Jump to content

Mel Kiper mock- Michigan DB Daxton Hill


Buffalo_Stampede

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Is Gabe Davis never going to get a chance?

This is professional sports you have to earn your chance and Davis could not beat out a receiver who retired at the end of the season. That major game which was great the other team double diggs every single play and they already had bad corners. Yes people are going to be skeptical, and he will have to compete on the outside with somebody besides Kumerow to earn it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Vickveto said:

This is professional sports you have to earn your chance and Davis could not beat out a receiver who retired at the end of the season. That major game which was great the other team double diggs every single play and they already had bad corners. Yes people are going to be skeptical, and he will have to compete on the outside with somebody besides Kumerow to earn it.

I think this take is pretty bad but that’s the only way I’ll justify someone saying Allen has no weapons. If you think Gabe Davis isn’t a WR2 then yes we “need” a WR. I disagree. I think Davis is a WR2.

 

I also think Knox has top 5 TE ability. I’ve been a huge believer in Knox since before his breakout last year. Knox could easily be a “WR2” IMO. Get 100+ targets.

 

we definitely need WR depth. I would draft Jameson Williams if he fell to 25. There are some good WR’s to be had 3-4 that will add to the WR room.

8 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

I'm not discounting Davis. We still need to add to the WR room, imo.

I was on the WR at 25 bandwagon until Diggs signed. We shouldn’t have to worry about our top 2 WR’s for 2 years. I think next year WR becomes more of a topic based on Davis. I wouldn’t pass on Jameson Williams because he’s a top 10 talent. But WR depth can be filled later in the draft.

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

Kenneth Walker. He went Pure Michigan (state of)

Interesting, especially since Beane doesn't usually draft players from those schools, or the Big 10 for that matter.

Edited by Mark Vader
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I think this take is pretty bad but that’s the only way I’ll justify someone saying Allen has no weapons. If you think Gabe Davis isn’t a WR2 then yes we “need” a WR. I disagree. I think Davis is a WR2.

 

I also think Knox has top 5 TE ability. I’ve been a huge believer in Knox since before his breakout last year. Knox could easily be a “WR2” IMO. Get 100+ targets.

 

we definitely need WR depth. I would draft Jameson Williams if he fell to 25. There are some good WR’s to be had 3-4 that will add to the WR room.

I was on the WR at 25 bandwagon until Diggs signed. We shouldn’t have to worry about our top 2 WR’s for 2 years. I think next year WR becomes more of a topic based on Davis. I wouldn’t pass on Jameson Williams because he’s a top 10 talent. But WR depth can be filled later in the draft.

There are four wr and Green at g that I like in the first. Booth is a pick I can't argue with, but I would not pass on Jameson WIlliams to take him personally. I indicated upthread some second round receiving choices. Skyy Moore could be added, though I'd like a bigger receiving threat with speed. That is something Davis doesn't offer, though I think he is probably ready to step up to No. 2. (Obviously, the KC playoff game was exceptional, but he didn't see the field, disappeared for games earlier in the season. Could be coaching staff issue, I don't know.)

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

If you think Gabe Davis isn’t a WR2 then yes we “need” a WR. I disagree. I think Davis is a WR2.

I said people have a reason to be skeptical if you’re looking from a non-bias lens. Devante parker Elijah Moore and Jaylen Waddle are considered better wide receivers by most NFL people those are the number twos in our own division.

 

9 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I would draft Jameson Williams if he fell to 25.

Without the injury he is the number one receiver on my board but I think it’s too risky we don’t know how his body will respond after this surgery or if he will ever even be the same again. Some guys just are not the same after a ACL even in the modern era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dax Hill would be a great acquisition at the Bills current draft slot.  He's a great athlete that can play all over the field.  With our needs at DB (Poyer aging and a potentail contract situation, Tre injured, Levi going to Pittsburgh, etc.), Hill could step in and help in a number of roles.  He could start as an outside CB this year, filling that need, and move to safety in the future if Poyer leaves.  Or he could settle in and stay at outside CB.  He could also play nickel, but Taron has that covered.  Hill would simply offer the Bills all kids of flexibilty in the defensive backfield.

 

Hill was a 5-star coming out of high school and went through a back-and-forth recruting battle between Michigan and Alabama, eventually landing with the Wolverines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Up to now, I hadn't spent much time thinking about Hill.   But after digging into it a bit, he seems like a very interesting candidate at #25.     

 

Positional flexibility is a hugh thing with the Bills and he'd check that box.  Others are football IQ and durability--he didn’t miss a game in college.     It'll come down to value at the pick, but I'd be happy if it shook out that way.

 

-----

Edit:   thinking about the odds of Hill at #25, I'm inclined to say they're now next to none--I can't ever recall Kiper correctly mocking the Bills pick when they've drafted so low.

Edited by Shake_My_Head
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr. Who said:

If someone like Booth is the pick in the first, George Pickens or Trey McBride ought to be second round targets you trade up to secure.

 

This is my prediction for what will happen. I think the 1st round pick will be defense. I would bet on Booth or Hill being the pick, but another edge rusher like Karlaftis or Mafe wouldn't surprise me at all. In the 2nd round I think we will trade up to secure a WR before the 2nd round talents are gone. I hope everyone doesn't freak out if we once again draft defense in the 1st round. There will be plenty of opportunities later in the draft to add to the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

I hope everyone doesn't freak out if we once again draft defense in the 1st round.

 

Well, I for one will be "dancing and a wigglin" like John Butler if they go defense in Round 1.     I just don't see enough value in the offens(ive) prospects around that #25 slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mark Vader said:

Interesting, especially since Beane doesn't usually draft players from those schools, or the Big 10 for that matter.

Have to think kiper didn’t do a deep dive on team drafting tendencies when doing this. I still think they will go with guys like booth from Clemson, Cine from UGA, Stingley from LSU, etc. and a RB in the 3rd or later vs this prediction 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

 

Is Gabe Davis never going to get a chance?

 


How is the “if you want to add a premium WR, it means you don’t believe in Gabe Davis” take still a thing?

 

Between Beasley and Sanders, the Bills lost 182 targets from last season, and have only added a cheap, one year, slot only WR to the roster.

 

They’re also in 3 or 4 WR sets over 80% of the time.

 

If Davis or Diggs were to miss time with injury, it would get ugly at outside WR.

 

Lastly, with the exploding contracts of WRs, adding a talented, cost controlled option at the position for four or five years makes a ton of sense, especially after paying Diggs.

 

So yes, I believe in Davis. I bet he’ll be an outstanding WR2. Push him to the moon!

 

But for all the reasons I just listed, the Bills still need to add a WR within the first few rounds.

Edited by Logic
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I love this player. Kiper forgets we have Taron Johnson in the slot. I would love to see how McDermott uses Hill’s versatility. He can play anywhere in the secondary I believe on day 1.

 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/insider/draft2022/insider/story/_/id/33721368/nfl-mock-draft-2022-mel-kiper-new-predictions-top-64-picks-rounds-1-2-including-first-round-trade?platform=amp

Kiper is an idiot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Logic said:


How is the “if you want to add a premium WR, it means you don’t believe in Gabe Davis” take still a thing?

 

Between Beasley and Sanders, the Bills lost 182 targets from last season, and have only added a cheap, one year, slot only WR to the roster.

 

They’re also in 3 or 4 WR sets over 80% of the time.

 

If Davis or Diggs were to miss time with injury, it would get ugly at outside WR.

 

Lastly, with the exploding contracts of WRs, adding a talented, cost controlled option at the position for four or five years makes a ton of sense, especially after paying Diggs.

 

So yes, I believe in Davis. I bet he’ll be an outstanding WR2. Push him to the moon!

 

But for all the reasons I just listed, the Bills still need to add a WR within the first few rounds.

They didn’t add a WR in the 1st few rounds when they had Diggs and Beasley. They added Davis and developed him. That’s exactly what their plan at WR should be this year. Round 3-4 WR and develop. Probably another one in the 6-7 rounds. We need depth.
 

Crowder should get around 70 targets. Davis an extra 40 targets. Knox an extra 10 targets. McKenzie probably gets more targets, let’s give him 10 more. I’m being conservative here with target projections. 
 

So we’re looking at a projection of 50 targets or so for the rookie WR. A season likely of 35 catches, 500 yards, 5 TDs.

 

 I think we can get a WR in the 3-4 round that gives us similar numbers but might need more time to develop. A Josh Palmer like WR from last year. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

One doesn't draft a slot corner in the 1st....or does one?

I think you could justify it considering the guys that play out of the slot a lot these days.   You are going to see Hill twice a year running from there and all over, it’s a good position to be set at.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Would be nice if they’d reverse that thought process for the defense… just for one year… 

 

The problem is the defensive talent thins out pretty quickly, whereas there will likely be very good WR talents still available in the mid-2nd round. Taking a defensive player in the 1st round does not mean we punted on improving the offense. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

I think a dynamic WR with terrific YAC ability moves the needle for this team more than another defensive piece… don’t even think it’s a debate… just gotta see how the board falls but if there’s a WR there with that dynamic YAC ability vs a slot corner…. How do you justify the slot corner pick?

The Bills won’t draft a slot CB in the 1st round. I don’t believe Hill will be that anyways.

 

As for a YAC WR, yeah. But I want open WRs 1st. It seems like all the dynamic WRs in this draft will go top 20. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I’m going to listen. I watched like an hour of Hill straight after I saw the mock. He looks like a perfect fit for our defense. 

Can he play outside corner or just slot?  
 

He could be a dark horse, but I don’t know what he would do year 1.  Won’t beat out Poyer or Hyde at S.  Taron Johnson is excellent at slot corner.  So, if they take Hill, they must believe he can move in at outside corner.  I’m not sure what to think of Hill.  Is he a safety who played slot and is being projected to outside corner?  He is certainly an athlete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

Can he play outside corner or just slot?  
 

He could be a dark horse, but I don’t know what he would do year 1.  Won’t beat out Poyer or Hyde at S.  Taron Johnson is excellent at slot corner.  So, if they take Hill, they must believe he can move in at outside corner.  I’m not sure what to think of Hill.  Is he a safety who played slot and is being projected to outside corner?  He is certainly an athlete.

I see him as an off the ball outside CB in our scheme. I can also see him, Johnson, Poyer, and Hyde moving around in the slot at times and coming on the blitz. It’ll be nice to have those interchangeable parts. Offense won’t know what they’re seeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...