Jump to content

Beane interview Thursday


Recommended Posts

if he is a legit candidate than who cares about the roonie rule. But good to know we are ready to hire someone if we decide.

Well... Us. We all care about the Roonie rule. We have to. If you want to see anyone hired anytime soon we should all worry about the Roonie rule being satisfied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's 2017. Beane can just say he identifies as an Black Asian White guy who is also a Middle Eastern Buddhist Muslim who is thinking about converting to Judaism once his gender transition is completed by the Iriquois Doctor who considers him both a son and a daughter. That will keep Goodell's head spinning for a while.

 

Or they could say they interviewed Whaley to keep his job.

 

Or they could claim caustic douche bags are a minority and claim they gave Tim Murray a shot.

 

Or maybe they could just keep an open mind and interview a legit candidate.

Lol that was worth the read

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe our next GM will try the strategy of picking players you put as your avatar

 

Well, that would be better than your QB strategy of waiting for perfection. 20 years with no franchise QB but you want to pass on very good QB prospects while drafting Levi Browns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael Lombardi explains why Doug Whaley’s firing should come as no surprise


Lombardi believes that the only way for the Bills to be successful is to find a GM that is philosophically aligned with McDermott and can help him build a team. This seems to be what the Bills are doing


Whaley was all about scouting players; McDermott is about building a team. Scouts don’t always know how to build teams. They know only how to pick players. And a scout focused primarily on scouting players can succeed only in a fantasy draft.




good commonsense

Edited by ALF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drafting for short term needs will leave a team with far less talent after a few drafts. See Levy-Jauron.

 

Only if you draft inferior talent because the need exists. I saw the first 3 picks in the '17 class as need players with good value so maybe I care a little less if they get it right.

 

If you take a Maybin because of need, I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...