Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Coach Tuesday said:


He is definitely someone opposing OC’s have to design a game plan around.  There are not many of these in the league - we have none.  

He’s also the only player to have 12+ sacks in his first 4 years if I remember correctly. Just because we didn’t get him doesn’t make him less of a player, the guy is absolutely disruptive. Never mind the amount of plays he affects that don’t even make the stat sheet. He’s on a first ballot hall of fame trajectory.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Brand J said:

He’s also the only player to have 12+ sacks in his first 4 years if I remember correctly. Just because we didn’t get him doesn’t make him less of a player, the guy is absolutely disruptive. Never mind the amount of plays he affects that don’t even make the stat sheet. He’s on a first ballot hall of fame trajectory.


Jerry justifying it by saying “we need to stop the run” lol what century is it, will that generation please step aside already.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Brand J said:

You can call anyone who’s on a path to being a first ballot hall of famer a generational talent. There aren’t many men that athletic with the production to match. Parsons is absolutely a generational talent.  

i guess

 

so we calling myles garrett and tj watt and danielle hunter and what maybe maxx crosby generational talents too? 

 

thats a lot of generational talents at the same position in one generation imo

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, GoBills808 said:

i guess

 

so we calling myles garrett and tj watt and danielle hunter and what maybe maxx crosby generational talents too? 

 

thats a lot of generational talents at the same position in one generation imo


How does this help Dallas win games the next two years?  

Posted
Just now, Coach Tuesday said:


Jerry justifying it by saying “we need to stop the run” lol what century is it, will that generation please step aside already.

 

Has anyone seen @Einstein and Jerry in the same room at the same time?

Posted

Jerry: "Things are good here. Things are good here. We have just decided it was in the best interest of our team to take the consideration we had. We appreciate his four years. We can take that consideration and we can win in our minds more than if we had gone the other route and signed him. That's not a negative on Micah. That's just unique to our circumstances."

Posted
1 minute ago, GoBills808 said:

i guess

 

so we calling myles garrett and tj watt and danielle hunter and what maybe maxx crosby generational talents too? 

 

thats a lot of generational talents at the same position in one generation imo

There can be multiple generational talents playing at once, you know. When Randy Moss was in the league, so was Calvin Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, & Terrell Owens. Those guys are on a tier by themselves, first ballot hall of famers. And then you have the rest of the players in the league.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:


Jerry justifying it by saying “we need to stop the run” lol what century is it, will that generation please step aside already.


it’s something this board would have rallied around at one point and still might on an off day

 

Ultimately it’s something you say when you can’t pass and stop the pass but want to distract from that 

Posted
1 minute ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

Jerry: "Things are good here. Things are good here. We have just decided it was in the best interest of our team to take the consideration we had. We appreciate his four years. We can take that consideration and we can win in our minds more than if we had gone the other route and signed him. That's not a negative on Micah. That's just unique to our circumstances."

One thing to say he's not worth 47 million dollars. It's another thing to say that.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

Jerry: "Things are good here. Things are good here. We have just decided it was in the best interest of our team to take the consideration we had. We appreciate his four years. We can take that consideration and we can win in our minds more than if we had gone the other route and signed him. That's not a negative on Micah. That's just unique to our circumstances."


Lol he called him “Michael” several times in his PC.  Jerry may be out to sea…

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Brand J said:

There can be multiple generational talents playing at once, you know. When Randy Moss was in the league, so was Calvin Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, & Terrell Owens. Those guys are on a tier by themselves, first ballot hall of famers. And then you have the rest of the players in the league.

But of those guys Moss is clearly the best right

 

Parsons I don't consider clearly the best

And actually tbh I'm ok calling Calvin Johnson and TO generational talents 

Throw Julio in there too

 

But they are/were better than Micah Parsons imo

Posted
1 minute ago, GoBills808 said:

But of those guys Moss is clearly the best right

 

Parsons I don't consider clearly the best

But being 2nd best in the entire league at what he does doesn’t disqualify him from being a generational talent. Remember, he’s done something in his first four years that no other player in the history of the league has done.
I do agree Moss was the best. Would you consider Calvin Johnson to be a generational talent?

Posted
1 minute ago, Brand J said:

But being 2nd best in the entire league at what he does doesn’t disqualify him from being a generational talent. Remember, he’s done something in his first four years that no other player in the history of the league has done.
I do agree Moss was the best. Would you consider Calvin Johnson to be a generational talent?

for sure

those were some of the best wideouts of all time

 

but for current DEs im only really calling Garrett 'generational' 

 

dont get me wrong- parsons is a great player. but the hyperbole around this trade...not feeling it personally

Posted
33 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

packers finished 3rd in their division going 1-5 last season...they got bigger needs imo

 

And yet they finished 11-6 & made the playoffs. Not everyone gets to play in the AFC East.

 

They'll be better this year, while the Vikings are likely to be worse. Jordan Love was playing injured. Now they just added a star pass rusher.

 

Their rookie WR Golden should also be very good. You may not think much of them, but I believe GB will win the division or just barely be edged out by Detroit. 

 

Either way, they'll be good. 

Posted
Just now, GoBills808 said:

for sure

those were some of the best wideouts of all time

 

but for current DEs im only really calling Garrett 'generational' 

 

dont get me wrong- parsons is a great player. but the hyperbole around this trade...not feeling it personally

We can agree to disagree. I think Parsons is 100% a generational talent and I’d bet the league would agree.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

Jerry: "Things are good here. Things are good here. We have just decided it was in the best interest of our team to take the consideration we had. We appreciate his four years. We can take that consideration and we can win in our minds more than if we had gone the other route and signed him. That's not a negative on Micah. That's just unique to our circumstances."

Egos clearly got in the way ..

Thank God we have a Brandon Beane

 

Draft Develop and Re sign 

5 minutes ago, BigDingus said:

 

And yet they finished 11-6 & made the playoffs. Not everyone gets to play in the AFC East.

 

They'll be better this year, while the Vikings are likely to be worse. Jordan Love was playing injured. Now they just added a star pass rusher.

 

Their rookie WR Golden should also be very good. You may not think much of them, but I believe GB will win the division or just barely be edged out by Detroit. 

 

Either way, they'll be good. 

How many WRs does this man need? Sheesh

Posted
16 minutes ago, Mike in Horseheads said:

Jerry: "Things are good here. Things are good here. We have just decided it was in the best interest of our team to take the consideration we had. We appreciate his four years. We can take that consideration and we can win in our minds more than if we had gone the other route and signed him. That's not a negative on Micah. That's just unique to our circumstances."

I wouldn't be as critical of him if it was three firsts and Kenny Clark before the draft because $47m per year when you're already paying Dak and Lamb is a lot.  However, only getting two which because of Parsons will be in the final eight of the draft now the next two years most likely it's an awful deal. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:


How does this help Dallas win games the next two years?  

 

the have 32 million free cap space to sign an edge rusher now 😄

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...