L Ron Burgundy Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Just now, daz28 said: Vald is extremely good at it, too. Trump DREAMS that he could interview like Putin. Tucker may as well be throwing bon-bons in his mouth. There's always an endgame, and I'm still struggling with what this one might be. Maybe to soften the blow if Trump wins the election, and loses Ukraine to Vlad. get Fox people thinking Vlad's not too bad a guy. he just mean tweets a lil too much. He is the best at it. #1, Brady level. He's fully aware some right wing stooges will swallow some of his poison too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 (edited) 2 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said: From her mouth to rons keyboard. Hillary never gets tired of making up Russia rumors. Speaking of contract deals with Russians. From the Lefts favorite newspaper: Edited February 8 by US Egg 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 6 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said: You slow son. Riiigght! But you voted for Biden so you have to be smart. You don't like putin, don't watch the interview. You don't have to cry faux outrage like a grown baby. You slower son. 6 hours ago, daz28 said: Vald is extremely good at it, too. Trump DREAMS that he could interview like Putin. Tucker may as well be throwing bon-bons in his mouth. There's always an endgame, and I'm still struggling with what this one might be. Maybe to soften the blow if Trump wins the election, and loses Ukraine to Vlad. get Fox people thinking Vlad's not too bad a guy. he just mean tweets a lil too much. You just can't help yourself. Show me on the doll where Trump hurt you. It's laughable at this point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 You'd think the bolded statement would be clear and obvious to 99% of the country. Not in 2024 though! When half the country are brainwashed useful idiot commie tools. BREAKING: The European Union is said to be seeking sanctions and a "travel ban" against Tucker Carlson for his interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin. I never thought I would be defending Tucker Carlson so much within a period of a couple days, but once again, if you support freedom then you should support Tucker's right to interview Putin, just like many others have in the past. I'm sure much of what Putin will say will be lies, embellishments and inaccuracies. Putin is the one who should be sanctioned further, not an American who is asking Putin questions. The 'risks' of this interview for Tucker shouldn't be sanctions from US allies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 7 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: You'd think the bolded statement would be clear and obvious to 99% of the country. Not in 2024 though! When half the country are brainwashed useful idiot commie tools. BREAKING: The European Union is said to be seeking sanctions and a "travel ban" against Tucker Carlson for his interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin. I never thought I would be defending Tucker Carlson so much within a period of a couple days, but once again, if you support freedom then you should support Tucker's right to interview Putin, just like many others have in the past. I'm sure much of what Putin will say will be lies, embellishments and inaccuracies. Putin is the one who should be sanctioned further, not an American who is asking Putin questions. The 'risks' of this interview for Tucker shouldn't be sanctions from US allies. If people are so bothered, don't watch. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Putin etc.. We've been told repeatedly over the years that Trump himself is as least as bad, if not worse than, all of the above. So.... Useful idiots, please explain the endless interviews of Trump by "journalists" and legacy media broadcasting his comments 24/7 since 2015. How dare they interview the nazi, fascist, orange dictator! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 10 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said: That is 100% the insinuation. I get nuance may not be your thing. Let's assume I'm wrong, what exactly would be the point of the interview? Gonna ask his favorite Taylor Swift song? No. The right thinks this is going to be old school journalism! But it's just a tool to Vlad. How about watching it and finding out? I think that's the point of what most have been saying. 10 hours ago, US Egg said: Hillary never gets tired of making up Russia rumors. Speaking of contract deals with Russians. From the Lefts favorite newspaper: I guess that "overcharge," er, "reset" button ddn't work... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Hitler was interviewed many times, hosted an Olympic games, and his books are still available for sale. Who decides who can and cannot be interviewed? That person has too much power apparently 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 6 hours ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: You just can't help yourself. Show me on the doll where Trump hurt you. It's laughable at this point. Your screen name, on a football site no less, LITERALLY has TDS in it, but me stating facts about him on a political page is laughable???? Sounds like you're the one with the obsession. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 hour ago, KDIGGZ said: Hitler was interviewed many times, hosted an Olympic games, and his books are still available for sale. Who decides who can and cannot be interviewed? That person has too much power apparently So you do need the list of dictators who were given the spotlight, which turned out to be a complete disaster causing literally hundreds of millions of deaths and suffering? No one is saying it's illegal, they're saying it's immoral, and just a really bad idea. Should we have an Isis tv channel, so people can make up their own minds about beheadings, too? The GQP has made what a short time ago was preposterous now the norm, but somehow they still claim to have common sense. Conservative Judge Royce Lamberth NAILED it: Judge Royce Lamberth, a Reagan appointee to the bench, said the “destructive” misinformation, spread by political leaders who have downplayed and misrepresented the attack, had become pervasive. “In my thirty-seven years on the bench, I cannot recall a time when such meritless justifications of criminal activity have gone mainstream,” Lamberth lamented in a seven-page public court filing. Though he did not mention Trump by name, Lamberth specifically called out language used by Trump and, more recently, Trump allies like Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), describing Jan. 6 defendants as “hostages.” “I have been shocked to watch some public figures try to rewrite history, claiming rioters behaved ‘in an orderly fashion’ like ordinary tourists, or martyrizing convicted January 6 defendants as ‘political prisoners’ or even, incredibly, ‘hostages,’” he wrote. “That is all preposterous. But the Court fears that such destructive, misguided rhetoric could presage further danger to our country.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, daz28 said: So you do need the list of dictators who were given the spotlight, which turned out to be a complete disaster causing literally hundreds of millions of deaths and suffering? No one is saying it's illegal, they're saying it's immoral, and just a really bad idea. Should we have an Isis tv channel, so people can make up their own minds about beheadings, too? The GQP has made what a short time ago was preposterous now the norm, but somehow they still claim to have common sense. Conservative Judge Royce Lamberth NAILED it: Judge Royce Lamberth, a Reagan appointee to the bench, said the “destructive” misinformation, spread by political leaders who have downplayed and misrepresented the attack, had become pervasive. “In my thirty-seven years on the bench, I cannot recall a time when such meritless justifications of criminal activity have gone mainstream,” Lamberth lamented in a seven-page public court filing. Though he did not mention Trump by name, Lamberth specifically called out language used by Trump and, more recently, Trump allies like Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), describing Jan. 6 defendants as “hostages.” “I have been shocked to watch some public figures try to rewrite history, claiming rioters behaved ‘in an orderly fashion’ like ordinary tourists, or martyrizing convicted January 6 defendants as ‘political prisoners’ or even, incredibly, ‘hostages,’” he wrote. “That is all preposterous. But the Court fears that such destructive, misguided rhetoric could presage further danger to our country.” I don't agree. They aren't saying there should be a Russian TV channel. They are saying this guy started a war let's see why and what he has to say about it. If he's a bad guy then we should know about it. Nobody should be censored because then who decides who gets censored? Like with the COVID stuff. They censored a lot of DOCTORS who ended up being completely right. Give us the information and we will decide for ourselves 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 17 minutes ago, daz28 said: Your screen name, on a football site no less, LITERALLY has TDS in it, but me stating facts about him on a political page is laughable???? Sounds like you're the one with the obsession. Aaannndd you have no clue who al bundy is? If u did it would all make sense. Calling Trump weak for not retaliating a retaliation is a weird hill to die on, but u do u. I really don't care. And they are not facts but your opinion, and a rather weak one at that. Your broken and it shows. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDHillFan Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: Give us the information and we will decide for ourselves I don’t proclaim to understand but it seems that the modern left, as exemplified by a handful of melodramatic sorts on this board, wants the exact opposite of this. Free thinking is not virtuous to this sort of person. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 8 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Aaannndd you have no clue who al bundy is? If u did it would all make sense. Calling Trump weak for not retaliating a retaliation is a weird hill to die on, but u do u. I really don't care. And they are not facts but your opinion, and a rather weak one at that. Your broken and it shows. Al would definitely be a MAGA guy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 15 minutes ago, Doc said: Al would definitely be a MAGA guy. 100%%%% NOMAAM! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phypon Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 24 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Aaannndd you have no clue who al bundy is? If u did it would all make sense. Calling Trump weak for not retaliating a retaliation is a weird hill to die on, but u do u. I really don't care. And they are not facts but your opinion, and a rather weak one at that. Your broken and it shows. Spelling is not your strong suit... Anyway, here is a vid from someone that was once upon a time a "Democrat"! Heads will explode! It doesn't mean he is a Republican (I know how you leftist's think in terms of things as only left or right). Good watch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Just now, phypon said: Spelling is not your strong suit... Anyway, here is a vid from someone that was once upon a time a "Democrat"! Heads will explode! It doesn't mean he is a Republican (I know how you leftist's think in terms of things as only left or right). Good watch: Do u have me confused with someone else? I'm definitely not a leftist. And who gives a f about spelling, it's a message board. And what did I even spell wrong? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts