Dr. Who Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) 7 hours ago, Rob's House said: If anyone can tell me what law President Trump broke, and support it with even a plausible argument, I will create a sign line praising your wisdom, and leave it up for 6 months. Look, isn't it obvious? He broke the moral law by defeating Madam President and then he broke the law of the Deep State Constant which is practically the same as gravity and then he broke the law of ingratiating himself to the people that count (i.e., not the flyover deplorables clinging to religion and guns) and finally he broke the law of surrender which has been the GOP appeasement policy since Reagan left office. Edited November 21, 2019 by Dr. Who 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 he caused Hillary so much pain that she had to run away from giving a concession speech the first great sign that we are so fortunate Trump won Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Holmes opining on policy and what we need to do. because... he makes policy apparently. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Let's not forget that the people who are certain that President Trump is a criminal are the same people who were certain that Juicy Smollett was the victim of a hate crime. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 I may have missed this ... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Gun Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 59 minutes ago, westside2 said: You're an idiot. You keep spouting the same rhetoric knowing full well that you're lieing your ass off. You don't give a Schiff about the country. Why are you defending those crooks is beyond me. He doesn't, he doesn't even live in the USA! He spells check, cheque, nobody that lives in the USA spells check that way not even by mistake do "we" spell check that way. He's an argumentative uninformed, ignorant troll! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 i keep hearing that the 'conspiracy theory' surrounding the Ukraine interference in the 2016 election has been disproven. my questions are... by whom has this been disproven and if it has been disproven, why do Dems care so much if the President purses it? nothing there, right? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I may have missed this ... The line at the end was terrific: "If this were a prize fight they'd stop it." ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, pop gun said: He doesn't, he doesn't even live in the USA! He spells check, cheque, nobody that lives in the USA spells check that way not even by mistake do "we" spell check that way. He's an argumentative uninformed, ignorant troll! Pretty sure he is Canadian 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Just now, Foxx said: i keep hearing that the 'conspiracy theory' surrounding the Ukraine interference in the 2016 election has been disproven. my questions are... by whom has this been disproven and if it has been disproven, why do Dems care so much if the President purses it? nothing there, right? Holmes just explained. It lifts attention off Russia's interference in the US election, drives a wedge between US and Ukraine diplomatic relations, and makes it easier for Russia to try and regain Ukraine as part of its sphere of influence. In other words, it goes against US Foreign Policy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Bray Wyatt said: Pretty sure he is Canadian it's hard to hide the brilliance sometimes 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figster Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 8 minutes ago, Rob's House said: If anyone can tell me what law President Trump broke, and support it with even a plausible argument, I will create a sign line praising your wisdom, and leave it up for 6 months. I'm not sure about any actual law being broken. I do however think American lives might be put at risk when you press for an announcement of an investigation on a fellow American in a country already known for its corruption. The course of an election may have also been altered. With all due respect to one of my favorite PPP posters@ Rob's House 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, jrober38 said: Holmes just explained. It lifts attention off Russia's interference in the US election, drives a wedge between US and Ukraine diplomatic relations, and makes it easier for Russia to try and regain Ukraine as part of its sphere of influence. In other words, it goes against US Foreign Policy. lol. your not serious. the US President set US Foreign Policy. does he not? or are you asserting that unelected officials do? you probably should quit while you're behind at this point. you can't possibly believe the nonsense you spout. Edited November 21, 2019 by Foxx 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Foxx said: lol. your not serious. the US President set US Foreign Policy. does he not? or are you asserting that unelected officials do? you probably should quit while you're behind at this point. Literally every single diplomat that has testified over the past 4 days has said that it was US policy to help protect Ukraine from Russia, so that Russia couldn't expand its power and sphere of influence globally. That's what their directives were, and they're all testifying that Guiliani, Trump's personal lawyer, was actively working to undermine the work they were doing. Edited November 21, 2019 by jrober38 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: Literally every single diplomat that has testified over the past 4 days has said that it was US policy to help protect Ukraine from Russia, so that Russia couldn't expand it's power and sphere of influence. That's what their directives were, and they're all testifying that Guiliani, Trump's personal lawyer, was actively working to undermine the work they were doing. Who sets US policy? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Just now, Bray Wyatt said: Who sets US policy? Trump does. It probably would have been helpful if all US diplomats knew what Trump's policy actually was in Ukraine. All of them seem to think it was something different than what Guiliani was working on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 32 minutes ago, snafu said: Didn't Trump ask to get the DNC server (Crowdstrike) that he believes is in Ukraine? I don’t think he was looking for evidence of Ukrainian interference. Just where the server is and how it might have gotten there. How is that morphing into Ukraine election meddling? GarBoTibs is desperate to rush a talking point -- even when it's laughably wrong -- when his masters tell him "BOOM!" He's a fool. As he keeps proving over and over again. Not worth your time or engagement. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said: Who sets US policy? the buck stops at the President's desk if you want to rebel you can resign or get your behind fired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 12 minutes ago, Foxx said: i keep hearing that the 'conspiracy theory' surrounding the Ukraine interference in the 2016 election has been disproven. my questions are... by whom has this been disproven and if it has been disproven, why do Dems care so much if the President purses it? nothing there, right? It hasn't been disproven. The only argument being lobbed by the GarBoTibs and their ilk is that ONLY Russia interfered in the 2016 election. We know this is false, and we know the Ukraine absolutely played a part (as did many other countries, including our own IC). That's their argument. And it's laughably ignorant -- which is why low information NPCs are drawn to it like moths to a flame. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: It hasn't been disproven. The only argument being lobbed by the GarBoTibs and their ilk is that ONLY Russia interfered in the 2016 election. We know this is false, and we know the Ukraine absolutely played a part (as did many other countries, including our own IC). That's their argument. And it's laughably ignorant -- which is why low information NPCs are drawn to it like moths to a flame. thanks. though my question was mainly rhetorical, your response helps (?) the NPC crowd. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts