Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 ...But I thought soliciting help from foreign nationals to undermine US policy was a crime? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 ASKING THE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS: Eric Ciaramella or Voldemort? LET’S HEAR FROM THE WHISTLEBLOWER It seems ludicrous that in an open society, a president could be impeached and possibly removed through a process that begins with a report by a bureaucrat whose identity is never formally revealed and who is immune from examination. After all, the impeachment process is an attempt to override the decision of the electorate as to who shall be president. It should not be undertaken, and certainly not consummated, without the fullest, most open process, including the possibility of investigating the origins of the process. (snip) Here, as Andy McCarthy says, President Trump might want to argue that this impeachment is the product of a conspiracy between Democrats and their allies in the bureaucracy, particularly the intelligence bureaucracy, to paralyze and hopefully shorten the Trump presidency. “Prosecutorial abuse” is not an ideal defense, but it’s a permissible one. With many of Trump’s defenses crumbling as the facts roll in, it may soon be among his best remaining ones. Indeed, it may resonate with the public which has already seen one attempt by Democrats to take down Trump outside the electoral process. Whether we like it or not, the bureaucrat who blew the whistle on Trump is entitled to whatever protection that statute provides. Fortunately, it provides him none. The fellow who blew the whistle on Trump is not a whistleblower in the statutory sense. More at the link https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/lets-hear-from-the-whistleblower.php 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 You can't make this up. This is high comedy. (settle down, Bob. I don't mean HIGH in the sense you think) 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 50 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Better -- why does he even need the money? Zaid has said he's repping him pro bono this whole time. Plus, as a whistleblower, he can't be fired. So what's the money for again? .... Riiiiight. Well, if you look at all the facts - who set up the GoFundMe, who the donors are, etc., it's pretty clear that Epstein didn't kill himself... 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2019 Author Share Posted November 12, 2019 11 minutes ago, B-Man said: ASKING THE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS: Eric Ciaramella or Voldemort? LET’S HEAR FROM THE WHISTLEBLOWER It seems ludicrous that in an open society, a president could be impeached and possibly removed through a process that begins with a report by a bureaucrat whose identity is never formally revealed and who is immune from examination. After all, the impeachment process is an attempt to override the decision of the electorate as to who shall be president. It should not be undertaken, and certainly not consummated, without the fullest, most open process, including the possibility of investigating the origins of the process. (snip) Here, as Andy McCarthy says, President Trump might want to argue that this impeachment is the product of a conspiracy between Democrats and their allies in the bureaucracy, particularly the intelligence bureaucracy, to paralyze and hopefully shorten the Trump presidency. “Prosecutorial abuse” is not an ideal defense, but it’s a permissible one. With many of Trump’s defenses crumbling as the facts roll in, it may soon be among his best remaining ones. Indeed, it may resonate with the public which has already seen one attempt by Democrats to take down Trump outside the electoral process. Whether we like it or not, the bureaucrat who blew the whistle on Trump is entitled to whatever protection that statute provides. Fortunately, it provides him none. The fellow who blew the whistle on Trump is not a whistleblower in the statutory sense. More at the link https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/lets-hear-from-the-whistleblower.php What do you want to hear from him? He will just say that he has a lot of honorable people backing up his claims. You guys have Trump lying and lying and lying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: 6 degrees of Soros-ation. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You can't make this up. This is high comedy. (settle down, Bob. I don't mean HIGH in the sense you think) THAT'S who he reminds me of. People keep making "some animals are more equal than others" Animal Farm references. But he reminds me much more of Dean Wormer from Animal House. Trying and failing at every turn to punish President Blutarsky. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in Mich Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: What do you want to hear from him? He will just say that he has a lot of honorable people backing up his claims. You guys have Trump lying and lying and lying Isn't it funny that as a group the GOP cannot decide on a story? No one is even suggesting telling the truth. If the true story was 'perfect' I am sure that would be the best story, but quite obviously it is not. Says a lot. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 Just now, Bob in Mich said: Isn't it funny that as a group the GOP cannot decide on a story? No one is even suggesting telling the truth. If the true story was 'perfect' I am sure that would be the best story, but quite obviously it is not. Says a lot. The GOP can't decide on the story? Schiff two months ago: "We need the whistleblower to testify" Schiff today: "Forcing the Whistelblower to testify is a bridge too far and endangers him!" Schiff two months ago: "There was explicit offers of quid pro quo -- over 8 mentions of Biden!" (Transcript comes out, shows that's not true) Schiff now: "Quid pro quo doesn't matter -- now it's about bribery and extortion!" Don't be like Bob. Be better than Bob. This after he promised, for three years, that he had more than circumstantial evidence that Trump committed TREASON. But Bob still trusts Schiff? Why? Is it because Bob is an asshat who is a blind partisan, uninterested in truth or thinking for himself? You betcha. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in Mich Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 48 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Delusional Rhino has a crush on Bob - it's weird He just can't stop talking about him You noticed too, right? Don't be like DR. lol The guy is like a lamprey or leech. A parasite that kills discussions around here. He is compelled to reply to my posts because...... well, simply because he knows it all and no else knows anything. How would the other impressionable posters possibly handle it if Bob planted an idea and DR wasn't around to readjust their thinking? Guess we will never know. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 Just now, Bob in Mich said: You noticed too, right? Don't be like DR. lol The guy is like a lamprey or leech. A parasite that kills discussions around here. He is compelled to reply to my posts because...... well, simply because he knows it all and no else knows anything. How would the other impressionable posters possibly handle it if Bob planted an idea and DR wasn't around to readjust their thinking? Guess we will never know. It's not that no one else knows anything, quite the opposite. It's that YOU don't know anything about this topic, as you've proven for three plus years. And you keep proving it. (Next post will be asking for tapes again... we're so close!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The GOP can't decide on the story? Schiff two months ago: "We need the whistleblower to testify" Schiff today: "Forcing the Whistelblower to testify is a bridge too far and endangers him!" Schiff two months ago: "There was explicit offers of quid pro quo -- over 8 mentions of Biden!" (Transcript comes out, shows that's not true) Schiff now: "Quid pro quo doesn't matter -- now it's about bribery and extortion!" When did this start being bribery? How withholding foreign aid be extortion, but giving it be bribery? It can't be both. This theory of the crime makes no sense. It even makes less sense, the more time passes. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in Mich Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 This is a test post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: When did this start being bribery? How withholding foreign aid be extortion, but giving it be bribery? It can't be both. This theory of the crime makes no sense. It even makes less sense, the more time passes. Yesterday is when the talking points were issued and the parrots began repeating it. ************************* 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 12 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: You noticed too, right? Don't be like DR. lol The guy is like a lamprey or leech. A parasite that kills discussions around here. He is compelled to reply to my posts because...... well, simply because he knows it all and no else knows anything. How would the other impressionable posters possibly handle it if Bob planted an idea and DR wasn't around to readjust their thinking? Guess we will never know. He's just a nutjob who says what 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2019 Author Share Posted November 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Bob in Mich said: Isn't it funny that as a group the GOP cannot decide on a story? No one is even suggesting telling the truth. If the true story was 'perfect' I am sure that would be the best story, but quite obviously it is not. Says a lot. They are just like the old Segrgationist southerners, nothing matters except clinging (corruptly) to power. 55 minutes ago, DC Tom said: When did this start being bribery? How withholding foreign aid be extortion, but giving it be bribery? It can't be both. This theory of the crime makes no sense. It even makes less sense, the more time passes. Lol, it's fool proof Tom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 22 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Lol, it's fool proof Tom. You would know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 Amazing how the lefties on here take what DR posts as nut job conspiracy theories, yet his posts have been more accurate than anything the lefties throw out there. Since this is all based on Trump, the lefties have lost their minds and any sense of objectivity when it comes to Trump. But hey, why should lefties stop now with their TDS? They will get 5 more years to practice it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 12, 2019 Author Share Posted November 12, 2019 5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: You would know. I know, I can understand it easily, while you fools just can't understand. Fool proof 3 minutes ago, njbuff said: Amazing how the lefties on here take what DR posts as nut job conspiracy theories, yet his posts have been more accurate than anything the lefties throw out there. Since this is all based on Trump, the lefties have lost their minds and any sense of objectivity when it comes to Trump. But hey, why should lefties stop now with their TDS? They will get 5 more years to practice it. Accurate? Lol!!! Like the Nunes Memo? Or how about him screaming Obama, Comey and Clinton were heading to jail. His Puzzagate bull sh it sure turned out to be..,bull sh it! You are an idiot 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 12, 2019 Share Posted November 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I know, I can understand it easily, while you fools just can't understand. Fool proof Not exactly. It must have been too difficult for you to comprehend that it wasn't foolproof if you could understand it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts