Jump to content

Talent vs Multiple low level players?


Who would you rather have?   

82 members have voted

  1. 1. Talent or Borderline players

    • AB or Bell
      20
    • Beasley, John Brown, and Gore
      62


Recommended Posts

The best teams get their elite talent via the draft and retain them.  They don't pay an extra 50% on guys because they are paying the FA premium rates.  And, curious, what happens when the team invests all that money on elite talent FAs and then they get hurt and you couldn't afford proper depth?  Short answer, you are screwed.

Edited by Mark80
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 100DollarBills said:

I left Morse out because we can sign him and Bell. The 3 guys I listed could have paid Bell. 

So you think giving a RB, QB money is a smart Idea?

 

When you have UDFA's being in the top 10 of RBs with only 192 attempts?

Edited by MAJBobby
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steelers vs. Rams. 

 

Steelers for years had this talent that you're crying about and couldn't make it to the big dance. 

 

Rams built a team of good players without any superstars (Kupp, Woods, Cooks) and made it to the superbowl (coincidentally, the argument could be made that they lost because their "talent" (Gurley) let them down.)

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HiddenInLight said:

You do realize that we can still afford bell right?

Maybe, but it would have been better to just have signed Bell and Morse. And used the leftover money on another OL. 

Just now, HiddenInLight said:

 

Marshawn Lynch 

A long time ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...