WEATHER DOT COM Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Just now, westside2 said: Go pound some yen CCP traitor. You're worse than BillZtime 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 1 hour ago, Doc said: This is patently false. Russian collusion is still believed by the entirety of the left despite 4 years of failure to prove a single thing. That's the definition of refusing to accept the results of an election. And impeachment happened because they had a majority in the House and wanted desperately to get him on something. Not unlike Clinton with lying about a BJ, although at least there Clinton perjured himself. As for trying to unilaterally jail people...who has been jailed? No. The definition of refusing to accept an election result would be to dispute it by legal means, as Trump has said he may do if he loses.. Trying to unilaterally jail people isn't the same as someone being jailed. Do you really not understand the difference? 6 minutes ago, westside2 said: Go pound some yen CCP traitor. You must be an attorney with those oratory skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 21 hours ago, Unforgiven said: What world do you live in? Bernie isn't running ergo scratch Socialism No Guns? Hardly. It's Heep Guns out of the hands of unstable people (Don's followers) Worship the Government? What about Worshiping Donald Fat Assed Trump? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teddy KGB Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 6 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: What world do you live in? Bernie isn't running ergo scratch Socialism No Guns? Hardly. It's Heep Guns out of the hands of unstable people (Don's followers) Worship the Government? What about Worshiping Donald Fat Assed Trump? Lmao. Why does Don’s figure bring you to tears? How is a 60 year old man this dumb ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 50 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said: How is a 60 year old man this dumb ? Practice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 1 hour ago, Kemp said: No. The definition of refusing to accept an election result would be to dispute it by legal means, as Trump has said he may do if he loses.. Trying to unilaterally jail people isn't the same as someone being jailed. Do you really not understand the difference? You must be an attorney with those oratory skills. You must be a traitor to the United States with those commie views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 (edited) 53 minutes ago, westside2 said: You must be a traitor to the United States with those commie views. Commie views? Are you pretending to be an idiot? Are you really this simple? I'm beginning to believe that Westside is a composite of stereotypes someone invented. Is he a cartoon character? Edited October 21, 2020 by Kemp 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plano Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 On 10/18/2020 at 9:13 AM, All_Pro_Bills said: When you can't refute fact use the old go-to move here? 1000% BS on the Russia story here. Aren't we bored with this narrative yet which has zero, absolutely zero proof or facts to drive it? The facts show the source e-mails and data are legitimate. BIDEN TOTALLY BUSTED. GAME OVER! you honestly think people give a *****? Hunter Biden isn't running for president. /thread /trump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 17 minutes ago, Plano said: you honestly think people give a *****? Hunter Biden isn't running for president. /thread /trump Of course people care, at least some people do. The only question is whether or not it swings voters into one column or another. You may not care about it, business as usual in Washington, but I’m thinking you were unTrumpian to begin with. I care, but my vote was decided long ago with some wiggle room in case something that bothered me came up. It’s not us that matter, really. It’ll be must see TV to see how Trump approaches Biden about Hunter at the debate, how Biden handles it and we go from there. It’s sad imo, but that’s the way the game is played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 Trump’s own business history is filled with overseas financial deals, and some have involved the Chinese state. He spent a decade unsuccessfully pursuing projects in China, operating an office there during his first run for president and forging a partnership with a major government-controlled company. And it turns out that China is one of only three foreign nations — the others are Britain and Ireland — where Trump maintains a bank account, according to an analysis of the president’s tax records, which were obtained by The New York Times. The foreign accounts do not show up on Trump’s public financial disclosures, where he must list personal assets, because they are held under corporate names. The identities of the financial institutions are not clear. The Chinese account is controlled by Trump International Hotels Management LLC, which the tax records show paid $188,561 in taxes in China while pursuing licensing deals there from 2013 to 2015. https://news.yahoo.com/trump-records-shed-light-chinese-120755338.html TeddyTrump insinuated I’m dumb huh? the same clown that can’t define Antifia after a year of being asked what it means? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 17 hours ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said: No doubt about it Three of the attorneys that represented Trump during his impeachment were attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, Kemp said: No. The definition of refusing to accept an election result would be to dispute it by legal means, as Trump has said he may do if he loses.. Trying to unilaterally jail people isn't the same as someone being jailed. Do you really not understand the difference? Tell me about Bush v. Gore... You can't unilaterally jail people in this country. And no, it hasn't happened and won't happen under Trump. Edited October 21, 2020 by Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Kemp said: Three of the attorneys that represented Trump during his impeachment were attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. One of the attorneys that represented Trump during his impeachment is accused of raping a 17 yeard old acquantaince of Epstein's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 17 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Of course people care, at least some people do. The only question is whether or not it swings voters into one column or another. You may not care about it, business as usual in Washington, but I’m thinking you were unTrumpian to begin with. I care, but my vote was decided long ago with some wiggle room in case something that bothered me came up. It’s not us that matter, really. It’ll be must see TV to see how Trump approaches Biden about Hunter at the debate, how Biden handles it and we go from there. It’s sad imo, but that’s the way the game is played. Going after Hunter will be an awful move. If it's being brought up it needs to be kept to Joe's direct actions and involvement. Anything beyond that will not play well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Going after Hunter will be an awful move. If it's being brought up it needs to be kept to Joe's direct actions and involvement. Anything beyond that will not play well. Who is bringing that up? The people that cried foul over Don Jr's meeting with a Russian lawyer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 9 minutes ago, Doc said: Who is bringing that up? The people that cried foul over Don Jr's meeting with a Russian lawyer? I'm pretty sure it was one of the things that played the worst across the board for him in the first debate. At least in the post-debate feedback I consumed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 27 minutes ago, Doc said: Tell me about Bush v. Gore... You can't unilaterally jail people in this country. And no, it hasn't happened and won't happen under Trump. Because Barr is blocking Trump's attempts. True or not true? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 43 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Going after Hunter will be an awful move. If it's being brought up it needs to be kept to Joe's direct actions and involvement. Anything beyond that will not play well. I disagree, though I would not have a few years ago. The Hunter story is about graft, corruption and pay for play. The fact that the guy has addiction issues, stripper issues and sleep with his dead brother’s wife issues are one thing, and should be left off the table..except... Hunter getting a cushy job, his father shaking down the Ukrainians and bragging about it like he’s Boss Tweed, combined with all the rest hits right to the point many disenchanted voters feel that Washington is all about—patronage and backwater deals. The game is played the way it’s played. Kavanaugh a serial rapist. Romney a serial chauvinist. Trump every version of a -phobe there is. Don Trump Jr part of the Russian collision tale. Ivanka is a feckless ...... You have your shot, take it. I agree you make it about Joe by talking about Hunter, but that’s the way it goes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 36 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: I'm pretty sure it was one of the things that played the worst across the board for him in the first debate. At least in the post-debate feedback I consumed Maybe then, but things have changed now. 28 minutes ago, Kemp said: Because Barr is blocking Trump's attempts. True or not true? He is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 27 minutes ago, Doc said: Maybe then, but things have changed now. He is? Trump has asked him to go after Biden. You've heard him say it. Barr doesn't seem anxious to do what Trump is asking of him. Is this news to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 10 minutes ago, Kemp said: Trump has asked him to go after Biden. You've heard him say it. Barr doesn't seem anxious to do what Trump is asking of him. Is this news to you? it’s not just the Biden’s. he wants him to go after every Democratic that speaks out about him. He’ll, I bet he’s got a hush order out on Romney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: it’s not just the Biden’s. he wants him to go after every Democratic that speaks out about him. He’ll, I bet he’s got a hush order out on Romney ...well if you say so, that MUST be the case...SMH.......keep reading MEIN Kemp's posts....... Edited October 21, 2020 by OldTimeAFLGuy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 7 hours ago, aristocrat said: that's bidens son's business partner who is now cooperating and confirming the biden story. Do you know who cooperated and confirmed Trump's charity illegally used $2,000,000 of charitable funds for himself on things like a painting of himself and a Tim Tebow helmet? Trump himself when he was caught, forced to pay back the $2,000,000 to other charities and sign a statement acknowledging he broke the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragoon Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 On 10/18/2020 at 8:25 AM, SectionC3 said: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/e2-80-98lock-up-the-bidens-e2-80-99-trump-says-at-georgia-campaign-rally/ar-BB1a75L6 This is the stuff of banana republic dictators. It's what happens when we accommodate extremism. It has to end. There is no space for the unjustified incarceration of a political rival in any corner of this democracy. There is no space for the leader of this country to suggest such incarceration. And there should be no space for anyone to support that behavior, be it overtly, covertly, directly, or indirectly. This will be my last post here for awhile. It's come to my attention that my bluntness and honesty has hurt the feelings of some very tender Trump supporters here, and in doing so I may have hurt this website. I couldn't care less about the former issue; it's ironic and pathetic that a bunch of people who support misogyny, xenophobia, dog-whistle racism, and the unjustified incarceration of political opponents, and who lack the empathy to wear a mask to protect their neighbors during a pandemic, have complained about and are so damaged by the expression of truth. The latter issue, however, matters. I don't want to hurt this business, and I don't want to imperil this website. I've also wasted too much time here, amusing as it may be. So, I'll stand back and stand by for awhile. Hoax. I'm not a scumbag who supports the Proud Boys. But I will go away for awhile. That's the truth. Best of luck, and choose wisely in October/November. The fate of our democracy depends on it. Go Bills. I will see you all in happier times. Nobody respects you enough for you to be the source of hurt feelings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 21, 2020 Share Posted October 21, 2020 1 hour ago, Kemp said: Trump has asked him to go after Biden. You've heard him say it. Barr doesn't seem anxious to do what Trump is asking of him. Is this news to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Improved DC Tom Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 2 hours ago, Dragoon said: Nobody respects you enough for you to be the source of hurt feelings. Counterpoint: he has no rational thought. Only feelings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 6 hours ago, Doc said: Maybe then, but things have changed now. He is? Oh. I forgot. Barr said he would do as Trump asked. Maybe in another dimension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teddy KGB Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 (edited) 10 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said: Trump’s own business history is filled with overseas financial deals, and some have involved the Chinese state. He spent a decade unsuccessfully pursuing projects in China, operating an office there during his first run for president and forging a partnership with a major government-controlled company. And it turns out that China is one of only three foreign nations — the others are Britain and Ireland — where Trump maintains a bank account, according to an analysis of the president’s tax records, which were obtained by The New York Times. The foreign accounts do not show up on Trump’s public financial disclosures, where he must list personal assets, because they are held under corporate names. The identities of the financial institutions are not clear. The Chinese account is controlled by Trump International Hotels Management LLC, which the tax records show paid $188,561 in taxes in China while pursuing licensing deals there from 2013 to 2015. https://news.yahoo.com/trump-records-shed-light-chinese-120755338.html TeddyTrump insinuated I’m dumb huh? the same clown that can’t define Antifia after a year of being asked what it means? Says the idiot whose scared Trumps goons are going to accost him at the polling stations Youre 8 stages past dumb. You’re a poor example of a man. Lay off the pot, it’s making you paranoid. Edited October 22, 2020 by Teddy KGB 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 9 hours ago, Kemp said: Oh. I forgot. Barr said he would do as Trump asked. Maybe in another dimension. So is Barr the good guy, keeping Trump in check? Or is he Trump's cleaner, doing his bidding and falsifying evidence against political enemies to force investigations and dropping charges against his allies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: So is Barr the good guy, keeping Trump in check? Or is he Trump's cleaner, doing his bidding and falsifying evidence against political enemies to force investigations and dropping charges against his allies? Like most people in DC, I suspect Barr is in it for himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 Anyone ever know anyone who calls themself "magnificently brilliant" besides Trump? If someone else said this same thing to you, what would you think of them? 3 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: So is Barr the good guy, keeping Trump in check? Or is he Trump's cleaner, doing his bidding and falsifying evidence against political enemies to force investigations and dropping charges against his allies? It's not a binary choice. Barr has been doing Trump's bidding. This particular order from Trump to Barr seems to be beyond what Barr is willing to do, probably for fear it could cause him legal troubles down the line. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 22 minutes ago, Kemp said: It's not a binary choice. Barr has been doing Trump's bidding. This particular order from Trump to Barr seems to be beyond what Barr is willing to do, probably for fear it could cause him legal troubles down the line. Do you think that nothing Barr has done previously could backfire legally? Or are his actions likely justified based on evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 20 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Do you think that nothing Barr has done previously could backfire legally? Or are his actions likely justified based on evidence? I think other things he's done could backfire on him, maybe legally, or maybe as something to force him out of public life because of being disgraced. I believe they are likely unjustified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 On 10/21/2020 at 8:24 AM, Kemp said: Trump has broken the law of the Emoluments clause of the Constitution. That's an indisputable fact. Should he be prosecuted? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Gary M said: 1. This has nothing to do with what will happen after Trump leaves office. Let's see what happens then. Remember what Trump's lawyers have argued, to date. 2. Trump has an overtly friendly Supreme Court.https://www.acslaw.org/expertforum/profiting-off-the-presidency-trumps-violations-of-the-emoluments-clauses/ Edited October 22, 2020 by Kemp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Kemp said: I think other things he's done could backfire on him, maybe legally, or maybe as something to force him out of public life because of being disgraced. I believe they are likely unjustified. Opinion duly noted. And opinions... 1 hour ago, Gary M said: Good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 2 hours ago, Kemp said: 1. This has nothing to do with what will happen after Trump leaves office. Let's see what happens then. Remember what Trump's lawyers have argued, to date. You said he is violation Emoluments clasue, a private person can't do that. 2 hours ago, Kemp said: 2. Trump has an overtly friendly Supreme Court. 🤣😂🤣 2 hours ago, Kemp said: https://www.acslaw.org/expertforum/profiting-off-the-presidency-trumps-violations-of-the-emoluments-clauses/ ^^^ Opinion Blog ^^^^ 🤡 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 12 minutes ago, Gary M said: You said he is violation Emoluments clasue, a private person can't do that. 🤣😂🤣 ^^^ Opinion Blog ^^^^ 🤡 The Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution prohibits the President from accepting any benefits from foreign states unless he first obtains the consent of Congress. President Trump has never sought or received such consent. The Founders adopted the Foreign Emoluments Clause because they believed America would be harmed if federal officeholders, including the President, made policy decisions based on their own self-interest rather than the national interest. There is nothing members of Congress can do to redress this constitutional violation so long as the President is accepting foreign government benefits without first obtaining congressional consent. That’s why the courts must enforce the Constitution. 18 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...well if you say so, that MUST be the case...SMH.......keep reading MEIN Kemp's posts....... If you knew how stupidly ironic this post is..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 (edited) For 3 yrs. she couldn't shut her mouth lying about Trump/Russia. Now, no comment on the most treasonous act ever committed by a Presidential candidate. The Left considers her silence on Biden's dirty work as Patriotic. Edited October 22, 2020 by I am the egg man 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted October 22, 2020 Share Posted October 22, 2020 Belleavia just played Nancy's statement. He said it sounded like a kidnapping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts