Koko78 Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 (edited) Hopefully Mueller's cronies have something more compelling than: Quote In one call, the agent wrote, Manafort said he wanted to give the person a "heads-up about Hapsburg." The individual then hung up "because he was concerned about the outreach," according to the affidavit. On Feb. 26, Manafort sent the person a series of messages through an encrypted application, including a link to a Business Insider story with the headline: "Former European leaders struggle to explain themselves after Mueller claims Paul Manafort paid them to lobby for Ukraine." Another message said, "We should talk. I have made clear that they worked in Europe." The person told investigators that he interpreted Manafort's efforts to reach him as a way to influence his potential statements. The person believed from his experience that the Hapsburg Group lobbied in the United States and knew that Manafort knew that as well, the agent wrote. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/muellers-team-accuses-manafort-witness-tampering-010919309--politics.html?.tsrc=bell-brknews You know, because the person 'interpreted' Manafort's phone call... Gotta love when the criminal justice system is all about feelings. Edited June 5, 2018 by Koko78 Forgot the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 2012, 2013??? Trump hadn’t even met Stormy Daniels yet. Manafort didn’t join Trump’s campaign until years later. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 (edited) 7 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Or "Special counsel in Russia probe accuses ex-Podesta Group associate Paul Manafort of attempting to tamper with witnesses" Which do you prefer, 26CornerBlitz? Edited June 5, 2018 by OJABBA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 9 hours ago, Koko78 said: Hopefully Mueller's cronies have something more compelling than: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/muellers-team-accuses-manafort-witness-tampering-010919309--politics.html?.tsrc=bell-brknews You know, because the person 'interpreted' Manafort's phone call... Gotta love when the criminal justice system is all about feelings. Mueller's cronies? You Trumpbots are something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 3 hours ago, OJABBA said: Or "Special counsel in Russia probe accuses ex-Podesta Group associate Paul Manafort of attempting to tamper with witnesses" Which do you prefer, 26CornerBlitz? I'm sure next time he'll adjust the AP headline. It's obvious you have a preference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 Give me someone who REALLY knows the Constitution of the United States who can put this whole thing into perspective. This babbling back and forth isn't productive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 Warnings from the right Grassley: Trump should get new lawyer if told he can pardon himself ... thehill.com/.../390571-grassley-trump-should-get-new-lawyer-if-told-he-can-pardon-... 20 hours ago - "If I were president of the United States and I had a lawyer that told me I could pardonmyself, I think I would hire a new lawyer," Grassley, the ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 12 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said: In your own words (if that's even possible for a bot), what does this mean? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted June 5, 2018 Author Share Posted June 5, 2018 Just now, GG said: In your own words (if that's even possible for a bot), what does this mean? Don't be a simpleton if that's possible. It's rather self explanatory. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 8 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Don't be a simpleton if that's possible. It's rather self explanatory. You started this thread. You should participate more than autobotting twitter feeds. Exactly what does Mueller's recent accusations against Manafort mean to the Russia collusion probe against Trump? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 Gee, no one on here has ever heard of criminals getting their story straight? Duh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 11 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Don't be a simpleton if that's possible. It's rather self explanatory. You know what "self explanatory" means? It means "I can't explain it." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted June 5, 2018 Author Share Posted June 5, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, GG said: You started this thread. You should participate more than autobotting twitter feeds. Exactly what does Mueller's recent accusations against Manafort mean to the Russia collusion probe against Trump? I'll participate as often or as little as I choose to. They obviously aren't directly connected. Let me make it clear that I owe you nothing in the way of explanations. 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: You know what "self explanatory" means? It means "I can't explain it." No. It means it's written in plain language that requires no interpretation or explanation you idiot. Edited June 5, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: I'll participate as often or as little as I choose to. They obviously aren't directly connected. Let me make it clear that I owe you nothing in the way of explanations. No. It means it's written in plain language that requires no interpretation or explanation you idiot. You posted this in the thread about the Russia collusion. What's the meaning of it as it relates to the collusion investigation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted June 5, 2018 Author Share Posted June 5, 2018 Just now, GG said: You posted this in the thread about the Russia collusion. What's the meaning of it as it relates to the collusion investigation? The Mueller investigation has broader authority to prosecute crimes discovered beyond collusion or have you not been paying attention? If you haven't, that's on you. As Trump's former campaign chair, there is a connection and I'm sure they'd ultimately like to have is cooperation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: The Mueller investigation has broader authority to prosecute crimes discovered beyond collusion or have you not been paying attention? If you haven't, that's on you. As Trump's former campaign chair, there is a connection and I'm sure they'd ultimately like to have is cooperation. I didn't know Manafort was Trump's campaign chairman in 2012, when he was also a bag man for the Clinton Foundation. Where were your twitter bots when Podesta Group suddenly closed up shop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 10 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: No. It means it's written in plain language that requires no interpretation or explanation you idiot. So it means nothing more than Manafort was tampering with witnesses? That's what you want to share with us? And it has absolutely no more meaning within the context of the Mueller investigation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted June 5, 2018 Author Share Posted June 5, 2018 Just now, GG said: I didn't know Manafort was Trump's campaign chairman in 2012, when he was also a bag man for the Clinton Foundation. Where were your twitter bots when Podesta Group suddenly closed up shop? Did any of that result is action from Mueller's team in Federal Court? 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: So it means nothing more than Manafort was tampering with witnesses? That's what you want to share with us? And it has absolutely no more meaning within the context of the Mueller investigation? There wouldn't have been any action by the Mueller team if that was not the case. Manafort tried to get cute and got caught. Try to follow along better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: So it means nothing more than Manafort was tampering with witnesses? That's what you want to share with us? And it has absolutely no more meaning within the context of the Mueller investigation? Ya, that's all, no big deal, huh? And only Mueller knows what it all means at this point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Did any of that result is action from Mueller's team in Federal Court? Shouldn't the answer be self-explanatory? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts