Jump to content

Rumor: Bills trying aggressively to move up for a WR in round one


Logic

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:


does Schopp have good League connections ? 

Or is his “consensus” derived from reading Twitter like the rest of us?

He is actually more clueless on what the bills are actually doing than most posters on this board or on Twitter 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cheektowaga Chad said:

He is actually more clueless on what the bills are actually doing than most posters on this board or on Twitter 


I used to listen to him 5-6 years ago but gave it away …

 

Never happy about anything ..and seemed to think his audience cared about his gambling and Fantasy football results ..

 

Assume nothing has changed …

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

No thanks, trade back with Carolina for their 2 seconds

 

 

How many 7rd picks can we get for 2 2nd ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:


I used to listen to him 5-6 years ago but gave it away …

 

Never happy about anything ..and seemed to think his audience cared about his gambling and Fantasy football results ..

 

Assume nothing has changed …

This about sums it up still 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Putin said:

How many 7rd picks can we get for 2 2nd ? 

Ooooo. Beanes got his eyes on EVERY 7th round pick in the draft. It’s gonna take some maneuvering but I think he can do it. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrags said:

Ooooo. Beanes got his eyes on EVERY 7th round pick in the draft. It’s gonna take some maneuvering but I think he can do it. 

He should maneuver for 2025 draft and probably get couple more 7th 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Success said:

 

I'm good trading up, or standing pat.  A trade back would be tough.

 

We traded Stephon Diggs.  We have 2 receivers who are basically #3 guys right now.  We need not just an immediate starter at that position - but a guy who can be an immediate #1.

 

If all they needed was a WR1 then sure.  But they need more positions that can play soon.  With no 3rd round picks and only one late 2nd prudence says move back or stay put.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Putin said:

He should maneuver for 2025 draft and probably get couple more 7th 

Yeah. We have so many holes. We’re bound to get a decent special teamer with all the extra picks. Who needs elite talent at the top of the draft 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m scared Beane will mortgage multiple top picks for 1 player…

 

I don’t mind trading a future 2nd plus a 4th to move ahead of the Fins at 21…But I wouldn’t wanna give up more than that…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Success said:

 

I'm good trading up, or standing pat.  A trade back would be tough.

 

We traded Stephon Diggs.  We have 2 receivers who are basically #3 guys right now.  We need not just an immediate starter at that position - but a guy who can be an immediate #1.

 

 

Having a ball hog ruins the offense, better to have 5 really good guys than 1 elite player. Coleman is also better than Davis so thats an upgrade.  Can a rookie be as great as Diggs coming in ??

 

Also it would be a trade back to 33 which isnt much different than being at 28 and we also would get 39. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m 100% all for moving up for a top 3 WR. Would give up a 1st, next years 1st, and our 2nd as well. Keeping the 2nd we got from the Diggs trade. If that means keeping our pick at 60 I’m all for that. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrags said:

Yeah. We have so many holes. We’re bound to get a decent special teamer with all the extra picks. Who needs elite talent at the top of the draft 

Exactly !! 
Our practice squad can use an upgrade nobody here is even talking about that !!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

Having a ball hog ruins the offense, better to have 5 really good guys than 1 elite player. Coleman is also better than Davis so thats an upgrade.  Can a rookie be as great as Diggs coming in ??

 

Also it would be a trade back to 33 which isnt much different than being at 28 and we also would get 39. 

If we could still get like Franklin or Worthy, along with a Legette or Polk, I’m all for it. Anything less than that it’s a waste 

Just now, Putin said:

Exactly !! 
Our practice squad can use an upgrade nobody here is even talking about that !!  

Right. Need to find someone to wear the C on special teams after all. Get a whole team of Tyler Matakevichs I say. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrags said:

If we could still get like Franklin or Worthy, along with a Legette or Polk, I’m all for it. Anything less than that it’s a waste 

 

i would be good with that but you never know what a waste will be.

 

Worthy and Franklin are too slim

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

As per usual Schopp has no clue what he's talking about.

 

This sets it up for him to cry when the Bills don't send the farm and do what he would like.

 

Has more to do with sending a willing trade partner the best deal. Believe it or not...not all the teams looking to move back are willing to move all the way to 28. One thing I'm certain of. If Beane wants to make a move...an attempt will be made. He's not shy. He's also not going to be taken advantage of, as well.

He actually said on yesterday's show how trading way up would be the stupidest idea possible, and that math backs that up.... I disagree with him, but that's his take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, freddyjj said:

Huh?   Amari Cooper went for a 4th.  

He also had a cap hit that’s $7m/year higher, and he’ll be 30 years old in June. 
 

I’ll concede I’m not an expert on the compensation, but I imagine it won’t come cheap to get the Bears to part with their #1 receiver from a year ago — a guy who had 950 more yards than their next closest WR. 

Edited by WickedGame
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 34-78-83 said:

He actually said on yesterday's show how trading way up would be the stupidest idea possible, and that math backs that up.... I disagree with him, but that's his take.

That's his take...until it's not. More than likely whatever the Bills do (or don't do) tonight he will disagree with ..no matter what stance he had before. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 34-78-83 said:

He actually said on yesterday's show how trading way up would be the stupidest idea possible, and that math backs that up.... I disagree with him, but that's his take.

I still remember him saying how Allen will never be more then 60 %completion  QB , 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...