Nunes Memo to be Released

[B-Man]

It’s difficult to square the Democratic hysteria supporting the suppression of the four-page Nunes memo with the document that was released yesterday. And it amazing how the Democrats’ media adjunct amplifies the Democrats’ line of the moment. All together now, they instantly adopt the party line and shriek in unison. Following Spinal Tap’s Nigel Tufnel, they are equipped to turn the volume up to 11. The sound is deafening. It’s hard to hear yourself think.

 

Adam Schiff is the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee. We caught a glimpse of his approach in “Motions full of Schiff” and in “Full of Schiff on Dem memo.”

Eric Swalwell is Schiff’s faithful sidekick. Swalwell plays Robin to Schiff’s Batman. Last night on Fox News Tucker Carlson invited Swalwell to defend the Democrats’ pre-release hysteria against the document we now hold in our hands.

 

“So Congressman,” Carlson asked, “many Democrats including leaders, including Pelosi and Schiff to name two, said the release would jeopardize American national security. That turned out to be a lie, provably, because there was nothing in this that was classified. There was no obvious reason it was classified in the first place. So, why would they tell us that when they knew it wasn’t true?”

 

http://video.foxnews.com/f847c5aa-8604-4a2a-996f-89a7f6d4d2d8

 

Swalwell responds in McCarthyite style. According to Swalwell, Carlson himself is damaging national security, hurting the country, and “refusingto acknowledge that the rule of law has been run over.” We can quibble on that last point, but what we have here is another case of Democratic projection.

 

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/02/swallow-well-or-gag.php

[blzrul]

Insistence on releasing this memo makes perfect sense. Because when Bill Clinton's BJ and Hillary Clinton's emails were being investigated, throwing mud at the accusers was so effective that the investigations were discontinued and everything went back to normal.   All forgotten, nothing to see here, move on.

 

Morons.  Especially when you read the damned thing.  Yawn. I'm starting to thing all the Democrats trying to prevent the release were using reverse psychology in order to make the GOP look even more desperate and ridiculous than they do now.  I'm stymied to think that these people are really planning to fall on their swords for a narcissistic, psychopathic huckster who doesn't have a clue as to how government works and, obviously, really doesn't give a damn. But, whatever.

 

[Deranged Rhino]

8 minutes ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

This memo is only the tip of the iceberg.  I see another 2-3 major releases between now and October, and A LOT of subpoenas and arrest warrants. I simply cannot bring myself to believe this is all they have...

 

Agreed. This is the start, not the end. 

 

They are starting with page because of the timeline. He was never on the transition team - yet they renewed his warrant twice after he was gone from the campaign. 

 

Why? 

 

Because they were not using it to spy on Page, but they were using it to spy on other trump officials whom they did not have a warrant for. 

 

When those aguing (without merit) that the memo is a nothing burger figure that part out, the conversations will start to change. 

 

Nunes - Grassley - Goodlatte - Horowitz. That's the batting order to come, and each one has a lot more than page. 

[Tiberius]

10 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:

 

You want to fight joe so you can have more Muslim neighbors ? 

They would probably be better people than you and he. 

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, blzrul said:

Insistence on releasing this memo makes perfect sense. Because when Bill Clinton's BJ and Hillary Clinton's emails were being investigated, throwing mud at the accusers was so effective that the investigations were discontinued and everything went back to normal.   All forgotten, nothing to see here, move on.

 

Morons.  Especially when you read the damned thing.  Yawn. I'm starting to thing all the Democrats trying to prevent the release were using reverse psychology in order to make the GOP look even more desperate and ridiculous than they do now.  I'm stymied to think that these people are really planning to fall on their swords for a narcissistic, psychopathic huckster who doesn't have a clue as to how government works and, obviously, really doesn't give a damn. But, whatever.

 

 

It takes a disconnect from reality to read the abuses of our most sacred constitutional rights (due process and privacy) and the subversion of the core of our justice system and come away thinking its TRUMP who doesn't "have a clue as to how government works".

 

This was a coup attempt. And you yawn. 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Paulus]

3 hours ago, HappyDays said:

 

Yikes this shows very poor comprehension of what happened. The FISA warrant for Carter Page was approved on its first submission. It was subsequently renewed on three separate occasions. It didn't "take them 4 times" to get the warrant. It took them one time, and then they renewed it every 90 days per FISA rules.

