GASabresIUFan Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 (edited) 4 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: . They have little financial wiggle room to build upon the core roster you laid out. I thought that as well. However after watching Greg Tompsett video referenced elsewhere I feel much better about the cap situation. They are between 30-40 mill over the cap depending on how much the cap rises. Cutting Harty, Hines, Gilliam, White, Neal and a few others gets us toward the goal. Add some extensions and a little restructuring and your’re there. Edited January 23 by GASabresIUFan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st pete gogolak Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Ironically enough, I look at this off-season as similar to the Sabres’ 22 - 23 offseason. Sabres were an up and coming team (of course that differs from the Bills who are an established playoff team) with well defined needs (veteran goalie, vet D man to partner with Power, add some grit up front). Kevin Adams failed miserably in the off-season and the Sabres have paid the price. Bills, like the Sabres, have well defined needs going into the offseason - WR, S, depth on the DL. I have no doubt that Beane, unlike Adams, will adress these needs in free agency and the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFan Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 41 minutes ago, Paup 1995MVP said: Bills D is OLD. That was certainly the case heading into last season. Jones, Miller, Settle, Phillips, Floyd, Poyer and Hyde certainly made it that way, but heading into next season many of those players will be gone. Hyde, Settle and Phillips are almost certainly gone. The youth movement centers around Benford, Benard, and Rousseau and should continue with new draftees at safety and along the D Line. The team as a whole is going to continue to get younger. McGovern, Brown and Torrance now anchor the O Line. New WRs will be drafted and Kincaid is now the starting TE. Cook is the starting RB. I think the only over 30 starters on offense are Diggs and Morse. (Dawkins will be 30 next year). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Might Rather Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 3 hours ago, Pete said: No team is giving Tra a big contract. Im guessing he restructures for a team friendly deal I agree, a healthy Tre with Douglas would be a nice starting CB tandem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
947 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Tre is not coming back. No CB in the history of the NFL has ever gotten even close to their prior abilities after an achilles tear. We constantly see guys at other positions come back as shells of themselves & are out of the league a year later. Maybe they restructure him into a big pay cut to allow him to rehab, but he isn't ever going to be a key player for us again. I love the guy, and it sucks, but it's time to move on. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty98 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Just now, 947 said: Tre is not coming back. No CB in the history of the NFL has ever gotten even close to their prior abilities after an achilles tear. We constantly see guys at other positions come back as shells of themselves & are out of the league a year later. Maybe they restructure him into a big pay cut to allow him to rehab, but he isn't ever going to be a key player for us again. I love the guy, and it sucks, but it's time to move on. Maybe not as a corner, but Tre is a player you could make the case for attempting a move to FS. I'm not saying he's a guaranteed surefire stud there, but it's something to look at. Coverage wise he's able to sit in zone and let it come to him more and he's been quick enough to patrol a deep cover 2 zone. He's a willing tackler on top of it, so I'm just saying it could be a possibility to have less needs come draft and lets you re up Rapp if necessary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brand J Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 2 minutes ago, Monty98 said: Maybe not as a corner, but Tre is a player you could make the case for attempting a move to FS. I'm not saying he's a guaranteed surefire stud there, but it's something to look at. Coverage wise he's able to sit in zone and let it come to him more and he's been quick enough to patrol a deep cover 2 zone. He's a willing tackler on top of it, so I'm just saying it could be a possibility to have less needs come draft and lets you re up Rapp if necessary Could you imagine Tre being the last line of defense with a charging Derrick Henry running at him? Hyde has taken him down in this exact scenario, but tackling has never been Tre’s strong suit and you need sure tacklers at safety. I believe he’d have the mind to play the position, but not the physicality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty98 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 6 minutes ago, Brand J said: Could you imagine Tre being the last line of defense with a charging Derrick Henry running at him? Hyde has taken him down in this exact scenario, but tackling has never been Tre’s strong suit and you need sure tacklers at safety. I believe he’d have the mind to play the position, but not the physicality. He's shown a willingness to tackle, also not to be forgotten, Hyde was a slot corner guy for Green Bay when we signed him. White has never shied away from contact, he may not be the greatest tackler ever, but he will make contact and he's got a knack for making the ball pop out. I'm just saying he's something that the team looks at and goes hey, he could be our cover guy vs getting a bonafide SS that's "imposing" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFan Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 7 minutes ago, Brand J said: Could you imagine Tre being the last line of defense with a charging Derrick Henry running at him? Hyde has taken him down in this exact scenario, but tackling has never been Tre’s strong suit and you need sure tacklers at safety. I believe he’d have the mind to play the position, but not the physicality. Others have made this point as well. I agree Tre is not a good tackler but he does bring other good things to a possible move to free safety such as coverage and ball hawking skills. He is also like Hyde, a very smart defender positionally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheyCallMeAndy Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 10 minutes ago, Brand J said: Could you imagine Tre being the last line of defense with a charging Derrick Henry running at him? Hyde has taken him down in this exact scenario, but tackling has never been Tre’s strong suit and you need sure tacklers at safety. I believe he’d have the mind to play the position, but not the physicality. Benford is born to be an elite safety, best case scenario is White returns and Benford moves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ngbills Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Our roster with an older Diggs, no Davis, no Harty, no Sherfield...we are only going as far as the WR group. Beane passed on Dhop, passed on OBJ, etc. This is not a year to pass. We need a legit threat as it could even be questionable if Diggs is still a #1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brand J Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 minute ago, Monty98 said: He's shown a willingness to tackle, also not to be forgotten, Hyde was a slot corner guy for Green Bay when we signed him. White has never shied away from contact, he may not be the greatest tackler ever, but he will make contact and he's got a knack for making the ball pop out. I'm just saying he's something that the team looks at and goes hey, he could be our cover guy vs getting a bonafide SS that's "imposing" A willingness to tackle doesn’t account for much if the play goes for a long gain because the tackle is missed. Without going back to look, I’m almost certain the 80 something yard run Breece Hall had in the opener happened because Tre missed a tackle at the LoS. He showed a willingness to hit Hall, but what does it matter if he can’t bring him down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty98 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 minute ago, Brand J said: A willingness to tackle doesn’t account for much if the play goes for a long gain because the tackle is missed. Without going back to look, I’m almost certain the 80 something yard run Breece Hall had in the opener happened because Tre missed a tackle at the LoS. He showed a willingness to hit Hall, but what does it matter if he can’t bring him down? Tre missed the tackle but he's in a tough spot, he's the contain guy. He's doing his job by forcing Hall inside where the flow is supposed to clean up. Does he miss a tackle? Yes, did he olé the tackle? Not at all. Poyer was worse down the field flat footed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, GASabresIUFan said: I thought that as well. However after watching Greg Tompsett video referenced elsewhere I feel much better about the cap situation. They are between 30-40 mill over the cap depending on how much the cap rises. Cutting Harty, Hines, Gilliam, White, Neal and a few others gets us toward the goal. Add some extensions and a little restructuring and your there. I guess everything’s relative, but in general once you’re among the teams paying a franchise QB, DE, TE, and WR the cap puzzle gets much more complicated than for teams that don’t have similar salaries on their books. By definition, It’s a money driven competition for free agents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFan Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 20 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: I guess everything’s relative, but in general once you’re among the teams paying a franchise QB, DE, TE, and WR the cap puzzle gets much more complicated than for teams that don’t have similar salaries on their books. By definition, It’s a money driven competition for free agents. Absolutely. The terrible contracts for Knox, Diggs and Miller are huge issues, but I think all 3 will probably be gone after 2025. After 2025 we can move on from all 3 with a cap savings of 44 million. I think we can get decent production from Knox and Diggs over the next 2 years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flmike Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 13 hours ago, GASabresIUFan said: This is one of the reasons I started the thread. So many people are screaming in other threads fire McD, fire Beane, we are in cap hell (we aren't), the offense sucks and the defense sucks etc.. However, when you put together a visual view of the roster, it reveals that Beane isn't an idiot, but has built a core of a very solid football team, which is getting younger again. In the last 3 drafts, he has added starters Rousseau, Brown, Cook, Benard, Shakir, Benford, Kincaid, and Torrence. He has 10 draft picks in 2024 to add more depth at WR, safety, and to fill other needs such as D Line. and LB. We saw how badly we need one more reserve LB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFan Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 15 minutes ago, flmike said: and LB. We saw how badly we need one more reserve LB I don't think that will be an issue. Milano and Benard will be back. Williams and Spector are under contract and acquitted themselves well. I suspect Dodson will also be re-signed. Given Milano's injury history, I expect at least 2 LBs on the practice squad, but the 5 players mentioned above give us the most talented and deepest LB room we have arguably had during the McBeane tenure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Won't the Bills have to do more with less cap next year? That means a lot of young players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 21 minutes ago, flmike said: and LB. We saw how badly we need one more reserve LB Yes, but realistically, you're never going to be 5-6 deep at LB. If you are, you're short-changing another position. The guys they have played remarkably well under the circumstances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 14 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Everyone's assuming Hines is cut. And in a vacuum, it seems like a no brainer. However, Beane has said he wants him next season and Hines has said he'll be here next season. The fact that there was no dispute over his lost money, the two came to an agreement on a number, and he wasn't outright released with a settlement says to me they struck a deal. We saved a little cap last season. He didn't push the issue with the Union and he's back next year. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10098381-bills-nyheim-hines-reflects-on-jet-ski-accident-my-life-is-like-final-destination Overall agree with you, think he will be back. They did miss him too as a return man. Can't recall did he also return punts or was it just KO? But do question the settlement part. Since it was a non-football injury, did or could the Bills even legally by league rules offer a settlement? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.