Jump to content

Shocker: Trump received millions from foreign governments as POTUS


Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Huh do you think this might have something to do with them not accepting the results of the election asking and getting hundreds of million in additional donations to fight the results and then seemingly barely spend anything close to that actually fighting it?

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Huh do you think this might have something to do with them not accepting the results of the election asking and getting hundreds of million in additional donations to fight the results and then seemingly barely spend anything close to that actually fighting it?

 

No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

The entire family is corrupt. A dog rescue charity associated with Lara Trump has spent ~ $1.9 million at Trump's properties over the last seven years and will drop an additional quarter-million at Mar-a-Lago country club this weekend.

 

Disgusting pigs

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

You've chosen to ignore content by Warcodered. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

2 months later...

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

2 months later...

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by ALF. Options 

2 weeks later...

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

Unread replies

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

3 weeks later...

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

 

Is it happening yet gais?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

   https://justthenews.com/accountability/watchdogs/senior-fbi-official-took-free-gifts-media-while-trump-russia-probe-was

 

Senior FBI official took free gifts from media while Trump-Russia probe was underway, watchdog says

 

 

The Office of Inspector General for the Department of Justice released the findings Tuesday of an investigation that found a former senior FBI official violated agency policy by having numerous unauthorized contacts with the media.

The investigation found that the official, who has not been named and has since retired from the agency, "had numerous contacts with members of the media between January and November 2016 in violation of FBI policy," as well as accepted unauthorized gifts from media members, according to the report.

The senior official had unofficial contact with media officials during the opening months of the Trump-Russia investigation. That investigation by the FBI started in the months leading up to and after the Nov. 2016 presidential election. However, the report does not mention that this official was part of the investigation.

Investigators found that the official had accepted tickets from members of the media for two black-tie dinner events, one costing $225 and the other costing $300.

From 2014 through 2016, the official had more unauthorized contacts with the media, including "substantive communications" with reporters and "unauthorized social engagements outside of FBI Headquarters involving drinks, lunches, and dinners."

The official was contacted by the bureau for an interview during the investigation but denied the request. The inspector general's office has the authority to subpoena FBI employees but not former ones.

 

There's organized crime, but  nothing to do with Trump.

It's blatantly obvious who the criminals are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Oooooh a party planner was arrested.  

 

see how they so easily dismiss corruption at the highest levels of our government. one of many instances. and many more to come to light. 

 

"I nailed it. . . for the home team..."

-Tom Barrack 

 

*(the home team is not the United States). Feel free to dismiss this and what it portends to this situation (and the macro, in which then President Trump had a pattern of surrounding his campaign and administration with criminals, grifters, and traitors...hmmm...wonder why) with little thought too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

 

see how they so easily dismiss corruption at the highest levels of our government. one of many instances. and many more to come to light. 

 

"I nailed it. . . for the home team..."

-Tom Barrack 

 

*(the home team is not the United States). Feel free to dismiss this and what it portends to this situation (and the macro, in which then President Trump had a pattern of surrounding his campaign and administration with criminals, grifters, and traitors...hmmm...wonder why) with little thought too.

 

a former president's very close friend who also was the inaugaration chair TURNS OUT TO BE AN UNREGISTERED agent of a foreign country. AND GUESS WHAT, that country tried interfering in our 2016 election. no wayyyyyyyyy. wonder what that is all about (hint, $$$). lol... sometimes its not that hard. 

 

and what if I told you this was only one of a handful of countries that did something similar to get their hooks in... crazy right? nah. can't be true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

 

see how they so easily dismiss corruption at the highest levels of our government. one of many instances. and many more to come to light. 

 

 

He wasn't in the government.

 

He raised money for the inauguration.

 

Now, if you want to declare that the DC lobbying  situation is corrupt, you will find no one arguing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

He wasn't in the government.

 

He raised money for the inauguration.

 

Now, if you want to declare that the DC lobbying  situation is corrupt, you will find no one arguing.

 

 


Why is everyone associated w Trump a crook?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

He wasn't in the government.

 

He raised money for the inauguration.

 

Now, if you want to declare that the DC lobbying  situation is corrupt, you will find no one arguing.

 

 

 

okay he's not in the government lol.. it changes little to my point. Don't use "tactics" to ignore the issue. Please. and yes, im sure we can agree there on lobbying, no doubt.

 

the point is he was close to Trump. and if you read even a summary review of the actual felonies and charges, you could easily understand the dangers to democracy that Trump brought upon himself and this country. now add in this was a pattern...

 

 

quote from Roger Stone on Barrack/Trump (2018):

 

"He is the only person I know who the president speaks to as a peer. Barrack is to Trump as Bebe Rebozo was to Nixon, which is the best friend."

1 minute ago, Nineforty said:

 

okay he's not in the government lol.. it changes little to my point. Don't use "tactics" to ignore the issue. Please. and yes, im sure we can agree there on lobbying, no doubt.

 

the point is he was close to Trump. and if you read even a summary review of the actual felonies and charges, you could easily understand the dangers to democracy that Trump brought upon himself and this country. now add in this was a pattern...

 

 

quote from Roger Stone on Barrack/Trump (2018):

 

"He is the only person I know who the president speaks to as a peer. Barrack is to Trump as Bebe Rebozo was to Nixon, which is the best friend."

 

If you are cool with "espionage-lite" going on all around our commander in chief (and frankly, it being welcomed/encouraged by the former president), so be it. but you sir, are not an American I want to know if that is the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A FOREIGN AGENT, NOT A LOBBYIST

"Contrary to what you might have read, this is not a FARA case, which is generally treated as a regulation covering certain kinds of lobbying for foreign (including non-governmental, like the political party Paul Manafort hid his work for) entities. Barrack was charged under 18 USC 951, which is about working for a foreign government directly. The statute is sometimes referred to as Espionage Lite, and in this case, the government might believe at least some of the people involved — perhaps Al Malik, who fled the country days after the FBI interviewed him in April 2018 — are spies. By charging 951, though, the government only has to show that the team was ultimately working on orders from government officials without registering, not that someone was secretly reporting to another country’s spying agencies.

And this is pretty clearly about a relationship directly with UAE. In addition to Barrack and his employee Matthew Grimes, the indictment describes a chain of command in which several senior Emirati officials convey requests through Rashid Sultan Rashid Al Malik Alshahhi (referred to as Alshahhi in the indictment and as Al Malik here and elsewhere) to Barrack. On the Emirati side, Emirati Official 1 (EO1), is described as someone who, “held a high-ranking position in its armed forces,” but who, given events described in the indictment, must be Dubai’s Crown Prince Mohamed bin Zayed. Emirati Official 2 (EO2) is described as a “high-ranking official with responsibilities related to national security,” but appears to be National Security Advisor Tahnoun Bin Zayed. Emirati Official 3 (EO3) is described as a member of UAE’s National Security Council. Their orders often get delivered to Al Malik through Emirati Official 4 (EO4), who is described as a government official who reports to EO 2 and EO3. There’s also a diplomat, Emirati Official 5, who asked Barrack to provide insight into the top national security appointments Trump was planning. Basically, this amounts to MbZ tasking EO4 to instruct Al Malik to provide instructions in turn to Barrack. This structure is important, because it demonstrates that Barrack was being directed directly by the UAE government and, starting in October 2016, directly by MbZ himself."

 

https://www.emptywheel.net/2021/07/21/the-big-boss-directing-tom-barracks-actions/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Gee, it's hard to justify all these "Trump Crony" posts,

 

When our Department of Justice disagrees..............right ?

 

The DOJ says Tom Barrack’s alleged conduct was a ‘betrayal’ of former President Trump

 

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2021/07/21/the-doj-says-tom-barracks-alleged-conduct-was-a-betrayal-of-former-president-trump/

 

 

Oh well.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

On 7/22/2021 at 6:24 PM, BillStime said:

 

 

 

 

On 7/22/2021 at 7:34 PM, BillStime said:
 

 

21 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

 

 

Hey, it's all BS, who'd a thunk it ?

 

:rolleyes:

 

But National Review reports today that this is all nonsense. In fact, Democratic Senators had access to a summary of all 4,500 tips during the confirmation.

 

Mike Davis, who served as chief counsel for nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee during the Kavanaugh hearings, tells National Review that there was a summary of all 4,500 tips in the FBI’s report, which was available to all 100 U.S. senators.

 

“They printed out the entire tip-line summary,” says Davis. “Every senator had full access to read those things if they wanted to.”…

 

“Every whack-job in the world called into that thing. That’s why there were 4,500 [tips],” says Davis. “Grassley’s team went through the entire tip-line. It was nonsense.” Davis worked under then-chairman Chuck Grassley on the committee and now runs the Article 3 Project, a conservative group that focuses on the judiciary.

 

A Republican senator who reviewed the FBI’s report confirms Davis’s description of the tip-line summary. “There was nothing in there . . . nothing anywhere providing a shred of corroboration” of an existing allegation or a new allegation, the senator tells National Review.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hey, it's all BS, who'd a thunk it ?

 

:rolleyes:

 

But National Review reports today that this is all nonsense. In fact, Democratic Senators had access to a summary of all 4,500 tips during the confirmation.

 

Mike Davis, who served as chief counsel for nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee during the Kavanaugh hearings, tells National Review that there was a summary of all 4,500 tips in the FBI’s report, which was available to all 100 U.S. senators.

 

“They printed out the entire tip-line summary,” says Davis. “Every senator had full access to read those things if they wanted to.”…

 

“Every whack-job in the world called into that thing. That’s why there were 4,500 [tips],” says Davis. “Grassley’s team went through the entire tip-line. It was nonsense.” Davis worked under then-chairman Chuck Grassley on the committee and now runs the Article 3 Project, a conservative group that focuses on the judiciary.

 

A Republican senator who reviewed the FBI’s report confirms Davis’s description of the tip-line summary. “There was nothing in there . . . nothing anywhere providing a shred of corroboration” of an existing allegation or a new allegation, the senator tells National Review.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kavanaugh: Nothing to see here


Capitol Riot: Nothing to see here


Benghazi: 28 months of hearings

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Today, the Biden Administration has delivered a victory for the rule of law, as it respects the public interest by complying with Chairman Neal’s request for Donald Trump’s tax returns.  As Speaker, on behalf of the House of Representatives, I applaud Chairman Neal for his dignified pursuit of the truth and the Biden Administration Department of Justice for its respect for the law.

“Access to former President Trump’s tax returns is a matter of national security.  The American people deserve to know the facts of his troubling conflicts of interest and undermining of our security and democracy as president.

“The House will always fight to expose the truth For The People.”

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...