Jump to content

Robert S. Mueller III Testimony Before Congress


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

so let me ask..you are saying they can truly make up an investigation on a crime they know not to have occurred? That i did not know

Yes. You're seeing it live.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

If you're speaking generally, every president can be charged for "it" when they leave office.  The dead ones are probably safe, but what about Gerald Ford? 

 

Agreed. 

 

None of them offended the left as badly though. The AOC extreme wing of the party won't stop until he's behind bars. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we believe the Russian investigation was thorough when we know Trump was witness tampering, lying, refused to talk and tried to stop the investigation...ok 

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

"How many times did you cite the WaPo in your report?"

 

Mueller: "No idea."

 

"I counted 60 times."

 

Asks the same questions about NYT and other media outlets.

 

"Vol 2 is mostly regurgitated press stories."

Stupid attack, they quoted the president, and now that's bad?? Lol! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's not speculation to state Mifsud is at the center of the origin, or if he was compromised it would destroy the entire foundation of the case. 

 

That's factual.

Didn't Misfud leave the country?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

"How many times did you cite the WaPo in your report?"

 

Mueller: "No idea."

 

"I counted 60 times."

 

Asks the same questions about NYT and other media outlets.

 

"Vol 2 is mostly regurgitated press stories."

Stupid attack, they quoted the president, and now that's bad?? Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

This whole thing looks terrible for the left. 

 

The best part is they have no idea how bad this looks. :lol: None.

Oh, was the left obstructing justice? Witness tampering? Please 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

This whole thing looks terrible for the left. 

 

The best part is they have no idea how bad this looks. :lol: None.

 

I disagree.

 

Most Americans aren't watching. They'll just see the headlines.

 

Tomorrow expect to see a bunch of newspapers with the front page headline along the lines of, "Trump was not exonerated". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buftex said:

Didn't Misfud leave the country?  

 

Nope. He's Italian. He was going back and forth between DC and Italy throughout 2017. Plenty of time for Mueller to question him (for a third time).

Just now, jrober38 said:

 

I disagree.

 

Most Americans aren't watching. They'll just see the headlines.

 

Tomorrow expect to see a bunch of newspapers with the front page headline along the lines of, "Trump was not exonerated". 

 

AKA, the media continuing its disinformation campaign.

(on behalf of the coup plotters)

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

Mueller can't be anymore clear that he thinks Trump obstructed justice. 

 

It will be very interesting to see what happens once he's out of office.

lol. he obstructed a crime he didn't commit, only a chimp finds that plausible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Nope. He's Italian. He was going back and forth between DC and Italy throughout 2017. Plenty of time for Mueller to question him (for a third time).

 

AKA, the media continuing its disinformation campaign.

(on behalf of the coup plotters)

 

What?

 

Mueller has said numerous times that Trump has not been exonerated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

I disagree.

 

Most Americans aren't watching. They'll just see the headlines.

 

Tomorrow expect to see a bunch of newspapers with the front page headline along the lines of, "Trump was not exonerated". 

 

And this is why this crap show will continue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

I disagree.

 

Most Americans aren't watching. They'll just see the headlines.

 

Tomorrow expect to see a bunch of newspapers with the front page headline along the lines of, "Trump was not exonerated". 

And that would not be incorrect.

Edited by Buftex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

I disagree.

 

Most Americans aren't watching. They'll just see the headlines.

 

Tomorrow expect to see a bunch of newspapers with the front page headline along the lines of, "Trump was not exonerated". 

 

Tomorrow?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's not his job nor how our system works. As stated earlier. Suggesting otherwise is to lie, or disinform. 

 

Well it's what he's said.

 

Mueller has said multiple times Trump hasn't been exonerated.

 

He's said multiple times that if Trump didn't commit any crimes, he'd have said so. 

 

2 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Tomorrow?

 

 

 

I don't know too many newspapers who publish mid day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jrober38 said:

 

 

Well it's what he's said.

 

Mueller has said multiple times Trump hasn't been exonerated.

 

He's said multiple times that if Trump didn't commit any crimes, he'd have said so. 

 

 

And that should offend you. 

 

Because it's bull####. 

 

He thinks you're too stupid to know it's bull####. As do the dems feeding it to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jrober38 said:

 

 

Well it's what he's said.

 

Mueller has said multiple times Trump hasn't been exonerated.

 

He's said multiple times that if Trump didn't commit any crimes, he'd have said so. 

 

 

So this means...after two years of investigation, Mueller doesn't know?

 

By all means, die on that hill.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

So this means...after two years of investigation, Mueller doesn't know?

 

By all means, die on that hill.

 

No.

 

As he's said numerous times, he's unwilling to say BECAUSE you cannot indict a sitting President.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Could he have indicted him if it was discovered Trump was a Russian asset colluding with Putin? 

 

(yes)

 

So it's bull####. 

 

Why would the law change just do to the severity of the charge?

 

The law is the law.

 

Mueller has been incredibly clear.

 

They cannot say Trump committed crimes, because they cannot indict him while he's President.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...