Jump to content

Domestic terrorist attack in Wisconsin


Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

It would appear that some people are equating killing a convicted pedophile with killing innocent 12 year olds. If this applies to you then you truly need counselor of of the most intense kind.


Wait - since when does the cult care about children?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9dbb7112b0f2b5955b872c08bf722ecb.jpeg

 

You can shove those fake tears 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Same old Billstime, never anything new, and certainly never any improvement in posts.

 

Make a foolish statement to try (and fail) to incite a response.

 

Then come back after his ass is handed to him and claim that

 

 

 

 

40 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Wait - since when does the cult care about children?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9dbb7112b0f2b5955b872c08bf722ecb.jpeg

 

You can shove those fake tears 

 

23 minutes ago, BillStime said:


image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

 

 

Same responses over and over and over and over and over and over.................

 

He uses the dead children of Sandy Hook........and now Waukesha

 

same LMAO 5 to 6 times a day

 

same Fake shaking Trump photo 5 to 6 times a day.

 

what an embarrassment.

 

 

 

and he will reply with nonsense calling you sweetie or dear, and puff himself up.

 

an embarrassment to the board.

 

 

BACK TO THE THREAD.

 

MEET THE PROGRESSIVE D.A. BEHIND THE WAUKESHA BAIL CATASTROPHE:

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/meet-progressive-da-behind-waukesha-bail-catastrophe/

 

[John] Chisholm, who was elected in 2007, supports deferrals for some misdemeanors and “low-level” felonies in order to cut down on incarcerations. And he’s taken credit for inspiring a new wave of prosecutors in cities like San Francisco, St. Louis, and Philadelphia who have enacted similar reforms. Chisholm congratulated San Francisco district attorney Chesa Boudin following his election in 2019, and the pair spoke at a forum earlier this year on the status of the progressive prosecutor movement.

 

Chisholm and other progressives support reforms to the cash-bail system, which they say criminalizes poverty. He has acknowledged that his reform-minded approach could put murderers back on the streets of Milwaukee.

 

“Is there going to be an individual I divert, or I put into [a] treatment program, who’s going to go out and kill somebody?” he told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in 2007. “You bet. Guaranteed. It’s guaranteed to happen. It does not invalidate the overall approach.”

 

The Milwaukee DA said his office recommended $1,000 bail for Brooks following his arrest on Nov. 5 on charges that he punched his girlfriend in the face and hit her with his vehicle in a gas station parking lot. The woman is identified only by her initials in court papers, which indicate they have a child together. Brooks was also charged with eluding police officers when they arrived to take him into custody.

 

Naturally, “In the aftermath of the Waukesha car attack that left multiple locals dead and dozens wounded, Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm has called for an investigation into the ‘inappropriately low’ cash bond offered to alleged perpetrator Darrell Brooks Jr.”

In much the same way that the Biden administration is conducting investigations into the mysterious sources of higher oil prices and inflation.

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Same responses over and over and over and over and over and over.................

 

He uses the dead children of Sandy Hook........and now Waukesha

 

same LMAO 5 to 6 times a day

 

same Fake shaking Trump photo 5 to 6 times a day.

 

what an embarrassment.

 

 

 

and he will reply with nonsense calling you sweetie or dear, and puff himself up.

 

an embarrassment to the board.

 

 

BACK TO THE THREAD.

 

MEET THE PROGRESSIVE D.A. BEHIND THE WAUKESHA BAIL CATASTROPHE:

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/meet-progressive-da-behind-waukesha-bail-catastrophe/

 

[John] Chisholm, who was elected in 2007, supports deferrals for some misdemeanors and “low-level” felonies in order to cut down on incarcerations. And he’s taken credit for inspiring a new wave of prosecutors in cities like San Francisco, St. Louis, and Philadelphia who have enacted similar reforms. Chisholm congratulated San Francisco district attorney Chesa Boudin following his election in 2019, and the pair spoke at a forum earlier this year on the status of the progressive prosecutor movement.

 

Chisholm and other progressives support reforms to the cash-bail system, which they say criminalizes poverty. He has acknowledged that his reform-minded approach could put murderers back on the streets of Milwaukee.

 

“Is there going to be an individual I divert, or I put into [a] treatment program, who’s going to go out and kill somebody?” he told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in 2007. “You bet. Guaranteed. It’s guaranteed to happen. It does not invalidate the overall approach.”

 

The Milwaukee DA said his office recommended $1,000 bail for Brooks following his arrest on Nov. 5 on charges that he punched his girlfriend in the face and hit her with his vehicle in a gas station parking lot. The woman is identified only by her initials in court papers, which indicate they have a child together. Brooks was also charged with eluding police officers when they arrived to take him into custody.

 

Naturally, “In the aftermath of the Waukesha car attack that left multiple locals dead and dozens wounded, Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm has called for an investigation into the ‘inappropriately low’ cash bond offered to alleged perpetrator Darrell Brooks Jr.”

In much the same way that the Biden administration is conducting investigations into the mysterious sources of higher oil prices and inflation.

 

 

 


You don’t like to see your hypocrisy shoved in your face?

 

Too freakn bad Bonnie! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top line question: should the Brooks' murders be charged under hate crime circumstances?

 

1. I've just carefully reviewed the "full video" of the carnage (8 sub-vids) pulled from the entire length of the event, approx 1m20s of blowing thru people.

 

2. Won't post or link here...not recommended to watch unless you're used to seeing such things.

 

3. Brooks drove E-W along the entire northern portion of the route, circa 0.6 miles!

 

4. I counted at least 6 intersections he could've exited, before finally driving thru barriers at W end of Main St.

 

5. This, along w reviewing his social media (prior to scrub), leads to clear indication he doesn't like certain races.

 

6. Totality of evidence may suggest racially purposeful murders (as a manner of speaking), though that may not have been initial intent.

 

Personally, my answer would be "no" as I'm not a supporter of hate crime legislation/prosecution.

 

Reasonable thoughts on this welcomed.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

UNEXPECTEDLY: Get ready to forget the Waukesha attack.

 

It least five people were killed and more than forty were injured on Sunday night when a driver plowed his SUV into attendees of the annual Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin. The driver has been identified in news reports as Darrell Edward Brooks Jr.

 

The horrific attack immediately made national news because of the death toll and brutal nature of the crime. Videos surfaced online showing the driver veering towards members of the parade and narrowly missing many others. Sunday’s incident appeared eerily similar to the 2016 Berlin terror attack, where an ISIS member killed twelve people by ramming his truck through a Christmas market.

 

However it seems probable that Waukesha will be memory-holed by the agenda-driven media because Brooks was a black man and, according to his social media, an anti-white supporter of Black Lives Matter. This doesn’t comport with the leftist media’s demonization of white men, whose alleged privilege and toxicity are the biggest threat to America.

 

I don’t claim to know that Brooks was motivated by his anti-white hatred, but I do find it suspicious that the media was so eager to rule out terrorism. In fact, CNN, CBS and other outlets were reporting on an alternative motive before they had even publicly identified a suspect. The explanation they have offered as to why Brooks drove into a crowd of hundreds of people would make even the lowest IQ individual scratch their head.

 

Apparently, Brooks was fleeing another crime scene (“possibly a knife fight”) when he ran into the parade. It makes perfect sense, you see, when evading possible arrest to drive to a highly populated area with a heavier police presence and swerve into innocent civilians.

 

No one with two brain cells would think that this makes any sense, but mainstream outlets are breathlessly repeating it without offering an ounce of skepticism. Will this turn into another Las Vegas shooting? It’s been five years since that mass murder event and we still don’t have a satisfactory answer as to why Stephen Paddock would kill dozens of country concert attendees.

 

https://spectatorworld.com/topic/waukesha-wisconsin-christmas-darrell-brooks-media/

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, B-Man said:

UNEXPECTEDLY: Get ready to forget the Waukesha attack.

 

It least five people were killed and more than forty were injured on Sunday night when a driver plowed his SUV into attendees of the annual Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin. The driver has been identified in news reports as Darrell Edward Brooks Jr.

 

The horrific attack immediately made national news because of the death toll and brutal nature of the crime. Videos surfaced online showing the driver veering towards members of the parade and narrowly missing many others. Sunday’s incident appeared eerily similar to the 2016 Berlin terror attack, where an ISIS member killed twelve people by ramming his truck through a Christmas market.

 

However it seems probable that Waukesha will be memory-holed by the agenda-driven media because Brooks was a black man and, according to his social media, an anti-white supporter of Black Lives Matter. This doesn’t comport with the leftist media’s demonization of white men, whose alleged privilege and toxicity are the biggest threat to America.

 

I don’t claim to know that Brooks was motivated by his anti-white hatred, but I do find it suspicious that the media was so eager to rule out terrorism. In fact, CNN, CBS and other outlets were reporting on an alternative motive before they had even publicly identified a suspect. The explanation they have offered as to why Brooks drove into a crowd of hundreds of people would make even the lowest IQ individual scratch their head.

 

Apparently, Brooks was fleeing another crime scene (“possibly a knife fight”) when he ran into the parade. It makes perfect sense, you see, when evading possible arrest to drive to a highly populated area with a heavier police presence and swerve into innocent civilians.

 

No one with two brain cells would think that this makes any sense, but mainstream outlets are breathlessly repeating it without offering an ounce of skepticism. Will this turn into another Las Vegas shooting? It’s been five years since that mass murder event and we still don’t have a satisfactory answer as to why Stephen Paddock would kill dozens of country concert attendees.

 

https://spectatorworld.com/topic/waukesha-wisconsin-christmas-darrell-brooks-media/

 

 

I also noticed the LSM made no mention of his long criminal past or his apparent racial background. If he was white , I believe it would have been mentioned and terrorism speculation by the media would be rampant. If this man had been shot in the mayhem, any mention of his name would be followed by “ a black man “The LSM is a propaganda machine and a total joke show . 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dukestreetking said:

Personally, my answer would be "no" as I'm not a supporter of hate crime legislation/prosecution.

 

You know who else was a vocal opponent of hate crime legislation?

 

On 4/28/2014 at 3:38 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

And it's for that reason that I think "hate crimes" are an over-correction that do far more harm than good.

 

On 6/5/2014 at 12:07 AM, Deranged Rhino said:

The notion of legislating or criminalizing thought, which hate crimes do by their very existence, is chilling to me overall.

 

Dumb question, of course you do.

 

smfh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by BillStime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Chef Jim said:


They’re afraid.  Rittenhouse has sure calmed the waters.  
 

🙄

He did!

He is not guilty.

But the people around him that created this version of a young boy are guilty. His victims were not innocent and neither were the rioters.

This is a society guilty issue.

Now KR is talking about Biden and malice and defamation, words that he couldn't understand without the adults in his life feeding him. 

Nice boy, doing as he is told by crappy adults. They sacrificed him and almost put him in jail as they sit and drink their long necks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

He did!

He is not guilty.

But the people around him that created this version of a young boy are guilty. His victims were not innocent and neither were the rioters.

This is a society guilty issue.

Now KR is talking about Biden and malice and defamation, words that he couldn't understand without the adults in his life feeding him. 

Nice boy, doing as he is told by crappy adults. They sacrificed him and almost put him in jail as they sit and drink their long necks.


He was defamed, with actual malice. He has lawyers feeding him that because he will, and should, sue the ***** out of any number of public officials and media members. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Same responses over and over and over and over and over and over.................

 

He uses the dead children of Sandy Hook........and now Waukesha

 

same LMAO 5 to 6 times a day

 

same Fake shaking Trump photo 5 to 6 times a day.

 

what an embarrassment.

 

 

 

and he will reply with nonsense calling you sweetie or dear, and puff himself up.

 

an embarrassment to the board.

 

 

BACK TO THE THREAD.

 

MEET THE PROGRESSIVE D.A. BEHIND THE WAUKESHA BAIL CATASTROPHE:

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/meet-progressive-da-behind-waukesha-bail-catastrophe/

 

[John] Chisholm, who was elected in 2007, supports deferrals for some misdemeanors and “low-level” felonies in order to cut down on incarcerations. And he’s taken credit for inspiring a new wave of prosecutors in cities like San Francisco, St. Louis, and Philadelphia who have enacted similar reforms. Chisholm congratulated San Francisco district attorney Chesa Boudin following his election in 2019, and the pair spoke at a forum earlier this year on the status of the progressive prosecutor movement.

 

Chisholm and other progressives support reforms to the cash-bail system, which they say criminalizes poverty. He has acknowledged that his reform-minded approach could put murderers back on the streets of Milwaukee.

 

“Is there going to be an individual I divert, or I put into [a] treatment program, who’s going to go out and kill somebody?” he told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in 2007. “You bet. Guaranteed. It’s guaranteed to happen. It does not invalidate the overall approach.”

 

The Milwaukee DA said his office recommended $1,000 bail for Brooks following his arrest on Nov. 5 on charges that he punched his girlfriend in the face and hit her with his vehicle in a gas station parking lot. The woman is identified only by her initials in court papers, which indicate they have a child together. Brooks was also charged with eluding police officers when they arrived to take him into custody.

 

Naturally, “In the aftermath of the Waukesha car attack that left multiple locals dead and dozens wounded, Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm has called for an investigation into the ‘inappropriately low’ cash bond offered to alleged perpetrator Darrell Brooks Jr.”

In much the same way that the Biden administration is conducting investigations into the mysterious sources of higher oil prices and inflation.

 

 

 

Whatever their motivations for instituting these changes, DA's and other public officials advocating for these criminal justice reforms will be under the microscope.  DA Chisholm calling for an investigation is nothing more than an exercise in avoiding the obvious.  He is the cause of the low bail setting.  No investigation is needed to reach that conclusion.  The only reason to call for such an investigation is to buy time in hopes this goes away since he is now exposed to potential negative consequences given the nature of this incident.  I seriously doubt this going away anytime soon.   

Next will be calls expressed through the usual media outlets not to politicize this tragedy.  Odd as those calls will come from people that look to politicize everything when they see potential to gain an advantage.  Another certainty is the playing of the race card in questioning the motivations of opposition to these reforms but given the circumstances I suspect that will be an epic fail.  Public anger and frustration will culminate in calls for the DA to resign with other complicit DA's in places like Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Chicago also getting scrutiny.  This law and order issue will play well going into the 2022 mid-terms.  Anyone seen at all sympathetic and supporting these "reforms" will have a big target on their backs next November.    

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

It would appear that some people are equating killing a convicted pedophile with killing innocent 12 year olds. If this applies to you then you truly need counselor of of the most intense kind.

 

That's what happens when you're a loser in life and have nothing else to contribute.

 

9 hours ago, Dukestreetking said:

Top line question: should the Brooks' murders be charged under hate crime circumstances?

 

1. I've just carefully reviewed the "full video" of the carnage (8 sub-vids) pulled from the entire length of the event, approx 1m20s of blowing thru people.

 

2. Won't post or link here...not recommended to watch unless you're used to seeing such things.

 

3. Brooks drove E-W along the entire northern portion of the route, circa 0.6 miles!

 

4. I counted at least 6 intersections he could've exited, before finally driving thru barriers at W end of Main St.

 

5. This, along w reviewing his social media (prior to scrub), leads to clear indication he doesn't like certain races.

 

6. Totality of evidence may suggest racially purposeful murders (as a manner of speaking), though that may not have been initial intent.

 

Personally, my answer would be "no" as I'm not a supporter of hate crime legislation/prosecution.

 

Reasonable thoughts on this welcomed.

 

Definite hate crime.  When he gets the death penalty, it should be by SUV.  His own.

 

9 hours ago, B-Man said:

UNEXPECTEDLY: Get ready to forget the Waukesha attack.

 

It least five people were killed and more than forty were injured on Sunday night when a driver plowed his SUV into attendees of the annual Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin. The driver has been identified in news reports as Darrell Edward Brooks Jr.

 

The horrific attack immediately made national news because of the death toll and brutal nature of the crime. Videos surfaced online showing the driver veering towards members of the parade and narrowly missing many others. Sunday’s incident appeared eerily similar to the 2016 Berlin terror attack, where an ISIS member killed twelve people by ramming his truck through a Christmas market.

 

However it seems probable that Waukesha will be memory-holed by the agenda-driven media because Brooks was a black man and, according to his social media, an anti-white supporter of Black Lives Matter. This doesn’t comport with the leftist media’s demonization of white men, whose alleged privilege and toxicity are the biggest threat to America.

 

I don’t claim to know that Brooks was motivated by his anti-white hatred, but I do find it suspicious that the media was so eager to rule out terrorism. In fact, CNN, CBS and other outlets were reporting on an alternative motive before they had even publicly identified a suspect. The explanation they have offered as to why Brooks drove into a crowd of hundreds of people would make even the lowest IQ individual scratch their head.

 

Apparently, Brooks was fleeing another crime scene (“possibly a knife fight”) when he ran into the parade. It makes perfect sense, you see, when evading possible arrest to drive to a highly populated area with a heavier police presence and swerve into innocent civilians.

 

No one with two brain cells would think that this makes any sense, but mainstream outlets are breathlessly repeating it without offering an ounce of skepticism. Will this turn into another Las Vegas shooting? It’s been five years since that mass murder event and we still don’t have a satisfactory answer as to why Stephen Paddock would kill dozens of country concert attendees.

 

https://spectatorworld.com/topic/waukesha-wisconsin-christmas-darrell-brooks-media/

 

Yup, doesn't fit the narrative.  I'll put on CNN at work today to see how much they talk about it and what they say.  I'm sure I already know...

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

That's what happens when you're a loser in life and have nothing else to contribute.

 

 

Definite hate crime.  When he gets the death penalty, it should be by SUV.  His own.

 

 

Yup, doesn't fit the narrative.  I'll put on CNN at work today to see how much they talk about it and what they say.  I'm sure I already know...


lmao - lmao - still a coward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...