Jump to content

Biden's follies


Recommended Posts

 

 

Biden's ICE Chief packs it in

JENNIE TAER  June 06, 2023

 

The Biden administration’s head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will leave his post, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a statement Monday.

 

ICE Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director Tae D. Johnson will retire from his post, Mayorkas said. Johnson’s departure comes just days after Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz’s retirement announcement. (RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: Romanians Are Flooding The Border At Record Numbers And Committing Fraud Across The US)

 

“I am grateful to Tae Johnson for his service to ICE, the Department, and the nation. Mr. Johnson has been an integral member of ICE’s leadership team through multiple administrations,” Mayorkas said in his statement.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2023/06/05/biden-ice-chief-retirement/

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

This administration is out of control. It’s unfortunate that the safeguards put in place to prevent this from happening have been corrupted as well. We need the leaders of the Republican Party and the moderates on the left to stand up and take action before it’s too late.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Westside said:

This administration is out of control. It’s unfortunate that the safeguards put in place to prevent this from happening have been corrupted as well. We need the leaders of the Republican Party and the moderates on the left to stand up and take action before it’s too late.

 

That's why they need to impeach Joke next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

That's why they need to impeach Joke next year. 

 

The way he is going he might not even be here next year. Then we will have to deal with the useless cackling "Queen".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

That's why they need to impeach Joke next year. 

They shouldn't impeach Biden for a couple reasons.  The first being any such action would likely fail.  And why stoop to the no-class level actions the Democrats pulled with Trump, twice.  The second being the same reason allied military commanders near the end of World War 2 discouraged any plans to assassinate or remove Hitler.  He was a terrible military strategist and his lousy decisions hurt the German war effort.  Eliminating him risked having the decision making authority transferred to military commanders with the competence to make better decisions.  Joe is just a lousy President.  As demonstrated by his poor job performance polling numbers. 

 

Imagine how much more damage Joe can do before November 2024.  Why impeach him?  Let an extremely unpopular President run for a second term or force the DNC to go in another direction against an incumbent President's re-election bid.  Another candidate could easily disassociate their campaign from the awful record of the incumbent.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gregg said:

The way he is going he might not even be here next year. Then we will have to deal with the useless cackling "Queen".

 

1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

They shouldn't impeach Biden for a couple reasons.  The first being any such action would likely fail.  And why stoop to the no-class level actions the Democrats pulled with Trump, twice.  The second being the same reason allied military commanders near the end of World War 2 discouraged any plans to assassinate or remove Hitler.  He was a terrible military strategist and his lousy decisions hurt the German war effort.  Eliminating him risked having the decision making authority transferred to military commanders with the competence to make better decisions.  Joe is just a lousy President.  As demonstrated by his poor job performance polling numbers. 

 

Imagine how much more damage Joe can do before November 2024.  Why impeach him?  Let an extremely unpopular President run for a second term or force the DNC to go in another direction against an incumbent President's re-election bid.  Another candidate could easily disassociate their campaign from the awful record of the incumbent.  

 

He would get impeached in the House but won't be convicted in the Senate and thus not removed from Office.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JDHillFan said:

On 6/14/2023 at 8:25 AM,  redtail hawk said:

but has returned decorum and yes, decency to the office.
 

 

from the step back to grabbing his hands. looks like she has dealt with creeps like that prior.

 

 

 

 

got he is pathetic.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

KRISTI NOEM: “The best way to celebrate America’s Birthday is with fireworks at Mount Rushmore.

                         Today, the Biden Administration rejected them. Again.”

 

Which means: “The last time there were fireworks at Mount Rushmore was in 2020, when Trump was president, meaning that the Biden administration has denied it every year they have been in office.”

 

https://www.westernjournal.com/un-american-biden-admin-shuts-4th-july-celebration-near-national-landmark/

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Biden’s “Normal”: The President’s Constitutional Takes are Becoming More Unhinged from History

By Jonathan Turley

 

The decision of the Supreme Court to end the use of race in college admissions was not unexpected. Indeed, the rulings in cases involving Harvard and the University of North Carolina ended decades of muddled 5-4 decisions. Yet, President Joe Biden seemed to go into full attack mode and actually claimed that the Court gutted the constitutional guarantee that “all men and women are created equal.” In declaring that this Court was not “normal,” Biden further insisted that these admissions decisions and the Dobbs abortion decision reversed the gains that “we fought a war over in 1860” to secure.

 

In an interview on MSNBC’s “Deadline: White House,” President Biden accused the Court of ignoring what “the Constitution says: We hold these truths to be self-evident, all men and women are created equal, endowed by their creator.” That is actually the Declaration of Independence, but it was the substance of the point that was so baffling.

 

In barring the use of race in admissions, the Court believed that it was protecting that very guarantee. It erased what the Court viewed as a glaring anomaly in its cases in the treatment of racial discrimination in education as opposed to employment. It was the capstone opinion for Chief Justice John Roberts who in 2017 declared: “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”  In 2006, Roberts added: “It is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.”

 

The Court was enforcing what it saw as the “self-evident” guarantee referenced in the Declaration and later protected in the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court reaffirmed that all men and women are created equal and will be treated equally in both education and employment.

 

The President is not alone in such hyperbole. Figures like Whoopi Goldberg actually asked whether the decision means that we are “heading to no women in colleges soon? Who knows.”

 

We actually do know. An opinion rejecting the use of racial classification to determine who goes to college could not read by anyone as endorsing the exclusion of other groups.

 

The truly baffling statement was Biden’s claims over the Civil War. By leaving questions like the abortion to the states, Biden claims that the Court was reversing what was gained in that war. The criticism came in response to an opinion insisting that there is no place for racial discrimination in higher education. That would hardly seem an argument that would be embraced by the confederacy.

 

President Biden has long taken liberties with our constitutional history. Many of us have repeatedly objected to claims that he has made in areas like the Second Amendment. One of his most repeated lines is that the Second Amendment was passed with the understanding that certain guns would be banned and adding “You couldn’t buy a cannon, when in fact the Second Amendment passed.”

 

That happens to be utterly false. Yet, even after the Washington Post declared Biden’s understanding of the Second Amendment to be false, he has continued to make the same false assertion over and over again.

 

Now Biden has moved on to the Civil War and his revisionism is about as subtle as Sherman’s scorched “March to the Sea.”

 

https://jonathanturley.org/2023/06/30/bidens-civil-war-the-presidents-constitutional-takes-are-becoming-more-unhinged-from-history/

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

Biden bummer: Confidence in America dragged to ‘lowest’ point


“For perspective, Venezuelans have the same confidence in their government as Americans do in the Biden administration, Gallup said.”

 


 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/biden-bummer-confidence-in-america-dragged-to-lowest-point#google_vignette

 

But hey, it's not a revolving door...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...