Jump to content

Admiral William H. McRaven


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Thurmal34 said:

Yeah Fables of the Reconstruction, Murmur, and even Document are fantastic. 

 

They arrived during my undergrad years, Murmur was a continually played album for studying 

 

Friends didnt like them at the time, when they bandwagoned on the fame I had lost interest 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/17/2018 at 6:57 AM, The_Dude said:

He’s completely turned conservativism upside down. Now conservatism means huge deficits, tax breaks for huge corporations, halting free trade, and alienating NATO while embracing Bolsheviks.  

 

 

Fiscal conservative was tossed out the window by the GOP in 1998.  20 years later, you noticed....

 

As for Putin, well, you and the rest of the Zionists here hate him because he tells the truth about you and 911.... and ISIS and all the rest of your false flag attacks on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

 

 

Fiscal conservative was tossed out the window by the GOP in 1998.  20 years later, you noticed....

 

As for Putin, well, you and the rest of the Zionists here hate him because he tells the truth about you and 911.... and ISIS and all the rest of your false flag attacks on us.

First point is valid.

 

Second point tells me it's your hour of internet time at the psych ward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

 

As for Putin, well, you and the rest of the Zionists here hate him because he tells the truth about you and 911.... and ISIS and all the rest of your false flag attacks on us.

 

Putin seems to know as much about 9/11 as you do, and that aint much.

Eventually, those who make claims have to provide evidence.

Name calling isn't evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LMFAO!!!

 

3 minutes ago, sherpa said:

Name calling isn't evidence.

 

 

 

That is ALL your side does.... since it cannot answer the basic questions of 911...

 

1. can a 757 go 500 mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground?

2  why does the 767 that hits the South Tower have a CARGO HATCH at the bottom center of the fuselage (hint - only CARGO 767 have that hatch, passenger 767 does not)?

3. why is there no evidence of a plane in the Shanksville ditch?

4. why are there NO PHOTOS of bin Laden in Saudi?

5.  what caused MOLTEN STEEL to fall out of the South Tower (hint jet fuel burning 600F - liquid steel 2200F = Zionist Traitors are missing 1600F to explain it)?

 

Image result for ziggy osama
 
Edited by LaDexter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

 

 

Fiscal conservative was tossed out the window by the GOP in 1998.  20 years later, you noticed....

 

As for Putin, well, you and the rest of the Zionists here hate him because he tells the truth about you and 911.... and ISIS and all the rest of your false flag attacks on us.

Crusading in every thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to quote your post because I can't get rid of that stupid picture, so I'll just copy it instead.

 

That is ALL your side does.... since it cannot answer the basic questions of 911...

 

1. can a 757 go 500 mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground?

2  why does the 767 that hits the South Tower have a CARGO HATCH at the bottom center of the fuselage (hint - only CARGO 767 have that hatch, passenger 767 does not)?

3. why is there no evidence of a plane in the Shanksville ditch?

4. why are there NO PHOTOS of bin Laden in Saudi?

5.  what caused MOLTEN STEEL to fall out of the South Tower (hint jet fuel burning 600F - liquid steel 2200F = Zionist Traitors are missing 1600F to explain it)?

 

I can answer any question about 9/11. It would be more interesting if the questions were challenging, but that is beyond your capability.

 

Still.....

 

1. Yes a 757 can do 500 mph when in a dive from altitude and at full thrust.

2. The 767 that hit the either tower is a standard 767. What you claim is a "cargo hatch" at the bottom is the landing gear door. When closed, it creates a bubble, which is what is seen. Not only is your premise incorrect and stupid, your claim that a "cargo 767 has that hatch" is idiotic. I have over 9000 hours in the 757/767, and there is no cargo version that has such a "hatch."

3. There is tons of evidence, a cockpit voice recorder and a flight data recorder at Shanksville. Tons of evidence of airplane and human remains.

4. bin Laden's mother has plenty of pictures of him in Saudi Arabia.

5. A lot of things were eventually burning from those buildings. Jet fuel was the initial incendiary, but hundreds of tons of other stuff was involved. 

 

I wonder if you are a high school student who has recently come across the most basic and stupid claims.

The stuff you post is really the worst of the worst.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sherpa said:

I'm not going to quote your post because I can't get rid of that stupid picture, so I'll just copy it instead.

 

That is ALL your side does.... since it cannot answer the basic questions of 911...

 

1. can a 757 go 500 mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground?

2  why does the 767 that hits the South Tower have a CARGO HATCH at the bottom center of the fuselage (hint - only CARGO 767 have that hatch, passenger 767 does not)?

3. why is there no evidence of a plane in the Shanksville ditch?

4. why are there NO PHOTOS of bin Laden in Saudi?

5.  what caused MOLTEN STEEL to fall out of the South Tower (hint jet fuel burning 600F - liquid steel 2200F = Zionist Traitors are missing 1600F to explain it)?

 

I can answer any question about 9/11. It would be more interesting if the questions were challenging, but that is beyond your capability.

 

Still.....

 

1. Yes a 757 can do 500 mph when in a dive from altitude and at full thrust.

2. The 767 that hit the either tower is a standard 767. What you claim is a "cargo hatch" at the bottom is the landing gear door. When closed, it creates a bubble, which is what is seen. Not only is your premise incorrect and stupid, your claim that a "cargo 767 has that hatch" is idiotic. I have over 9000 hours in the 757/767, and there is no cargo version that has such a "hatch."

3. There is tons of evidence, a cockpit voice recorder and a flight data recorder at Shanksville. Tons of evidence of airplane and human remains.

4. bin Laden's mother has plenty of pictures of him in Saudi Arabia.

5. A lot of things were eventually burning from those buildings. Jet fuel was the initial incendiary, but hundreds of tons of other stuff was involved. 

 

I wonder if you are a high school student who has recently come across the most basic and stupid claims.

The stuff you post is really the worst of the worst.  

 

He's just a troll.  Not a very good one, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LaDexter said:

 

That is ALL your side does.... since it cannot answer the basic questions of 911...

 

1. can a 757 go 500 mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground?

2  why does the 767 that hits the South Tower have a CARGO HATCH at the bottom center of the fuselage (hint - only CARGO 767 have that hatch, passenger 767 does not)?

3. why is there no evidence of a plane in the Shanksville ditch?

4. why are there NO PHOTOS of bin Laden in Saudi?

5.  what caused MOLTEN STEEL to fall out of the South Tower (hint jet fuel burning 600F - liquid steel 2200F = Zionist Traitors are missing 1600F to explain it)?

 

 

 

Well Sherpa answered them with intelligence and facts , though I suspect from LA Dexter's posting record , that it is way out of his league ...............

 

so I will answer them as he would.

 

1.) No..............anyone who says so is a LIAR

 

2.) Hint:.............It was the Jeeeeews

 

3.) See answer #2

 

4.) Until one is produced, I am right, and if one IS produced...........its fake

 

5,) I will defer all steel melting gibberish question, to Prof. O'Donnell

 

 

 

 

P.S.

 

I am still awaiting my Sofia Loren in Australia pictures, until they are produced all your theories are moot.

 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, sherpa said:

Yes a 757 can do 500 mph when in a dive from altitude and at full thrust.

 

 


But that's not the "official version" of what happened.  The initial view of the damage to the Pentagon suggested the "plane" came "down."  The video shows just the opposite, that the "plane" behaved exactly like a cruise missile... coming in horizontally, so low that its "engines" would have been in the ground had it been a 757 and not a cruise missile...

 

Image result for 911 pentagon

 

 

17 hours ago, sherpa said:

The 767 that hit the either tower is a standard 767. What you claim is a "cargo hatch" at the bottom is the landing gear door

 

 

Not quite.  NO PLANE hit the North Tower, it blew up from inside.  For the South Tower, the image below not only shows the cargo hatch, but also an external "pod," likely heliping the CIA guide it remotely from WTC 7.  There are three versions of the 767, and two are cargo, and the CIA bought several.  The "landing gear" excuse is pathetic, but it is all you have before you start tossing insults and race/religion cards....  

 

Image result for 911 wtc 767 cargo

 

17 hours ago, sherpa said:

There is tons of evidence,

 

that your Hebrew to English translation software still has bugs....  and everything you post you know is a lie....

 

 

Image result for 911 shanksville
 

 

 

Them CHOZEN have two "explanations" for why there is no plane wreckage in Shanksville.  The first is that the plane "disintegrated," and the second is that it pulled a Scooby and buried itself....

 

Image result for scooby doo digging
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dexter.

It is not worth quoting your post to respond to it.

You are ignorant to the point of embarrassment.

The flight data recorder accurately depicts American 77's crash into the Pentagon, as does tons of other evidence and human remains.

 

Regarding the 767, and your "cargo" door/remote control nonsense, you are not only foolishly wrong, but your claim makes no sense.

Cargo areas are loaded horizontally. Otherwise the cargo falls on your head. The doors open parallel to the ground for that reason.

Your claim that the landing gear door is a cargo door on some never seen or designed 767 is preposterous.

 

Still.....I'd like to see you operate it.

What do you think would happen if you opened it?

Here's a hint.

Whatever was in there would fall on your head and crush you, and that doesn't address the impossibility of loading it vertically.

And by the way.....What did they do with the landing gear that's located there?

 

Stick to you Jew hatred. 

You are not smart enough for this.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sherpa said:

Dexter.

It is not worth quoting your post to respond to it.

You are ignorant to the point of embarrassment.

The flight data recorder accurately depicts American 77's crash into the Pentagon, as does tons of other evidence and human remains.

 

Regarding the 767, and your "cargo" door/remote control nonsense, you are not only foolishly wrong, but your claim makes no sense.

Cargo areas are loaded horizontally. Otherwise the cargo falls on your head. The doors open parallel to the ground for that reason.

Your claim that the landing gear door is a cargo door on some never seen or designed 767 is preposterous.

 

Still.....I'd like to see you operate it.

What do you think would happen if you opened it?

Here's a hint.

Whatever was in there would fall on your head and crush you, and that doesn't address the impossibility of loading it vertically.

And by the way.....What did they do with the landing gear that's located there?

 

Stick to you Jew hatred. 

You are not smart enough for this.

 

 

 

C'mon man, he has a crackpot website with circled pictures backing him up! Circled. Pictures.

 

You only come to the table with common sense, physics, and a crapton of industrial experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, sherpa said:

Dexter.

It is not worth quoting your post to respond to it.

You are ignorant to the point of embarrassment.

The flight data recorder accurately depicts American 77's crash into the Pentagon, as does tons of other evidence and human remains.

 

Regarding the 767, and your "cargo" door/remote control nonsense, you are not only foolishly wrong, but your claim makes no sense.

Cargo areas are loaded horizontally. Otherwise the cargo falls on your head. The doors open parallel to the ground for that reason.

Your claim that the landing gear door is a cargo door on some never seen or designed 767 is preposterous.

 

Still.....I'd like to see you operate it.

What do you think would happen if you opened it?

Here's a hint.

Whatever was in there would fall on your head and crush you, and that doesn't address the impossibility of loading it vertically.

And by the way.....What did they do with the landing gear that's located there?

 

Stick to you Jew hatred. 

You are not smart enough for this.

 

 

How do you know he didn't open the door and whatever was there fell on his head, convincing him that it truly was a cargo door? Or, maybe affecting his memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

How do you know he didn't open the door and whatever was there fell on his head, convincing him that it truly was a cargo door? Or, maybe affecting his memory.

 

Whatever was in there would have been the main landing gear strut, four very heavy tires and a ton of hydraulic lines and anti skid stuff.

The kid is an amateur.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sherpa said:

 

Whatever was in there would have been the main landing gear strut, four very heavy tires and a ton of hydraulic lines and anti skid stuff.

The kid is an amateur.  

That explains his severe retardation then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...