Jump to content

This Years Draft: Can a Team Gain An Advantage Digitally?


TroutDog

Recommended Posts

On OBL today, they had a discussion with Trey Wingo (seems to be only in the app right now and I can’t post a link from there...it’s in hour 2).
 

They asked him if it’s possible for one team to gain an advantage with the craziness of this year. He didn’t really answer it but I’m wondering, for some of our more adept IT people here at TBD if they can come up with any (as I suspect that’s where it would come from). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MJS said:

I would say the advantage goes to teams who have been doing their due diligence the past couple months.


I get it. Just wondering if there is a way to ensure more connectivity to multiple connections and how that could impact the process. 
 

Bills, for example, have deep pockets (like Dallas and others) but some teams have tighter purse strings. 
 

Apologies if this is silly, I just found it interesting and given the state of things, hoped someone could expand on possibilities. ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TroutDog said:


I get it. Just wondering if there is a way to ensure more connectivity to multiple connections and how that could impact the process. 
 

Bills, for example, have deep pockets (like Dallas and others) but some teams have tighter purse strings. 
 

Apologies if this is silly, I just found it interesting and given the state of things, hoped someone could expand on possibilities. ? 

I would assume that every team could afford the technology necessary to stay as connected as they want to be.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TroutDog said:


I get it. Just wondering if there is a way to ensure more connectivity to multiple connections and how that could impact the process. 
 

Bills, for example, have deep pockets (like Dallas and others) but some teams have tighter purse strings. 
 

Apologies if this is silly, I just found it interesting and given the state of things, hoped someone could expand on possibilities. ? 


I’d assume having good processes and communication, contingency plans etc... in place will help detail oriented teams. Someone’s data goes down or something you don’t want to be scrambling on the clock to figure out what to do. Or if there’s some variety of disagreement how do you ensure everyone’s working off the same info or share new better info on the fly without being in the room. 

Just now, MJS said:

I would assume that every team could afford the technology necessary to stay as connected as they want to be.


agreed. I’d think the bigger question is how adept they are at using it. Buddy nix may not excel in this format while a more tech savvy group could.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With technology like Zoom, it sounds like team personnel will be able to communicate the same as normal.  The GM, coaches and scouts will still be able to talk about what is going on.  They just won't technically be in the same room.  The process of looking at draft boards, calling other teams with trade offers, actually making picks will pretty much be the same.  I think all of this will work out fine.

 

The biggest change in this year's draft process is the inability to meet with prospects.  I think this will cause many "red flag" prospects (whether through injury or character) to drop farther than normal.  Team doctors can't do their due diligence on injuries, which makes the risk higher.  Coaches can't sit-down with prospects and get a feel for their knowledge and fit.  This is where some creative GMs may find an advantage.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mjt328 said:

With technology like Zoom, it sounds like team personnel will be able to communicate the same as normal.  The GM, coaches and scouts will still be able to talk about what is going on.  They just won't technically be in the same room.  The process of looking at draft boards, calling other teams with trade offers, actually making picks will pretty much be the same.  I think all of this will work out fine.

 

The biggest change in this year's draft process is the inability to meet with prospects.  I think this will cause many "red flag" prospects (whether through injury or character) to drop farther than normal.  Team doctors can't do their due diligence on injuries, which makes the risk higher.  Coaches can't sit-down with prospects and get a feel for their knowledge and fit.  This is where some creative GMs may find an advantage.

 

 

 

Beane and his Scouting/Personnel Team seem to be in the upper third of the league (that's not me saying it it's the league's general opinion) and will help IMO.

Using the 1st and 5th for Diggs gives a bit of an added advantage that they will not pick a bust with the 1st round pick.

 

If they do indeed pick a RB with the 2-4 pick (which I hope they do) it could be argued that RBs with the vast amount of tape on them

and the position in general can be achieved digitally.

 

Compared to teams with a huge amount of picks this year (Miami comes to mine) I think the Bills can get through this unique draft year with

a bit of an advantage compared to other teams.

 

I'm still wondering if Beane has a few vets on the current roster that he is trying to dangle as bait.

A Bills trade to start Day 2 or Day 3 is still on my wish list.

Edited by ColoradoBills
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day - owners have deep pockets - and every scout and GM etc. has basically just had some ridiculous battlestation put into their home offices with a few weeks to test out the conferencing features etc.  

 

Probably have some sort of slick Draft board software that someone built and sold to sports teams for you to organize it how you would on a big magnetic board.  I've built some stuff in excel that i thought was pretty cool for fantasy baseball - but this is probably like, click his name and a popup comes up with like measureables, stats, grades that you input etc. 

 

If they don't i'd fire the App developer immediately - this should be able to be programmed in like a day.  Assuming the NFL provides teams with a usable database of draft-eligible player measurements and stats. 

12 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

Beane and his Scouting/Personnel Team seem to be in the upper third of the league (that's not me saying it it's the league's general opinion) and will help IMO.

Using the 1st and 5th for Diggs gives a bit of an added advantage that they will not pick a bust with the 1st round pick.

 

If they do indeed pick a RB with the 2-4 pick (which I hope they do) it could be argued that RBs with the vast amount of tape on them

and the position in general can be achieved digitally.

 

Compared to teams with a huge amount of picks this year (Miami comes to mine) I think the Bills can get through this unique draft year with

a bit of an advantage compared to other teams.

 

I'm still wondering if Beane has a few vets on the current roster that he is trying to dangle as bait.

A Bills trade to start Day 2 or Day 3 is still on my wish list.

 

I think the vet's in trouble would likely be - Nsekhe (if they feel good about williams/bates), Long (for same reasons), Maybe Lee Smith, and Philips.  But I'd bring every one of them to camp this year - its going to be an abbreviated camp.  If someone important along the oline gets hurt etc. you're going to want them there.  Move them closer to cut downs.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dneveu said:

 

I think the vet's in trouble would likely be - Nsekhe (if they feel good about williams/bates), Long (for same reasons), Maybe Lee Smith, and Philips.  But I'd bring every one of them to camp this year - its going to be an abbreviated camp.  If someone important along the oline gets hurt etc. you're going to want them there.  Move them closer to cut downs.

 

All those guys could be in play (among a few others) and I do agree about bringing the majority of them to camp BUT if a trade can be made with ONE of them

to move up to get a rookie who can make a difference.............I'm liking that too.

 

It's a low probability but i would be cool for Beane to "cast a spell" over a GM of the BoB variety! 

 

If that does not happen your comment about doing that closer to cut downs is my final hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a bills fan perspective, the way I look at it is there is a greater chance multiple teams will make a mistake because they’re not working in a war room. The likelihood of top talent getting pushed further down into the second round exists due to the situation. (Always an optimist)

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mathja said:

From a bills fan perspective, the way I look at it is there is a greater chance multiple teams will make a mistake because they’re not working in a war room. The likelihood of top talent getting pushed further down into the second round exists due to the situation. (Always an optimist)

Completely agree. Because of the virtual experience this month the draft will be more challenging for Zoom war rooms. People talking over each other.  Maybe a scout isn't heard? There will be players dropping you wouldn't expect. This will favor the Bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

image.jpeg.578a7762233d8f81ccc3a62e70ec7989.jpeg

I used to live in Cincinnati and I would not be surprised one bit if Mikey Brown went the cheap route and used dial up.  Their Ohio rival Browns will probably call them just to break the connection and mess up their pick.  And Belichick won't need his film crew to hack their signals either.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dneveu said:

At the end of the day - owners have deep pockets - and every scout and GM etc. has basically just had some ridiculous battlestation put into their home offices


Kind of my point: there is talk in media of NHL teams folding after this as they operate at such thin margins to begin with (see Florida, among others). 
 

Not too many years ago, Ralph wouldn’t have been able to put the money that the Pegula’s are putting into the Bills. Jacksonville, for one, makes me wonder if they have the coin. Others?

 

If so, how do the deep pocketed teams gain an advantage in an otherwise parity driven league?

4 hours ago, mjt328 said:

With technology like Zoom


This is inherently unsafe as has been all over the news recently. In fact, the CEO of Zoom admitted as much. Kind of my point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NoSaint said:


I’d assume having good processes and communication, contingency plans etc... in place will help detail oriented teams. Someone’s data goes down or something you don’t want to be scrambling on the clock to figure out what to do. Or if there’s some variety of disagreement how do you ensure everyone’s working off the same info or share new better info on the fly without being in the room. 


agreed. I’d think the bigger question is how adept they are at using it. Buddy nix may not excel in this format while a more tech savvy group could.


The are Billion dollar organizationsz I assume they have at least 10-12 IT people on staff who will be constantly monitoring the servers. Remoting in is super easy anyways for the IT guys. Not to mention, I would put money on these being treated almost like a webinar. “Rooms” will already be set up. Invites sent out. Open your outlook calendar and click the links needed for each conference. All most likely handled by either team IT directors and/or the NFL. This isn’t Sue in accounting trying to see if she can skype the sales team at once to see if she can get an update on past due invoices. 
 

Most of these coaches and scouts are doing some work from home or on the road. They’ll need a VPN to get access to any film or material. Then there is probably a 75% chance that there is some multi factor authentification involved. This is most definitely the most “complicated” part of the entire thing, and it’s literally just typing in a number, or hitting confirm on an app on your phone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TroutDog said:


Kind of my point: there is talk in media of NHL teams folding after this as they operate at such thin margins to begin with (see Florida, among others). 
 

Not too many years ago, Ralph wouldn’t have been able to put the money that the Pegula’s are putting into the Bills. Jacksonville, for one, makes me wonder if they have the coin. Others?

 

If so, how do the deep pocketed teams gain an advantage in an otherwise parity driven league?


This is inherently unsafe as has been all over the news recently. In fact, the CEO of Zoom admitted as much. Kind of my point. 

 

I feel like the NFL "league" of owners wouldn't let a team fail at this point.  The richest of owners would prop up the other ones with loans and stuff.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...