Transsurrection in TN, MT, TX, IA: All the documented events that aren't happening.

[ChiGoose]

4 minutes ago, Buffarukus said:

 

i dunno chi. for something that is logical and all in the rights head the left sure seems to be very adversarial on the topic and when you coincide it with the protests to KEEP age inappropriate books on shelves for minors. demand drag queens read to toddlers. protest and condemn a bill that eliminates sexual/gender subjects in GRADES 3 and less. you have a pretty sick trend of children and gender sex that the left is on.

 

its really easy to publically say this is not happening its all in the rights head but if it is we fully agree and condemn it as well. 

 

the left seems to not know that kids grow up. suprisingly when they do. noone has issue with them learning or dancing with drag queens  or whatever. 

 

so myth or not who is really taking the very demented side on these issues? the ones "making them up" or the ones advocating the myth keeps happening?

Do you believe “And Tango Makes Three” is an inappropriate book?

 

Do you believe that when kids hear a story about two male penguins adopting a baby penguin, they think of sex?

[Buffarukus]

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

Do you believe “And Tango Makes Three” is an inappropriate book?

 

Do you believe that when kids hear a story about two male penguins adopting a baby penguin, they think of sex?

 

no. not at all but your using the lowest common denominator. many parents were reading material they found in their kids library that the board said was inappropriate for the adults at the meeting. so i think we both have to admit that we dont know whats at every district and use the most innocent examples isnt being honest. 

 

as for the other topics? 

[ChiGoose]

Just now, Buffarukus said:

 

no. not at all but your using the lowest common denominator. many parents were reading material they found in their kids library that the board said was inappropriate for the adults at the meeting. so i think we both have to admit that we dont know whats at every district and use the most innocent examples isnt being honest. 

 

as for the other topics? 

Is it inappropriate for schools to have books about gay couples? Or slavery? Or minorities?

[Buffarukus]

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

Is it inappropriate for schools to have books about gay couples? Or slavery? Or minorities?

 

depends on the context and age of child. most of those books are called history books and i think your trying to again ferret out the craziest examples.

 

at the end of the day if two peguins gets washed out with a book on oral sex thats fine with me. it shouldnt be that hard to keep appropriate books on a library shelf yet youll claim the left is defending gay penguins the right will claim oral sex. both are going on. 

 

other topics?

[ChiGoose]

4 minutes ago, Buffarukus said:

 

depends on the context and age of child. most of those books are called history books and i think your trying to again ferret out the craziest examples.

 

at the end of the day if two peguins gets washed out with a book on oral sex thats fine with me. it shouldnt be that hard to keep appropriate books on a library shelf yet youll claim the left is defending gay penguins the right will claim oral sex. both are going on. 

 

other topics?

Are you in support of the government telling us what is and isn’t appropriate to read under penalty of a criminal charge?

[Buffarukus]

12 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Are you in support of the government telling us what is and isn’t appropriate to read under penalty of a criminal charge?

 

i think thats called the fcc. r rated movies should not be in the kids section. you agree?

 

now your doing what i said. trying to defend somthing we as adults should agree on and not need gov involvement. are we debating a "myth"?

 

here is NOT two penguins

 

 

 

Edited April 9, 2023 by Buffarukus

[BillsFanNC]

3 hours ago, Buffarukus said:

 

i think thats called the fcc. r rated movies should not be in the kids section. you agree?

 

now your doing what i said. trying to defend somthing we as adults should agree on and not need gov involvement. are we debating a "myth"?

 

here is NOT two penguins

 

 

 

 

But but but It's not happening!

 

 

And it would be equally inappropriate if the above cited passages from a book in an elementary school library were graphically describing heterosexual genital touching and oal sex among 4th graders. A point that dishonest posters like @ChiGoose always ignore as well.

 

To quote the parent in the video..

 

"Who normalizes sexual behavior among 4th graders? I can tell you who. Pedophiles. "

 

And who throws in behind pedophiles?

 

Commies.

[Orlando Tim]

8 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

For like the zillionth time, genital surgery on minors goes against the medical guidelines. Surgery on minors is extremely rare and if it is done, it’s generally top surgery performed after years of gender affirming care. 
 

Do you guys care at all that you’re being lied to? When you hear these outrageous claims that liberals are trying to chop up kids genitals, doesn’t it seem ludicrous? Do you ever think to look up what the actual medical guidelines are?

Bad faith actors are trying to boil down the entire range of different forms of gender affirming care into surgery and then lying about it. You’re being fooled and playing right into their hands. 
 

In general, what liberals want for trans kids is that they get age-appropriate medical community approved care from medical professionals with informed consent and parental support. That’s it. This BS about genital surgery is coming from people who seem to be incapable of not thinking about kids’ junk. 

It should never happen to a child and it is more than "extremely" rare. I know two children who had it happen to them, one of them at the age of 15. Both sets parents were very supportive of it. Both children were very mentally ill in many ways but it was illegal to stop the parents from allowing this to happen. Lastly both of these kids tried to commit suicide within 18 months after the surgery, that surgery did not help them become what they wanted.

4 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

Is it inappropriate for schools to have books about gay couples? Or slavery? Or minorities?

In what context is it appropriate to discuss the sex slave trade currently going on now in the world with a 1 st grade class?

[BillsFanNC]

And also remember the euphemism "gender affirming care" includes using puberty blockers on children. 

 

Also notice the game pedo commies like @ChiGoose play...well even if surgery is done its extremely rare and it's top surgery...

 

As if performing a double mastectomy on a 14 year old isn't disgusting on every level. And it isn't rare.

 

But sure, we're being lied to and fooled says the commie.

 

 

 

 

[aristocrat]

12 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

And also remember the euphemism "gender affirming care" includes using puberty blockers on children. 

 

Also notice the game pedo commies like @ChiGoose play...well even if surgery is done its extremely rare and it's top surgery...

 

As if performing a double mastectomy on a 14 year old isn't disgusting on every level. And it isn't rare.

 

But sure, we're being lied to and fooled says the commie.

 

 

 

 

Brains don’t stop developing until your 20s yet somehow these kids can make informed decisions on permanent body disfigurement. 

[BillsFanNC]

More receipts from the it's not happening in schools files...

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

4 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

Is it inappropriate for schools to have books about gay couples? Or slavery? Or minorities?

Are these books describing graphic sexual relations to 6 year old readers?

[JaCrispy]

27 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Perverts and Pedo adults that get off at the thought that, just maybe, they can get a kid to taste him/herself after planting the idea in their head…think about that for a moment…This is what the modern Democrat Party is pushing…

 

 

 

 

Edited April 9, 2023 by JaCrispy

[ChiGoose]

4 hours ago, Buffarukus said:

 

i think thats called the fcc. r rated movies should not be in the kids section. you agree?

 

now your doing what i said. trying to defend somthing we as adults should agree on and not need gov involvement. are we debating a "myth"?

 

here is NOT two penguins

 

 

 

Do you go to jail if your kid sees an R Rated movie? Do you get a criminal record if you don’t follow MPA (not FCC…) guidelines?

 

27 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Are these books describing graphic sexual relations to 6 year old readers?

 

7 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Perverts and Pedo adults that get off at the thought that, just maybe, they can get a kid to taste him/herself after planting the idea in their head…think about that for a moment…This is what the modern Democrat Party is pushing…

 

 

 

 

I don’t know if you’re all missing the point intentionally or are just so encased in your bubbles that you cannot comprehend any nuance.

 

The point is that the government should not be censoring books under penalty of a crime. That’s something you would think small government conservatives could get behind. 
 

School curriculum and library books should be decided at the local level between school administrators, librarians, and parents. At no point should someone be in legal jeopardy because they put a book on a shelf.

 
It’s pretty ironic that you’re all demonizing liberals for upholding a traditionally conservative value of letting people decide what to read without government interference. 

[BillStime]

It’s so nice to see the cult care about what kids are taught at school….
 

What’s sad is their care only goes so far as they don’t mind kids getting slaughtered at school.

 

Chris Rufo thanks these idiots for their endless support.

 

I bet those 9 year old kids in Nashville were looking forward to Easter today… instead; their families are crushed and devastated thanks to insecure MAGA gun nuts.

 

Yeah - but keep biching about LGTBQ you pathetic simps.

 

When you start to support gun control I’ll start to care about your FEELINGS about LGTBQ.

 

Idiots 

 

fn idiots 

 

[aristocrat]

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

It’s so nice to see the cult care about what kids are taught at school….
 

What’s sad is their care only goes so far as they don’t mind kids getting slaughtered at school.

 

Chris Rufo thanks these idiots for their endless support.

 

I bet those 9 year old kids in Nashville were looking forward to Easter today… instead; their families are crushed and devastated thanks to insecure MAGA nut jobs.

 

Yeah - but keep biching about LGTBQ you pathetic simps.

 

When you start to support gun control I’ll start to care about your FEELINGS about LGTBQ.

 

Idiots 

 

fn idiots 

 

wasn’t it a member of the lgbtq community that killed the kids there?

[BillsFanNC]

11 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Perverts and Pedo adults that get off at the thought that, just maybe, they can get a kid to taste him/herself after planting the idea in their head…think about that for a moment…This is what the modern Democrat Party is pushing…

 

 

 

 

 

And then they'll call YOU a fascist when you provide dozens of receipts showing that it is, IN FACT, happening. 

 

Think about that for a moment....

 

We are dealing with pure commie evil.

[aristocrat]

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

Do you go to jail if your kid sees an R Rated movie? Do you get a criminal record if you don’t follow MPA (not FCC…) guidelines?

 

 

I don’t know if you’re all missing the point intentionally or are just so encased in your bubbles that you cannot comprehend any nuance.

 

The point is that the government should not be censoring books under penalty of a crime. That’s something you would think small government conservatives could get behind. 
 

School curriculum and library books should be decided at the local level between school administrators, librarians, and parents. At no point should someone be in legal jeopardy because they put a book on a shelf.

 
It’s pretty ironic that you’re all demonizing liberals for upholding a traditionally conservative value of letting people decide what to read without government interference. 

you can go to jail if you give a minor pornography. 

[ChiGoose]

3 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

you can go to jail if you give a minor pornography. 

Sure, that’s what we have child endangerment and decency laws for. 
 

Thank you for pointing out that these book bans are unnecessary.