 

The Intercept has the best explainer:

 

https://theintercept.com/2018/02/02/nunes-memo-fisa-trump-russia/

 

 

 

I could have been a victim of fake news, or perhaps you were. Regardless, your ass-burgers are showing.

 

Honestly, I really don't understand how anyone is trusting these guys. Your do know this type of thing could have been perpetrated by Republican President on an opposing party during an election? I just think Nixon wasn't as calculating as the Obama guy, even though Nixon was only a fraction as corrupt.

Edited February 3, 2018 by Paulus

[Deranged Rhino]

Here's some food for thought for all those out there who dislike Trump and don't understand why the facts laid out in the memo are a big deal. Take it as you will:

 

I understand that for many people, Trump = Hitler - thus anything done to resist him is a-okay because the ends justify the means. But when faced with the predicament we find ourselves in today, it's important to remember that principles only matter if you stick to them when they are inconvenient.

 

Perhaps the most crucial principle in this country rests upon the idea that our justice system protects the accused. "Innocent until proven guilty." That underlies everything that makes this country what it is: One of mankind's greatest achievements.  

 

Even if you HATE Trump, which many do for reasons they can't explain other than by regurgitating talking points they heard on the "news", you cannot forgo that principle. 

 

EVER. 

 

It must be protected - especially when it's inconvenient to your politics. That's when it matters MOST. We can't throw that crucial principle out the window simply because we don't like the man in office. That's exactly what our system of justice and government is designed to PREVENT, not enable. 

 

Doing so is a violation of everything written in the constitution. Every. Single. Thing. 

 

So, take a step back and look at what we know so far...

 

We know, from the evidence presented and the open source material available, that people within 44's administration, USIC and DOJ, along with Clinton and members of her campaign, said that fundamental principle DID NOT MATTER AND IGNORED IT.

 

They ignored it not because Trump was a criminal... 

 

Not because he was a Russian agent...

 

But because he was POLITICAL OPPOSITION.

 

Nothing more. 44 and the USIC unleashed the most invasive tools in our surveillance state against US CITIZENS without probable cause because they were POLITICAL OPPONENTS. That's as fundamentally anti-American as it can possibly get.   

 

In part, this was done in order to POISON the minds of the voting public before they went to the polls, clearing the way for 44's chosen candidate. 

 

Then, after their attempt to rig an election did not work, these same operators turned the weaponized surveillance state against a LEGALLY ELECTED POTUS in the hopes of forcing him out of office or at least crippling his administration to the point of being ineffective. That's called a COUP. And the evidence for it is overwhelming. 

 

Even if you HATE Trump, even if you despise him, any honest person who cares about this country must admit these actions were ILLEGAL and a violation of our country's most sacred principles. It's a crime whose scope threatens to undermine our entire form of government. 

 

That's a violation of the WORST KIND by the very people elected to PROTECT our rights as citizens from exactly this kind of over reach. 

 

Before the memo came out, those with blood on their hands screamed to the media (and from anchor chairs) that releasing the memo was dangerous to national security, that it threatened democracy at its core. This was ALWAYS laughable. EXPOSING corruption is not a destabilizing act - it's the first step on the road to justice and assuring this never happens again. SUBVERTING OUR DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES TO RIG AN ELECTION IS THE DESTABILIZING ACT. 

 

You can't argue none of these violations matter because Trump is the target and he deserves it. That's not only disingenuous, it cuts against everything that makes this country worth living in....

 

Worth fighting for...

 

Worth DYING for.

 

If you're STILL not seeing why this is a slippery slope, why these actions are so egregious, imagine this scenario:

 

Imagine if we learn that during the 2018 midterms Trump used the powers of the state to spy (without a warrant) on every single democratic candidate, reading their emails, texts, calls - looking for anything disqualifying and leaking it to the media. And if he didn't find anything, then imagine he brought in Steve Bannon and Brietbart to INVENT salacious material and feed it to the media to create a circular loop of reporting and confirmation. Now, imagine if the media found out that all of this was done - not because the people being spied on were criminals, but because they were politically opposed to Trump. What would the reaction be? 

 

Would you agree THAT would be a problem? Would THAT be something to get upset about? Would THAT be something that threatens the very fabric of our republic? 

 

If you answer that honestly, the only answer is YES.

 

And if THAT scenario is wrong, then what actually happened to Trump and his team is absolutely wrong as well. 

 

You can't have it both ways. 

 

[jrober38]

13 hours ago, bdutton said:

 

I respectfully disagree on this point.  Campaign contributions did little to change the outcome of this election.  Trump won despite being a bad candidate.  Hillary was so much worse.

 

What needs to be done is to prevent politicians from benefiting financially from their time in office. Too many politicians are leaving office 1000 times richer than when then entered office.

 

I think we're talking about the same thing. Whether it's campaign contributions or fundraising of the copious amounts of money politicians make from lobbyists the massive amounts of money involved in politics inevitably leads to corruption. Federal politicians act to protect the interests of the people who give them millions in lobbying and not the people who vote for them in the elections. If you take away the huge money that comes from lobbying and fundraising, politicians would wind up having to serve the people instead of corporations and the super wealthy.  

[Deranged Rhino]

Schiff falls right into the trap: 

 

 

Ah, but Mr. Schiff, the memo DID NOT SAY THAT AT ALL. In fact, open source evidence shows that it just ain't true:

17 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Some of the early spin is going to end up backfiring badly. First example:

 

 

This is a demonstrable lie. 

 

The memo says known compromised agent Strzok began investigating Papadopoulos in July of 2016. People are jumping on this as proof the memo is a nothingburger. 

 

But it's a trap - and untrue. 

 

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/445504/obama-camp-disingenuous-denials-fisa-surveillance-trump

 

We KNOW 44 tried to get FISA warrants on 4 Trump officials in JUNE. 

 

June comes before July, doesn't it, Chris? 

 

What the memo shows is that after trying (and failing) in June to get a FISA warrant (after losing access in April), the DOJ tried to use Papadopoulos as cause for a FISA and that failed too. It wasn't until the dossier was created and bolstered through circular reporting in the MSM that they got the warrant. 

 

The trap of it all is the MSM is going to latch onto this as a talking point assuming it's all the evidence Nunes has... because no one is looking down the line and seeing the train coming down the !@#$ing tracks:

 

 

This is going to be fun to watch.

 

 

[Paulus]

1 hour ago, blzrul said:

Insistence on releasing this memo makes perfect sense. Because when Bill Clinton's BJ and Hillary Clinton's emails were being investigated, throwing mud at the accusers was so effective that the investigations were discontinued and everything went back to normal.   All forgotten, nothing to see here, move on.

 

Morons.  Especially when you read the damned thing.  Yawn. I'm starting to thing all the Democrats trying to prevent the release were using reverse psychology in order to make the GOP look even more desperate and ridiculous than they do now.  I'm stymied to think that these people are really planning to fall on their swords for a narcissistic, psychopathic huckster who doesn't have a clue as to how government works and, obviously, really doesn't give a damn. But, whatever.

 

Harvey Weinstein lite was a repugnant man, so was his treasonous wife. I can't wait until his daughter, who looks exactly like a Jewish caricature in Nazi propaganda (pics related), makes her run. I mean, she already has a great start stealing money from charity for her own personal use. Of course, the corrupt establishment folks are afraid of Trump. 

 

 

[MILFHUNTER#518]

31 minutes ago, Paulus said:

Harvey Weinstein lite was a repugnant man, so was his treasonous wife. I can't wait until his daughter, who looks exactly like a Jewish caricature in Nazi propaganda (pics related), makes her run. I mean, she already has a great start stealing money from charity for her own personal use. Of course, the corrupt establishment folks are afraid of Trump. 

 

 

 

Wow. Just wow.

[keepthefaith]

On 1/31/2018 at 3:16 PM, Tiberius said:

 

 

So it looks like there will be a long investigative hike on the FBI/DOJ/FISA surveillance of Trump and company trail and there could be a lot of arrests made before it all ends.  I think Trump and the DOJ and the house and senate committees will wait until Mueller is done before they get too nasty.  I also think Mueller who is mostly playing for the other team knows this and that he will drag out his investigation for endless months as a way to protect many of his former associates for as long as he can. 

 

Mueller who supposedly has the latitude to take his investigation in whatever direction the evidence leads him seems to be ignoring the apparent and improper bias and surveillance.

 

 

Edited February 3, 2018 by keepthefaith

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It takes a disconnect from reality to read the abuses of our most sacred constitutional rights (due process and privacy) and the subversion of the core of our justice system and come away thinking its TRUMP who doesn't "have a clue as to how government works".

 

This was a coup attempt. And you yawn. 

 

This is Debbie we’re talking about here. She’s a code pinker.

[TH3]

Deranged,

 

Dude - You are either in the wrong business and/or are wasting your talents here. You are talented - I say that sincerely - you should be writing spy novels for cripesake...you seem to be able to extrapolate so much out of this memo that even people at a national level can't. 

 

Seriously... you should write a spy novel.

[snafu]

1 minute ago, baskin said:

Deranged,

 

Dude - You are either in the wrong business and/or are wasting your talents here. You are talented - I say that sincerely - you should be writing spy novels for cripesake...you seem to be able to extrapolate so much out of this memo that even people at a national level can't. 

 

Seriously... you should write a spy novel.

 

Truth is stranger than fiction.

[3rdnlng]

6 minutes ago, baskin said:

Deranged,

 

Dude - You are either in the wrong business and/or are wasting your talents here. You are talented - I say that sincerely - you should be writing spy novels for cripesake...you seem to be able to extrapolate so much out of this memo that even people at a national level can't. 

 

Seriously... you should write a spy novel.

Deranged is a Hollywood screen writer and I suspect all this research he has done is for either a production or a book.

[MILFHUNTER#518]

8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Deranged is a Hollywood screen writer and I suspect all this research he has done is for either a production or a book.

 

Seriously? I am not being sarcastic, is he really?

[Nanker]

8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Deranged is a Hollywood screen writer and I suspect all this research he has done is for either a production or a book.

Yes. And I for one can't wait till he publishes his tome. It sounds as it should be required reading in every High School civics class... if they even have those anymore. 

 

A hat-tip to DR, who's been on this for many, many months and has connected the dots on the voluminous research he and others have done. 

Kudos, sir!

 

2 minutes ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

 

Seriously? I am not being sarcastic, is he really?

Indeed he is.

[3rdnlng]

10 minutes ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

 

Seriously? I am not being sarcastic, is he really?

Yep. I suspect he hangs with Charlie Sheen though.

[Deranged Rhino]

Good article here clarifying the difference between title VII and title I and why that matters re the Memo. 

 

Page's FISA - per the memo - was NOT VII (meaning incidental collection), it was Title I meaning the government claimed Page was a Russian agent or spy. 

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/02/inside-the-hpsci-memo-a-key-distinction-being-conflated-title-i-vs-title-vii/

[B-Man]

Why Did the Democrats Lie So Baldly about the Memo

Adam Schiff, Dianne Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi, among seemingly dozens of Democrats, not to mention half the mainstream media, had been warning us for days that the release of the memo authored by Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee would place our national security at grave risk. "Sources and methods" would be revealed.

 

Now that we have seen the memo, it's clear that was an absolutely bald-faced lie of the most obvious sort. Nothing in it impacts national security in the slightest. There's no mention whatsoever of any "sources and methods."

 

Unless they were lobotomized, those Democrats and their dependable PR team (aka the media) must have realized they were blatantly lying to the American public. Evidently, they didn't care. How're we now supposed to trust what these people say about anything? Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. 

 

Their latest meme is "cherry picking." The memo was cherry-picked and therefore to be ignored. That's like saying a murderer who has a clean driving record and is a good cook is not a murderer. Whatever else happened, the FBI clearly used a slanderous fictional document to get a FISA ruling to surveil Carter Page without telling the court the document was a pack of lies paid for by the Clinton campaign and written by a creepy spy with old-line Soviet connections. And they did it multiple times.

 

{snip}

 

It seems this particular lie was a last line of defense — for now — against a coming potential Armageddon for their party.  This memo, bad as it is, is apparently only the first of many, a small percentage of what is to come. And the Democrats know it.

 

Fear is operative. Maybe panic. An entire weltanschauung is under threat — jobs, friends, self-image, who knows what. If this goes on much longer and much more comes out, some Democrats -—not apparatchik Schiff, needless to say, but others — might have to face reality and say something. A few journalists (not at CNN, but maybe someplace else) might have to report the truth. It happened with Watergate. Republicans turned against Nixon. But, of course, they're "the stupid party."

 

But speaking of stupid, something else occurred that few are mentioning, but may be of more significance than anything. What were these FISA judges thinking who allowed for the surveillance?  They actually read the Steele dossier, one would assume. Were they imbeciles or as biased as McCabe, Strzok and the rest of that seedy FBI cabal? Whether they were told that document came from the Clinton campaign or not, it read like an outtake from the back pages of the National Enquirer — and not one of the good issues (John Edwards, etc.). The dossier was ludicrous on its face, yet the supposedly great legal minds of the FISA court accepted it as what appears to be the most important evidence for the case.

 

Think about that.

 

What we need, obviously, is the old word transparency. The public needs to see the full details of what went into the FISA decisions — and we don't need to hear any of that fake palaver about national security. Everybody's security depends on the FISA court working in a one-hundred percent unbiased manner. Otherwise we're living a nightmare.

 

That court, and its workings, and its personnel should be a key part of any investigation going forward. New rules and regulations have to be put in place.

 

FINALLY: Looking good in all this is Senator Rand Paul. He warned us about our fragile privacy. Looking especially bad, the American Civil Liberties Union who are defecating on their charter. Looking even worse: Barack Obama. He led the charge to turn the intelligence agencies against the people. Looking lost — Robert Mueller. How will he get half the country to believe anything he says at this point?

 

https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/democrats-lie-baldly-memo/

[Nanker]

17 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Yep. I suspect he hangs with Charlie Sheen though.

 

 

[bdutton]

Liberal Logic:

Edited February 3, 2018 by bdutton

[Deranged Rhino]

Here's a very poor attempt at deflection by Rep Eric Swallwell. Note his argument is that Tucker is "undermining the rule of law" for raising these concerns while ignoring the fact this whole ordeal was brought upon the American people by 44 and company ignoring the rule of law to spy on their political opposition. 

 

If this is all they got as a defense, then the next few months are going to be rougher on them than even I imagined:

 

 

Just now, bdutton said:

Liberal Logic:

 

 

It's amazing to see.

*******************

 

 

[3rdnlng]

12 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Here's a very poor attempt at deflection by Rep Eric Swallwell. Note his argument is that Tucker is "undermining the rule of law" for raising these concerns while ignoring the fact this whole ordeal was brought upon the American people by 44 and company ignoring the rule of law to spy on their political opposition. 

 

If this is all they got as a defense, then the next few months are going to be rougher on them than even I imagined:

 

 

Well Swalwell is Adam Schiff's lapdog and argues pretty much the same way. These guys truly are idiots.

[Doc Brown]

17 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Why Did the Democrats Lie So Baldly about the Memo

I think I answered this before with a similar headline.  Because they're idiots who are terrible at playing politics.  The same reason they overreacted to the Tax Bill and now are regretting it as people are slowly realizing their taxes aren't going up but going down.  The same reason they were screaming Russian collusion/rigging election when they should of been self examining their own party like the GOP did in '09.  

[TH3]

31 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Good article here clarifying the difference between title VII and title I and why that matters re the Memo. 

 

Page's FISA - per the memo - was NOT VII (meaning incidental collection), it was Title I meaning the government claimed Page was a Russian agent or spy. 

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/02/inside-the-hpsci-memo-a-key-distinction-being-conflated-title-i-vs-title-vii/

 

Hey DR, I can not keep up with your voluminous reporting on the Democratic assault on our country!...I am making a chart...was Ellen Degeneres in on this vein of treason...or was that in another section of liberal madness?

[Deranged Rhino]

Just now, baskin said:

 

Hey DR, I can not keep up with your voluminous reporting on the Democratic assault on our country!...I am making a chart...was Ellen Degeneres in on this vein of treason...or was that in another section of liberal madness?

 

If you think my contention is that this was purely a democratic assault on our country, you haven't been paying close enough attention. 

 

The rot is on both sides, crosses multiple administrations. 

 

It's just right now, in this moment, it's 44 and company who got caught with their hand in the cookie jar. That's not the start or end of the corruption. It's just the group that's caught in the spotlight. Do you think that the only time these spying powers have been abused by the state happened in the '16 election? 

 

Nah. 

[DC Tom]

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

If you think my contention is that this was purely a democratic assault on our country, you haven't been paying close enough attention. 

 

 

It's baskin.  What do you think?

[Prickly Pete]

4 minutes ago, baskin said:

 

Hey DR, I can not keep up with your voluminous reporting on the Democratic assault on our country!...I am making a chart...was Ellen Degeneres in on this vein of treason...or was that in another section of liberal madness?

'

Go !@#$ yourself

[TH3]

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

If you think my contention is that this was purely a democratic assault on our country, you haven't been paying close enough attention. 

 

The rot is on both sides, crosses multiple administrations. 

 

It's just right now, in this moment, it's 44 and company who got caught with their hand in the cookie jar. That's not the start or end of the corruption. It's just the group that's caught in the spotlight. Do you think that the only time these spying powers have been abused by the state happened in the '16 election? 

 

Nah. 

If you think I read ANY of this stuff past the first several words...you are under the wrong impression...thats what is good about DC...his thoughts are limited to typically 12-15 words and are almost always repetitive and contain no substance whatsoever....you...on the other hand...anyone who can weave Ellen freaking Degeneres into a liberal conspiracy...that gold...Jerry...gold...

In another thread...DR did actually weave Ellen Degeeres into the liberal conspiracy...it was genius....

5 minutes ago, OJABBA said:

'

Go !@#$ yourself

 

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, baskin said:

If you think I read ANY of this stuff past the first several words...you are under the wrong impression...

 

I must have been. I thought you had a larger attention span than that of a gnat. I was wrong.

[DC Tom]

5 minutes ago, baskin said:

If you think I read ANY of this stuff past the first several words...you are under the wrong impression...

 

Then don't opine on it, retard.

[TH3]

6 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Then don't opine on it, retard.

You guys seem to read quite a bit and opine even more....from what I can see most of it is unoriginal repeats stemming from obviously agenda oriented press outlets or just plain links to threads....but the case of DR ..it is...magnificence!

 

 

BTW...you talked about psychanalysis...would you say your issues are more mommy or daddy oriented?

[3rdnlng]

1 minute ago, baskin said:

You guys seem to read quite a bit and opine even more....from what I can see most of it is unoriginal repeats stemming from obviously agenda oriented press outlets or just plain links to threads....but the case of DR ..it is...magnificence!

 

 

BTW...you talked about psychanalysis...would you say your issues are more mommy or daddy oriented?

Opposed to your issues, that are more jackass oriented?

[Tiberius]

1 hour ago, keepthefaith said:

 

So it looks like there will be a long investigative hike on the FBI/DOJ/FISA surveillance of Trump and company trail and there could be a lot of arrests made before it all ends.  I think Trump and the DOJ and the house and senate committees will wait until Mueller is done before they get too nasty.  I also think Mueller who is mostly playing for the other team knows this and that he will drag out his investigation for endless months as a way to protect many of his former associates for as long as he can. 

 

Mueller who supposedly has the latitude to take his investigation in whatever direction the evidence leads him seems to be ignoring the apparent and improper bias and surveillance.

 

 

Well, the Manafort trial doesn't even begin until September. 

 

And remember, Mueller wants to interview the president, so that's still being negotiated. Under oath. Lol 

50 minutes ago, baskin said:

 

Hey DR, I can not keep up with your voluminous reporting on the Democratic assault on our country!...I am making a chart...was Ellen Degeneres in on this vein of treason...or was that in another section of liberal madness?

Ellen!! Rotflmao!! 

[B-Man]

 

Quote

 

Dan Rather

✔@DanRather

With the release of the memo, the goal of the White House and its willing enablers is to make what is really the truth into a forgettable sidebar.https://www.facebook.com/theDanRather/posts/10159959973570716 …

8:35 PM - Feb 2, 201

 

 

Quote

David Burge@iowahawkblog

 

Why don't you sit this one out, Times New McRomanhttps://twitter.com/DanRather/status/959601138063482880 …

12:58 PM - Feb 3, 2018

 

 

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, baskin said:

You guys seem to read quite a bit and opine even more....from what I can see most of it is unoriginal repeats stemming from obviously agenda oriented press outlets or just plain links to threads....but the case of DR ..it is...magnificence!

 

 

BTW...you talked about psychanalysis...would you say your issues are more mommy or daddy oriented?

 

Time for gatorman to pop in and say "Hold my beer and watch this..."

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

The replies to Scarborough's tweet are truly asinine.

Edited February 3, 2018 by DC Tom