Jump to content

Why Democrats Should Never Have Power Anywhere


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Commsvet11 said:


If you are okay with an adult dressing as women then wanting to dance for children and be okay with you can ***** yourself. Is that understood? 


You clearly have no idea what’s going on or how things work. Maybe log off for a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/3/2022 at 5:44 AM, Albwan said:

Fgl-ddQaUAAaXEP?format=jpg&name=small

This is one I have never understood and nobody can provide me with a good answer:

 

"We hate this country and want to change everything about it."

 

-Ok then move.

 

"Why should we have to move? You move!"

 

-Because you hate this country!

 

(Silence...)

 

Can someone please explain this to me? Most of us love this country so why would we want to change it? I don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:

This is one I have never understood and nobody can provide me with a good answer:

 

"We hate this country and want to change everything about it."

 

-Ok then move.

 

"Why should we have to move? You move!"

 

-Because you hate this country!

 

(Silence...)

 

Can someone please explain this to me? Most of us love this country so why would we want to change it? I don't get it.

Let me explain. The distinction is between those who want to change things about the country and those who want to “fundamentally transform” it. It’s hard to determine which is which anymore. The Left, which by nature, has always stood for change, has tipped the scale a bit too far towards the transformation end lately, and the American people are about to speak up and tip and back. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Commsvet11 said:


So you don’t support drag queens wanting to hang out with children reading them stories? 
 

 

 

So do you think this is sexualizing kids:

image.png.7297ed003df7446923db38d196d4c8eb.png

 

When a person in a Mickey Mouse costume entertains kids during brunch, is that sexual?

 

It's fine not to like drag queens. It's not for everyone. I don't particularly enjoy them. But to argue that it's sexual to have someone in a costume leading sing-a-longs is just flat out wrong. If seeing a guy in a dress triggers sexual thoughts in you, that's on you, not them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SoCal Deek said:

Let me explain. The distinction is between those who want to change things about the country and those who want to “fundamentally transform” it. It’s hard to determine which is which anymore. The Left, which by nature, has always stood for change, has tipped the scale a bit too far towards the transformation end lately, and the American people are about to speak up and tip and back. 

Yes, more balance please. I for one am sick of the "if you disagree with anything we say then you are a racist/MAGAt/Trumper/Jan 6/antivax/conspiracy/fox news/kkk/white supremacist/Nazi/hillbilly/cancelled/stupid/clown/etc."

 

The people on the Left have to agree that this has gone way too far.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


Uh huh. And since crime stories hurt Dems, we don’t ever see stories about crime, right?

If you think its really that simple.

Six corporations/families own 90% of the media consumed in the US.  This isn't a conspiracy theory.  

Being that virtually everything in society has become politicized, this should be a huge red flag for anyone interested in the truth and preservation of our way of life.

Recognizing this imbalance is critical in understanding how we arrived in this place of "disinformation".

"He who controls the media, controls the people".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KDIGGZ said:

Yes, more balance please. I for one am sick of the "if you disagree with anything we say then you are a racist/MAGAt/Trumper/Jan 6/antivax/conspiracy/fox news/kkk/white supremacist/Nazi/hillbilly/cancelled/stupid/clown/etc."

 

The people on the Left have to agree that this has gone way too far.

I assure you that the majority of them agree it’s gone too far, and all reports show they’re about to say so on Tuesday. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BillStime said:


Did the drag queen hit on you and you um - liked it?

 

Grow the F up snowflakes 

Literally regurgitating what your masters tell you and do you notice the DR twins don’t chastise you?? Right @Brueggs? @BillsFanNC?

 

Who owns who?

 

Freakn degenerates 

Homophobic jokes from you, why am I not surprised? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Brueggs said:

If you think its really that simple.

Six corporations/families own 90% of the media consumed in the US.  This isn't a conspiracy theory.  

Being that virtually everything in society has become politicized, this should be a huge red flag for anyone interested in the truth and preservation of our way of life.

Recognizing this imbalance is critical in understanding how we arrived in this place of "disinformation".

"He who controls the media, controls the people".

 

I think that the corporations are in it for the reasons that corporations do anything: money. It's why nobody should ever watch TV news, especially cable news. It's infotainment at best and misinformation at worst. It's designed to invoke emotional reactions in the viewers (anger, fear, etc.) so they keep their eyeballs on it through the ad breaks.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

 

So do you think this is sexualizing kids:

image.png.7297ed003df7446923db38d196d4c8eb.png

 

When a person in a Mickey Mouse costume entertains kids during brunch, is that sexual?

 

It's fine not to like drag queens. It's not for everyone. I don't particularly enjoy them. But to argue that it's sexual to have someone in a costume leading sing-a-longs is just flat out wrong. If seeing a guy in a dress triggers sexual thoughts in you, that's on you, not them.

 

Can you honestly say you enjoy exhibitions of men masquerading as creepy and garish looking women?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

I think that the corporations are in it for the reasons that corporations do anything: money. It's why nobody should ever watch TV news, especially cable news. It's infotainment at best and misinformation at worst. It's designed to invoke emotional reactions in the viewers (anger, fear, etc.) so they keep their eyeballs on it through the ad breaks.

It's all a business. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

 

So do you think this is sexualizing kids:

image.png.7297ed003df7446923db38d196d4c8eb.png

 

When a person in a Mickey Mouse costume entertains kids during brunch, is that sexual?

 

It's fine not to like drag queens. It's not for everyone. I don't particularly enjoy them. But to argue that it's sexual to have someone in a costume leading sing-a-longs is just flat out wrong. If seeing a guy in a dress triggers sexual thoughts in you, that's on you, not them.

 


1.) Mickey Mouse is a fictional character, a cartoon and a costume MADE for children. By the way I wouldn’t be using Disney as a good example of not wanting groom children.
 

2.) Are you actual arguing Drag Queens are just a costume and not sexual? 

 

3.) What motive is there for someone to dress up as woman and want to hang out with children and shouldn’t that motive be questioned? You must think it’s fine because it’s just a “costume” but strippers wear “costumes” you want one of them to put on a show for kids too? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Can you honestly say you enjoy exhibitions of men masquerading as creepy and garish looking women?

 

I literally said I didn't particularly care for it in the post you quoted.

 

As I keep saying, it's not for everyone. But it's not sexual either. It's people in costumes doing sing-a-longs and balloons and stuff. It's as sexual as a woman dressed as Belle and someone in a Beast costume. 

 

The Right sexualizing it is dangerous. It's why we are now seeing attacks and fire-bombings of places that hose drag brunches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Commsvet11 said:


1.) Mickey Mouse is a fictional character, a cartoon and a costume MADE for children. By the way I wouldn’t be using Disney as a good example of not wanting groom children.
 

2.) Are you actual arguing Drag Queens are just a costume and not sexual? 

 

3.) What motive is there for someone to dress up as woman and want to hang out with children and shouldn’t that motive be questioned? You must think it’s fine because it’s just a “costume” but strippers wear “costumes” you want one of them to put on a show for kids too? 

 

Holy hell. You're deep into the brainwashing, aren't you?

 

1. You seriously think that Disney is trying to groom kids for pedophiles?

 

2. As I stated above, drag shows *can* be sexual. They also can just be a guy in a costume leading sing-a-longs. 

 

3. What motive is there for a woman to dress up as a princess and want to hang out with children and shouldn't that motive be questioned. You must think it's fine because it's just a "costume" but strippers wear "costumes" you want one of them to put on a show for kids too?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

I think that the corporations are in it for the reasons that corporations do anything: money. It's why nobody should ever watch TV news, especially cable news. It's infotainment at best and misinformation at worst. It's designed to invoke emotional reactions in the viewers (anger, fear, etc.) so they keep their eyeballs on it through the ad breaks.

I agree with this.  However, I don't think money is the primary driver, it's power.  They have plenty of money, and we have seen some of them tank, and just keep going with it.  These outlets are an important cog in a much bigger machine.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...