Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Where's the mention of the Capital? 

 

Check and mate.

 

 

 

 

I think you meant the Capitol.  You also might want to brush up on that thing called circumstantial evidence.  Or not.  Either way it’s fine with me. 

41 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

OK. At this moment the description fits. YOU ARE AN IDIOT!

A pleasant afternoon to you as well.  

It’s sad that Chef Jim Crow, DoQ, and that Deek guy hate America so much that they don’t see a problem

with an attempt to defeat the will of the voters and to overthrow the government.  Maybe you guys could try Myanmar for awhile and see how it goes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

While not good, pepper spraying and not actually killing officer Sicknick was "better."  Which is why the idiots who assaulted him won't be charged with, much less convicted of, murder (or sedition or treason).

 

And Trump told his followers to storm the Capitol just like those dumb ####### Democrat pols told people to kill and injure people and destroy and loot property for 8 months last year.  See I can read into things what I want just as well as you can.  

 

Maybe the Capitol police should be asking why there wasn't more security that day?  Again it's not like everyone didn't know what was going to happen.  That would have been the best way to "back the blue."

 Cool.  So you admit that Trump encouraged the insurrection.  Now, tell me what democrats encouraged looting, etc.,  last year.  I don’t dispute that someone along the way probably did such a thing.  I just would like to know who it was and and what encouragement was given.  
 

also, your logic on the Capitol is akin to saying that “the girl deserved to be raped because of what she wore.”  Good stuff, DoQ. 

 

Edited by SectionC3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

I think you meant the Capitol.  You also might want to brush up on that thing called circumstantial evidence.  Or not.  Either way it’s fine with me. 

A pleasant afternoon to you as well.  

It’s sad that Chef Jim Crow, DoQ, and that Deek guy hate America so much that they don’t see a problem

with an attempt to defeat the will of the voters and to overthrow the government.  Maybe you guys could try Myanmar for awhile and see how it goes.  

Yawn!


Don’t lash out at me. You’re the one who posted quotes that in no way tell anyone to storm the Capitol. I’m just reacting to your pathetic attempt at constructing a narrative. 

 

Were those numbskulls wrong for storming the Capitol? Yes they were wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

I think you meant the Capitol.  You also might want to brush up on that thing called circumstantial evidence.  Or not.  Either way it’s fine with me. 

A pleasant afternoon to you as well.  

 

 

Sorry Capitol.  At what point did Trump tell people to "Storm the Capitol"?  Based on your quotes from his speech he told them to march down the street.  

 

Check and mate. 

10 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

It’s sad that Chef Jim Crow, DoQ, and that Deek guy hate America so much that they don’t see a problem

with an attempt to defeat the will of the voters and to overthrow the government.  Maybe you guys could try Myanmar for awhile and see how it goes.  

 

Oh we see a problem all right and it has nothing to do with America, the riots or people's democratic right to vote.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Yawn!


Don’t lash out at me. You’re the one who posted quotes that in no way tell anyone to storm the Capitol. I’m just reacting to your pathetic attempt at constructing a narrative. 

 

Were those numbskulls wrong for storming the Capitol? Yes they were wrong.

Nobody lashed out at you, sir.  I sense you’re a bit triggered today with your name-calling.  

 

Let’s move on to the question whether Trump was wrong in encouraging his followers to “Walk down Pennsylvania Avenue!”  “Show strength!”  “Fight like hell!”  You goofs can’t have it both ways - on the one hand, DoQ is saying that the cops should have been better prepared because it was a tinder box.  On the other hand, literalists Crow and Deek—who also deny the existence of circumstantial evidence—seem to think the encouragement to “march” and to “fight” and to “show strength” to the same crowd that DoQ thinks comprised a tinder box was perfectly fine and in no way could have catalyzed the assault upon the Capitol.  When you guys get your act together, let me know.  

5 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Sorry Capitol.  At what point did Trump tell people to "Storm the Capitol"?  Based on your quotes from his speech he told them to march down the street.  

 

Check and mate. 

 

Oh we see a problem all right and it has nothing to do with America, the riots or people's democratic right to vote.  

What’s the problem?  Low self-esteem?  That’s sort of the vibe that I get out of you.  No offense. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

how about all of us who listened to Trumps speech and didnt riot?  we didnt get the message i guess.  didnt the actual problem people go there before the end of Trumps speech?  seems like the used their own minds too, even if they are idiots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Nice.  Using quotes for the first time I see.  You still spelled Capitol incorrectly.  

 

I'm using quotes because I'm quoting you counselor.

 

So at what point did Trump tell the folks at the rally to, in your words, "Storm the Capitol"? 

 

At what point did he tell them to go to the steps of the Capitol?

 

At what point did he tell them to enter the Capitol?

 

As a matter of fact he only used the word Capitol twice in the speech neither of which had anything to do with the folks at the rally going there.  

 

Have you won one match from me?  

 

How about the best of 9?  

 

You move from one trolling expedition to another with me because you lose them all.  

27 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

What’s the problem?  Low self-esteem?  That’s sort of the vibe that I get out of you.  No offense. 

 

Oh so now your an online psychologist?  

 

No problem counselor.  Just getting a kick out of watching  you jump from topic to topic like the good troll you are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

Nobody lashed out at you, sir.  I sense you’re a bit triggered today with your name-calling.  

 

Let’s move on to the question whether Trump was wrong in encouraging his followers to “Walk down Pennsylvania Avenue!”  “Show strength!”  “Fight like hell!”  You goofs can’t have it both ways - on the one hand, DoQ is saying that the cops should have been better prepared because it was a tinder box.  On the other hand, literalists Crow and Deek—who also deny the existence of circumstantial evidence—seem to think the encouragement to “march” and to “fight” and to “show strength” to the same crowd that DoQ thinks comprised a tinder box was perfectly fine and in no way could have catalyzed the assault upon the Capitol.  When you guys get your act together, let me know.  

What’s the problem?  Low self-esteem?  That’s sort of the vibe that I get out of you.  No offense. 

So you’re saying people can’t “walk down Pennsylvania Avenue” anymore? I’m not seeing how any of YOUR examples support the narrative you’re intent on promoting. Please tell me you’ve got more than that. Remember, those are YOUR examples Mr Prosecutor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 Cool.  So you admit that Trump encouraged the insurrection.  Now, tell me what democrats encouraged looting, etc.,  last year.  I don’t dispute that someone along the way probably did such a thing.  I just would like to know who it was and and what encouragement was given.  
 

also, your logic on the Capitol is akin to saying that “the girl deserved to be raped because of what she wore.”  Good stuff, DoQ.

 

Great Gibbons, you admit that Waters, Booker, Castro and even Pelosi told people to riot.  One lasted 8 months, led to more crime nationally and has a great chance of happening over and over.  The other lasted 8 hours, was self-limited and will never happen again.

 

And the last sentence is silly.  The Capitol police officers at the Capitol had no control over how much security was provided that day.  Again they should be directing their anger at those who rebuffed requests for significantly more security that day, as things likely wouldn't have gotten to the point they did.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Great Gibbons, you admit that Waters, Booker, Castro and even Pelosi told people to riot.  One lasted 8 months, led to more crime nationally and has a great chance of happening over and over.  The other lasted 8 hours, was self-limited and will never happen again.

 

And the last sentence is silly.  The Capitol police officers at the Capitol had no control over how much security was provided that day.  Again they should be directing their anger at those who rebuffed requests for significantly more security that day, as things likely wouldn't have gotten to the point they did.

 

will ferrell laughing GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.yahoo.com/news/group-accused-plotting-kidnap-michigan-144724252.html

The group accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov. Whitmer was riddled with

FBI informants who took leading roles, according to BuzzFeed

 

Some of the informants, including an Iraq war veteran, reportedly took leading roles in the scheme.

For example, an Iraq war veteran informant "became so deeply enmeshed in a Michigan militant group" that he rose to second-in-command of the group, BuzzFeed reported.

The war vet told members of the group to convene with other potential suspects and even paid for members' transportation to meetings, according to the news outlet.

Another man who advised the militia group on where to place explosives and offered to get as many as needed was also an informant, BuzzFeed reported.

New information on the extent of the FBI's involvement has raised questions as to whether there would have even been a conspiracy to take down the Democratic governor without their help.

 

It gets better:

A special agent with the FBI involved in the operation that resulted in a group of men being charged for allegedly plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer was criminally charged on Monday in connection to a domestic incident.

Richard Trask was arraigned in a Michigan court on one count of assault with intent to do great bodily harm, less than a murder charge, after a domestic incident with his wife on Sunday. He was subsequently released on a $10,000 recognizance bond, according to the Detroit News.

 

 

I can't help but laugh.

Edited by Unforgiven
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...