Jump to content

Transsurrection: All the documented events that aren't happening. TRANS WOMEN ARE MEN


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

What it boils down to is there is an extremely small minority of people with unacceptably low moral and ethical standards of behavior attempting to impose these low standards of behavior on the other 99.99% of the population.  And they're being backed and bankrolled by "liberal" donors that see an opportunity to gain more power by championing their views which sow the seeds of conflict among the 99.99%.  Divide and conquer. 

If you think it's okay to expose 5 year old kids to sexual subjects and scenes then social norms define you as a pervert, period.

 

 

 

Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

                                                FrHuXrRWcAAgR78?format=jpg&name=large

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


when did they become child entertainers? Lol. The left suddenly became obsessed with having drag shows everywhere. Went from just the usual local drag shows at gay bars or whatever where nobody bothered them. now everywhere so no wonder you have them getting push back. Leave them out of the schools and there are no issues what is the harm in that? Why do they need to be in schools?


If you don’t want a drag show in your kid’s school, get involved and talk to the administrator.

 

The problem here is with the government criminalizing it instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


If you don’t want a drag show in your kid’s school, get involved and talk to the administrator.

 

The problem here is with the government criminalizing it instead. 


because they keep putting it in schools. If the admins disagree or anyone disagrees with it you get called transphobic and get fired. You realize you cannot disagree with them in any way without getting called transphobic?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


because they keep putting it in schools. If the admins disagree or anyone disagrees with it you get called transphobic and get fired. You realize you cannot disagree with them in any way without getting called transphobic?  


Most of the stories I’ve found have been schools employees being suspended or fired for allowing drag shows, not opposing them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


Most of the stories I’ve found have been schools employees being suspended or fired for allowing drag shows, not opposing them 


https://nypost.com/2022/06/11/over-200k-being-spent-on-drag-queen-shows-at-nyc-schools/amp/

 

over the past few days you’ve been proven wrong on everything we’ve discussed. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


https://nypost.com/2022/06/11/over-200k-being-spent-on-drag-queen-shows-at-nyc-schools/amp/

 

over the past few days you’ve been proven wrong on everything we’ve discussed. 


Claiming that people are being fired for opposing drag and citing an article that does not show people being fired for opposing drag and then claiming victory is the level of intellectual rigor I’ve come to expect from this place. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Claiming that people are being fired for opposing drag and citing an article that does not show people being fired for opposing drag and then claiming victory is the level of intellectual rigor I’ve come to expect from this place. 


you said people were being fired at schools for having drag not me lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


because they keep putting it in schools. If the admins disagree or anyone disagrees with it you get called transphobic and get fired. You realize you cannot disagree with them in any way without getting called transphobic?  


 

13 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


you said people were being fired at schools for having drag not me lol

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Imagine 10 years ago if someone asked should the government censor books under penalty of being charged with a crime.
 

10 years ago, that’s the biggest softball question of all time. Of course no, next question.  

Certain books have always, always not been available in grade school libraries. This isn't something new. 10 yrs ago we relied on common sense to make that determination. It's a shame that we need laws today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pokebball said:

Certain books have always, always not been available in grade school libraries. This isn't something new. 10 yrs ago we relied on common sense to make that determination. It's a shame that we need laws today.


How very big government of you. Laws telling us what books we can’t read. 
 

Surely you wouldn’t be opposed to California outlawing books that don’t conform to the most pinko commie worldview then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


How very big government of you. Laws telling us what books we can’t read. 
 

Surely you wouldn’t be opposed to California outlawing books that don’t conform to the most pinko commie worldview then?

Great response. This is the type of intellectual rigor I’ve come to expect from you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


How very big government of you. Laws telling us what books we can’t read. 
 

Surely you wouldn’t be opposed to California outlawing books that don’t conform to the most pinko commie worldview then?

The will of the people should decide. You anti democracy? How should it work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pokebball said:

The will of the people should decide. You anti democracy? How should it work?


People should have the freedom to read what they want. School libraries should be curated by librarians with input from the administration and parents. 

The government shouldn’t be able to criminalize books.

 

Nobody should risk being indicted for a crime over a difference on opinion on the appropriateness of a book. 


Good faith discussions with community input will still have contention and disagreement, but that’s fine and to be expected. 
 

It’s the role people are asking the government to play that is a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


People should have the freedom to read what they want. School libraries should be curated by librarians with input from the administration and parents. 

The government shouldn’t be able to criminalize books.

 

Nobody should risk being indicted for a crime over a difference on opinion on the appropriateness of a book. 


Good faith discussions with community input will still have contention and disagreement, but that’s fine and to be expected. 
 

It’s the role people are asking the government to play that is a problem.


the right said books describe kids sucking dick shouldn’t be in school 

the left said they should and kept them there 

the right went hard and decided to criminalize it. 
the left had their chance to get the books out so these are the consequences 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

How very big government of you. Laws telling us what books we can’t read. 
 

Surely you wouldn’t be opposed to California outlawing books that don’t conform to the most pinko commie worldview then?

 

Big government.  LOL!  There are different rules for children.  Always have been, always will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


People should have the freedom to read what they want. School libraries should be curated by librarians with input from the administration and parents. 

The government shouldn’t be able to criminalize books.

 

Nobody should risk being indicted for a crime over a difference on opinion on the appropriateness of a book. 


Good faith discussions with community input will still have contention and disagreement, but that’s fine and to be expected. 
 

It’s the role people are asking the government to play that is a problem.


You’ve been proven wrong on every subject discussed here. It’s amazing to watch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Big government.  LOL!  There are different rules for children.  Always have been, always will be.


Yeah, we have child endangerment laws and decency laws. If the things the right is complaining about are as bad as they are saying, they should charge people under those laws. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


People should have the freedom to read what they want. School libraries should be curated by librarians with input from the administration and parents. 

The government shouldn’t be able to criminalize books.

 

Nobody should risk being indicted for a crime over a difference on opinion on the appropriateness of a book. 


Good faith discussions with community input will still have contention and disagreement, but that’s fine and to be expected. 
 

It’s the role people are asking the government to play that is a problem.

Public schools are the government.

 

Parent's elect their representatives, both legislative and school board.

 

Good faith discussions are a part of the democratic process and people are electing their representatives based on those discussions (campaigns).

 

It sounds to me the process is occurring just as you describe, and you just don't like the result.

 

School employees have never had the final say. public input has always existed. There have always been boundaries. Over the past decade, our govt employees at schools have pushed the envelope. Citizens have reacted to that. And here you are reacting to that reaction. Democracy is working.

Edited by Pokebball
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aristocrat said:


You’ve been proven wrong on every subject discussed here. It’s amazing to watch. 


I mean, only if you can’t read. The levels of Strawman on this thread are astronomical.
 

Saying the government shouldn’t be telling us what we can read or overriding medical professionals is suddenly a radical position to take. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...