keepthefaith Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: BTW, Hillary was accused of playing loose with classified info. This Memo is said to be revealing classified info. Yes using the correct process to de-classify it. There is a difference ya know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: BTW, Hillary was accused of playing loose with classified info. This Memo is said to be revealing classified info. Not anymore. It was declassified by the classifying authority - the President. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 32 minutes ago, Koko78 said: You do know that he only informed Congress, and it was members of Congress that announced it, right? Isn't that a difference without a distinction? He was reopening the worthless investigation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Isn't that a difference without a distinction? No. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 13 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Yes using the correct process to de-classify it. There is a difference ya know. Oh, but Trump's very own pick for the FBI said don't do it, so did his own pick for AG. And Hillary didn't release it at all. She used a personal computer, just like Trump's people are doing right now. This is such a fart show Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 They should! This is all such a stupid sh it show it needs to be suppressed Quote Special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation has gathered enough steam that some lawyers representing key Donald Trump associates are considering the possibility of a historic first: an indictment against a sitting president. While many legal experts contend that Mueller lacks the standing to bring criminal charges against Trump, at least two attorneys working with clients swept up in the Russia probe told POLITICO they consider it possible that Mueller could indict the president for obstruction of justice. Quote “If I were a betting man, I’d bet against the president,” said one of the lawyers. The second attorney, who represents a senior Trump official, speculated that Mueller could try to bring an indictment against Trump even if he expects the move to draw fierce procedural challenges from the president’s lawyers – if only to demonstrate the gravity of his findings. “It’s entirely possible that Mueller may go that route on the theory that, as an open question, it should be for the courts to decide,” the attorney said. “Even if the indictment is dismissed, it puts maximum pressure on Congress to treat this with the independence and intellectual honesty that it will never, ever get." https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/02/trump-russia-indictment-mueller-probe-384969 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 22 minutes ago, Tiberius said: They should! This is all such a stupid sh it show it needs to be suppressed https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/02/trump-russia-indictment-mueller-probe-384969 One last time.... How the F ck can you charge someone for obstructing the investigation of a crime that never happened? Are you really this blind to this whole thing? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 minute ago, Cinga said: One last time.... How the F ck can you charge someone for obstructing the investigation of a crime that never happened? Are you really this blind to this whole thing? Thanks for the question. I will answer any of these questions at any time. The investigation is on going, two have already pleaded guilty, two are indicted and awaiting trial. The investigation is on going and is being interfered with, or obstructed. Sure, there might be no crime, but then again, why would they obstruct an investigation if they knew there was no crime? Way too early to say there was no crime. BTW, I think there was a crime. Page worked for Manafort, Manafort worked for Putin and Manafort worked for Trump. It's Page's communications they are trying to get suppressed..though not legally, just in the political arena. Real sh it show Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 Nice principles...................... Report: Mueller may indict Trump just to make a point In a piece at Politico today, two unnamed attorneys argue Mueller might indeed indict Trump even if he thinks the case would ultimately get thrown out by the courts: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Nice principles...................... Report: Mueller may indict Trump just to make a point In a piece at Politico today, two unnamed attorneys argue Mueller might indeed indict Trump even if he thinks the case would ultimately get thrown out by the courts: yeah, and i just got to read this one https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/02/02/trump_and_his_minions_cant_out-leak_the_fbi_136166.html can't outleak the FBI? So such an honorable organization like the FBI might have vengeance in mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It undermines national security in the sense that if this level of corruption and malfeasance is uncovered within the FBI and DOJ, it taints and delegitimizes every single investigation they've participated in since the beginning of the corruption and malfeasance within those organizations. It also fundamentally undercuts the legitimacy of the Federal government itself. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: It undermines national security in the sense that if this level of corruption and malfeasance is uncovered within the FBI and DOJ, it taints and delegitimizes every single investigation they've participated in since the beginning of the corruption and malfeasance within those organizations. It also fundamentally undercuts the legitimacy of the Federal government itself. The shot heard round the world. ************************************** Shep Smith just called the memo "The Russian Memo" at the top of his show. True colors are showing, Shep. Edited February 2, 2018 by Deranged Rhino separated posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 17 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: It undermines national security in the sense that if this level of corruption and malfeasance is uncovered within the FBI and DOJ, it taints and delegitimizes every single investigation they've participated in since the beginning of the corruption and malfeasance within those organizations. It also fundamentally undercuts the legitimacy of the Federal government itself. The federal government has legitimacy? It hasn't since like 1910. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 47 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The shot heard round the world. ************************************** Shep Smith just called the memo "The Russian Memo" at the top of his show. True colors are showing, Shep. Who's Shep with again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Who's Shep with again? Fox News... some say he is their token gay liberal.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: The shot heard round the world. ************************************** Shep Smith just called the memo "The Russian Memo" at the top of his show. True colors are showing, Shep. He also said that the reason for Trump allowing the memo to be released was to thwart Mueller before he had an interview with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 hour ago, joesixpack said: The federal government has legitimacy? It hasn't since like 1910. Ok, Tim McVegh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 1 hour ago, Cinga said: Fox News... some say he is their token gay liberal.... I think he dreams at night of Anderson Cooper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts