January 6th 2021 FEDSURRECTION: The Corrupt Biden Regime: White House, FBI, DOJ, media, committee

[Doc]

What a bunch of children.

[All_Pro_Bills]

5 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

No sh*t !

 

They have had this as the goal since 12/7 they aren't "conducting an investigation"

 

Jan. 6 committee pushing Garland to prosecute Trump

 

How do we know? Because Democrats (plus two rogue Republicans) have begun calling on Attorney General Eric Garland to “do his job” and get ready to prosecute Donald Trump and anyone else who’s name can in any way be tied to the January 6, 2021 riot on Capitol Hill. How Garland is expected to do that at this stage of the game was not explained. (Associated Press)

 

What the committee has been relying on thus far is a lot of headlines without much underlying substance.

 

For example, this week some of the members cited a judge in California (a Clinton appointee) who wrote that it is “more than likely than not” that Donald Trump committed some sort of crime related to the January 6 events.

 

You’ll notice that no evidence is offered and no specific crime is specified. It’s not really even a suggestion that there is a charge available to file. It’s just “more likely than not.”

 

https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2022/04/02/jan-6-committee-pushing-garland-to-prosecute-trump-n459576

When the threshold of guilt of "beyond a reasonable doubt" is replaced by some 3rd world junta standard of "more than likely than not" we can convict anyone of anything.  This committee is a danger to freedom.  As are those supporting them.

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillStime]

34 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

What was the outcome?

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

[Doc]

9 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

If that's the sex and cocaine party Cawthorn was invited to and turned down...

[BillsFanNC]

 

[Big Blitz]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[B-Man]

 

 

I'm reading "Ivanka Trump Testifies to House Panel Investigating Jan. 6 Attack" in The New York Times.

 

Key sentence:

It was not immediately clear how revelatory her testimony was for the committee, but those familiar with the interview said Ms. Trump did not seek to invoke any privilege — such as executive privilege or the Fifth Amendment, as other witnesses have done — and broadly, if not garrulously, answered the panel’s questions.

 

And what's with "not immediately clear how revelatory"? It sounds like she testified simply and straightforwardly, but there was nothing interesting. Why act like later something might be revealed? It's such lame titillation. What was unclear?

 

What is the function of "if not garrulously"? It strikes me as vaguely sexist, as though you would expect her to chatter inanely.

 

Posted by Ann Althouse

 

https://althouse.blogspot.com/2022/04/if-ivanka-wasnt-garrulous-why-bring-up.html

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/05/us/politics/ivanka-trump-jan-6.html?smid=url-share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited April 6, 2022 by B-Man

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

22 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

I'm reading "Ivanka Trump Testifies to House Panel Investigating Jan. 6 Attack" in The New York Times.

 

Key sentence:

It was not immediately clear how revelatory her testimony was for the committee, but those familiar with the interview said Ms. Trump did not seek to invoke any privilege — such as executive privilege or the Fifth Amendment, as other witnesses have done — and broadly, if not garrulously, answered the panel’s questions.

 

And what's with "not immediately clear how revelatory"? It sounds like she testified simply and straightforwardly, but there was nothing interesting. Why act like later something might be revealed? It's such lame titillation. What was unclear?

 

What is the function of "if not garrulously"? It strikes me as vaguely sexist, as though you would expect her to chatter inanely.

 

Posted by Ann Althouse

 

https://althouse.blogspot.com/2022/04/if-ivanka-wasnt-garrulous-why-bring-up.html

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/05/us/politics/ivanka-trump-jan-6.html?smid=url-share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Makes perfect sense, of course.  They can't really say much about the testimony, but they can assure their readers that the Wharton School of Business graduate known for speaking eloquently and articulately yammered on like a giddy schoolgirl in front of the panel looking to destroy her, her family, her father and their entire way of life.  

 

You would really get better coverage reading People magazine. 

[Doc]

"Garrulous" would define the J6 committee...

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

This acknowledgement of reality — that it’s not a crime to walk through a door held open for you by police — is fatal to the corrupt government’s entire J6 narrative.

 

It’s also why DOJ has criminally abused defendants to force plea deals: DOJ knows its cases are garbage.

 

 

Edited April 6, 2022 by B-Man

[BillsFanNC]

Insurrection! Coup! 

 

***** off.

 

 

 

[Doc]

The lawsuits will be epic.

[BillStime]

15 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

Insurrection! Coup! 

 

***** off.

 

 

 

DR doing his best to distract from what Conald was really trying to accomplish:

 

An all out coup and assault on our republic.

 

Notice DR never actually comments on the real investigations? The ones involving all the players and crooks who surrounded Conald and enabled his plan to overthrow the government? 
 

Thats why DR created this thread.
 

This thread serves as a pathetic attempt to distract his lemmings from the most corrupt administration in our lifetime. 

 

Notice how the most powerful and successful POTUS of our lifetime - you know - that one term loser who lost the popular vote TWICE and was impeached TWICE always plays the victim?  This POS has manipulated his cult to lose all critical thinking capabilities and play victim to justify all his crooked ways - and his lemmings follow like good little terrorists.

 

This cult is so conditioned - so brainwashed - they bend over backwards defending this:

 

 

These idiots work themselves up so hard - just look at DRs opening - to convince THEMSELVES the lies they have been told are true

 

 

Edited April 7, 2022 by BillStime

[Tenhigh]

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

DR doing his best to distract from what Conald was really trying to accomplish:

 

An all out coup and assault on our republic.

 

Notice DR never actually comments on the real investigations? The ones involving all the players and crooks who surrounded Conald and enabled his plan to overthrow the government? 
 

Thats why DR created this thread.
 

This thread serves as a pathetic attempt to distract his lemmings from the most corrupt administration in our lifetime. 

 

Notice how the most powerful and successful POTUS of our lifetime - you know - that one term loser who lost the popular vote TWICE and was impeached TWICEl always plays the victim?  This POS has manipulated his cult to lose all critical thinking capabilities and play victim to justify all his crooked ways - and his lemmings follow like good little terrorists.

 

This cult is so conditioned- so brainwashed - they bend over backwards defending this:

 

 

These idiots work themselves up so hard - just look at DRs opening - to convince THEMSELVES the lies they have been told are true

 

 

You seemed to be the only one worked up, amigo.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

DR doing his best to distract from what Conald was really trying to accomplish:

 

An all out coup and assault on our republic.

 

Notice DR never actually comments on the real investigations? The ones involving all the players and crooks who surrounded Conald and enabled his plan to overthrow the government? 
 

Thats why DR created this thread.
 

This thread serves as a pathetic attempt to distract his lemmings from the most corrupt administration in our lifetime. 

 

Notice how the most powerful and successful POTUS of our lifetime - you know - that one term loser who lost the popular vote TWICE and was impeached TWICEl always plays the victim?  This POS has manipulated his cult to lose all critical thinking capabilities and play victim to justify all his crooked ways - and his lemmings follow like good little terrorists.

 

This cult is so conditioned- so brainwashed - they bend over backwards defending this:

 

 

These idiots work themselves up so hard - just look at DRs opening - to convince THEMSELVES the lies they have been told are true

 

 

What’s your explanation for the lack of criminal charges against Trump?  

[BillsFanNC]

 

And ***** off @BillStime

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

In other words, for many of the J6 defendants who might have been rightfully charged at worst with trespassing, that is now out as well. 

 

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

9 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

What’s your explanation for the lack of criminal charges against Trump?  

Let's face it.  At this point given 16 months of almost nothing, nobody can actually be stupid enough to believe these conspiracies about 1/6.  Believers in it are just good liars.  Proponents of all these insurrection conspiracies know they're all bull crap but don't care.  All that matters is the result, not the means or methods or the truth.  Like Captain Ahab getting his whale the far-left is going to get Trump whatever the cost and whatever it might take.

 

So maybe another question for anyone genuinely interested in truth and reality is why does anyone continue to believe in these manufactured conspiracies generated by the same group of people when one after another they're failed to deliver any indictable evidence or charges and have proven to be false?  Maybe its time to consider the motivations of the accusers rather than the accursed and do some critical thinking about the nefarious objectives of the political actors not named Trump at work here?  

 

Of course my thoughts will likely be met with lots of tweet quotes and check lists of transgressions generated by various 1/6 conspiracy believers when all that really matters is evidence, charges, indictments, trials, convictions, and sentencing of the guy in charge.  If you can't produce any of that you've got nothin'.  End of story. 

[SoCal Deek]

15 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Let's face it.  At this point given 16 months of almost nothing, nobody can actually be stupid enough to believe these conspiracies about 1/6.  Believers in it are just good liars.  Proponents of all these insurrection conspiracies know they're all bull crap but don't care.  All that matters is the result, not the means or methods or the truth.  Like Captain Ahab getting his whale the far-left is going to get Trump whatever the cost and whatever it might take.

 

So maybe another question for anyone genuinely interested in truth and reality is why does anyone continue to believe in these manufactured conspiracies generated by the same group of people when one after another they're failed to deliver any indictable evidence or charges and have proven to be false?  Maybe its time to consider the motivations of the accusers rather than the accursed and do some critical thinking about the nefarious objectives of the political actors not named Trump at work here?  

 

Of course my thoughts will likely be met with lots of tweet quotes and check lists of transgressions generated by various 1/6 conspiracy believers when all that really matters is evidence, charges, indictments, trials, convictions, and sentencing of the guy in charge.  If you can't produce any of that you've got nothin'.  End of story. 

One word from Nancy Pelosi and all of this ends. Do you think she’ll call it off? Nope! SHE is the problem. 

[BillStime]

1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Let's face it.  At this point given 16 months of almost nothing, nobody can actually be stupid enough to believe these conspiracies about 1/6.  Believers in it are just good liars.  Proponents of all these insurrection conspiracies know they're all bull crap but don't care.  All that matters is the result, not the means or methods or the truth.  Like Captain Ahab getting his whale the far-left is going to get Trump whatever the cost and whatever it might take.

 

So maybe another question for anyone genuinely interested in truth and reality is why does anyone continue to believe in these manufactured conspiracies generated by the same group of people when one after another they're failed to deliver any indictable evidence or charges and have proven to be false?  Maybe its time to consider the motivations of the accusers rather than the accursed and do some critical thinking about the nefarious objectives of the political actors not named Trump at work here?  

 

Of course my thoughts will likely be met with lots of tweet quotes and check lists of transgressions generated by various 1/6 conspiracy believers when all that really matters is evidence, charges, indictments, trials, convictions, and sentencing of the guy in charge.  If you can't produce any of that you've got nothin'.  End of story. 

 

Wait, we are supposed to put all our eggs in Hunters laptop - lmao - but completely IGNORE what Trump was attempting to do leading up to and after 1/6?

 

 

idiots

 

 

 

[Doc]

46 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

One word from Nancy Pelosi and all of this ends. Do you think she’ll call it off? Nope! SHE is the problem. 

 

Too bad its at the expense of the J6 protestors, but they're just damaging their party even further.

[BillStime]

2 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

And ***** off @BillStime

 

 

Awe, poor DR is upset for getting called out for the obvious.

 

And speaking of getting called out:

 

@SoCal Deek - WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?

 

On 4/5/2022 at 5:50 PM, SoCal Deek said:

 spew Twitter garbage, call people all sorts of vile names

 

PERFECT OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU TO STAND UP TO THESE ATROCIITIES.

 

 

lolmao

 

[BillStime]

5 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Too bad its at the expense of the J6 protestors, but they're just damaging their party even further.

 

Yea, good one "Doc"  - I don't hear Nancy's voice at Trump's COUP rally, do you?

 

"Take the Capitol"

 

 

The Party of Hypocrisy and Projection

[B-Man]

15 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This acknowledgement of reality — that it’s not a crime to walk through a door held open for you by police — is fatal to the corrupt government’s entire J6 narrative.

 

It’s also why DOJ has criminally abused defendants to force plea deals: DOJ knows its cases are garbage.

 

 

This will be the coming reality.

 

They will desperately try and maintain their false narrative, no matter who they have to attack.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Wait, we are supposed to put all our eggs in Hunters laptop - lmao - but completely IGNORE what Trump was attempting to do leading up to and after 1/6?

 

 

idiots

 

 

 

What’s your explanation for the lack of criminal charges against Trump? 

Is law enforcement in on it? Are they Cultists?  

[Westside]

21 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

The question I have is, who told the USCP to hold open the doors and let people in? The command had to come from somewhere. I doubt they just decided to forego all there training and the oath to protect on there own. 

 

[BillStime]

36 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Inside job - duh - lmao

 

Capitol Police announce disciplinary action against six cops for their actions at Jan. 6 riot

 

These idiots keep making their own case against Trump and they don’t even realize it or are purposely being intellectually dishonest - lmao

 

 

[BillStime]

20 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

What’s your explanation for the lack of criminal charges against Trump? 

Is law enforcement in on it? Are they Cultists?  

 

Same reason why Michael Cohen went to jail for facilitating Individual 1's hush payment to his porn star.  Notice nothing happened to Individual 1?

 

There are obviously two justice systems in America.

 

And yes, Trumps 1/6 coup was beyond obvious an inside job... 

[Doc]

It's getting worse for the Dems by the day.  Too bad we all lose in the process.

[Albwan]

6 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

And ***** off @BillStime

 

 

billstime and the minority of low intellect lefties that are terrorizing this country still insist facts and truth are a lie.

It's been working well for the past couple of years so they will keep trying until it doesn't work anymore.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

16 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Same reason why Michael Cohen went to jail for facilitating Individual 1's hush payment to his porn star.  Notice nothing happened to Individual 1?

 

There are obviously two justice systems in America.

 

And yes, Trumps 1/6 coup was beyond obvious an inside job... 

Your position is that Trump is not being prosecuted or charged with criminal activity because Michael Cohen was charged with criminal activity and and prosecuted?   That's pretzel logic. 

 

The scenario you laid out does not support your contention that there are two justice systems in America.  What it supports is that one person was presumed to be guilty of criminal acts, was tried and found guilty, the other(s) were not.   That's not to say there aren't two, three, four or more systems applied--we probably agree on that--- it's just that what you have laid out isn't indicative of that premise at all.  

 

Still, your positioning here is that everything is "obvious".  I'm really struggling to understand what's in it for law enforcement NOT to prosecute a case so easily won that we can sit here in our relative ignorance and know, with certainty, that conviction would follow prosecution as night follows day. 

[Doc]

Don't bother.  It's how they try to maintain the fantasy that there was Russian collusion.  "Durr, there's  2 types of justice and that's the only reason he hasn't been charged."  Well then I guess that's why Hilly hasn't been locked-up yet, eh?

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[Doc]

Hey, I guess the J6 committee did reveal the truth.  Too bad for the Dems it's not what they thought it would be...