Jump to content

The Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump


Nanker

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

CNN, the Washintgon Post, the NYT, the LA Times, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, Politico, The Hill, USA Today, NPR, Vox, The Atlantic, and Bloomberg are all calling them "witnesses."

 

Who's gaslighting whom?

 

Fact witnesses and expert witnesses are both witnesses. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

No, it actually isn't.  The modern university system was built on military cooperation, so it's entirely accurate to call them a pillar of the nation on par with the military.

 

Probably not what he meant, though.

 

In design sure. 

 

In implementation no. 

 

Endowments and dark money funding the universities for decades has changed that equation mightily. 

6 minutes ago, Capco said:

 

I mean I was just quoting someone else when I said that it was a pillar on par with the military.  Not even an original idea or anything.  

 

Of course you were. Why have an original thought when you can show your deference to your betters by appealing to authority?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Kevbeau said:

My wife did for her graduate degree. At least half of her classmates I’ve met are insufferable.


Hubby has a very "prestigious" education.  When we first started dating, my family thought he was a condescending snob. LOL  No one would call him that now. I think it is just what the Ivy League and "upper tier" graduate schools produce as it is so insular and moneyed. If you (generic "prestigious"-school -graduate "you") venture out into the real world, you mellow and expand. If you stay locked in an ivory tower away from deplorables, you don't grow, and pretty soon, you start believing your own bull####.  

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Of course you were. Why have an original thought when you can show your deference to your betters by appealing to authority?

 

Oh idk, because an original thought isn't always necessary as part of a supporting argument?  I mean I get the slight you're trying to send but... yeah lol.  

 

You go ahead and keep on thinking you are the one with all the answers while you try to portray the experts as holier-than-thou.  Oh boy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Hubby has a very "prestigious" education.  When we first started dating, my family thought he was condescending snob. LOL  No one would call him that now. I think it is just what the Ivy League and "upper tier" graduate schools produce as it is so insular and moneyed. If you (generic "prestigious"-school -graduate "you") venture out into the real world, you mellow and expand. If you stay locked in an ivory tower away from deplorables, you don't grow, and pretty soon, you start believing your own bull####.  

 

Which is why hundreds a year are directly funneled into the government leviathan before ever stepping foot in the real world. 

 

That's how you build an establishment political class of bureaucrats who think they, not the President, should be in charge because they went to Harvard.

4 minutes ago, Capco said:

 

Oh idk, because an original thought isn't always necessary as part of a supporting argument?  I mean I get the slight you're trying to send but... yeah lol.  

 

You go ahead and keep on thinking you are the one with all the answers while you try to portray the experts as holier-than-thou.  Oh boy.  

 

You misunderstand me completely if you think my position is that I have all the answers. It's quite the opposite. The only thing I know for certain is that I do not know everything. 

 

That causes me to question things more than most, and look deeper. 

 

We are, right now, in an information war. It's global, it's bigger and more invasive than any that has come before it. The position you're advocating for is one of laziness and only assures your own ignorance. Outsourcing your own freethinking to your "betters" because of where they went to school is how you assure that you stay a debt slave for life. Just trying to get you to open your eyes, bud. :beer: 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

stay a debt slave for life

 

Another topic for another time and one I think we'd share a lot of common ground on.  I gotta run to lunch with the old man but either way it's always nice chatting back and forth.  

 

You have a good one (and same to everyone else).  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Hubby has a very "prestigious" education.  When we first started dating, my family thought he was condescending snob. LOL  No one would call him that now. I think it is just what the Ivy League and "upper tier" graduate schools produce as it is so insular and moneyed. If you (generic "prestigious"-school -graduate "you") venture out into the real world, you mellow and expand. If you stay locked in an ivory tower away from deplorables, you don't grow, and pretty soon, you start believing your own bull####.  

I generally agree, but these were graduate students who had supposedly already spent time in the “real world.”  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

Everyone knows the 4 witnesses were not fact witnesses. 

 

A medical examiner called to the stand in a murder case is not a fact witness.

 

Why is the right gaslighting the public with this lame narrative?

 

13 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

Fact witnesses and expert witnesses are both witnesses. 

 

Make up your ***** mind.  :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Capco said:

 

Another topic for another time and one I think we'd share a lot of common ground on.  I gotta run to lunch with the old man but either way it's always nice chatting back and forth.  

 

You have a good one (and same to everyone else).  

 

:beer: 

 

(I really wasn't trying to insult you, my dude, just early morning commuting and texting. I always appreciate your participation)

 

************************

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Kevbeau said:

I generally agree, but these were graduate students who had supposedly already spent time in the “real world.”  

 

Depends on the "real world" job in those two years, I guess.  And then they head back to school for reimmersion. 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

<snip> The only thing I know for certain is that I do not know everything. 

 

That causes me to question things more than most, and look deeper. 

 

<snip>

Dammit, you're Socrates?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Uncle Joe said:

Dammit, you're Socrates?

 

I did a past life regression once for my day job (research about scammers for a comedy) -- I was REALLY banking on having that be one of my past lives, even tried to lead the person doing the reading down that path... 

 

But it turns out I was just a farmer in Indonesia who drown in a river. :lol: 

 

I wanted my money back. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I did a past life regression once for my day job (research about scammers for a comedy) -- I was REALLY banking on having that be one of my past lives, even tried to lead the person doing the reading down that path... 

 

But it turns out I was just a farmer in Indonesia who drown in a river. :lol: 

 

I KNEW it!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Capco said:

If we need to have a conversation about reforming parts of higher education, that's fine.  But what we're seeing instead is a wholesale dismantling of the respect and trust in that institution.  That's what should alarm you.  

 

Part of the problem with all of this higher ed issue is the ridiculous belief that simply 'being from Harvard' or 'being from Yale' etc. immediately means you are intelligent and must be considered an authority on whatever topic that Harvard or Yale graduate is speaking about.

 

That's simply not the case, and the degree does not grant them immediate classification of intelligence. It simply grants them a better opportunity to prove they are intelligent. People like Warren and Obama prove this on a regular basis every time they open their Ivy League mouths. They're not near as smart as we're supposed to believe they are.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Capco said:

"Never before, in the history of the republic, have we been forced to consider the conduct of a president who appears to have solicited personal, political favors from a foreign government."

 

Is it that Trump supporters simply think the above is bogus/hot air?  Or do they just not care and turn a blind eye even if they think he did do what he is being accused of, perhaps by citing other presidents who they think did the same or worse?  

 

I'd hope it's mostly the former.  

They don't care. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Part of the problem with all of this higher ed issue is the ridiculous belief that simply 'being from Harvard' or 'being from Yale' etc. immediately means you are intelligent and must be considered an authority on whatever topic that Harvard or Yale graduate is speaking about.

 

That's simply not the case, and the degree does not grant them immediate classification of intelligence. It simply grants them a better opportunity to prove they are intelligent. People like Warren and Obama prove this on a regular basis every time they open their Ivy League mouths. They're not near as smart as we're supposed to believe they are.

 

Always brings me back to this oldie but goodie

 

 

Edited by GG
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Foxx said:

no, it's that there is no factual evidence of this being true.

"I need a favor, though" 

 

Thats evidence, along with tons of circumstantial evidence, eye witness accounts and the words of Trump administration officials 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Capco said:

"Never before, in the history of the republic, have we been forced to consider the conduct of a president who appears to have solicited personal, political favors from a foreign government."

 

Is it that Trump supporters simply think the above is bogus/hot air?  Or do they just not care and turn a blind eye even if they think he did do what he is being accused of, perhaps by citing other presidents who they think did the same or worse?  

 

I'd hope it's mostly the former.  

Read the transcript and then you might find out why Trump supporters believe this is all bogus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

"I need a favor, though" 

 

 

"I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot..."

 

What Trump actually said.  "Us" and "our country" are the antithesis of asking for a personal favor.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Foxx said:

no, that is not evidence. that is you posting an excerpt without context.

Nope, it's evidence

 

Im sure you believe Ukraine interfered in 2016, millions of illegals voted and Pizzsagate were all real though :doh:

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

"I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot..."

 

What Trump actually said.  "Us" and "our country" are the antithesis of asking for a personal favor.

You are actually arguing Trump was working for the good of the country. You don't believe that. You know that's a lie 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

You are actually arguing Trump was working for the good of the country. You don't believe that. You know that's a lie 

 

No, I'm arguing that you misrepresented the evidence, and when properly represented the evidence doesn't support impeachment.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

....

sorry, but without context, it is nothing more than an excerpt that proves nothing.

 

yes, i believe there was Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election, the degree of which is debatable. millions of illegals voted illegally, i dunno about that but undoubtedly some did. to think that they did not is just being willfully blind or worse, dishonest.  is Pizzagate real, read my last sentence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

No, I'm arguing that you misrepresented the evidence, and when properly represented the evidence doesn't support impeachment.

By arguing Trump was doing what was for the good of the country, a complete joke. 

 

He was shaking down Ukraine, pure and simple. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Foxx said:

sorry, but without context, it is nothing more than an excerpt that proves nothing.

 

yes, i believe there was Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election, the degree of which is debatable. millions of illegals voted illegally, i dunno about that but undoubtedly some did. to think that they did not is just being willfully blind or worse, dishonest.  is Pizzagate real, read my last sentence.

The context is the withheld aid and what they had to do to get it, which was to do something to interfere in our domestic elections

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Steven Crowder is Canadian! :lol::nana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Hubby has a very "prestigious" education.  When we first started dating, my family thought he was a condescending snob. LOL  No one would call him that now. I think it is just what the Ivy League and "upper tier" graduate schools produce as it is so insular and moneyed. If you (generic "prestigious"-school -graduate "you") venture out into the real world, you mellow and expand. If you stay locked in an ivory tower away from deplorables, you don't grow, and pretty soon, you start believing your own bull####.  

Generally speaking, those that stay in the academic world are so insulated from the real world that they believe in such things as The Green New Deal.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nancy Pelosi’s dramatic statement about how they must move forward with articles of impeachment for Trump because the founders would want them to (or whatever hot mess she was babbling about) was just a hot mess.

 

Truly.

 

Nobody was surprised that they’d move forward (Nadler has been bragging about doing it since 2017), and ultimately it came across as a Hail Mary of sorts. Mollie Hemingway noticed something else very telling coming from several reporters this morning:

 

 

 

 

Democrats are in trouble.

 

We know it.

 

They know it.

 

Even the media know it.

 

But you know, Ben Franklin and they have a heavy heart and stuff.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

By arguing Trump was doing what was for the good of the country, a complete joke. 

 

He was shaking down Ukraine, pure and simple. 

 

By demonstrating that you intentionally misquoted the evidence to support your preconceived notion.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 


That is a must watch, there are three short videos.  Yovanovitch was up to her eyeballs in the Ukrainian money-laundering scandal, which we knew. 

@Chef Jim the second video  touches on Franklin Templeton money laundering that you had asked about the other day.  The third video mentions Schiffy. 

 


 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The context is the withheld aid and what they had to do to get it, which was to do something to interfere in our domestic elections ...

okay i'll bite... what exactly did they do to get the aid released?

 

go ahead, i'll wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

"I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot..."

 

What Trump actually said.  "Us" and "our country" are the antithesis of asking for a personal favor.

But Pamala Karlan knows that "us" means "me". Must be those numerous degrees that she has have enlightened her.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...