Jump to content

Are there any racist institutions? How and why.


Recommended Posts

 

 

THE GRIFTERS: 

The SPLC Is Massively Overcounting ‘Hate’ Groups—and It’s Not Just Moms for Liberty.

 

https://reason.com/2023/06/09/southern-poverty-law-center-moms-for-liberty-splc-hate-extremist-list/

 

 

 

 

But does it count itself as one? SPLC Lawyer Arrested in Atlanta Molotov Cocktail Riot, Faces Terrorism Charges.

 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/03/06/splc-lawyer-arrested-atlanta-molotov-cocktail-riot-faces-terrorism-charges/

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

 

 

REVOLT: SPLC Union Speaks Out on Hamas-Israel War as Southern Poverty Law Center Remains Silent.

 

 

 

This would be enough to get the SPLC put on an SPLC hate list, if anyone there had ever voted Republican.

 

 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/10/23/splc-labor-union-condemns-beginnings-genocide-gaza-makes-no-mention-israeli-victims/

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
On 2/22/2019 at 10:26 AM, B-Man said:

STACY MCCAIN: Another Dot on the ‘Hate Map:’ Why is the SPLC smearing so many conservative groups? 

 

Because they’re a Democratic Super-PAC masquerading as a human rights organization, with the help of a complicit media.

 

 

FTA:

 

Whether through laziness or sympathy for the SPLC’s left-wing agenda, few journalists ever carefully scrutinize the list of U.S. “hate groups” that are allegedly now at an all-time high. For example, among the 17 “Anti-Immigrant Hate Groups” on the SPLC’s map are Pro English — because it’s “hate” to encourage Americans to learn the English language, apparently — and Americans for Legal Immigration (ALIPAC), whose president William Gheen has emphatically denounced the SPLC’s label. While “no evidence exists that anyone in our organization has ever engaged in racism, hate, or violence against minorities,” Gheen wrote in a 2014 letter to the SPLC, the “hate group” listing was “directly encouraging people to threaten violence against me and my family.”

 

The 100 “Anti-Muslim Hate Groups” listed by the SPLC include 47 separate listings for local affiliates of ACT for America, a group headed by Brigitte Gabriel, a Lebanese immigrant and author of the 2006 bestseller Because They Hate: A Survivor of Islamic Terror Warns America. Whatever one thinks of Ms. Gabriel or her group, what purpose is served by depicting ACT for America not as one “hate group,” but 47? Obviously, the SPLC does this to pad its numbers — to inflate the “hate,” so to speak — and any intelligent person must doubt whether any actual menace to Muslims is posed by Ms. Gabriel’s admirers in towns like Oostburg, Wisconsin, or Cape Cod, Massachusetts, each of which has a dot on the SPLC’s map.

 

 

 

Remember this the next time that you read the fake "Hate groups on the rise" narrative.

 


Are there any racist institutions? How and why.

 

Hmmmm…

 

Why did Hanan Qahwaji, aka Miss MAGA Trumper, feel the need to change her name to Brigitte Gabriel? And why did she alter her appearance?

 

Could it be due to her desire to be accepted within an institution perceived as racist?


As Tucker would say: Just asking questions… right? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 pages and still not one example of systemic racism. 

 

Outside the dei based hiring and promoting practices the left promotes.  Now that's a system based on race. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Tommy Callahan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tommy Callahan said:

49 pages and still not one example of systemic racism. 

 

 

 

Oh, no? Why did Nikki change her name?

 

And why is Trump calling her Nimrada (purposely misspelling it)?

 

Obama didn't have to change his name.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Systemic racism can be identified and articulated.   The answer would not be a question.  

 

In fact.  If anything your trying to imply racial biases are systemic racism. Proving you don't really grasp a topic your yelling about.   Again. 

 

None of your examples are even in the same sphere as systemic racism 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Systemic racism can be identified and articulated.   The answer would not be a question.  

 

In fact.  If anything your trying to imply racial biases are systemic racism. Proving you don't really grasp a topic your yelling about.   Again. 

 

None of your examples are even in the same sphere as systemic racism 

 

This thread isn't about SYSTEMIC. It's about racist institutions.

 

Keep spinning precious and ignoring the questions.

 

I know it's difficult for you to swallow.... esp given all the threads in PPP that target - BLACK PEOPLE.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Racial biases and you ranting is not an example of systemic racism (actual racism) or racist institutions.  

 

Your reply just further proved you have no understanding of the topic your yelling about. 

 

 

But then again. That's your thing. 

 

Or saying for a reply.  But that would make you a.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tommy Callahan said:

Racial biases and you ranting is not an example of systemic racism (actual racism) or racist institutions.  

 

Your reply just further proved you have no understanding of the topic your yelling about. 

 

 

But then again. That's your thing. 

 

Or saying for a reply.  But that would make you a.... 

 

Why won't you answer the questions?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Ok.  Dei has created racist/sexist  hiring and promoting policies. 

 

all these pages and I at least could point at one. 

 

your replying with questions.  Meaning you are the second option. 

 

 

 

 

 

Why won't you answer THE questions... 

 

lmao

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny ***** on here.  While it might not be directly racist, which is kinda Trump's usual game, it is definitely meant to entertain his ######ed base. 

He often tries to speak in weird undertones.  Like his all time classic.....  Proud boys Stand Back and Stand By. 

“I don’t know who the Proud Boys are.” He added, “Whoever they are, they have to stand down. Let law enforcement do their work.”

He definitely resonates perfectly with ######s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

Funny ***** on here.  While it might not be directly racist, which is kinda Trump's usual game, it is definitely meant to entertain his ######ed base. 

He often tries to speak in weird undertones.  Like his all time classic.....  Proud boys Stand Back and Stand By. 

“I don’t know who the Proud Boys are.” He added, “Whoever they are, they have to stand down. Let law enforcement do their work.”

He definitely resonates perfectly with ######s. 

Trump completely broke a few of you. Really sad to see.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Trump completely broke a few of you. Really sad to see.

 

Funny.  I see it as he completely owns most of you.  Like brain washed little *****.  I dont see Biden worship on the left.  More of a realistic approach on that side, even though I find some liberal ideology idiotic in a different way. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

Funny.  I see it as he completely owns most of you.  Like brain washed little *****.  I dont see Biden worship on the left.  More of a realistic approach on that side, even though I find some liberal ideology idiotic in a different way. 

 

These guys can't stand being reminded of their poor choices.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Back to the thread.

 

What they really mean when they cry ‘Islamophobia’

The debate over a Biden nominee affiliated with a center that promotes hate for Israel shows that allegations of anti-Muslim prejudice are attempts to cover up antisemitism.

By JONATHAN S. TOBIN

 

FTA:

 

 

But there’s more to this controversy than the usual bitter partisanship that characterizes the efforts of Republicans and Democrats to pack the federal courts with judges who conform to their ideological preferences whenever the White House and the Senate are controlled by the same party. Whether or not Mangi is confirmed is of lesser importance than the principle that Democrats are trying to lay down in this controversy.

 

That’s because once people understand what the Rutgers Center for Race, Security and Rights is doing, it’s easy to see that questioning those who support it, as Mangi did until he resigned in advance of his confirmation hearings, isn’t Islamophobia. It’s an entirely necessary and reasonable examination of a state-supported institution that is a prime example of how academia has become a hotbed of antisemitism and Israel-bashing, both indoctrinating students in hate and making the lives of Jews on college campuses intolerable.

 

The center is a cesspool of anti-Israel propaganda helmed by a radical Rutgers Law School professor Sahar Aziz, an avowed opponent of Israel’s existence. It has a record of programs aimed at delegitimizing the Jewish state and the rights of the Jewish people, as well as promoting Islamist radicals. Just one among a number of egregious incidents involved the center holding a 9/11 anniversary event to provide a platform for supporters of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorist group.

 

You don’t have to do a deep dive into its history to see exactly what kind of an organization it is. A glance at the center’s website provides a quick understanding of its “educational” mission. Who do they think is the real problem in American foreign policy? That would be the activities of the “Israel Lobby and its Zionist supporters to shame and silence critics of Israeli ethnic cleansing and apartheid.” It says that to label these smears of Israel and Jews (“Zionists”) as antisemitic is “Islamophobic.”

 

 

https://www.jns.org/what-they-really-mean-when-they-cry-islamophobia/

 

 

.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/21/2024 at 9:16 AM, Tommy Callahan said:

Are sanctuary laws racist.

 

 

If this was the old neighborhood this kind of crap wouldn't happen.  Because the folks there would get together and beat this SOB to death with baseball bats and then tell the city to go screw themselves with their sanctuary status.    

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes- every woke corporation and government agency that complies with DEI is a racist institution…👍

 

Doesn’t matter how righteous they feel the endeavor is, they are still hiring and firing based on race…Not only is it racist, but it’s illegal, according to the Civil Rights Act of 1964…👍

 

 

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/13/2024 at 9:42 PM, BillStime said:

Are there any racist institutions? How and why.
 

Yes, of course. See Florida.

 

But @JaCrispy will justify this behavior by DeSaster because he cares more about MAGA than his own fkn legacy. Sad.

 

 

 

Bodied by community notes lmao

 

 

3 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

Weirdness of the statement aside, it's stupid for Republicans to go after black voters. Blacks vote as a bloc more than any other group in this country. Ignore them, reward your friends instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...