Jump to content

Black Lives Matter Messaging at "The Stadium"


SectionC3

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

When they talk about the nuclear family, they are talking about the idealized family model.  So, rather than preferring a father, a mother, and then siblings, they advocate a community approach. That is what they mean when they say they want to do away with the nuclear family. Families that are missing a father, headed by a grandparent, etc., still fall within the framework of a nuclear family, because that is what is being mimicked.  BLM is saying the family model should be one where all members of the community, e.g. neighbors, guide and are responsible for the children.  

There's a lot of whackos in communities who will do terrible things to children

 

if you have nobody to raise you a community approach might be a good thing. If you have a family it's not

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

No. This is not true at all. You should read some critical race theory. It seems like you would be shocked to learn what critical race theorists/BLM are really advocating. 

 

I guess part of this is I am more familiar with the literature that undergirds these movements than you are.  In the deepest sense, you really don't know what you are talking about. 

Given your inability to understand even one sentence of a relatively straightforward quote, forgive me if I take your diagnosis with a bit of skepticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dablitzkrieg said:

The group is basically a terrorist organization with their only goal to destroy the nuclear family and cause problems. What I've learned to do is separate the organization from the actual terminology "black lives matter". Of course they do. End of story

Exactly I support black people 100%

 

And so should everyone

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo716 said:

There's a lot of whackos in communities who will do terrible things to children

 

if you have nobody to raise you a community approach might be a good thing. If you have a family it's not

 

 

Are there not "whackos" in nuclear families? Are there not abusers and child molesters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

 

I mean, for the most part so do I and I'm an upper middle class straight white dude. They aren't exclusively beliefs held by black people for black people, though they have extremely valid additional reasons for wanting those things beyond my reasons.

You are fully within your rights to believe in those things and so is BLM. But most people don't realize that is part of the goal.

 

A lot of people don't want prisons and police to be abolished. They don't want a dramatic redistribution of wealth. And they don't think drugs and prostitution should be legal. They may believe in the importance of the traditional family. So they should be informed that such things are part of the BLM agenda before they get on the bandwagon. If their objective is to focus on black lives and ending racism they should look to another organization.

Just now, BullBuchanan said:

Unless they were raised by their grandparents or a set of divorced parents though, right?

And who said that? Nobody. You can believe families are important and also supports black people. They aren't mutually exclusive.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MJS said:

You are fully within your rights to believe in those things and so is BLM. But most people don't realize that is part of the goal.

 

A lot of people don't want prisons and police to be abolished. They don't want a dramatic redistribution of wealth. And they don't think drugs and prostitution should be legal. They may believe in the importance of the traditional family. So they should be informed that such things are part of the BLM agenda before they get on the bandwagon. If their objective is to focus on black lives and ending racism they should look to another organization.

And who said that? Nobody. You can believe families are important and also supports black people. They aren't mutually exclusive.

Several people above who claimed that the only family was a nuclear family.

Edited by BullBuchanan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dablitzkrieg said:

The group is basically a terrorist organization with their only goal to destroy the nuclear family and cause problems. What I've learned to do is separate the organization from the actual terminology "black lives matter". Of course they do. End of story

QFT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

Denmark has like 10 million people and Canada 38 million... We have like 350 million

 

That is why there's income inequality. We have everything from people with the biggest work ethics, to people with no work ethic who live off the government teat forever. Millions and millions and millions that adds up

 

There's a lot of people who don't like to work in this country. Lots of people like to collect government welfare and live of the government's teat

 

That drives a lot of the income inequality

 

if you are willing to work 60 hours a week in this country you will climb up the ladder guaranteed

False.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BullBuchanan said:

Several people above who claimed that the only family was a nuclear family.

Can you quote them? I didn't see that. And I didn't see anyone saying that black people who haven't had a traditional upbringing don't matter.

 

I see people saying that the traditional family structure is important. And if you look at the data it shows that those who grow up without one of their parents are far more likely to be in poverty, abuse drugs and alcohol, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disappointed the bills are supporting this terrorist org

 

black lives absolutely matter, but they won’t if the communists that run the BLM org achieve their goals. No lives will matter if the communists win.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Your statement tells me that you have trouble reading. Read the quote back and try to figure out how the subject and qualifier advocate for the position you're defending.

What part of the nuclear family do you attribute to workers owning the means of production?


I mean, for the most part so do I and I'm an upper middle class straight white dude. They aren't exclusively beliefs held by black people for black people, though they have extremely valid additional reasons for wanting those things beyond my reasons.

They are rebuking the nuclear family for the collective. That’s what you wrote, take a look. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MJS said:

Can you quote them? I didn't see that. And I didn't see anyone saying that black people who haven't had a traditional upbringing don't matter.

 

I see people saying that the traditional family structure is important. And if you look at the data it shows that those who grow up without one of their parents are far more likely to be in poverty, abuse drugs and alcohol, etc.


There's data that suggest people whose grandparents live with them are more likely to be poor, abuse drugs and alcohol etc.? What about those raised by two sets of parents?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HamSandwhich said:

They are rebuking the nuclear family for the collective. That’s what you wrote, take a look. 

Read it again, you didn't understand it. It's explicitly stated that nuclear families are not a requirement. They are one of many valid options.

1 minute ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

BillBuchanan is one of those idiots that Turningpoint USA and others interview at BLM rally or college campuses to make activists look bad.  

You follow turning point? That makes so much sense. They have trouble with reading too. That's why they use pictures.

Edited by BullBuchanan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DE Bills Fan said:

Sorry. It’s fine to support helping the black community but NOT supporting an organization who has anti-social goals in their mission statement. Whatever pandering the Bills are trying to gain is going to be counter-balanced by the backlash of people who have researched the BLM platform and deplore it. Just look at this thread. 

 

What do you consider "anti-social goals" ?   Have you actually read their mission statement or are you just spouting white supremacist bull manure trumpeted by some politician or talking head?     I went to the Black Lives Matter website and read their mission statement.  I've printed it below so that you can tell me -- and everyone else -- what exactly is "anti-social" about it.

 

What We Believe

Four years ago, what is now known as the Black Lives Matter Global Network began to organize. It started out as a chapter-based, member-led organization whose mission was to build local power and to intervene when violence was inflicted on Black communities by the state and vigilantes.

In the years since, we’ve committed to struggling together and to imagining and creating a world free of anti-Blackness, where every Black person has the social, economic, and political power to thrive.

Black Lives Matter began as a call to action in response to state-sanctioned violence and anti-Black racism. Our intention from the very beginning was to connect Black people from all over the world who have a shared desire for justice to act together in their communities. The impetus for that commitment was, and still is, the rampant and deliberate violence inflicted on us by the state.

Enraged by the death of Trayvon Martin and the subsequent acquittal of his killer, George Zimmerman, and inspired by the 31-day takeover of the Florida State Capitol by POWER U and the Dream Defenders, we took to the streets. A year later, we set out together on the Black Lives Matter Freedom Ride to Ferguson, in search of justice for Mike Brown and all of those who have been torn apart by state-sanctioned violence and anti-Black racism. Forever changed, we returned home and began building the infrastructure for the Black Lives Matter Global Network, which, even in its infancy, has become a political home for many.

Ferguson helped to catalyze a movement to which we’ve all helped give life. Organizers who call this network home have ousted anti-Black politicians, won critical legislation to benefit Black lives, and changed the terms of the debate on Blackness around the world. Through movement and relationship building, we have also helped catalyze other movements and shifted culture with an eye toward the dangerous impacts of anti-Blackness.

These are the results of our collective efforts.

The Black Lives Matter Global Network is as powerful as it is because of our membership, our partners, our supporters, our staff, and you. Our continued commitment to liberation for all Black people means we are continuing the work of our ancestors and fighting for our collective freedom because it is our duty.

Every day, we recommit to healing ourselves and each other, and to co-creating alongside comrades, allies, and family a culture where each person feels seen, heard, and supported.

We acknowledge, respect, and celebrate differences and commonalities.

We work vigorously for freedom and justice for Black people and, by extension, all people.

We intentionally build and nurture a beloved community that is bonded together through a beautiful struggle that is restorative, not depleting.

We are unapologetically Black in our positioning. In affirming that Black Lives Matter, we need not qualify our position. To love and desire freedom and justice for ourselves is a prerequisite for wanting the same for others.

We see ourselves as part of the global Black family, and we are aware of the different ways we are impacted or privileged as Black people who exist in different parts of the world.

We are guided by the fact that all Black lives matter, regardless of actual or perceived sexual identity, gender identity, gender expression, economic status, ability, disability, religious beliefs or disbeliefs, immigration status, or location.

We make space for transgender brothers and sisters to participate and lead.

We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle cisgender privilege and uplift Black trans folk, especially Black trans women who continue to be disproportionately impacted by trans-antagonistic violence.

We build a space that affirms Black women and is free from sexism, misogyny, and environments in which men are centered.

We practice empathy. We engage comrades with the intent to learn about and connect with their contexts.

We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.

We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.

We foster a *****‐affirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise).

We cultivate an intergenerational and communal network free from ageism. We believe that all people, regardless of age, show up with the capacity to lead and learn.

We embody and practice justice, liberation, and peace in our engagements with one another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, HamSandwhich said:

They are rebuking the nuclear family for the collective. That’s what you wrote, take a look. 

Also, you didn't answer my question about socialism. Do you not believe that you can be a socialist and have a nuclear family? I don't think you understand what socialism is, and just use it as a slur.

1 minute ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

Serious question: do you even know what the word heteronormativity means? 

 

To your point, I, like the rest of the world, have Facebook. Yes, those viral videos have appeared on my timeline. 

Yes I do. 

Edited by BullBuchanan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

 

BillBuchanan is one of those idiots that Turningpoint USA and others interview at BLM rally or college campuses to make activists look bad.  

 

2 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Read it again, you didn't understand it. It's explicitly stated that nuclear families are not a requirement. They are one of many valid options.

You follow turning point? That makes so much sense. They have trouble with reading too. That's why they use pictures.

Ok, well I'm going to stay out of it now. I enjoy having thought provoking conversation and providing and receiving useful information. But I don't much like the bickering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MJS said:

 

Ok, well I'm going to stay out of it now. I enjoy having thought provoking conversation and providing and receiving useful information. But I don't much like the bickering.

 

No, that's what this board is for. I got irritated and ruined it. I'll step away.  Your conversation is more important than my insults.

 

*I deleted my comments. 

Edited by JoshAllenHasBigHands
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...