Jump to content

Defund the Police?


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:

Well, she doesn't have a gun...so...

 

My revolt and laughable contempt for her action is not her objection to the existence of the police or her support of de-funding the police.  My objection is the obvious lack of conviction of her and others that support the de-funding idea.  They rally around the mantra of de-funding but when trouble comes to them personally they immediately drop their objections to the existence and the need for police.  It all disappears into the hypocrites slogan of "police for me but not for thee".  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

 

My revolt and laughable contempt for her action is not her objection to the existence of the police or her support of de-funding the police.  My objection is the obvious lack of conviction of her and others that support the de-funding idea.  They rally around the mantra of de-funding but when trouble comes to them personally they immediately drop their objections to the existence and the need for police.  It all disappears into the hypocrites slogan of "police for me but not for thee".  

Oh, you don't have to explain it to me. 

 

Just to clarify:  I am all for discussing changing policing.  The world is dynamic and how it is policed needs to be as well.  That being said, liberals have essentially removed EVERY tool parents have in their arsenal to discipline/raise children appropriately so the results we're seeing (lack of decency, respect, accountability) are AT A MINIMUM equally responsible for the degradation of the relationship between law enforcement and the community.

 

Liberals ENTIRE political mantra is hypocrisy.  You can't have enormous government and all the resulting regulation without a ridiculously effective enforcement arm.  You can't continually create system dependence and then act surprised when the dependant refuse to even minimally participate in anything productive.  You are bitching about what you literally put in place, you morons.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Yes, but she does have armed security, which were hilariously conspicuous when she was demanding every else should lose their right to carry.

Does she?  I mean, it wouldn't be surprising if she did.  The left loves its hypocrisy almost as much as it loves its pedos.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suspect arrested in ambush shooting of two LASD deputies in Compton
 

The suspect accused of shooting two Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputies during an ambush in Compton has been arrested, authorities announced Wednesday.
 

Deonte Lee Murray, 36, of Compton, is scheduled to be arraigned Wednesday afternoon on two counts each of willful, deliberate and premeditated attempted murder of a peace officer and possession of a firearm by a felon, District Attorney Jackie Lacey said.
 

</snip>

  • Sad 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Suspect arrested in ambush shooting of two LASD deputies in Compton
 

The suspect accused of shooting two Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputies during an ambush in Compton has been arrested, authorities announced Wednesday.
 

Deonte Lee Murray, 36, of Compton, is scheduled to be arraigned Wednesday afternoon on two counts each of willful, deliberate and premeditated attempted murder of a peace officer and possession of a firearm by a felon, District Attorney Jackie Lacey said.
 

</snip>

.and maybe Garcetti recommends no bail.......SMH......we just had an arrest in Rochester NY of a guy charged with 2nd degree murder and the Judge released him with NO bail because he didn't consider him "a flight risk"...seriously?...Murder 2 and NO bail?......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Suspect arrested in ambush shooting of two LASD deputies in Compton
 

The suspect accused of shooting two Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputies during an ambush in Compton has been arrested, authorities announced Wednesday.
 

Deonte Lee Murray, 36, of Compton, is scheduled to be arraigned Wednesday afternoon on two counts each of willful, deliberate and premeditated attempted murder of a peace officer and possession of a firearm by a felon, District Attorney Jackie Lacey said.
 

</snip>

Dying to find out how tall he is.  The video made him look like a Munchkin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Suspect arrested in ambush shooting of two LASD deputies in Compton
 

The suspect accused of shooting two Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputies during an ambush in Compton has been arrested, authorities announced Wednesday.
 

Deonte Lee Murray, 36, of Compton, is scheduled to be arraigned Wednesday afternoon on two counts each of willful, deliberate and premeditated attempted murder of a peace officer and possession of a firearm by a felon, District Attorney Jackie Lacey said.
 

</snip>

 

Looks like BullBuchanan can finally get that GoFundMe site up and running now that he has Deonte's name.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Looks like BullBuchanan can finally get that GoFundMe site up and running now that he has Deonte's name.  

Like the one for Kyle Rittenhouse? It's the same thing.

Actually it's not the same thing, because the dead protesters didn't belong to an organized terrorist group.

Edited by BullBuchanan
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Like the one for Kyle Rittenhouse? It's the same thing.

Actually it's not the same thing, because the dead protesters didn't belong to an organized terrorist group.

 

You think a guy shooting people in self-defense is the same as a guy who intentionally set out to murder two cops?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:

Like the one for Kyle Rittenhouse? It's the same thing.

Actually it's not the same thing, because the dead protesters didn't belong to an organized terrorist group.


Kyle Rittenhouse is an American hero. 
 

He did nothing wrong. 
 

And the dead protesters were terrorists. Ask the boys who were sexually abused by the first guy Rittenhouse killed. I’m glad that dudes dead. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Dragoon said:


Kyle Rittenhouse is an American hero. 
 

He did nothing wrong. 
 

And the dead protesters were terrorists. Ask the boys who were sexually abused by the first guy Rittenhouse killed. I’m glad that dudes dead. 

A scumbag who committed first degree murder and punched a a high school girl is your hero? Story checks out.

I hope he gets the chair.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

A scumbag who committed first degree murder and punched a a high school girl is your hero? Story checks out.

I hope he gets the chair.

 

You are a parody.

 

Note how Bull demonstrates that he knows that his claim of "first degree murder" is such bullsh*t that he has to add "punched a high school girl" to his list.

 

Ridiculous.

 

 

Oh and his "get the chair" wish ?

 

The death penalty in Wisconsin was repealed in 1853. It has had no death penalty for over 150 years, longer than any other state in the country.

 

Sorry.

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

A scumbag who committed first degree murder and punched a a high school girl is your hero? Story checks out.

I hope he gets the chair.

 

It's all propaganda! Wake up sheeple! We can't stop fighting until everyone kills a cop! :lol:

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

You are a parody.

 

Note how Bull demonstrates that he knows that his claim of "first degree murder" is such bullsh*t that he has to add "punched a high school girl" to his list.

 

Ridiculous.

 

 

Oh and his "get the chair" wish ?

 

The death penalty in Wisconsin was repealed in 1853. It has had no death penalty for over 150 years, longer than any other state in the country.

 

Sorry.


There is an ignore feature. He's a good one to use it on.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

You are a parody.

 

Note how Bull demonstrates that he knows that his claim of "first degree murder" is such bullsh*t that he has to add "punched a high school girl" to his list.

 

Ridiculous.

 

 

Oh and his "get the chair" wish ?

 

The death penalty in Wisconsin was repealed in 1853. It has had no death penalty for over 150 years, longer than any other state in the country.

 

Sorry.

 

 

 

He crossed state lines to commit his crime. That could enable federal prosecution, which does have the death penalty.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BullBuchanan said:

He crossed state lines to commit his crime. That could enable federal prosecution, which does have the death penalty.

 

He crossed state lines to help his employer protect his business.

 

I guess next you're going to tell me he should be charged for bringing his gun across state lines.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, IDBillzFan said:

 

He crossed state lines to help his employer protect his business.

 

I guess next you're going to tell me he should be charged for bringing his gun across state lines.

Being charged with Murder 1 would seem to dispute your claim. 

Given that it wasn't his gun, and he legally wasn't allowed to have it, yes that's also a crime.

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

You are a parody.

 

Note how Bull demonstrates that he knows that his claim of "first degree murder" is such bullsh*t that he has to add "punched a high school girl" to his list.

 

Ridiculous.

 

 

Oh and his "get the chair" wish ?

 

The death penalty in Wisconsin was repealed in 1853. It has had no death penalty for over 150 years, longer than any other state in the country.

 

Sorry.

 

 

 


I was going to reply to him but you did it perfectly. Well done. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BullBuchanan said:

Being charged with Murder 1 would seem to dispute your claim. 



 

Guilty until proven innocent, eh?

 

You’ve a lot to learn about American values. 
 

How old are you? Just trying to understand your world view. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BullBuchanan said:

And yet you also missed that he could be charged with a federal crime.


No, I have not failed to take notice of the polarization of law enforcement. Biden/Obama/Hillary and the bogus Russian investigation. The horrible arrest of the Mclowskis (or whatever the spelling of their name is), the arrest of Kyle, the treatment of Patriots vs American hating commies in Portland. I’ve taken notice. Believe me, I’ve taken notice. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dragoon said:


No, I have not failed to take notice of the polarization of law enforcement. Biden/Obama/Hillary and the bogus Russian investigation. The horrible arrest of the Mclowskis (or whatever the spelling of their name is), the arrest of Kyle, the treatment of Patriots vs American hating commies in Portland. I’ve taken notice. Believe me, I’ve taken notice. 

omg, you're a lunatic. A trip, for sure, but a total lunatic.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:

We don't trust the police but we do trust the District Attorney's office to correctly charge and prosecute the crimes BROUGHT TO US BY THE POLICE.

 

Ladies and gentlemen...liberal intellect.

Did police "bring them the crimes"? last time I saw they let him walk right by them while they were taking another donut break.

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Did police "bring them the crimes"? last time I saw they let him walk right by them while they were taking another donut break.

 

I know, it's a lot easier to try humor when your stupidity is pointed out so obviously.  Point still stands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

omg, you're a lunatic. A trip, for sure, but a total lunatic.


I take that as a compliment in the highest form because it came from you. 
 

Ive seen what you promote — you thinking I’m the lunatic means you’ve the correct view on me. 
 

...how old are you?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dragoon said:


I take that as a compliment in the highest form because it came from you. 
 

Ive seen what you promote — you thinking I’m the lunatic means you’ve the correct view on me. 
 

...how old are you?

Ditto.

Why the creepy questions about my age? I'm not interested.

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Ditto.

Why the creepy questions about my age? I'm not interested.

 


Because your world view makes sense if you’re under 27. 
 

Winston Churchill has a popular quote I’ve seen in memes that he didn’t actually say but it’s something he’d agree with...’if you weren’t a liberal before 25 you never had a heart and if you’re a liberal older than 25 you don’t have a brain.’  I’m just trying to figure out if you’re a benevolent youngster who lacks the life experience necessary to see the folly in everything you promote. If you’re going there’s hope you might straighten out. If you’re not young it’s significantly less likely. 
 

I just wanna know if I’m talking to a confused kid or an idiot anarchist. 

Edited by Dragoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dragoon said:


Because your world view makes sense if you’re under 27. 
 

Winston Churchill has a popular quote I’ve seen in memes that he didn’t actually say but it’s something he’d agree with...’if you weren’t a liberal before 25 you never had a heart and if you’re a liberal older than 25 you don’t have a brain.’  I’m just trying to figure out if you’re a benevolent youngster who lacks the life experience necessary to see the folly in everything you promote. If you’re going there’s hope you might straighten out. If you’re not young it’s significantly less likely. 
 

I just wanna know if I’m talking to a confused kid or an idiot anarchist. 

That quote has to be adapted to the modern moron.  You have to understand - back then people actually read books and talked to smarter people regularly.  These clowns watch television and hang with like-minded simpletons on social media.  They've never once even examined an opposing view.

 

"How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?"

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:

That quote has to be adapted to the modern moron.  You have to understand - back then people actually read books and talked to smarter people regularly.  These clowns watch television and hang with like-minded simpletons on social media.  They've never once even examined an opposing view.

 

"How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?"


 

The Floyd line cracked me up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Dragoon said:


Because your world view makes sense if you’re under 27. 
 

Winston Churchill has a popular quote I’ve seen in memes that he didn’t actually say but it’s something he’d agree with...’if you weren’t a liberal before 25 you never had a heart and if you’re a liberal older than 25 you don’t have a brain.’  I’m just trying to figure out if you’re a benevolent youngster who lacks the life experience necessary to see the folly in everything you promote. If you’re going there’s hope you might straighten out. If you’re not young it’s significantly less likely. 
 

I just wanna know if I’m talking to a confused kid or an idiot anarchist. 

I'm anything but an anarchist, if you actually know the meaning of the term. I know the right likes to use it whenever they get bored of saying communist/socialist/marxist, liberal etc.

I also haven't been under 27 in some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BullBuchanan said:

I'm anything but an anarchist, if you actually know the meaning of the term. I know the right likes to use it whenever they get bored of saying communist/socialist/marxist, liberal etc.

I also haven't been under 27 in some time.


If you wanna have debates about terminology, I’m your huckleberry. 
 

The fact you claim to be older than 27 tells me there’s not much hope for you. Sad. Idk, maybe you’ll figure it out. I eventually did and I walked away. God willing one day you will too, but you seem quite committed to nonsense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dragoon said:


If you wanna have debates about terminology, I’m your huckleberry. 
 

The fact you claim to be older than 27 tells me there’s not much hope for you. Sad. Idk, maybe you’ll figure it out. I eventually did and I walked away. God willing one day you will too, but you seem quite committed to nonsense. 

If by nonsense, you mean quite committed to anti-fascism and a pro-worker economy, I wholeheartedly agree. I think I've gone as conservative as I ever will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...