Jump to content

Bills sign a safety!!!! Mike Edwards a Bill


DJB

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

This leaves open possibility of adding a veteran starter still IMO

 

Leaves the door wide open to draft one high as well. That price should also fall under the comp pick level as well and not take anything away. Good value signing IMO

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edwards, it appears is taking #21.

 

That’s cold. 

19 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

Leaves the door wide open to draft one high as well. That price should also fall under the comp pick level as well and not take anything away. Good value signing IMO

I think this is more likely the case.

 

Edwards will be this year’s Taylor Rapp signing. I think they draft a FS.

 

It would be awesome to land Blackmon still, though. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

Edwards, it appears is taking #21.

 

That’s cold. 


he said he's friends with Poyer and wants to wear 21 because of that supposedly 
 

3 minutes ago, Sweats said:

I'm not sure i really like this signing........ya dig?

 

Care to explain why?   What exactly is negative about a 1 year 2.8 mil contract for a 27 year old with 2 Championships on 2 different teams.  With 13 takeways in 28 starts, 3 playoff INTs  and 4 Defensive TDs.  Who can play SS, FS, Nickel 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


he said he's friends with Poyer and wants to wear 21 because of that supposedly 
 

 

Care to explain why?   What exactly is negative about a 1 year 2.8 mil contract for a 27 year old with 2 Championships on 2 different teams.  With 13 takeways in 28 starts, 3 playoff INTs  and 4 Defensive TDs.  Who can play SS, FS, Nickel 

 

 

 

I'm not saying he's not a great addition....it's just that i prefer Blackman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I wish they went 2 years with Edwards.


Beane was too cheap …Edwards obviously going to bet on himself to get paid more next year ..

 

They have now signed both Rapp and Edwards to less money than what they paid Hyde last year … 

 

They could easily still make another add if they wanted from Free Agency and probably still be some margin under what they paid Poyer and Hyde last year 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:


Beane was too cheap …Edwards obviously going to bet on himself to get paid more next year ..

 

They have now signed both Rapp and Edwards to less money than what they paid Hyde last year … 

 

They could easily still make another add if they wanted from Free Agency and probably still be some margin under what they paid Poyer and Hyde last year 

 

 

I would still try hard for one more veteran that way they would only have to draft a safety if he was the clear BPA. I think this draft has multiple guys who would benefit from only playing specials for a year then taking over for Rapp/Edwards in 2025.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most important thing about this signing is that we are now spending roughly $38M on the entire secondary (post-6/1 when Tre's cap hit is reduced), and that will likely be closer to $34M or so when Taron Johnson's extension is officially reported. This represents a welcome and major redistribution of resources from our secondary to more important positions on the roster.

 

Edited by HappyDays
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Most important thing about this signing is that we are now spending roughly $38M on the entire secondary (post-6/1 when Tre's cap hit reduced), and that will likely be closer to $34M or so when Taron Johnson's extension is officially reported. This represents a welcome and major redistribution of resources from our secondary to more important positions on the roster.

Bingo. Can’t get younger and cheaper without getting younger and cheaper. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

This leaves open possibility of adding a veteran starter still IMO

 

 

I get cap inflation, but seems like a lot for a guy who wasn't even a starter on the Chiefs and they didn't want back.  I get that he started at the end of the season, but that was due to injury

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...