Tiberius Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 Duh! Adm. Mike Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command, told a Senate panel Tuesday that the Trump administration is not doing enough to counter Russia’s attempts to meddle in future U.S. elections through the use of cyberattacks. “Clearly, what we’ve done hasn’t been enough,” Rogers bluntly declared during a Senate armed services committee hearing. In particular, Rogers said the administration’s decision to not immediately implement congressionally mandated sanctions against Russia sends a signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that the Kremlin can continue to wage cyber warfare against the U.S. and other countries. “Not just the sanctions but more broadly, my concern is, I believe that President Putin has clearly come to the conclusion there’s little price to pay here, and that therefore I can continue this activity,” Rogers told Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). https://www.thedailybeast.com/nsa-boss-seems-to-hit-trump-on-russia-putin-believes-little-price-to-pay-for-messing-with-us?ref=home Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 Anyone trying to push a division between Rogers and Trump is selling lies. I promise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Anyone trying to push a division between Rogers and Trump is selling lies. I promise. I like how they're trying to claim that the head of US Cyber Command is opining on the effectiveness of sanctions to prevent "hacking" or "collusion" or "meddling" whatever the dipSchiff narrative is this week, instead of, you know, beefing up cyber security. Because the media would never take out of context statements to push the narrative. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: I like how they're trying to claim that the head of US Cyber Command is opining on the effectiveness of sanctions to prevent "hacking" or "collusion" or "meddling" whatever the dipSchiff narrative is this week, instead of, you know, beefing up cyber security. Because the media would never take out of context statements to push the narrative. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 24 minutes ago, DC Tom said: That the judge's acceptance makes them legally binding as a court order, meaning Mueller's team can't adjust them. Not just that, but that he believes the prosecutor can order the court to do jack Schiff. Prosecutors can negotiate, recommend, and request; they don't get to give orders - especially to the judge. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 Jeff Sessions: DOJ will open investigation into FISA abuses http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jeff-sessions-doj-will-open-investigation-into-fisa-abuses/article/2650184?utm_content=bufferd93ad&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Jeff Sessions: DOJ will open investigation into FISA abuses http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jeff-sessions-doj-will-open-investigation-into-fisa-abuses/article/2650184?utm_content=bufferd93ad&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer Now it gets interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 6 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Jeff Sessions: DOJ will open investigation into FISA abuses http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jeff-sessions-doj-will-open-investigation-into-fisa-abuses/article/2650184?utm_content=bufferd93ad&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer About darn time. Start with Susan Rice. I promise you she is guilty as sin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 15 hours ago, Koko78 said: I like how they're trying to claim that the head of US Cyber Command is opining on the effectiveness of sanctions to prevent "hacking" or "collusion" or "meddling" whatever the dipSchiff narrative is this week, instead of, you know, beefing up cyber security. Because the media would never take out of context statements to push the narrative. Ya, why would anyone want to punish those responsible for attacking our election. My God you are a total tool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Ya, why would anyone want to punish those responsible for attacking our election. My God you are a total tool Oh, so "attacking" is the new DNC-approved talking point buzzword this week, 'cause a few facebook ads are a complete attack on our republic... Which reminds me, what happened to "hacking" the election and all this "collusion" that took place? What happened with those buzzwords? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 yup, nobody is allowed to comment on the next US Presidential election that is not within the confines of the US and Guam (if it hasn't tipped over by then) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: Oh, so "attacking" is the new DNC-approved talking point buzzword this week, 'cause a few facebook ads are a complete attack on our republic... Which reminds me, what happened to "hacking" the election and all this "collusion" that took place? What happened with those buzzwords? So you just want to play word games over this attempt to interfere in our elections. Trump doesn't care either, as we have seen. The GOP is just out for power whatever the costs. Short term gains won't save you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: So you just want to play word games over this attempt to interfere in our elections. Trump doesn't care either, as we have seen. The GOP is just out for power whatever the costs. Short term gains won't save you Wait, a political party is out for power? The Russians have been meddling in foreign elections?!? Holy Schiff, Batman! Welcome to what everyone already knew... Edited February 28, 2018 by Koko78 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 2 minutes ago, row_33 said: yup, nobody is allowed to comment on the next US Presidential election that is not within the confines of the US and Guam (if it hasn't tipped over by then) As long as we get good counts in all 57 states I'm ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: As long as we get good counts in all 57 states I'm ok. Those counts better include 125% of deceased voters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: As long as we get good counts in all 57 states I'm ok. Hee... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Quote WASHINGTON — Paul Manafort, President Trump's former campaign chief, pleaded not guilty Wednesday to vast money laundering conspiracy and fraud charges as a federal judge set the stage for a trial to begin Sept. 17. Manafort appeared for the first time in federal court since his campaign deputy Rick Gates pleaded guilty Friday to related charges and agreed to cooperate with the government’s prosecution of Gates’ longtime business partner. Manafort was required to appear Wednesday to enter a new plea to a revamped five-count indictment issued Friday. The indictment alleged that Manafort had secretly enlisted a group of “former European politicians,” including a former European chancellor to advocate on behalf of the pro-Russian faction Manafort represented in Ukraine. Prosecutors have asserted that Manafort wired the unnamed officials more than 2 million euros from his off-shore accounts. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/28/paul-manafort-trumps-former-campaign-manager-pleads-not-guilty-trial-set-sept-17/380831002/?csp=chromepush 13 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Wait, a political party is out for power? The Russians have been meddling in foreign elections?!? Holy Schiff, Batman! Welcome to what everyone already knew... That's it! "Russia if you are listening!" Treason! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/28/gaetz-troll-reintroduce-schiff-fisa-bill/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: Oh, so "attacking" is the new DNC-approved talking point buzzword this week, 'cause a few facebook ads are a complete attack on our republic... Which reminds me, what happened to "hacking" the election and all this "collusion" that took place? What happened with those buzzwords? Would having ineligible voters (illegals, felons, the deceased) voting be considered "attacking" our elections? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 13 minutes ago, Doc said: Would having ineligible voters (illegals, felons, the deceased) voting be considered "attacking" our elections? not at all, their only sin is these votes assumed by the Dems don't bother showing up to vote for them but they refuse to change their failed narrative..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts