L Ron Burgundy Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 6 hours ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Riiigght! But you voted for Biden so you have to be smart. You don't like putin, don't watch the interview. You don't have to cry faux outrage like a grown baby. You slower son. You just can't help yourself. Show me on the doll where Trump hurt you. It's laughable at this point. Still slow. Outrage would require giving 2 f's I give zero. I'm calling out what's going to happen. The circus around this is beneath my contempt. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phypon Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Do u have me confused with someone else? I'm definitely not a leftist. And who gives a f about spelling, it's a message board. And what did I even spell wrong? Great fo U. Watch the vid regardless. It's a good vid. Did you watched it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 32 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Aaannndd you have no clue who al bundy is? If u did it would all make sense. Calling Trump weak for not retaliating a retaliation is a weird hill to die on, but u do u. I really don't care. And they are not facts but your opinion, and a rather weak one at that. Your broken and it shows. Leftist have gone to war against humor because making fun of their many foolish notions is both fun and what they might say are microaggressions. Al Bundy would certainly be cancelled and his No Maam organization declared an extremist group. And I'll wager none of the leftists ever scored 4 touchdowns in a single game either! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said: Still slow. Outrage would require giving 2 f's I give zero. I'm calling out what's going to happen. The circus around this is beneath my contempt. So you can predict the future? Good for u. Once again if you're so bothered, don't watch. Still slower. Beneath you? Your a dem, no telling how low you can sink. Just now, All_Pro_Bills said: Leftist have gone to war against humor because making fun of their many foolish notions is both fun and what they might say are microaggressions. Al Bundy would certainly be cancelled and his No Maam organization declared an extremist group. And I'll wager none of the leftists ever scored 4 touchdowns in a single game either! They wouldn't last a down vs Bubba "spare tire" dixon, that's for sure! 6 minutes ago, phypon said: Great fo U. Watch the vid regardless. It's a good vid. Did you watched it? Spell better and I might take you more seriously. I haven't watched it, maybe when I'm done with work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phypon Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 6 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: So you can predict the future? Good for u. Once again if you're so bothered, don't watch. Still slower. Beneath you? Your a dem, no telling how low you can sink. They wouldn't last a down vs Bubba "spare tire" dixon, that's for sure! Spell better and I might take you more seriously. I haven't watched it, maybe when I'm done with work. Honestly, it's worth the watch. I think you will appreciate it. For real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Just now, phypon said: Honestly, it's worth the watch. I think you will appreciate it. For real. I will do, in the meantime, do u have a quick cliff note summary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 45 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Aaannndd you have no clue who al bundy is? If u did it would all make sense. Calling Trump weak for not retaliating a retaliation is a weird hill to die on, but u do u. I really don't care. And they are not facts but your opinion, and a rather weak one at that. Your broken and it shows. The man said what he said, and was very clear. Because you guys want his jock, you choose to willfully misinterpret what is clearly being said. Maybe next time we kill one terrorist, you'll be ok with 100 US casualties as a proper "retaliation" by a terrorist nation. Hope it's no one in my family that has to die in your required retaliation by the terrorist country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 1 minute ago, daz28 said: The man said what he said, and was very clear. Because you guys want his jock, you choose to willfully misinterpret what is clearly being said. Maybe next time we kill one terrorist, you'll be ok with 100 US casualties as a proper "retaliation" by a terrorist nation. Hope it's no one in my family that has to die in your required retaliation by the terrorist country. Want his jock? You're the obsessed one unable to rationalize a clear and concise thought. Good day sir. I'm done with u. Once again, you're campaigning for war, and war has already cost this country plenty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 52 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: I don't agree. They aren't saying there should be a Russian TV channel. They are saying this guy started a war let's see why and what he has to say about it. If he's a bad guy then we should know about it. Nobody should be censored because then who decides who gets censored? Like with the COVID stuff. They censored a lot of DOCTORS who ended up being completely right. Give us the information and we will decide for ourselves You're confusing censorship with just not doing what has been historically proven to be a really bad idea. A good example of this is that one could go to an all black ghetto, and shout racist remarks just to see what happens, but it's a terrible idea. Giving an audience to your enemies and known naked aggressors is a bad idea. Suppose Kim Jong Un nukes America. Should we interview him to find out why? To me this is all COMPLETELY ABSURD. Mr. Hitler, why did you exterminate the Jews, the American people need to know if and why that was justified. Oh vey. 3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Want his jock? You're the obsessed one unable to rationalize a clear and concise thought. Good day sir. I'm done with u. Once again, you're campaigning for war, and war has already cost this country plenty. Campaigning for stopping dictators from naked aggression, but you call it whatever you like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 7 minutes ago, daz28 said: You're confusing censorship with just not doing what has been historically proven to be a really bad idea. A good example of this is that one could go to an all black ghetto, and shout racist remarks just to see what happens, but it's a terrible idea. Giving an audience to your enemies and known naked aggressors is a bad idea. Suppose Kim Jong Un nukes America. Should we interview him to find out why? To me this is all COMPLETELY ABSURD. Mr. Hitler, why did you exterminate the Jews, the American people need to know if and why that was justified. Oh vey. Campaigning for stopping dictators from naked aggression, but you call it whatever you like. It wasn't naked aggression, it was retaliation. Thinking is hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 15 minutes ago, daz28 said: You're confusing censorship with just not doing what has been historically proven to be a really bad idea. A good example of this is that one could go to an all black ghetto, and shout racist remarks just to see what happens, but it's a terrible idea. Giving an audience to your enemies and known naked aggressors is a bad idea. Suppose Kim Jong Un nukes America. Should we interview him to find out why? To me this is all COMPLETELY ABSURD. Mr. Hitler, why did you exterminate the Jews, the American people need to know if and why that was justified. Oh vey. Campaigning for stopping dictators from naked aggression, but you call it whatever you like. Read the book 1984. I think you would like to live in that kind of world. The rest of us do not. Nobody should have the power to pick and choose who gets censored and who does not. If Trump wins and says only right wing people are allowed to be on TV and everyone else gets silenced because they are evil would that be ok with you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 2 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: Read the book 1984. I think you would like to live in that kind of world. The rest of us do not. Nobody should have the power to pick and choose who gets censored and who does not. If Trump wins and says only right wing people are allowed to be on TV and everyone else gets silenced because they are evil would that be ok with you? I don't know about daz but it would be a'ight with me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 14 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: It wasn't naked aggression, it was retaliation. Thinking is hard. I'm talking about Putin invading Ukraine, but yeah, terrorism is worse than naked aggression, and requires an even stronger response, which they aren't entitled to retaliate, and cause American casualties. Sheesh. Are you pro-terrorism now? 5 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: Read the book 1984. I think you would like to live in that kind of world. The rest of us do not. Nobody should have the power to pick and choose who gets censored and who does not. If Trump wins and says only right wing people are allowed to be on TV and everyone else gets silenced because they are evil would that be ok with you? Comparing giving airtime with American right wingers vs Hitler death squads is quite the stretch. I can't believe anyone would consider American journalists not giving Hitler a platform from which to defend genocide to be "censorship". Again, it's not and shouldn't be illegal, but just a really, really stupid idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 5 minutes ago, wnyguy said: I don't know about daz but it would be a'ight with me. No free speech should continue, but the consequences of using it should be heavily weighed. People can do lots of things legally that are really bad ideas. The fact that Tucker is getting good publicity for doing something really stupid is proof that free speech has consequences that can be good for some, but really bad for others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Just now, daz28 said: No free speech should continue, but the consequences of using it should be heavily weighed. People can do lots of things legally that are really bad ideas. The fact that Tucker is getting good publicity for doing something really stupid is proof that free speech has consequences that can be good for some, but really bad for others. How do we know it's stupid until after the interview takes place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 11 minutes ago, daz28 said: I'm talking about Putin invading Ukraine, but yeah, terrorism is worse than naked aggression, and requires an even stronger response, which they aren't entitled to retaliate, and cause American casualties. Sheesh. Are you pro-terrorism now? Comparing giving airtime with American right wingers vs Hitler death squads is quite the stretch. I can't believe anyone would consider American journalists not giving Hitler a platform from which to defend genocide to be "censorship". Again, it's not and shouldn't be illegal, but just a really, really stupid idea. I'm done with u. Have fun down your rabbit hole. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 4 minutes ago, wnyguy said: How do we know it's stupid until after the interview takes place? History. Like I said, I could list dictators that it was a horrible idea to give a pulpit to, but I figured everyone already knew who they were. I can't stress enough how Tucker has the right, but good sense should tell him it's not a good idea. Money and popularity are the worst reasons possible to do it. Would it have been absurd if a journalist went to Japan to ask them why they bombed Pearl harbor? It's amazing that the same people who DESPISE Jane Fonda for her pro-Vietnam stance, are the same ones who are proponents of Tucker. Again, this is so absurd to me, that I should just recuse myself from the discussion if i don't seem to be getting anywhere. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 19 minutes ago, daz28 said: Comparing giving airtime with American right wingers vs Hitler death squads is quite the stretch. I can't believe anyone would consider American journalists not giving Hitler a platform from which to defend genocide to be "censorship". Again, it's not and shouldn't be illegal, but just a really, really stupid idea. They are trying to make it illegal that's the thing. And yes, many including some on here would compare right wingers to Nazis. And even so, they interviewed Hitler many times. Heck, they even had a Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden at the height of the war! Because this is America so you should be free to be as dumb as you want to be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts