Xwnyer Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 2 hours ago, KelsaysLunchbox said: http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8374 And before you ask..NO he is not worth being brought in, mentioned as a bridge, gap or in any way or for associated with the Buffalo Bills QB position. actually I like the kid at NC State that decided to stay for his senior season Kid can sling it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putin Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 4 minutes ago, JohnC said: I stated that Peterman was more likely to be on the roster next season than Taylor would. Do you disagree with that? He will actually have a chance to compete , and might even win ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 13 minutes ago, billsfan11 said: And your point is?... lol Can't you read. That Peterman is more likely to be on the roster than Taylor would be. 10 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: I don't care one way or the other, he's not the answer. I never said Peterman was the answer. However, he is more likely to be on the roster as a backup than Taylor is on the roster at all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, JohnC said: Can't you read. That Peterman is more likely to be on the roster than Taylor would be. Thats really not a point proving anything. TT owed 18 mil next year if he’s on the team. Peterman, 600k or something? Do I really need to say more? Edited February 15, 2018 by billsfan11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 2 minutes ago, JohnC said: Can't you read. That Peterman is more likely to be on the roster than Taylor would be. I never said Peterman was the answer. However, he is more likely to be on the roster as a backup than Taylor is on the roster at all. We'll see. I can envsion scenarios where neither is on the Bills' roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 17 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: Tyrod (assuming that the price is right) I think in this case price is irrelevant. I have seen Glennon playing and am of the opinion that he will be fighting to be the #2 on any team. Tyrod still could be a bridge for some teams. Hence, a team would be more willing to 'over pay' for Tyrod than pay for Glennon. And this is coming from a guy who doesnt particularly like TT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 1 minute ago, billsfan11 said: Thats really not a point proving anything. TT owed 18 mil next year if he’s on the team. Peterman, 600k or something? Do I really need to say more? As I said Peterman is more likely to be on the roster than Taylor. I don't know what you are disagreeing with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billieve420 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, JohnC said: Can't you read. That Peterman is more likely to be on the roster than Taylor would be. One guy will make 18 million if kept past March deadline. The other is on a rookie contract. It has nothing to do with the player but the money. It has nothing to do with who is the better QB at this point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 4 minutes ago, JohnC said: As I said Peterman is more likely to be on the roster than Taylor. I don't know what you are disagreeing with. You are talking about the Bills roster, not just any roster. is that correct ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 2 minutes ago, Fan in Chicago said: I think in this case price is irrelevant. I have seen Glennon playing and am of the opinion that he will be fighting to be the #2 on any team. Tyrod still could be a bridge for some teams. Hence, a team would be more willing to 'over pay' for Tyrod than pay for Glennon. And this is coming from a guy who doesnt particularly like TT. Glennon is awful. I wonder if he’s in the league next year? These guys tend to washout. Teams wants vets that they believe can play for a little while, young guys that aren’t bad and young guys that they haven’t yet seen fail. Will a team use a roster spot on Glennon instead of Riley Ferguson (as an example)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 1 minute ago, billieve420 said: One guy will make 18 million if kept past March deadline. The other is on a rookie contract. It has nothing to do with the player but the money. It has nothing to do with who is the better QB at this point. You are wrong. If Taylor could play the position at a high level he would be well worth the contract. In fact he would be a bargain. The reality is that his level of play doesn't come close to matching his salary. The value isn't there as a starter. As a backup he would be overpaid. Just now, Fan in Chicago said: You are talking about the Bills roster, not just any roster. is that correct ? That is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Just now, Kirby Jackson said: Glennon is awful. I wonder if he’s in the league next year? These guys tend to washout. Teams wants vets that they believe can play for a little while, young guys that aren’t bad and young guys that they haven’t yet seen fail. Will a team use a roster spot on Glennon instead of Riley Ferguson (as an example)? Not disagreeing. I read you saying 'if the price is right' and took it to mean that a team may decide between Taylor and Glennon based on their price. Glennon is way worse than TT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 What do gms think? I could easily see this guy wasn’t a qb. Was there really a market so big it drove his price that high? How do you explain this to your boss? When they could have just paid a wr to help Mitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 7 minutes ago, JohnC said: As I said Peterman is more likely to be on the roster than Taylor. I don't know what you are disagreeing with. Ok...... And??... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, aristocrat said: What do gms think? I could easily see this guy wasn’t a qb. Was there really a market so big it drove his price that high? How do you explain this to your boss? When they could have just paid a wr to help Mitch They didn't have Mitch when they signed Glennon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Just now, dneveu said: They didn't have Mitch when they signed Glennon. IIRC Glennon was POed when they drafted Trubisky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, Fan in Chicago said: Not disagreeing. I read you saying 'if the price is right' and took it to mean that a team may decide between Taylor and Glennon based on their price. Glennon is way worse than TT No, someone said we all know who will sign first between Glennon and Tyrod. I said Tyrod assuming that the price is right. If Glennon takes a league minimum offer he might sign first. If you told a team you can have either at the same price everyone would pick Taylor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 7 minutes ago, dneveu said: They didn't have Mitch when they signed Glennon. Cleveland was never linked to Mitch. Niners weren’t either. Any way you slice it it’s a bad deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 2 hours ago, billieve420 said: For some people on this board any QB not named Tyrod would be better regardless of how good or bad they are. No point in arguing it won't matter. They deserve to have QBs Johnny Manziel, Tim Tebow and John Skelton as QBs with contracts as bad as only Jim Overdorf can make them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Quint Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 Tall and big hands. A resurgence might be possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts