has been elbows deep often enough to know from experience what's important, no matter how big a rube he might be!

[NewEra]

5 hours ago, Mikie2times said:

Here is a stack rank by average contract value. Then it shows the sacks, TFL, QB Hits, sum of all 3, then the sum of all 3 divided by games. 

Rousseau is the lowest in the per game count of any DE making what he makes, and you don't find anyone lower than him until you hit Hasson Reddick who is making 6 million less per year. His per game counts put him firmly in the 11-15 million dollar range. 

 

 

lol….and do those guys in that sack range play amazing d vs the run?  
 

sacks sacks sacks sacks sacks

 

there is more to being a good DE than accumulating sacks. Those that get 14+ are going to get 30-50M and some of them play poor run D.  
 

Rousseau plays great run D and is a decent pass rusher and is 25 years old.  Hes not a star and he isn’t paid like a star.  

[BillsFan130]

2 hours ago, Simon said:

 

Clearly.

And I would put forth that yours is rooted in math and highlight reels while mine is simply based on actual football. 

You are free to rely on yours to advance your agenda and I am free to rely on mine to discuss what actually happened. 🤷‍♂️

Mine is rooted in both. I watch him play and I see the all 22 clips, just like you im sure.

 

I see a solid player who fundamentally is good, especially in the run game.
 

What I don't see is a game changing, impact player. And the math, (assuming you mean stats), reflect that.  On pace for like 5 sacks and like 5 TFLs for a 20m dollar player? I'm sorry that I want more out of him and I don't consider that anywhere near dominating

[FireChans]

7 minutes ago, NewEra said:

lol….and do those guys in that sack range play amazing d vs the run?  
 

sacks sacks sacks sacks sacks

 

there is more to being a good DE than accumulating sacks. Those that get 14+ are going to get 30-50M and some of them play poor run D.  
 

Rousseau plays great run D and is a decent pass rusher and is 25 years old.  Hes not a star and he isn’t paid like a star.  

 

On 11/25/2025 at 8:19 AM, FireChans said:

His cap hit is low because we just extended him.

 

it doubles in 2026 and doubles again in 27.

 

If you want to compare apples to apples, Micah Parsons has a cap hit of $4M more than Greg this year, $8M next year, and $5M more in 2027

 

[BillsFan130]

1 hour ago, boyst said:

Let me guess you dominate your Madden league and send all out blitzes on most downs?

 

The game of football is much different than the sport we watch.

 

It's hilarious to see such takes. Thanks for entertaining me. 

"Bruce Smith didn't get a sack today, he sucks. 4 weeks in a row no sack"

" He was chipped and then double teamed every time."

" But he didn't get a sack and was always right about to get one before the QB moved up in the pocket."

" He plays 34 DE"

" He only has 7 sacks this year. Phil has 5 and much cheaper. We don't need Bruce."

"Ok"

 

I don't get it. I really don't get it. 

Against Houston he had 0 QB hits, 0 TFLs, 0 sacks, 0 batted balls, 0 fumbles. sorry that I don't find that "dominating ". 

 

No problem for the entertainment👍

[CheshireCT]

To me it seems like he plays great when he’s 100% fresh, and then as soon as he’s playing with any kind of wear & tear, he drops off the map. Am I wrong? I’m guessing we’ll eventually hear he was playing the last 8 games with an ankle sprain or something.

[BuffaloBillsGospel2014]

I wanted us to let Rousseau go and sign Harold Landry. I also wanted us to sign WR Dovante Adams plus trade for George Pickens (a 3rd round pick and swap of late rounders), we then wouldn't have signed Larry Ogunjobi, Michael Hoecht, CB Tre White or Josh Palmer and we would have been 100% better off from all of those things. You could have just paid me Beane's salary and we'd be 100% in a better spot right now... Just sayin! 😀

[BuffaloBillyG]

1 hour ago, Simon said:

 

I honestly think that 90% of it is simply about personal experience.

A lot of folks haven't been lucky enough to spend a lot of time on a field and learn what really counts. It doesn't make them stupid; it's just that the more experience you have working any particular complex problem, the more you come to understand what's actually important in those complexities and what's just tlts on a bull.

It's like an accountant from Raleigh looking to buy a tractor; he doesn't have much experience so the first thing he's going to look at is the paint job. When the reality is that even some farmbilly from the red clay hills of Central Caroline has been elbows deep often enough to know from experience what's important, no matter how big a rube he might be!

It's not just spending time on the field. It's the complete refocus of what's important in people's mindsets. 

 

IMO, it's a direct result of fantasy football mindset. If a guy doesn't show up on the stat sheet, fans view him as worthless. Praise will be heaped on James Cook for his great season (and he deserves it) but will advocate for cutting Reggie Gilliam, who has cleared many paths for him. 

Edited 26 minutes ago by BuffaloBillyG

[boyst]

1 hour ago, Simon said:

 

I honestly think that 90% of it is simply about personal experience.

A lot of folks haven't been lucky enough to spend a lot of time on a field and learn what really counts. It doesn't make them stupid; it's just that the more experience you have working any particular complex problem, the more you come to understand what's actually important in those complexities and what's just tlts on a bull.

It's like an accountant from Raleigh looking to buy a tractor; he doesn't have much experience so the first thing he's going to look at is the paint job. When the reality is that even some farmbilly from the red clay hills of Central Caroline has been elbows deep often enough to know from experience what's important, no matter how big a rube he might be!

Have you ever called plays? Specifically on defense or pass blocking schemes for the OL?

[Kelly to Allen]

1 hour ago, TheBeaneBandit said:

They were down to 3rd string tackles....from tackles who aren't good. 

 

Jaylon Moore is their 1st backup. He's started many games. Jawan Taylor played 3qtrs and is a starter at rt

[EmotionallyUnstable]

2 hours ago, Mikie2times said:

relative to his pears.

I heard what you were saying until you starting comparing him to fruit