Are Democrats pro-terror?

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

Be careful what you want to start....  Especially as stupid as this, even for you...

 

In 2006, Florida Rep. Mark Foley was forced to resign after it was revealed that he’d sent sexually explicit messages and propositioned teenage congressional pages via email and text.

In 2015, former Rep. Dennis Hastert, the longest-ever serving Republican speaker of the House, pleaded guilty to making illegal hush-money payments in order to cover up his history of sexually abusing high school wrestlers he had coached decades before.

During and after the 2016 presidential race, among the dozens of women who accused former president Donald Trump of being a sexual predator were several contestants in the 1997 Miss Teen USA pageant, who reported that he barged into their dressing room while girls as young as 15 were changing. (Trump allegedly told them, “Don’t worry, ladies, I’ve seen it all before.”)

During the 2018 midterms, Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore was accused of preying on girls as young as 14 and 16; the New Yorker reported that his habit of trying to pick up high schoolers was so notorious that it actually got him banned from a local mall.

Also in 2018, Rep. Jim Jordan, one of Trump’s fiercest allies and a co-founder of the hardline conservative Freedom Caucus, became embroiled in a scandal over his time as a wrestling coach at Ohio State University, where a team doctor named Richard Strauss, who committed suicide in 2005, was found to have sexually abused more than 177 male student athletes.

And finally, Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida is currently the subject of a literal sex-trafficking investigation, which is looking into whether he had sex with an underage 17-year-old girl, among other issues. (Greene is close with Gaetz, who denies the allegations, and has defended him.)

 

Blanket statements like you and others make on here are extremely dangerous and irresponsible. 

 

no it is not dangerous,  there are idiots in every walk of life. Plenty of disgusting humans in religious groups, in Republican Party etc. bad acting individuals are everywhere. 

 

But it is a hard verifiable fact that liberal lgbtq+ groups have been sympathetic to pedophilia institutionally and within that community there are efforts to normalize the behavior as an innate irrepressible attraction. 
 

sorry that triggers you into naming a bunch of sleeze-balls as if it alters the fact. 

[BillsFanNC]

Are democrats by and large pro terror?

 

Of course not.

 

Are Republicans by and large pro terror?

 

Of course not.

 

I love though how leftists fail to realize that this thread is merely a reflection of the asinine  "Are Republicans pro terror" thread that has existed here for quite some time.

Edited November 23, 2022 by BillsFanNC

[Buffarukus]

7 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Are democrats by and large pro terror?

 

Of course not.

 

Are Republicans by and large pro terror?

 

Of course not.

 

I love though how leftists fail to realize that this thread is merely a reflection of the asinine  "Are Republicans pro terror" thread that has existed here for quite some time.

 

i think the question is not are individuals but what is the parties stance from where people seek leadership. read my response above for examples of democratic actions that has to this point been forgotten.

 

"summer of love" was annouced for the CHOP and allowed to exist until a teenager was murdered.

 

 dem gov marched up with rioters to the federal courthouse to show solidarity with criminals who were throwing molitoves locking doors and trying to burn people alive in the buildings

 

trump actually sent fed help to chicago to help clear up the spiking violence it worked. the dems still reputed it as fascist takeover and most refused!!! how many additional people died due to dems political bias and democratic refusal to get the rioting under control.

 

i could go on and on.

 

 

what is closely comparable? JAN 6th!! JAN 6th!! oh the day that was immediately denounced by rep and anyone involved is under strict prosecution? it was stupid of trump to do and i hope he loses in the primaries but what else are we talking about? +6 years media been talking about dog whistles and greatest threats to the country. alot of MAGA losses in the mid terms. still waiting on all this threat crap from election denials. still seeing dems desperate to pin any all violence on rep to the point we have countless lies. smollett, nooses in nascar, pelosi... you name it. just today they are saying the colorado shooter was a trans himself. take a day or two and they look like jacka$$[$ and STILL pray the next maniac can be that maga demon they all been waiting on so they can collect more power. its truley sick.

 

so someone PLEASE explain what am i missing that makes the two comparable?

 

 

Edited November 24, 2022 by Buffarukus

[Doc]

6 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

Says Doc who is not affiliated with the Republican party.  😉

 

I'm not.  I've espoused many positions that are middle-of-the-road.  The problem is that Dems are going hard left and want it all their way or nothing at all, and there is no viable Independent candidate. 

 

6 hours ago, Buffarukus said:

democrats were litterally bailing out rioters..that proves they were never for peaceful protests

 

storefronts were boarding up in cities in case trump won.

 

dems dont even acknowledge the existence of antifa let alone try to stop their violent gatherings. but proudboys!!!!

 

blm broke down barriers at the white house. attacked police. set fire to st johns church. and the reaction by dems was. lol the president had to go into a bunker..what a coward! lollollolol. they took over many capital buildings and police stations while stealing land and setting up their own violent racist little armed communities. nothing terroristic about that.  but of coarse instantly switch to storming capitals is the biggest threat on democracy!! im shaking with tears by these magas and there buffalo outfits who had doors opened. 🙄 please. only difference? most if not all the perpetrators were all actually hunted down and prosecuted for that one.

 

mass looting is justified as " just getting bread for starving children" and " they are taking  reparations". so now at a point steal $999 and we might hand you a ticket if we ever catch you

 

lets advocate people to go to supreme court judges homes and even after a plot to kidnap is stopped we will keep advocating. what could go wrong

 

 

on 

and 

on

 

but yeah just a few minor isolated incidents is what your going with? what percentage of the 90% do you think your posts make up?

 

Yeah but all the death, injury and billions of dollars in damage were justified because of George Floyd (even though Chauvin was arrested within days of the first protests).

[Buffarukus]

1 hour ago, Doc said:

Yeah but all the death, injury and billions of dollars in damage were justified because of George Floyd (even though Chauvin was arrested within days of the first protests).

 

i cant seem to ever get a response when i bring up the violence they blindly followed. weird. 🤔

 

🦗🦗🦗🦗

[L Ron Burgundy]

On 11/1/2022 at 5:15 PM, Boatdrinks said:

It’s sad when one’s party has moved so far outside reality that one must resort to defending it with “ we don’t ALL..” Acknowledge it : their ideas are insane and logically bankrupt. That’s what they’ve become. Time to choose a new party? 

Lol!  I love you claim to have any logic, here or any other post.  The people doing the drag crap and supporting it in front of kids represent a very small portion of our party.  I'm willing to bet qanon represents a larger portion of yours.  And we know while they ardently claim to be fighting for kids many are, you may have guessed it, pedos themselves. 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

15 hours ago, Buffarukus said:

 

democrats were litterally bailing out rioters..that proves they were never for peaceful protests

 

storefronts were boarding up in cities in case trump won.

 

dems dont even acknowledge the existence of antifa let alone try to stop their violent gatherings. but proudboys!!!!

 

blm broke down barriers at the white house. attacked police. set fire to st johns church. and the reaction by dems was. lol the president had to go into a bunker..what a coward! lollollolol. they took over many capital buildings and police stations while stealing land and setting up their own violent racist little armed communities. nothing terroristic about that.  but of coarse instantly switch to storming capitals is the biggest threat on democracy!! im shaking with tears by these magas and there buffalo outfits who had doors opened. 🙄 please. only difference? most if not all the perpetrators were all actually hunted down and prosecuted for that one.

 

mass looting is justified as " just getting bread for starving children" and " they are taking  reparations". so now at a point steal $999 and we might hand you a ticket if we ever catch you

 

lets advocate people to go to supreme court judges homes and even after a plot to kidnap is stopped we will keep advocating. what could go wrong

 

 

on 

and 

on

 

but yeah just a few minor isolated incidents is what your going with? what percentage of the 90% do you think your posts make up?

 

 

Absolutely.

 

If the question is...

 

Do democrats ignore or excuse political violence when politically expedient for them?

 

Then in recent years the answer is by and large yes.

[JaCrispy]

On 11/1/2022 at 12:04 PM, Boatdrinks said:

No. We believe pedophiles are among the most vile human beings on earth. Even worse than liberals. 

And soon the Left wing LGBT cult will allow pedo’s to join their membership…Let that sink in…😉

[Doc]

8 hours ago, Buffarukus said:

i cant seem to ever get a response when i bring up the violence they blindly followed. weird. 🤔

 

🦗🦗🦗🦗

 

What I said is what they'll tell you.  That it was all justified because of what happened to GF.

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillsFanNC]

If an elected democrat calls a group responsible for political violence and terrorism a myth, is that leader excusing political violence?

 

Maaaaaayyybbee.

 

 

 

 

[BillStime]

2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

If an elected democrat calls a group responsible for political violence and terrorism a myth, is that leader excusing political violence?

 

Maaaaaayyybbee.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[BillStime]

On 11/23/2022 at 3:21 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

this is true… LGBTQ groups have been sympathetic toward pedophilia as a sexual preference (minor attracted persons). I didn’t realize this until I was looking at photos of lgbtq+ protests and noticed some of the signs. Then there was some article about a liberal professor in the center by leagues defending people attracted to minors. 

 

It’s just a fact. You can bet your arse it’s on the list of “what inclusion is” next steps for the radical left. 

You wanna back this up with facts?

[BillsFanNC]

And there's more violence for leftist scum like billstime to excuse..

 

 

 

 

 

[BillStime]

6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

And there's more violence for leftist scum like billstime to excuse..

 

 

 

 

 

Oh I thought you blocked me cupcake

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

But wait there's more....there's always more of leftists promoting or condoning violence...

 

 

[BillStime]

On 11/23/2022 at 3:21 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

this is true… LGBTQ groups have been sympathetic toward pedophilia as a sexual preference (minor attracted persons). I didn’t realize this until I was looking at photos of lgbtq+ protests and noticed some of the signs. Then there was some article about a liberal professor in the center by leagues defending people attracted to minors. 

 

It’s just a fact. You can bet your arse it’s on the list of “what inclusion is” next steps for the radical left. 

Still can’t back up your feelings w facts?

[BillStime]

On 11/23/2022 at 4:25 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

no it is not dangerous,  there are idiots in every walk of life. Plenty of disgusting humans in religious groups, in Republican Party etc. bad acting individuals are everywhere. 

 

But it is a hard verifiable fact that liberal lgbtq+ groups have been sympathetic to pedophilia institutionally and within that community there are efforts to normalize the behavior as an innate irrepressible attraction. 
 

sorry that triggers you into naming a bunch of sleeze-balls as if it alters the fact. 

You want to back this up with facts?

[cle23]

On 11/23/2022 at 4:25 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

no it is not dangerous,  there are idiots in every walk of life. Plenty of disgusting humans in religious groups, in Republican Party etc. bad acting individuals are everywhere. 

 

But it is a hard verifiable fact that liberal lgbtq+ groups have been sympathetic to pedophilia institutionally and within that community there are efforts to normalize the behavior as an innate irrepressible attraction. 
 

sorry that triggers you into naming a bunch of sleeze-balls as if it alters the fact. 

 

Many pedophilia groups have tried to incorporate themselves into the LGBTQ community, but that does not mean that the LGBTQ community wants them there.  Most of the pedophilia groups try to get themselves closer so that it will become more normalized, but again, that doesn't mean the LGBTQ groups are accepting of it.  

 

A vast majority of pedophiles are heterosexual in their adult relationships, and those that aren't tend to be uninterested in either adult sexes.  There are obviously some homosexual pedophiles as well, but it is a very small percentage.

[BillStime]

On 11/23/2022 at 3:21 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

this is true… LGBTQ groups have been sympathetic toward pedophilia as a sexual preference (minor attracted persons). I didn’t realize this until I was looking at photos of lgbtq+ protests and noticed some of the signs. Then there was some article about a liberal professor in the center by leagues defending people attracted to minors. 

 

It’s just a fact. You can bet your arse it’s on the list of “what inclusion is” next steps for the radical left. 

Still too afraid to back up your feelings? 

[Doc]

9 hours ago, cle23 said:

Many pedophilia groups have tried to incorporate themselves into the LGBTQ community, but that does not mean that the LGBTQ community wants them there.  Most of the pedophilia groups try to get themselves closer so that it will become more normalized, but again, that doesn't mean the LGBTQ groups are accepting of it.  

 

A vast majority of pedophiles are heterosexual in their adult relationships, and those that aren't tend to be uninterested in either adult sexes.  There are obviously some homosexual pedophiles as well, but it is a very small percentage.

 

Fringe groups try to align themselves with the group/party that more closely aligns with their beliefs.  Doesn't mean that group/party wants to accept them.

Edited December 1, 2022 by Doc

[cle23]

On 11/24/2022 at 8:26 AM, JaCrispy said:

And soon the Left wing LGBT cult will allow pedo’s to join their membership…Let that sink in…😉

 

No.  No they will not.  I am sure there are a few fringe people fighting for that, but there are no major LGBTQ groups fighting to include pedophiles.  Just because people (mostly "conservatives") keep repeating the "What's next, pedophiles/animals/etc?" arguments doesn't mean that it is actually happening.

[T master]

Does the question really need to be asked after the defund the police movement & all that happened in the Dem run cities some called for national guard to be brought in while the mayors backed off until they started getting into their neighborhood then it all changed when their safety was at risk .

 

Plus if it fit their agenda i'd have to say hell yah they are ...

Edited December 1, 2022 by T master

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillStime]

14 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

Seattle journos refuse to help Katie Daviscourt after seeing ANTIFA assault and ROB her

 

 

All we can say after reading this entire thread about a KING 5 Seattle journo/photographer ignoring Katie Davis after she was robbed and assaulted by ANTIFA right in front of him is … wow. Guess we shouldn’t be surprised since it’s Seattle and a complete shiznit-hole but still.

 

You’d think the a-holes would at least help her call the police? Yeah?

 

But nope.

 

 

 

https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2022/12/11/seattle-journos-refuse-to-help-katie-daviscourt-after-seeing-antifa-assault-and-rob-her-thread/

 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

On 11/30/2022 at 11:57 PM, cle23 said:

 

Many pedophilia groups have tried to incorporate themselves into the LGBTQ community, but that does not mean that the LGBTQ community wants them there.  Most of the pedophilia groups try to get themselves closer so that it will become more normalized, but again, that doesn't mean the LGBTQ groups are accepting of it.  

 

A vast majority of pedophiles are heterosexual in their adult relationships, and those that aren't tend to be uninterested in either adult sexes.  There are obviously some homosexual pedophiles as well, but it is a very small percentage.

Most, many, vast majority… you keep using words that suggest any of these things have anything to do with the majority of people. The entire lgbtqia+ movement is about supporting a minority of people, and every time society says… ok fine it’s cool a letter gets added to what needs to be normalized. Sexualization of minors is certainly  next on the roadmap. 
 

[cle23]

2 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Most, many, vast majority… you keep using words that suggest any of these things have anything to do with the majority of people. The entire lgbtqia+ movement is about supporting a minority of people, and every time society says… ok fine it’s cool a letter gets added to what needs to be normalized. Sexualization of minors is certainly  next on the roadmap. 
 

 

You can't just say " the next thing on the roadmap" anytime you want.  You can literally say that about anything under the sun because it hasn't happened yet.  The next step in protecting QBs in the NFL is putting them in pink tutus on the field.  See how that works?  There will be a very, very tiny portion of the population who does want acceptance for the sexualization of minors, and it won't be accepted, and rightfully so. 

 

Every single one of the other portions of the LGBTQ groups is between consenting adults.  THAT is the difference.  Sexual activity between adults is fine, and should be fine, however the relation comes to be.  The reason pedophilia is NOT the same is because children cannot, and should not be able to consent to sexual activities.  Again,  most pedophiles AREN'T part of the LGBTQ movement.  They are heterosexual in their adult relationships.  

[BillStime]

On 11/23/2022 at 3:21 PM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

this is true… LGBTQ groups have been sympathetic toward pedophilia as a sexual preference (minor attracted persons). I didn’t realize this until I was looking at photos of lgbtq+ protests and noticed some of the signs. Then there was some article about a liberal professor in the center by leagues defending people attracted to minors. 

 

It’s just a fact. You can bet your arse it’s on the list of “what inclusion is” next steps for the radical left. 

Still equating gays to pedophiles but too much of a coward to back that up?

 

Typical pos projecting as usual  

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

4 hours ago, cle23 said:

 

You can't just say " the next thing on the roadmap" anytime you want.  You can literally say that about anything under the sun because it hasn't happened yet.  The next step in protecting QBs in the NFL is putting them in pink tutus on the field.  See how that works?  There will be a very, very tiny portion of the population who does want acceptance for the sexualization of minors, and it won't be accepted, and rightfully so. 

 

Every single one of the other portions of the LGBTQ groups is between consenting adults.  THAT is the difference.  Sexual activity between adults is fine, and should be fine, however the relation comes to be.  The reason pedophilia is NOT the same is because children cannot, and should not be able to consent to sexual activities.  Again,  most pedophiles AREN'T part of the LGBTQ movement.  They are heterosexual in their adult relationships.  

“Progressivism” isn’t about saying ok we finally got there. There is always the next thing to normalize. 

[cle23]

3 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

“Progressivism” isn’t about saying ok we finally got there. There is always the next thing to normalize. 

 

Let's even say that's true.  That doesn't mean people are going to normalize hurting kids.  For whatever reason, people always jump to the "they're going to want to legalize sex with kids and animals" are the 2 I always see, but it's always some made up scenario from people who disagree with LGBTQ, and not anyone that has information to back it up. 

 

Just because that is somehow your next "logical" step does not mean that would be the next logical step for the people you are talking about. 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

1 hour ago, cle23 said:

 

Let's even say that's true.  That doesn't mean people are going to normalize hurting kids.  For whatever reason, people always jump to the "they're going to want to legalize sex with kids and animals" are the 2 I always see, but it's always some made up scenario from people who disagree with LGBTQ, and not anyone that has information to back it up. 

 

Just because that is somehow your next "logical" step does not mean that would be the next logical step for the people you are talking about. 

It’s not that much of a stretch. There is this concerted push to redefine civilization in the context of sexuality and attraction as an un-mutable characteristic and gender as amorphous. At the same time there is an effort to redefine the despicable behavior at the center of this as Minor attraction. 
 

 how about instituting laws that require doctors to perform gender reassignment surgery or synthetic hormone therapy on 13 year olds? That’s sick.
 

Logic has kind of gone by the wayside 

[cle23]

17 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

It’s not that much of a stretch. There is this concerted push to redefine civilization in the context of sexuality and attraction as an un-mutable characteristic and gender as amorphous. At the same time there is an effort to redefine the despicable behavior at the center of this as Minor attraction. 
 

 how about instituting laws that require doctors to perform gender reassignment surgery or synthetic hormone therapy on 13 year olds? That’s sick.
 

Logic has kind of gone by the wayside 

 

Right, I tend to disagree with children making any life changing decisions when they are CHILDREN.  The same as the with the pedophile situation.  I do not agree with any law that would institute requirements of doctors, and I honestly disagree with performing any such actions while the child is under age.  As an adult, people can do what they want.  But again, the original discussion was that LGBTQ was trying to incorporate pedophiles, and when the discussion shifted to show that by in large that isn't the case, now you keep moving the goalposts.  

 

I find the whole gender being "fluid" situation very odd and I honestly don't understand it, but if that person is an adult, and wants to be "gendered" as something not of which they were born, more power to them, but they have to live with the consequences that come with it.  I would never attack or discriminate in the sense of their rights, but I honestly probably wouldn't make that person a large part of my personal life either.  

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

3 hours ago, cle23 said:

 

Right, I tend to disagree with children making any life changing decisions when they are CHILDREN.  The same as the with the pedophile situation.  I do not agree with any law that would institute requirements of doctors, and I honestly disagree with performing any such actions while the child is under age.  As an adult, people can do what they want.  But again, the original discussion was that LGBTQ was trying to incorporate pedophiles, and when the discussion shifted to show that by in large that isn't the case, now you keep moving the goalposts.  

 

I find the whole gender being "fluid" situation very odd and I honestly don't understand it, but if that person is an adult, and wants to be "gendered" as something not of which they were born, more power to them, but they have to live with the consequences that come with it.  I would never attack or discriminate in the sense of their rights, but I honestly probably wouldn't make that person a large part of my personal life either.  

Really not shifting any goalposts, just giving other examples of how progressive extremists aren’t going to stop.  Kids aren’t safe either. The slope is quite ***** slippery.

[Irv]

Dems are pro terror.  Demented Biden traded a murderer for a useless women's basketball player.  What a mess.  

[cle23]

6 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Really not shifting any goalposts, just giving other examples of how progressive extremists aren’t going to stop.  Kids aren’t safe either. The slope is quite ***** slippery.

 

Right, EXTREMISTS.  I can even agree with that.  Extremists won't stop.  But your original comment said "The entire lgbtqia+ movement is about supporting a minority of people, and every time society says… ok fine it’s cool a letter gets added to what needs to be normalized. Sexualization of minors is certainly  next on the roadmap."

 

That is why I said you keep moving the goalposts.  You went from "The entire movement" to extremists and then are still arguing your point.  The LGBTQ movement does NOT support pedophilia.  A few EXTREMIST groups that want to incorporate themselves into the movement do, such as "MAPS", but they are disgusting and not accepted by the LGBTQ groups.  

 

Again, this whole thing is simple.  LGBTQ is about accepting and consenting adults.  Any of the other stuff with children is not the same at all because children cannot consent to sexual activities.  

 

I am all for keeping an eye on the fringe psychos, but it bothers me when people try to lump them in with the everyday normal functioning members of our society.

4 hours ago, Irv said:

Dems are pro terror.  Demented Biden traded a murderer for a useless women's basketball player.  What a mess.  

 

I'll agree that it wasn't a good trade. I think Griner's imprisonment was a sham by Russia, but you don't release a know terrorist back out into the world over it.

 

What are your thoughts on the 5,000 Taliban released by Trump?

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

3 hours ago, cle23 said:

 

Right, EXTREMISTS.  I can even agree with that.  Extremists won't stop.  But your original comment said "The entire lgbtqia+ movement is about supporting a minority of people, and every time society says… ok fine it’s cool a letter gets added to what needs to be normalized. Sexualization of minors is certainly  next on the roadmap."

 

That is why I said you keep moving the goalposts.  You went from "The entire movement" to extremists and then are still arguing your point.  The LGBTQ movement does NOT support pedophilia.  A few EXTREMIST groups that want to incorporate themselves into the movement do, such as "MAPS", but they are disgusting and not accepted by the LGBTQ groups.  

 

Again, this whole thing is simple.  LGBTQ is about accepting and consenting adults.  Any of the other stuff with children is not the same at all because children cannot consent to sexual activities.  

 

I am all for keeping an eye on the fringe psychos, but it bothers me when people try to lump them in with the everyday normal functioning members of our society.

 

I'll agree that it wasn't a good trade. I think Griner's imprisonment was a sham by Russia, but you don't release a know terrorist back out into the world over it.

 

What are your thoughts on the 5,000 Taliban released by Trump?

 
the entire movement supports a minority of people can be true as can they are driven by extremists. both can be facts. In my view both are facts. 
 

 

[JaCrispy]

On 12/11/2022 at 10:49 PM, cle23 said:

 

You can't just say " the next thing on the roadmap" anytime you want.  You can literally say that about anything under the sun because it hasn't happened yet.  The next step in protecting QBs in the NFL is putting them in pink tutus on the field.  See how that works?  There will be a very, very tiny portion of the population who does want acceptance for the sexualization of minors, and it won't be accepted, and rightfully so. 

 

Every single one of the other portions of the LGBTQ groups is between consenting adults.  THAT is the difference.  Sexual activity between adults is fine, and should be fine, however the relation comes to be.  The reason pedophilia is NOT the same is because children cannot, and should not be able to consent to sexual activities.  Again,  most pedophiles AREN'T part of the LGBTQ movement.  They are heterosexual in their adult relationships.  

Just because most pedo’s are heterosexual doesn’t mean it can’t be added to the LBGT…

 

29 Years of Fanhood is correct in that the LBGT movement just adds groups that aren’t “traditionally accepted”…So, with pedo’s being a minority movement, all that the LBGT community would have to do is add another letter…

[cle23]

32 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Just because most pedo’s are heterosexual doesn’t mean it can’t be added to the LBGT…

 

29 Years of Fanhood is correct in that the LBGT movement just adds groups that aren’t “traditionally accepted”…So, with pedo’s being a minority movement, all that the LBGT community would have to do is add another letter…

 

How is it so hard to understand that the LGBTQ community doesn't support pedophilia? You and 29 keep just stating it like inviting a neighbor to the Saturday barbecue.  Just because you invite your 6 closest neighbors doesn't mean you invite the pedophile neighbor too.  I do not know one group that is in the LGBTQ community that in any way shape or form supports pedophilia besides the few fringe groups here and there. 

 

  The only people wanting to include pedophiles in that community are people already against that community.

[JaCrispy]

13 minutes ago, cle23 said:

 

How is it so hard to understand that the LGBTQ community doesn't support pedophilia? You and 29 keep just stating it like inviting a neighbor to the Saturday barbecue.  Just because you invite your 6 closest neighbors doesn't mean you invite the pedophile neighbor too.  I do not know one group that is in the LGBTQ community that in any way shape or form supports pedophilia besides the few fringe groups here and there. 

 

  The only people wanting to include pedophiles in that community are people already against that community.

First off, not everyone in the LGBT community support eachother…There are many lesbians and gays that don’t support Trans people either, because they might believe it attempts erase woman, or gay people’s sexuality, itself…But they are still part of the same community…They are still an alliance…

 

And why? Because of the idea of “intersectionality”…This is the concept that says, even if your community disagrees with another, as long as your are both considered marginalized, you are automatically allies against the “oppressors” of society…And because the Cis, white, Christian, male has been deemed the oppressor of society, according to the Left, it makes gays, lesbians, and Trans people automatically allies…

 

Now, based on that concept of “intersectionality, because Pedo’s (regardless of sexuality) are a marginalized community, too,  I could see Pedo’s eventually added to the LGBT community…It only makes logical sense, based on the Left’s own ideology…😉