Jump to content

The $2 BILLION dollar question: Why would MBS invest in Jared Kushner?


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You get yourself so caught up in trying to argue a point that you continually post nonsense.  If you have a point to make, slow down. Breathe.  Type slowly.  Keep it between the lines.  Better yet—figure out the point, and articulate.  
 

 

 

 

Nonsense - please precious, look in the mirror. You are the definition of nonsense.

 

Hack harder bro - you don't even realize it.

 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@muppy, please see the post above from BillSy, and consider as part of my ongoing science experiment into the mind of a typical troubled internet poster. 

 

You'll note trend--the repetition of a premise already reconciled, in this case, the 'h' word.   While Freud might suggest BillSy is exhibiting classical Oedipal behavior, modern psychology is a bit more forgiving and simply suggests a desire to validated.  

 

What's interesting is that upon validation, BillSy seems to have become more agitated.  We can imagine him sitting somewhere, in a partially manic state, typing these words as if they make sense beyond the four corners of his head:

"...just highlighting your desperate no stop attempt to white was Conald Trump.".    I don't doubt he believes in desperate no stop motives, I just don't have a clue what he is talking about.   

 

Perhaps his tag teamer @redtail hawk can shed some light here?  

 

Now, when brought to his attention, and with well-intended advice provided, he stands by his statement, he repeats the 'h' word, and referred to me as "precious", but not in a way normally associated with conversational internet English.  I googled that too, using the search term "Fixated/Obsessive Individual Refers to Conversation Partner As Hack and Precious", and this came up.  Submitted without comment, other than the comments submitted.

 

 

  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

@muppy, please see the post above from BillSy, and consider as part of my ongoing science experiment into the mind of a typical troubled internet poster. 

 

You'll note trend--the repetition of a premise already reconciled, in this case, the 'h' word.   While Freud might suggest BillSy is exhibiting classical Oedipal behavior, modern psychology is a bit more forgiving and simply suggests a desire to validated.  

 

What's interesting is that upon validation, BillSy seems to have become more agitated.  We can imagine him sitting somewhere, in a partially manic state, typing these words as if they make sense beyond the four corners of his head:

"...just highlighting your desperate no stop attempt to white was Conald Trump.".    I don't doubt he believes in desperate no stop motives, I just don't have a clue what he is talking about.   

 

Perhaps his tag teamer @redtail hawk can shed some light here?  

 

Now, when brought to his attention, and with well-intended advice provided, he stands by his statement, he repeats the 'h' word, and referred to me as "precious", but not in a way normally associated with conversational internet English.  I googled that too, using the search term "Fixated/Obsessive Individual Refers to Conversation Partner As Hack and Precious", and this came up.  Submitted without comment, other than the comments submitted.

 

 

 

@muppy - since Len is your go to authority on the definition of hack - can you also clarify for Len the definition of delusional, too?

 

Not only is Leo a hack - but he is also delusional AF.

 

thanks - and have a great day.

 

 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BillStime said:

 

@muppy - since Len is your go to authority on the definition of hack - can you also clarify for Len the definition of delusional, too?

 

Not only is Leo a hack - but he is also delusional AF.

 

thanks - and have a great day.

 

 

I am offering you a hug, because I think you dearly need it.  PM me if you want to work it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

greeting PPP peeps @leh-nerd skin-erd  @BillStime

 

As I was walking my dog in the neighborhood I was struck by the beauty of all the freshly blooming flowers. And then Im thinkin' oh man Ive been summoned to the dungeon...LOL Leo and Billstime Mind your Manners or Im going to commence handing timeouts. Call em "mupfractions" I am Not  fan of all this jibberishy name calling baloney.

 

Now that THAT is settled this place needs a sprinkle of color its Drab, depressing and CLEARLY needs a feminine touch at times. Proceed my ppp ppps, but PLEASE Behave. DONT MAKE ME GET THE HOSE!

 

☮️

 

m

 

 

 

 

flowers.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Do your thing, but if he asks you to help move a couch into a van because he broke his arm, you've been warned. 

TED BUNDY used that ruse. ✔️ Beware. 🙂 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, muppy said:

greeting PPP peeps @leh-nerd skin-erd  @BillStime

 

As I was walking my dog in the neighborhood I was struck by the beauty of all the freshly blooming flowers. And then Im thinkin' oh man Ive been summoned to the dungeon...LOL Leo and Billstime Mind your Manners or Im going to commence handing timeouts. Call em "mupfractions" I am Not  fan of all this jibberishy name calling baloney.

 

Now that THAT is settled this place needs a sprinkle of color its Drab, depressing and CLEARLY needs a feminine touch at times. Proceed my ppp ppps, but PLEASE Behave. DONT MAKE ME GET THE HOSE!

 

☮️

 

m

 

 

 

 

flowers.jpg

He started it. 😉

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

He started it. 😉

Nanny Nanny Boo Boo 😋

 

haha You know Im goofballin in this thread Leo.  And just to clarify Im no PPP monitor or decorum police. You are NOT a hack though.  

 

PS: happy St Pattys day. 🍀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, muppy said:

Nanny Nanny Boo Boo 😋

 

haha You know Im goofballin in this thread Leo.  And just to clarify Im no PPP monitor or decorum police. You are NOT a hack though.  

 

PS: happy St Pattys day. 🍀

This is why just when you think you’re  out, I draaaaaaaaaag ya back in!  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, muppy said:

greeting PPP peeps @leh-nerd skin-erd  @BillStime

 

As I was walking my dog in the neighborhood I was struck by the beauty of all the freshly blooming flowers. And then Im thinkin' oh man Ive been summoned to the dungeon...LOL Leo and Billstime Mind your Manners or Im going to commence handing timeouts. Call em "mupfractions" I am Not  fan of all this jibberishy name calling baloney.

 

Now that THAT is settled this place needs a sprinkle of color its Drab, depressing and CLEARLY needs a feminine touch at times. Proceed my ppp ppps, but PLEASE Behave. DONT MAKE ME GET THE HOSE!

 

☮️

 

m

 

 

 

 

flowers.jpg

 

hssssssss. MY EYES!! remove the flowers and color!!!! we of the dungeon do not want the pretty. off with you!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

🎯


What’s funny - this doesn’t even include the amount of money/bribes Trump made off his resorts around the world and his hotel down the street from the WH.

 

Wonder why he sold his license to that hotel after he left the WH?

 

He knows he has no chance in hell of winning the presidency again.

 

 

But Conald will still grift and his pathetic base will pay his way.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.525e3d44cc5b73b62f98c749f80cee33.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BillStime said:

🎯


What’s funny - this doesn’t even include the amount of money/bribes Trump made off his resorts around the world and his hotel down the street from the WH.

 

Wonder why he sold his license to that hotel after he left the WH?

 

He knows he has no chance in hell of winning the presidency again.

 

 

But Conald will still grift and his pathetic base will pay his way.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.525e3d44cc5b73b62f98c749f80cee33.jpeg

You're really at the end of your rope here and obviously willing to jump through hoops and bend light to avoid admitting Biden is involved in influence racketeering. Your false comparison of what Trump's kids did or didn't do and the legal and ethical implications vs. the influence peddling racket the Biden's have created in no way absolves Joe and Hunter Biden of running an extortion operation while he was VP and the legal consequences of their payoff operation.   The two have nothing to do with each other.

 

If Kushner's deal stinks then DOJ under the control of Democrats led by AG Garland are free to investigate.  I suggest you ask Merrick why he hasn't.  One reason might be that while throwing up some red flags concerning conflict of interest none of what transpired was hidden or secret.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

You're really at the end of your rope here and obviously willing to jump through hoops and bend light to avoid admitting Biden is involved in influence racketeering. Your false comparison of what Trump's kids did or didn't do and the legal and ethical implications vs. the influence peddling racket the Biden's have created in no way absolves Joe and Hunter Biden of running an extortion operation while he was VP and the legal consequences of their payoff operation.   The two have nothing to do with each other.

 

If Kushner's deal stinks then DOJ under the control of Democrats led by AG Garland are free to investigate.  I suggest you ask Merrick why he hasn't.  One reason might be that while throwing up some red flags concerning conflict of interest none of what transpired was hidden or secret.

 

Yup.  You'd think they've even come up with some contrived charge at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

end of your rope


oh - ok awe poo- lmao

 

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Biden is involved in influence racketeering


Oh he is? Did you find a receipt under your bed yet?

 

lmao

 

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Trump's kids


Where did Ivanka work?

 

What influence did the POTUS have over those expedited CHINESE patents?

 

Why did the CHINESE rent office space at TRUMP Tower during Conald’s entire tenure?

 

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

their payoff operation.


Trump Org

 

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

If Kushner's deal stinks then DOJ under the control of Democrats led by AG Garland are free to investigate.  I suggest you ask Merrick why he hasn't.  One reason might be that while throwing up some red flags concerning conflict of interest none of what transpired was hidden or secret.


Don’t you worry - the $2 BILLION DOLLARS to Kushner will blow up in your face just like everything else does for you pathetic sorry people.

 

6 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

end of your rope here and obviously willing to jump through hoops


Still laughing at this one - it must really suck to keep running into concrete walls awwwwweeee pooooh

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7f69609e9ab9ecce4f0

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Trump kids are the thing that Republicans don’t want to talk about
 

How much taxpayer money has been spent on these Hunter Biden investigations not five minutes has been spent on the Trump’s who literally took foreign money right out in the open after having security clearance is in the White House that their daddy had to give them because they shouldn’t have had them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

The Trump kids are the thing that Republicans don’t want to talk about
 

How much taxpayer money has been spent on these Hunter Biden investigations not five minutes has been spent on the Trump’s who literally took foreign money right out in the open after having security clearance is in the White House that their daddy had to give them because they shouldn’t have had them


The Joke Admin is willing to indict Trump for anything and everything.  What's stopping them from going after his kids?  Nothing.  Which tells me there's no there there.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/16/2023 at 7:18 PM, Doc said:


The Joke Admin is willing to indict Trump for anything and everything.  What's stopping them from going after his kids?  Nothing.  Which tells me there's no there there.

Oh, there's a there there all right.

This is not to excuse Hunter's shady deals and dad's possible role in them. 

But it's not like First Son In Law is all on the up and up. And we all know how his dad just loves the Saudi regime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/16/2023 at 9:18 PM, Doc said:


The Joke Admin is willing to indict Trump for anything and everything.  What's stopping them from going after his kids?  Nothing.  Which tells me there's no there there.

 

Or in this case if there actually is something there, going after Kushner would also implicate friends of the regime.

 

Can't have that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Or in this case if there actually is something there, going after Kushner would also implicate friends of the regime.

 

Can't have that.

One of the village idiots started this topic as a distraction and to present an apples to apples argument of an apples to oranges situation suggesting taking bribes and payoffs from foreign entities in return for as yet unknown political favors while laundering those payments through various shell companies and accounts and then distributing those funds to multiple  parties, including the former VP's son and to the former VP himself, to use the funds for personal use and supporting a lavish lifestyle was equivalent to managing a registered private equity investment fund which took in investment money from a specific foreign official, namely Saudi MBS. 

 

Might there be an 'ethical" issue with the latter?  Perhaps, but there is most likely no legal problem where the former is clearly criminal.  But hey, even though they know its true, nothing short of torturing a confession out of them will ever convince some folks to admit it.  I don't need to name them, do I?   

 

There's nothing more to say here and the moderators, if they exist, should close this topic.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

 

Might there be an 'ethical" issue with the latter?  Perhaps, but there is most likely no legal problem where the former is clearly criminal. 

It's not that dissimilar.

The suggestion - and it came from a WSJ report, not from AOC or something - is that the payments to Kushner, who has yet to come up with any actual investments in Israel, could be seen as a kind of payoff for his father-in-law's unprecedented level of support for the Saudi regime.

So there's legitimate questions: was an advisor deal for Jared discussed during the course of the Trump admin? (Remember, Jared had an official post) What value is Jared providing in exchange for the extraordinarily lucrative deal?

And then on the political side: if Trump is elected, what does he propose to do about his son in law, sometime business associate, and prior White House official being under retainer by the Saudi regime?

6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

 

There's nothing more to say here and the moderators, if they exist, should close this topic

Well that would be a bit selective, wouldn't it

Edited by The Frankish Reich
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

It's not that dissimilar.

 

You're kidding me, right?  Secret payoffs and bribes are completely different from investing in a registered fund.  When you pay bribes you expect favors, when you invest money you expect a monetary return.  What else can I tell you?  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

One of the village idiots started this topic as a distraction and to present an apples to apples argument of an apples to oranges situation suggesting taking bribes and payoffs from foreign entities in return for as yet unknown political favors while laundering those payments through various shell companies and accounts and then distributing those funds to multiple  parties, including the former VP's son and to the former VP himself, to use the funds for personal use and supporting a lavish lifestyle was equivalent to managing a registered private equity investment fund which took in investment money from a specific foreign official, namely Saudi MBS. 

 

Might there be an 'ethical" issue with the latter?  Perhaps, but there is most likely no legal problem where the former is clearly criminal.  But hey, even though they know its true, nothing short of torturing a confession out of them will ever convince some folks to admit it.  I don't need to name them, do I?   

 

There's nothing more to say here and the moderators, if they exist, should close this topic.

 

Concerned much? lmao

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, All_Pro_Bills said:

when you invest money you expect a monetary return.

Except the Saudis have seen no monetary return, and have not closed on any investment opportunities Jared has (in theory) brought to them.

On any level, it is a weird deal. And remember: this is the Saudi sovereign wealth fund. In other words, Saudi royal funds. Government funds. Not a private company.

It's wrong to ask about the origins of this curious deal and what exactly Saudi Arabia expects to get out of it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...