Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

 

He probably shouldn't have pleaded guilty if "there was no crime."  

15 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

The new move by Sullivan is an attempt to force a pardon. It won’t happen. 


https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1260705216829239296

 

Don't be so sure.  Now we know why the judge invited the amicus participation.  Because he things the DOJ is politically motivated and full of bunk on this one.  I don't believe in reading tea leaves because it's never an exact science. But here it's not looking good for Flynn at the trial level.  Maybe appeal will tell a different story, but there's likely to be an election between now and then. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Magox said:

How convenient

 

 

 

 

Which is different than he testified under oath. 

 

He'll be reunited soon enough with Michael Hastings. Karma is a SOB. 

26 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Don't be so sure. 

 

Care to make a wager?

***********************

 

*************************

 

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Which is different than he testified under oath. 

 

He'll be reunited soon enough with Michael Hastings. Karma is a SOB. 

 

Care to make a wager?

***********************

 

*************************

 

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Eli Lake more of a skeptic early on?

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

He probably shouldn't have pleaded guilty if "there was no crime."  

 

Don't be so sure.  Now we know why the judge invited the amicus participation.  Because he things the DOJ is politically motivated and full of bunk on this one.  I don't believe in reading tea leaves because it's never an exact science. But here it's not looking good for Flynn at the trial level.  Maybe appeal will tell a different story, but there's likely to be an election between now and then. 

Well, again, no.  

 

Engaging in dialogue is fine, we can go back and forth on these issues all day long.  The DOJ chose to withdraw the case, so by extension, a guilty plea by General Flynn would have resulted in an travesty of justice.  I suppose it's possible you believe that every case is adjudicated with fairness, that no party is ever coerced into making a plea under threat of governmental tyranny, that every prosecutor is above board and no innocent party is ever found guilty of a crime.  I don't think you believe that, but it aligns with your political values in this case. 

 

Since the judge in the case has chosen to act as outlined, the only appropriate resolution is for Flynn's attorney to see it through.  If the DOJ feels Sullivan is out of line, and they have the ability to remove him from the case lawfully, or isolate him generally, that would seem to be the best resolution for all parties involved.  Clearly, the political animus rests with Judge Sullivan here.  He's presided over the case, alleged 'treason' when no such claim was made, has chosen to disregard the thoughts of the DOJ, and sought out a politically motivated prosecutor to keep what is obviously a dog of a case forward.  This squeezes Genera Flynn yet again, financially and emotionally, in spite of the obvious problems with the government case when there was one. 

  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

So nice to see people standing up for the rule of law against this corrupt regime https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/14/judge-sullivan-shows-awesome-power-federal-judges/

 

 

 

 

Laurence Tribe?

you mean the guy who’s been wrong about everything for nearly four years? Why do they keep trotting out that “expert”? If you want to see what will actually happen, look in the opposite direction that Laurence Tribe points you.

 

And can anyone explain why an ACTUAL judge, Sullivan, needs a FORMER, now-pretend judge to decide his cases for him? What a pu$$y.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, snafu said:

 

Laurence Tribe?

you mean the guy who’s been wrong about everything for nearly four years? Why do they keep trotting out that “expert”? If you want to see what will actually happen, look in the opposite direction that Laurence Tribe points you.

 

And can anyone explain why an ACTUAL judge, Sullivan, needs a FORMER, now-pretend judge to decide his cases for him? What a pu$$y.

 

 

Tribe never pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...