YoloinOhio Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 1 minute ago, TheTruthHurts said: 21, 22, 53, 158, Glenn , and McCoy for #2. Bills still have a pick in each of the 1st 5 rounds. I don’t think they need to trade McCoy in that deal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 1 minute ago, RochesterRob said: Who is Joe Banner? I think he's the guy that turns green if you make him mad. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted March 7, 2018 Author Share Posted March 7, 2018 23 minutes ago, Buffalo Bills Detective said: MAJBobby's reaction to this news: This is the best, I crack up every time I scroll down this thread. Well done good sir! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turftoe Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 18 minutes ago, HappyDays said: Eric Galko said that without actually saying it. But then I hear all the Foles rumors, so maybe Foles is their plan A but they already have plan B in place if that doesn't happen. I'm guessing that it was Indy that offered a 2nd for Foles. He is well known to FR and adds insurance if Luck isn't ready to go early in the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 21 minutes ago, HappyDays said: Eric Galko said that without actually saying it. But then I hear all the Foles rumors, so maybe Foles is their plan A but they already have plan B in place if that doesn't happen. Galko actually said they had interest in Foles AND Rosen. But that they would only do one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan89 Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, TheTruthHurts said: 21, 22, 53, 158, Glenn , and McCoy for #2. Bills still have a pick in each of the 1st 5 rounds. I think any trade up for #2 is going to look like 21, 22, 53, Glenn or 158, and next years 1st. Glenn and McCoy have very little value to the Giants. Glenn is a bit injury prone lately and is on a huge contract, if the Giants want him fine but he isn't pushing this deal over the top. McCoy is a 30 year old RB making 8 million a year, the Giants capped strapped somewhat aren't taking him on. Not only are they going to want a good haul of picks this year (21, 22, 53) but they are also going to want to set the table for next years draft and the Bills are going to have to include next years 1st in that package because some other team will. Edited March 7, 2018 by billsfan89 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted March 7, 2018 Author Share Posted March 7, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said: Galko actually said they had interest in Foles AND Rosen. But that they would only do one. I'd prefer Foles but not if we have to use both 1st rounders on him. I've come around to Rosen as the best pure QB prospect but his injury concerns scare me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CajunBillsBacker Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 I think they want Barkley and will turn down all offers if Barkley is there. Best case scenario is for the Browns to take Barkley so the Giants will be more intrigued to move back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 6 minutes ago, TheTruthHurts said: I think he's the guy that turns green if you make him mad. I thought he was the guy that played the bumbling Sgt Schultz on Hogan's Heroes. I...KNOW...NOTH..ING! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted March 7, 2018 Author Share Posted March 7, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, HappyDays said: I'd prefer Foles but not if we have to use both 1st rounders on him. I've come around to Rosen as the best pure QB prospect but his injury concerns scare me. But Foles' entire career besides 1 season doesn't scare you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted March 7, 2018 Author Share Posted March 7, 2018 Just now, kdiggz said: But Foles' entire career besides 1 season doesn't scare you? What a horrendous move this would be... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 27 minutes ago, PIZ said: No one commenting on the "Tyrod and a first for Foles" note? That’s what caught my eye...I hope we don’t give up s first plus Tyrod... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted March 7, 2018 Author Share Posted March 7, 2018 1 minute ago, JaCrispy said: That’s what caught my eye...I hope we don’t give up s first plus Tyrod... There is a good chance that we are only offering a 3rd, but had to bump it up to a first to get them to take TT 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, kdiggz said: But Foles' entire career besides 1 season doesn't scare you? It scares me less than any of the concerns with the top QBs in the draft. He just played the best football of his life. He just turned 29. I absolutely want him. My mind goes back and forth on if I'd be willing to give both 1sts for him. At least we know we're getting someone who has shown success at the NFL level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said: There is a good chance that we are only offering a 3rd, but had to bump it up to a first to get them to take TT I don’t mind Foles but I hope it is no more than a 2nd rounder... after all they would be getting a replacement in addition to the pick Edited March 7, 2018 by JaCrispy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEraBills Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 (edited) 14 minutes ago, billsfan89 said: I think any trade up for #2 is going to look like 21, 22, 53, Glenn or 158, and next years 1st. Glenn and McCoy have very little value to the Giants. Glenn is a bit injury prone lately and is on a huge contract, if the Giants want him fine but he isn't pushing this deal over the top. McCoy is a 30 year old RB making 8 million a year, the Giants capped strapped somewhat aren't taking him on. Not only are they going to want a good haul of picks this year (21, 22, 53) but they are also going to want to set the table for next years draft and the Bills are going to have to include next years 1st in that package because some other team will. If Denver does not land a QB in FA it's probably going to have to be more than that if Denver wants to move up to 2. They have the ammo to do it. They have #5, two 3rds, three 4ths, plus the 2nd rounder. Plus they can add future picks if they want. The price is going to get driven up. Plus, if the Browns do not take Barkley at #1 it's going to be difficult to convince someone to just I dunno, pass on the best player in the draft. Edited March 7, 2018 by NewEraBills Forgot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted March 7, 2018 Author Share Posted March 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, NewEraBills said: If Denver does not land a QB in FA it's probably going to have to be more than that if Denver wants to move up to 2. They have the ammo to do it. They have #5, two 3rds, three 4ths, plus the 2nd rounder. Plus they can add future picks if they want. The price is going to get driven up. Plus, if the Browns do not take Barkley at #1 it's going to be difficult to convince someone to just I dunno, pass on the best player in the draft. Cousins or Keenum would be a huge relief...This could get pricey, but if you are convinced this is your guy, go bold or go home... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffAlone Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 21 minutes ago, offyourocker said: I sure hope we would not do that for Rosen. Too many questions. Mayfield if we move up that much Ok...i hear ya. Why in your opinion is Mayfield better than Rosen? I see them as the top 2 by a large margin. But size n smarts, with laser accuracy, outshines drive, commitment, or any percieved chip imo. Id be happy with either. But if we gotta trade up to 2 to get Rosen, compared with 5 to get Baker, im on the Rosen wagon. Although, it'd be cool as hell to officially change the name of the 12th man to the "Baker's Dozen"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts