Jump to content

Democratic 2020 Presidential Primary Thread


snafu

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

I saw this "everywhere" Buffalo Gal, and I really question it.

 

I'm no fan of Uncle Joe, but this was posted last night at 10:30, before the debate was even over a New Yorker Magazine writer..........really ?

 

I think that it was just part of the plan to get rid of Biden.

 

I think that it is liberal propaganda.

 

 

.


oh yup. You are going to see more and more stories like this, something, anything to make Ds soften on Creepy Uncle Joe. The rigged polls the next few weeks should be interesting. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

4 minutes ago, row_33 said:

even if they aren't quite to the stage of "freaking out", having to deny you are freaking out isn't a good spin on things.

 

 

maybe more like a hairy spaz

 

 

It doesn't really matter. Remember Obama's first debate with Romney. He was as unprepared and as embarrassing as you can be in a debate with having the name Dan Quayle.

 

Yet he still won.

 

This debate stuff doesn't help anyone interested in making a decision n who to vote for so much as it's a self-serving event designed to give the political talking heads something to talk and write about.

Edited by IDBillzFan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

She's a liar  democrat

 

 

 

 

 

 

It was unusual in 2016 for Donald Trump to release a list from which he would choose Supreme Court nominees.

 

Now, there's an effort to make it seem abnormal not to release a list of potential Supreme Court nominees:



This is similar to the pressure on Trump to release his tax returns. Others have done it, so it's abnormal not to do it. What is he hiding? It's nefarious! That's how this trick works.

But will this trick work for the list of potential Supreme Court nominees — something only Trump has ever done. And I think he did it because he needed to counter speculation that he wasn't really conservative and was only pretending to be pro-life.

 

.

 

She does live in California, where you need multiple jobs to afford even basic necessities...thanks to "progressives".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, IDBillzFan said:

It doesn't really matter. Remember Obama's first debate with Romney. He was as unprepared and as embarrassing as you get be in a debate with having the name Dan Quayle.

 

I've always thought this to be a carefully orchestrated rope-a-dope strategy by Barack.  It worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Okay, so I guess Christianity is also perverse, right?

 

It's cost the world millions and millions of souls itself.

 

That's a terrible (and highly ironic) deflection. 

 

Communism is not a good system. Socialism is not a good system. Both are drenched in blood, and history keeps proving this time and time again. What's being pushed by the progfascists is thinly veiled communism -- pushed by people who are Marxist in their educational backgrounds. Learn your history.

Edited by Deranged Rhino
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, reddogblitz said:

 

I've always thought this to be a carefully orchestrated rope-a-dope strategy by Barack.  It worked.

 

I never saw it that way. I saw it as Barack Obama's ego getting embarrassed. He thought he could just waltz in like a Choom Gang get together and walk away with little or no effort. He schitt the bed that night, and his monstrous ego was laid bare for the world to see.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Rumors have it that Kamala went to "swinger" parties with Willie Brown and mouthed off a lot. I have a hard time picturing my president doing that.

 

You have a hard time picturing your President having extramarital sex and mouthing off?

You're serious? Am I missing the sarcasm?

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

I saw this "everywhere" Buffalo Gal, and I really question it.

 

I'm no fan of Uncle Joe, but this was posted last night at 10:30, before the debate was even over by a New Yorker Magazine writer..........really ?

 

I think that it was just part of the plan to get rid of Biden.

 

Make no mistake, the powers-that-be want Harris. From the very odd Smollett "Lynching" which just happened to coincide with Harris' anti-lynching legislation (who knew that hanging someone from a tree wasn't already illegal??) to the Biden busing document dump to the expose on Ukraine and China shakedowns... the men-behind-the-curtain have decided that Joe is a no-go.

 

If they want to gamble that there is no actual Trump card to play on Harris, though... there isn't enough Fake News in the world to stanch that kind of thing.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


LOL
 

 

 

                       Marianne Williamson  =     Sybill Trelawney

 

                               Image result for sybill trelawney

 

                               

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's a terrible deflection. 

 

 

It wasn't just terrible, it was lazy. 

 

One thing you can always count on from the far left: the moment they start to lose a debate, they say something stupid about Christianity to piss people off and change the dialogue.

 

It's low-hanging fruit for the least intelligent of the left.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's a terrible deflection. 

 

Communism is not a good system. Socialism is not a good system. Both are drenched in blood, and history keeps proving this time and time again. What's being pushed by the progfascists is thinly veiled communism -- pushed by people who are Marxist in their educational backgrounds. Learn your history.

 

Real Marxism has plummeted to about 1% of the levels it was at before 1989

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You've never attended an American university I'd wager ;) :beer: 

 

they have courses of Soviet History and Thought and Dialectical Theory going as strong as 30 years ago?

 

i highly doubt that

 

you are confusing "just being annoying" with being "truly Marxist"

 

you Americans have no clue at all compared to countries where serious left and far-left politics is part of the normal discourse

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

You have a hard time picturing your President having extramarital sex and mouthing off?

You're serious? Am I missing the sarcasm?

 


Meh, she can do what she wants with her sex life (between consenting adults). Where people have issues is that was a stepping stone to advance her career. Who knows, even without the phantom jobs Willie gave her she might still be where she is today. 

Note: photos makes that all moot. She couldn't politically survive  (on a national level) a photo expose of her participating in a swingers party. Americans for the most part, are prudes and that is a bridge too far. 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
I hate autocorrect
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...