mannc Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 19 hours ago, The Jokeman said: The 3rd is cuz their minority DC got hired as HC in Houston. I’m actually surprised no one has sued over that rule. It is blatantly illegal. I’m guessing no one wants to rock the boat…would be career suicide. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billzgobowlin Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 I see a little California bias. 9 compensatory picks for two teams in rounds 3-6? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 apparently there’s been mistakes before. Hopefully this is amended? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 2 hours ago, GunnerBill said: No but they did lose a minority coordinator to a HC position and a starting Quarterback to free agency. That explains their 3rd and their 4th and shouldn't surprise anyone. Some of their later picks do seem to be from teams overpaying former 49ers in free agency at the mid range. They should have a reverse comp pick……lose a 3rd…..for shedding Jimmy G. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 18 hours ago, Brand J said: Trade 6 players for one? No thanks. The rounds may be lower, but that doesn’t mean gems can’t be had in the 5th and 6th. Nah I was joking. I dont get the excitement over 11 picks if 7 of them are 5th round and on. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bermuda Triangle Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 4 hours ago, mannc said: I’m actually surprised no one has sued over that rule. It is blatantly illegal. I’m guessing no one wants to rock the boat…would be career suicide. How is it illegal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Punt the pick to Denver for Courtland Sutton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Punt the pick to Denver for Courtland Sutton Have you seen his contract ? They won’t pay him $14m a year Edited March 9 by Aussie Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 4 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: Have you seen his contract ? They won’t pay him … Denver clears 14.5 in space + the acquiring team can convert his base to make him a 3.5 million cap hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: Denver clears 14.5 in space + the acquiring team can convert his base to make him a 3.5 million cap hit. Dreaming 😴 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Just now, Aussie Joe said: Dreaming 😴 how so? If we re-signed Gabe he’d be getting around the same $ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: how so? If we re-signed Gabe he’d be getting around the same $ And they won’t be doing that either… but at least they don’t have to give up a draft pick to pay Davis… They aren’t in a position to trade for a WR 2 and then pay them $14m a year regardless of how much they kick down the road Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Just now, Aussie Joe said: And they won’t be doing that either… but at least they don’t have to give up a draft pick to pay Davis… They aren’t in a position to trade for a WR 2 and then pay them $14m a year regardless of how much they kick down the road time will tell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: time will tell You will be onto the next guy in half an hour anyway 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 11 minutes ago, Bermuda Triangle said: How is it illegal? It is overt and explicit discrimination on the basis of race…always illegal. The way they have structured the rule would make it a bit more difficult to bring a successful case, but I don’t think there is any way that program would withstand legal scrutiny. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurlyBurly51 Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 9 hours ago, GunnerBill said: No but they did lose a minority coordinator to a HC position and a starting Quarterback to free agency. That explains their 3rd and their 4th and shouldn't surprise anyone. Some of their later picks do seem to be from teams overpaying former 49ers in free agency at the mid range. So now you know the formula? Please do share. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 5 hours ago, HurlyBurly51 said: So now you know the formula? Please do share. Well clearly nobody knows the formula as well as they thought but there are some things that are very simple about it: 1. You lose a minority coordinator to a HC position or senior personnel guy to a GM position and you are awarded two 3rd round comp picks in the subsequent two drafts. 2. The remaining picks are broadly issued by AAV contract value of free agents lost. The 49ers lost Jimmy G to a the richest FA contract given out last spring. The only things that are different from the projections from Over The Cap who explain the formula very clearly and do a great job with projections are Jimmy G and Tremaine being assigned 4th round value instead of 3rd round value which was projected. Everything else was exactly as those who understand the way that formula has been applied the past few years expected. So when people say "how the hell has San Francisco got all these picks?" The answer is they llst a minority coordinator to be a HC, they lost a starting QB in free agency and they lost a bunch of other qualifying role players. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurlyBurly51 Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 10 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: The only things that are different from the projections from Over The Cap who explain the formula very clearly and do a great job with projections are Jimmy G and Tremaine being assigned 4th round value instead of 3rd round value Oh, so just a full round lower. No biggie. So just a guess. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 (edited) 3 hours ago, HurlyBurly51 said: Oh, so just a full round lower. No biggie. So just a guess. Yes a full round. There are no half rounds. Keep thinking it is a conspiracy though if it helps you feel better. Edited March 10 by GunnerBill 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 14 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Yes a full round. There are no half rounds. Keep thinking it is a conspiracy though if it helps you feel better. He's still grinding that "you guys hypothesized that maybe Beane might move Douglas" axe. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.