Albwan Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'll try to condense as much as possible on the fly as I take a break to procrastinate. I'm sure I'll skip over some important details, but happy to flesh more of it out as needed: Essentially, the Herridge tweets revolve around the latest filings and discovery made by Flynn's attorney Sidney Powell. These documents are from the DOJ and Flynn's former attorneys. Powell took over the Flynn case in 2019 after Flynn fired his previous attorneys who "lawyered" him into taking a plea. Since the first few batches of the (now) infamous Strzok/Page texts were dumped on the public in 2018, there has long been suspicion that Flynn was railroaded deliberately by the FBI. This suspicion grew the longer the sentencing dragged on, as well as once the Mueller report and all the Congressional inquires came to their conclusions. It's incredible to remember that Flynn was the first indictment of the SCO, and he's still yet to be sentenced. As more and more information/transcripts/records from the CrossFireHurricane dripped out into open source, it became clear that the FBI targeted Flynn, broke the law to entrap him -- and it didn't work. So, instead, the FBI lied about what Flynn told the agents doing the interview. It's a big accusation, which has only grown more solid with each passing disclosure of documents. The biggest pieces of evidence to prove this remains the original 302 forms filled out by Strzok and Agent Pientka who were the ones who ambushed Flynn at the White House. An edited version of the 302s were released, but never their originals. The edit, at the time, was written off by the SCO as merely a change in the date but not of anything of substance within the 302 itself. That is a lie, proven by several pieces of email and communications between the investigation team discussing how and why it was changed. The original 302s were edited by McCabe and Strozk to make it appear that Flynn was dishonest when in fact he had not been. This was because Flynn had to go down for any of the rest of the set-up they were running on 45 to work. (more on that in a sec) It turns out, based on the information Powell provided to Herridge and others, both the DOJ and Flynn's former attorneys had been withholding over 17,000 pages of documents. Included in these documents, which the SCO team swore did not exist as recently as three months ago, are multiple pieces of confirmation in the form of communications/emails that show Flynn didn't break the law. They knew he didn't break the law, but forced a plea from him anyway by not only falsifying evidence, but also by threatening to prosecute his son (on similarly bogus charges) and working with his attorneys behind his back to railroad him into copping a plea. Why go through all that effort to get rid of Flynn so early on? Because of two very inconvenient facts: 1) He was a lifelong democrat, who was appointed by 44 to be the head of the DIA 2) He was fired by 44 for wanting to go to Congress and the public and report on how the US was arming AQ and ISIS fighters in Syria #1 is important, because in that position, Flynn was better versed than anyone else on Trump's transition team to know exactly how the former administration, the FBI, DOJ, and CIA would come after Trump. Including, their illegal use of the 702 program (publicly discovered by Admiral Rogers in the spring of 2016). If you're Brennan, and you're executing a backdoor coup through lawfare and manipulating public perception, Flynn has to go immediately just based on his skill set. #2 is important because the game to "get Flynn" had been gestating even before Trump tabbed him as his NSC chief. Flynn was a threat to a lot of people in the administration (on a political level), and he didn't go quietly into the night when Obama asked him to step down. He had a "story to tell" and was going to tell it. That's why, in one of the early communications between Strozk and McCabe, McCabe (allegedly/famously) said: "First we ***** Flynn, then we ***** Trump." Essentially, these documents that are about to be released supposedly contain more evidence to prove the above. **************** And here we go... (She works with Powell -- documents should be coming shortly) First batch: DAMN. I think this is pretty good evidence that cointelpro is back in vogue... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 2 hours ago, Magox said: I’m guessing CBS is wishing they didn’t hire Catherine Herridge right about now. Her findings will be suppressed from their evening coverage and relegated to her twitter acct. I suspect she is actually helping their news business (ratings). 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 WAPO National Security Correspondent and Pulitzer winner: ----------------------------- Lawfare and other Leftist rags hack: -------------------------------------------------------- A must watch clip: 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 The fact that anyone would still be attacking Flynn and defending the FBI after this document release proves that this country is horribly broken and quite possibly permanently divided. What in the world was the FBI doing? This is not their job? Nor is it appropriate it any way! Who would defend such actions and tactics? God help us all. Nobody wants to live in the sort of country that the Left is now defending. Not even the Left! They’re just so unaware that they may get that Police State they’re always dreaming above, before they realize it’s too late to save themselves from it! 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Man, oh, man. They got Trump now! It's the smoking gun! It's the final nail in the coffin. It's the end of his presidency! I haven't seen this many people this wrong for this long since the DNC made Hillary their presidential nominee. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 11 more documents coming today or early tomorrow. 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 15 hours ago, Magox said: I’m guessing CBS is wishing they didn’t hire Catherine Herridge right about now. Her findings will be suppressed from their evening coverage and relegated to her twitter acct. She’s great. To me, she’s one of the few that always comes across as an old school, just the facts, reporter. I’m glad she’s off Fox. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: The fact that anyone would still be attacking Flynn and defending the FBI after this document release proves that this country is horribly broken and quite possibly permanently divided. What in the world was the FBI doing? This is not their job? Nor is it appropriate it any way! Who would defend such actions and tactics? God help us all. Nobody wants to live in the sort of country that the Left is now defending. Not even the Left! They’re just so unaware that they may get that Police State they’re always dreaming above, before they realize it’s too late to save themselves from it! To the bolded, I'm afraid we are. The FBI actors here could come out and admit under oath what happened and the left/media would still defend what they did as being right. We are irreparably broken down the partisan divide. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Joe Biden Was at Meeting Where James Comey Was Told to Brief Trump on Steele Dossier by Joel B. Pollak Original Article . 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 13 minutes ago, snafu said: She’s great. To me, she’s one of the few that always comes across as an old school, just the facts, reporter. I’m glad she’s off Fox. I agree wholeheartedly. I love that sort of journalism that doesn't inject their opinions, as you say, a "just the facts" reporter. I'm glad she is doing that over there at CBS, but unfortunately, she doesn't get to decide what gets reported... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Flashback: Interview with Powell: 1 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 14 minutes ago, B-Man said: Joe Biden Was at Meeting Where James Comey Was Told to Brief Trump on Steele Dossier by Joel B. Pollak Original Article . Bernie Sanders has got to be sitting back, watching this, thinking.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Just now, IDBillzFan said: Bernie Sanders has got to be sitting back, watching this, thinking.... He would be if he wasn't a sellout (and just as guilty as Joe when it comes to pushing the Russia/Trump hoax). But alas, he is, and he did. Because Bernie's a bad guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 10 hours ago, Hedge said: ----------------------------- Lawfare and other Leftist rags hack: I think this Wittes guy isn’t painting a full picture. Isn’t he leaving out the parts where the actual FBI agents who did the interview of Flynn said that he didn’t lie to them? Isn’t he leaving out the part whereby his former counsel likely had a serious conflict of interest with a Turkish co-defendant and bungled their handling of Flynn as a result? I don’t believe these are “standard practices”, and if they are then these practices should be changed. If I recall right Flynn did lie to Pence, and that may be a fireable offense in my book. But there are major parts of Flynn’s prosecution and defense that are curious to say the least. I wonder if Wittes will say that McCabe’s firing without a pension is “enough”? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 Just now, snafu said: I think this Wittes guy isn’t painting a full picture. Isn’t he leaving out the parts where the actual FBI agents who did the interview of Flynn said that he didn’t lie to them? Isn’t he leaving out the part whereby his former counsel likely had a serious conflict of interest with a Turkish co-defendant and bungled their handling of Flynn as a result? I don’t believe these are “standard practices”, and if they are then these practices should be changed. If I recall right Flynn did lie to Pence, and that may be a fireable offense in my book. But there are major parts of Flynn’s prosecution and defense that are curious to say the least. I wonder if Wittes will say that McCabe’s firing without a pension is “enough”? Wittes and lawfare have been the heart of the resistance since the beginning. Look at how many of the (now undeniably dirty/guilty) FBI/DOJ personnel involved in this joined his org when they were fired. He's DEEPLY dirty in this whole endeavor himself, so his job now is to try to gaslight. It's his only hope to save his chums -- but it's too late for that. 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 9 minutes ago, Magox said: I agree wholeheartedly. I love that sort of journalism that doesn't inject their opinions, as you say, a "just the facts" reporter. I'm glad she is doing that over there at CBS, but unfortunately, she doesn't get to decide what gets reported... I agrees about CBS’s potential handling of Herridge, but so far she’s not apparently limited. The reason why I like her off Fox is that anyone reporting actual facts on Fox (even without spin) is considered to be in the pocket of the administration, and dismissed out of hand as a result. Can’t say that about CBS. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted April 30, 2020 Share Posted April 30, 2020 @Deranged Rhino I’m still expecting a “let bygones be bygones” outcome. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts