Jump to content

Georgia election laws and MLB


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, BillStime said:

These laws wouldn’t exist if they didn’t suppress someone right doc?

 

In this case it is voters who leveraged drive in voting.

 

Are you for or against For the People act?

 

Yeah: people who aren't allowed to vote.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yeah: people who aren't allowed to vote.

 


ie. voters who blue.

 

Governor Abbott, who uses a wheelchair - knows the convenience drive thru offers to caregivers.

 

Stop gaslighting and pushing the Big Lie because the SOB you voted for lost in a landslide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Yeah: people who aren't allowed to vote.  DOES NOT EQUAL   voters who blue.

 

It means those persons, no matter of sex, color, wealth, or political persuasion who are NOT eligible to vote cannot votes.

 

Thats how the law applies  ---- equally

 

 

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


Who are you talking about?  Caregivers for whom? 

 

That is a BillZtime squirrel Jim (as you know.)

 

 

"Drive through voting" is not necessary for voters, that is why Mail-in / Absentee ballots were developed.

 

but he wants to divert from his earlier B.S.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

back to the thread........

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/definite_sign_of_panic_pennsylvania_acting_secretary_of_state_issues_illegal_orders_to_obstruct_audit_of_2020_election.html

 

Definite sign of panic: Pennsylvania acting Secretary of State issues illegal orders to obstruct audit of 2020 election

By Thomas Lifson

 

Yesterday, I wrote that it looks like Pennsylvania Dems are panicking over the audit of the 2020 election announced by State Senator Doug Mastriano, chair of the state senate’s  Intergovernmental Operations Committee. Two days after the announcement of the audit, President Biden suddenly was scheduled for a trip to the Keystone State "to deliver remarks on actions to protect the sacred constitutional right to vote." Bringing the “The Big Guy” to pressure officials to obstruct access to the data which the state senate has an absolute right to examine.

 

But that was just half the story.

 

{snip}

 

So, the timeline is:

 

July 7:  Senator Mastriano announces his audit.

July 8:  Acting Secretary of State Degraffenreid orders local officials to obstruct access to the evidence.

July 9:  President Biden’s handlers schedule a trip to Pennsylvania, obviously to weigh in and force local officials to participate in the cover-up of evidence.

 

Senator Mastriano is not intimidated:

 

More at the link:

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:


ie. voters who blue.

 

 

 

 

“Republicans want every legal voter to be able to cast a legal vote for the candidate of their choice.”

 

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie puts into effective terms the actual goal of voting reform measures pushed by Republicans. It is a refreshing counter to some of the outlandish mischaracterizations that have been made by the left.

 

 

 

Facts matter. A leftist narrative takes a shellacking.

 

So important from @GovChristie

 

If Texas Democrats walk out again, they’ll effectively block those expanded ballot access efforts.

 

And they’re doing it for theater, because they know COVID drive-through voting was never meant to be permanent.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

“Republicans want every legal voter to be able to cast a legal vote for the candidate of their choice.”

 

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie puts into effective terms the actual goal of voting reform measures pushed by Republicans. It is a refreshing counter to some of the outlandish mischaracterizations that have been made by the left.

 

 

 

Facts matter. A leftist narrative takes a shellacking.

 

So important from @GovChristie

 

If Texas Democrats walk out again, they’ll effectively block those expanded ballot access efforts.

 

And they’re doing it for theater, because they know COVID drive-through voting was never meant to be permanent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

How many illegal votes were cast in 2020?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

How many illegal votes were cast in 2020?

 

No.

 

No more question answered for you.

 

Until you act like an adult poster.

 

Christie's point about democrat party's reaction to legislators trying to re-stabilize our elections is the point...............not an arbitrary number.

 

Your constant refusal to focus on what is being discussed and try to divert is not worth the effort.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

No.

 

No more question answered for you.

 

Until you act like an adult poster.

 

Christie's point about democrat party's reaction to legislators trying to re-stabilize our elections is the point...............not an arbitrary number.

 

Your constant refusal to focus on what is being discussed and try to divert is not worth the effort.

 

 

 

 

 

 

LMAO - adult poster? The one who spams the board non stop with far right wing garbage OPINIONS?

 

How many illegal votes were discovered in 2020? Why can't you answer the question, Mr Adult Poster you?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

How many illegal votes were discovered in 2020? Why can't you answer the question, Mr Adult Poster you?

 

 

You dullard.

 

It's not I can't answer the question,

 

it's I won't answer the question.

 

Because it is a dodge, an evasion, a childish attempt to avoid the point.

 

In other words it is the standard response from a dunce like yourself.

 

 

Imagine calling other opinions "garbage" when you didn't actually read them.

 

An adult would be embarrassed........................not Billzy.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

You dullard.

 

It's not I can't answer the question,

 

it's I won't answer the question.

 

Because it is a dodge, an evasion, a childish attempt to avoid the point.

 

In other words it is the standard response from a dunce like yourself.

 

 

Imagine calling other opinions "garbage" when you didn't actually read them.

 

An adult would be embarrassed........................not Billzy.

 

 

 

 

You can't answer a simple question... pathetic.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

You can't answer a simple question... pathetic.

 

 

I would have bet my house that that was going to be your weak-ass response....................you are empty.

 

 

 

Meanwhile:

 

Bro, WE KNOW: Democrat straight-up admits they have to cheat to win in 2022

 

 

While Democrats are busy trying to scare the crap out of Americans by telling them voting laws protecting their vote will actually SUPPRESS THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE,

 

Rep. Jim Clyburn is saying the quiet part out loud and admitting why they REALLY want to pass this election bill.

 

 

 

https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2021/07/11/bro-we-know-dem-says-quiet-part-out-loud-admits-they-will-lose-the-house-if-they-cant-squash-the-filibuster-and-pass-election-bill/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

I would have bet my house that that was going to be your weak-ass response....................you are empty.

 

 

 

Meanwhile:

 

Bro, WE KNOW: Democrat straight-up admits they have to cheat to win in 2022

 

 

While Democrats are busy trying to scare the crap out of Americans by telling them voting laws protecting their vote will actually SUPPRESS THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE,

 

Rep. Jim Clyburn is saying the quiet part out loud and admitting why they REALLY want to pass this election bill.

 

 

 

https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2021/07/11/bro-we-know-dem-says-quiet-part-out-loud-admits-they-will-lose-the-house-if-they-cant-squash-the-filibuster-and-pass-election-bill/

 

Your owners are failing you, Bonnie.

 

C'est dommage

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

back to the thread........

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/definite_sign_of_panic_pennsylvania_acting_secretary_of_state_issues_illegal_orders_to_obstruct_audit_of_2020_election.html

 

Definite sign of panic: Pennsylvania acting Secretary of State issues illegal orders to obstruct audit of 2020 election

By Thomas Lifson

 

Yesterday, I wrote that it looks like Pennsylvania Dems are panicking over the audit of the 2020 election announced by State Senator Doug Mastriano, chair of the state senate’s  Intergovernmental Operations Committee. Two days after the announcement of the audit, President Biden suddenly was scheduled for a trip to the Keystone State "to deliver remarks on actions to protect the sacred constitutional right to vote." Bringing the “The Big Guy” to pressure officials to obstruct access to the data which the state senate has an absolute right to examine.

 

But that was just half the story.

 

{snip}

 

So, the timeline is:

 

July 7:  Senator Mastriano announces his audit.

July 8:  Acting Secretary of State Degraffenreid orders local officials to obstruct access to the evidence.

July 9:  President Biden’s handlers schedule a trip to Pennsylvania, obviously to weigh in and force local officials to participate in the cover-up of evidence.

 

Senator Mastriano is not intimidated:

 

https://reports.agorafinancial.com/AWN_creditcard_071911_op/EAWNM849/index.htm;jsessionid=CF85FE44A0B2C1ED534E3FEDF6E6AA62?pageNumber=2More at the link:

 

 

 

This is representative of the core problem.  Confidence.  It doesn't matter if there was election fraud or not.  It doesn't matter if people casting votes were not eligible to cast a vote.  It doesn't matter if the "process" was fair or not.  It doesn't matter who won.  We can argue and debate the finer points of the election law or results until the Sun burns out and who is right or wrong won't matter. 

 

What matters is if there was election fraud a very large number of citizens know with 100% certainty that the officials running the system, the official responsible for overseeing the system, the media reporting on it, and everyone else involved would all lie about it whether or not it happened.  And would not investigate anything, would not look to find anything, and would obstruct and inhibit any audits and recounts by doing everything and anything they could to stop anyone else from finding any problems anywhere.

 

The record to date supports this view.  We are at the point of "systemic corruption".  Where every institution, not just those connected to the elections, is viewed as corrupt.  Its like Operation Mindcrime track 3.  Its not Democrats vs. Republicans, or liberals vs, conservatives, or left vs, right.  Its corruption and the consequences of corruption embedded in a lawless and self-serving government supported by its co-beneficiaries in the private sector such as big tech.  Right now what's in short supply is honesty and integrity.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

As many as the number of people who will be suppressed from voting because of the new election laws.

I am sorry Doc but that is not true- fraud is something you hide but if you are being oppressed or suppressed you scream it from the mountain tops. No one is being suppressed but all elections have fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The AllStar game had its second lowest rating ever barely beating it's 2019 numbers. I will admit that it is difficult to pin the blame on the politics since no one seems to care about baseball at all that I speak with. I think that maybe MLB was hoping to gain a few liberal viewers but MLB seems to just be treading water until soccer over takes it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

The AllStar game had its second lowest rating ever barely beating it's 2019 numbers. I will admit that it is difficult to pin the blame on the politics since no one seems to care about baseball at all that I speak with. I think that maybe MLB was hoping to gain a few liberal viewers but MLB seems to just be treading water until soccer over takes it. 


And since they moved the All-Star game GA has simultaneously burst into flames and chaos.  MLB showed them didn’t they. 
 

Like the kid who kicks and screams but no one pays him any mind 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


And since they moved the All-Star game GA has simultaneously burst into flames and chaos.  MLB showed them didn’t they. 
 

Like the kid who kicks and screams but no one pays him any mind 


Of course you’re giddy

 

image.thumb.jpeg.7a696fcc76b219fe604f695c7d0e7c7e.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

BUT THE NARRATIVE! 

 

Evidence Shows Georgia Hand Recount Was ‘Riddled With Massive Errors and Provable Fraud,’ Claims Lawsuit.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/07/14/evidence-shows-georgia-hand-recount-was-riddled-with-massive-errors-and-provable-fraud-claims-lawsuit-n1461756

Likely to follow. 

US AG Garland to send another team of DOJ civil rights lawyers to Georgia immediately. 

"Fact checkers" deployed by social media to block and delete content about GA audits. 

Launch of intelligence community disinformation and smear campaign to discredit the auditors. 

MSM will block, ignore, and dismiss news stories and sources on any irregularities insisting it was the fairest election ever.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Likely to follow. 

US AG Garland to send another team of DOJ civil rights lawyers to Georgia immediately. 

"Fact checkers" deployed by social media to block and delete content about GA audits. 

Launch of intelligence community disinformation and smear campaign to discredit the auditors. 

MSM will block, ignore, and dismiss news stories and sources on any irregularities insisting it was the fairest election ever.

 

 

 

 

Maybe the MSM will also point out that the allegations underpinning this lawsuit aren't verified.  Figure out what that means when you "do your research."

6 hours ago, Chef Jim said:


And since they moved the All-Star game GA has simultaneously burst into flames and chaos.  MLB showed them didn’t they. 
 

Like the kid who kicks and screams but no one pays him any mind 

You mean Antifa struck in Georgia, Chef Jim Crow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Maybe the MSM will also point out that the allegations underpinning this lawsuit aren't verified.  Figure out what that means when you "do your research."

You mean Antifa struck in Georgia, Chef Jim Crow?

There isn't a requirement for the left to "prove" or "verify" anything (which they never do) as evidenced by the continuous flow of false and misleading stories like the Russian collusion hoax.  So putting out news on investigations in progress is a legitimate activity.  And suggesting some reactions even if in jest to that news is well within my rights here to post.  So let's see how this plays out.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

There isn't a requirement for the left to "prove" or "verify" anything (which they never do) as evidenced by the continuous flow of false and misleading stories like the Russian collusion hoax.  So putting out news on investigations in progress is a legitimate activity.  And suggesting some reactions even if in jest to that news is well within my rights here to post.  So let's see how this plays out.     

 

You didn't do your research.  Try harder next time before you post another hoaxy response. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

You didn't do your research.  Try harder next time before you post another hoaxy response. 

Why do you come here just to be obnoxious? I know all of sometimes go there but you seem to never even try to offer something of substance, just name calling and insults.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Why do you come here just to be obnoxious? I know all of sometimes go there but you seem to never even try to offer something of substance, just name calling and insults.

I'm sorry that you've been triggered this morning.  Sad. 

 

Obnoxious is supporting the insurrection, Lysol treatments for COVID, Charlottesville, and general lies, misinformation, and histrionics (such as "why doesn't the left have to prove or verify anything!").  

 

For what it's worth, if you and your hoaxy pals "did your research" (properly), you'd note that the allegations in the GA lawsuit mentioned by All_Pro_Bills_HoaxMan aren't verified (sworn) by the attorneys.  So they have as much worth as the nonsense that's lobbed on this forum (Antifa! Fake news! Obama is a Muslim born in Indonesia! Burning Democrat Run Cities! Lysol and McDonald's secret sauce cures COVID!). 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

 

You didn't do your research.  Try harder next time before you post another hoaxy response. 

What research is necessary?  First there's no burden of proof meeting any legal standard here.  This isn't a court of law its a message board.

 

I'm merely providing my comment on what the opposition will likely do to block any progress.  That's my view, my opinion, plain and simple.  Posting on a story about the audit and the findings to date. You can either like it or not like it.   

 

So what "research" do you want me to do?  Fly down to Atlanta and interview the audit team and then give you a full report?  

 

It seems to me you're just looking to avoid addressing the very strong probability that some level of systemic fraud is going to be uncovered in Georgia.  Why don't you comment on that specific story instead of blowing a lot of smoke here?  And maybe give us your expert opinion on how the audit team's approach and methodology is flawed?

 

Frankly, your thought process is flawed here.  What you're saying is we cannot generate any original thoughts or have any opinions or views unless these views and opinions are confirmed and verified as "true" by experts.  Then we will be allowed to discuss the topic.  So no critical thinking or logical thinking is allowed.  Essentially your looking to impose some sort of pseudo censorship on our discussions unless the posts meet some "standard" you find acceptable. Nice..

 

 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BillStime said:


Of course you’re giddy

 

image.thumb.jpeg.7a696fcc76b219fe604f695c7d0e7c7e.jpeg

 

I am far from giddy.  And what in the ever loving Christ does that picture have to do with my post of the topic at hand?  Oh that's right.  NOTHING.  

 

Back to the tool shed with you!! 

2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

You mean Antifa struck in Georgia, Chef Jim Crow?

 

I have no idea what this means. 

 

I will ask you again.  Please explain why the GA voter law, in your mind, is Jim Crow on steroids?  Why can't you answer this simple question?  You must have reasons correct?  

 

You can join Billy Boy in the tool shed because that's all you are at this point

 

Carry on.............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

I am far from giddy.  And what in the ever loving Christ does that picture have to do with my post of the topic at hand?  Oh that's right.  NOTHING.  

 

Back to the tool shed with you!! 

 

I have no idea what this means. 

 

I will ask you again.  Please explain why the GA voter law, in your mind, is Jim Crow on steroids?  Why can't you answer this simple question?  You must have reasons correct?  

 

You can join Billy Boy in the tool shed because that's all you are at this point

 

Carry on.............

Asked and answered, Chef Jim Crow.  Do your research. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Asked and answered, Chef Jim Crow.  Do your research. 

 

I am doing my research. Why is, in your opinion, the Georgia Bill Jim Crow on steroids?  If you answered I'm sorry I missed it so can you please let me know why.  Shouldn't be too hard.   Humor me. 

Edited by Chef Jim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

I am doing my research. Why is, in your opinion, the Georgia Bill Jim Crow on steroids?  If you answered I'm sorry I missed it so can you please let me know why.  Shouldn't be too hard.   Humor me. 

 

He and his hoaxy pals can't answer that.  Neither can the real lawyers the Dems have hired.  Which is why the law will stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

He and his hoaxy pals can't answer that.  Neither can the real lawyers the Dems have hired.  Which is why the law will stand.

 

No one has answered it and the reason is because they can't. They constantly through ***** out like this with nothing to back it up.  Not even an opinion.  The cry at me when I ask questions but this is exactly why I ask them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

No one has answered it and the reason is because they can't. They constantly through ***** out like this with nothing to back it up.  Not even an opinion.  The cry at me when I ask questions but this is exactly why I ask them.  

The problem is the truth and facts invalidate and conflict with their argument and at the end of the day all that's left is meaningless slogans and symbols which have no application to the issue.   

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...