djp14150 Posted August 18 Posted August 18 I heard on the game of the bears looking to build a new stadium. what stunned me is where they want to build it. the location is not good. chicago with its convention center and hotels is one of 3 cities innthe U.S. that can hold major conferences. Vegas on the strip can do this. Orland convention center which is near sea world and universal can host large conferences too. where Chicago want to build this new stadium appears to be out by O hare airport. On the surface that is perfectly fine. The problems arise if they think they can use it to host other big events like final 4 and conventions. If they build the stadium in the downtown area where hotels are they could do this. Quote
eball Posted August 18 Posted August 18 As a Bills fan, I’m going to be thinking about this issue all day. 1 8 1 Quote
Captain Hindsight Posted August 18 Posted August 18 I love these posts. The bears probably spent like 100k for a study of the best place to build the new stadium, had countless meetings with state and govt officials, held town halls with citizens and finally, after all that, were able to agree on a site. But then somebody comes on a message board and is like "why not downtown?" 1 Quote
chris heff Posted August 18 Posted August 18 43 minutes ago, DD4Bills said: but will it have a dome?? And it should be downtown. Quote
LabattBlue Posted August 18 Posted August 18 1 hour ago, djp14150 said: I heard on the game of the bears looking to build a new stadium. what stunned me is where they want to build it. the location is not good. chicago with its convention center and hotels is one of 3 cities innthe U.S. that can hold major conferences. Vegas on the strip can do this. Orland convention center which is near sea world and universal can host large conferences too. where Chicago want to build this new stadium appears to be out by O hare airport. On the surface that is perfectly fine. The problems arise if they think they can use it to host other big events like final 4 and conventions. If they build the stadium in the downtown area where hotels are they could do this. Why do they need a domed stadium downtown for conventions? They already have a world class convention center. Where they put the new stadium doesn’t matter one bit to their convention business. Quote
Fan boy '92 Posted August 18 Posted August 18 1 hour ago, DD4Bills said: but will it have a dome? translucent roof yo Quote
Utah John Posted August 18 Posted August 18 We were in Chicago on vacation a couple of weeks ago, and we took a small tour bus around the eastern part of the city. The driver pointed out the original stadium and then the expensive addition on the top of it, the part that looks like a UFO landed on it. So Chicago spent all that money on upgrading their current stadium and now they're going to spend billions on a brand new stadium. The old one is near Lake Michigan which is also where the museums etc are, and Wrigley Field is also on the eastern side of the city but farther north. Maybe the new location was chosen to try to spread the wealth or maybe it was to reduce traffic congestion on game days. Quote
BillsDad51 Posted August 18 Posted August 18 It's a typical Chicago s***show. Bears purchased a horse race track in Arlington Heights for $100+ million, allegedly for new stadium. Bears and Arlington Heights squabbled over tax breaks. Governor said there would be no money from state. City of Chicago at first said no to a new stadium. It's still in the hole for $600 million for the Soldier Field reno. Then the city came up with some proposals and the Bears appeared to be willing to work with them. Then a couple of weeks ago Bears said they are proceeding with plans for a stadium in Arlington Heights. Footnote: 20 years ago when Bears were looking to build a new stadium, his highness King Richard Daley II proclaimed they would stay at a renovated Soldier Field, hence the spaceship on the old field. Chicago missed out on an opportunity to build a domed stadium elsewhere downtown when lawmakers were more amenable to providing stadium construction revenue. A dome in Chicago no doubt would have landed the Super Bowl every few years. 1 Quote
Billy Claude Posted August 18 Posted August 18 7 hours ago, djp14150 said: where Chicago want to build this new stadium appears to be out by O hare airport. It has nothing to do with what Chicago wants and as usual it's about what makes the most money for the Bears. The Bears wanted a lot of money from the state and city to build downtown and were rejected. The Bears own 350 acres in Arlington Heights so they think they can make more money building the stadium there and developing the surrounding area. Arlington Heights might also be willing to give them tax incentives. Quote
HurlyBurly51 Posted August 18 Posted August 18 I'm convinced if there were a different mayor in office this could have all been worked out. Quote
djp14150 Posted August 18 Author Posted August 18 5 hours ago, BillsDad51 said: It's a typical Chicago s***show. Bears purchased a horse race track in Arlington Heights for $100+ million, allegedly for new stadium. Bears and Arlington Heights squabbled over tax breaks. Governor said there would be no money from state. City of Chicago at first said no to a new stadium. It's still in the hole for $600 million for the Soldier Field reno. Then the city came up with some proposals and the Bears appeared to be willing to work with them. Then a couple of weeks ago Bears said they are proceeding with plans for a stadium in Arlington Heights. Footnote: 20 years ago when Bears were looking to build a new stadium, his highness King Richard Daley II proclaimed they would stay at a renovated Soldier Field, hence the spaceship on the old field. Chicago missed out on an opportunity to build a domed stadium elsewhere downtown when lawmakers were more amenable to providing stadium construction revenue. A dome in Chicago no doubt would have landed the Super Bowl every few years. if thry build a dome stadium out there and think they will get these other events….i don’t think it will happen because the lack of hotels and logistics. Quote
Mike in Horseheads Posted August 18 Posted August 18 Maybe we should merge the the Browns, Eagles and Bears threads, do we need a poll? 1 Quote
Breakout Squad Posted August 19 Posted August 19 9 hours ago, Fan boy '92 said: translucent roof yo Honestly it’s a pretty cool stadium concept. A dome makes sense because of the wind and bitter winter. And the translucent roof is brilliant because they get way more sunshine than WNY kind of like Minnesota. Quote
Matt_In_NH Posted August 19 Posted August 19 I heard it will be a dome but it will have wind and snow machines cause they want the home field advantage like it is outside I. Chicago. Quote
Fan boy '92 Posted August 19 Posted August 19 1 hour ago, Breakout Squad said: Honestly it’s a pretty cool stadium concept. A dome makes sense because of the wind and bitter winter. And the translucent roof is brilliant because they get way more sunshine than WNY kind of like Minnesota. Honestly, I'm glad you didn't pick the place or design of our new palace. Quote
major Posted August 19 Posted August 19 I was there last year. It’s a historic stadium and should stay put. Just remove the UFO additions and go back to the way it was. 1 Quote
Breakout Squad Posted August 19 Posted August 19 1 hour ago, Fan boy '92 said: Honestly, I'm glad you didn't pick the place or design of our new palace. Cool Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.