Jump to content

The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:


Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

If there's one thing BM has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt it's that he's a liar. 

 

If there are two things BM has proven behind a shadow of a doubt it's that he's a liar and has the intellectual depth of a sheet of paper. 

 

Is it a sheet of paper with lies written all over it?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

...but DR is the stalker?

 

There is a whole legion of Q believers brother. 

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

If there's one thing BM has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt it's that he's a liar. 

 

If there are two things BM has proven behind a shadow of a doubt it's that he's a liar and has the intellectual depth of a sheet of paper. 

 

There’s my shadow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Says the guy continuing to quote me in thread after thread after being asked not to. 

 

Which just proves he's a liar. All he continues to do is sliiiiide and divide because he lacks the testicular fortitude to be honest, and he lacks the intellectual horsepower to think for himself.

 

Sad... but funny to scrap off the bottom of my shoe.

 

2RrxM.jpg

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul Le Roux was a self-made vice entrepreneur, raking in $250 million a year selling drugs, weapons and murder-for-hire on the dark web.

 

Quote

“Well played, gentlemen,” he said, smiling at the arresting agents like a Bond supervillain. “But if you’re looking at me, you’re obviously looking for bigger things.”

 

Taken down in 2012 because he wouldn't buy an underling brunch.

Perhaps this is not Deep State related, but who knows? It is an interesting read, regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Says the guy continuing to quote me in thread after thread after being asked not to. 

 

Which just proves he's a liar. All he continues to do is sliiiiide and divide because he lacks the testicular fortitude to be honest, and he lacks the intellectual horsepower to think for himself.

 

Sad... but funny to scrap off the bottom of my shoe.

 

2RrxM.jpg

 

You didn’t ask me not to quote you. You told me that you would make me regret it if I said your name. I keep saying you’re the leader here. I aimed too low. You see yourself as Emporer. 

Edited by BeginnersMind
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

You didn’t ask me not to quote you. You told me that you would make me regret it if I said your name. I keep saying you’re the leader here. I aimed too low. You see yourself as Emporer. 

 

I believe this is the first time in the history of this board that someone other than me has been accused of being the leader here.  :lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

? McCabe may want to shut his yap and lay low rethinking this "national tour". 

Graham vows to hold hearing on McCabe's "stunning" 25th Amendment comments
 

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he will hold a hearing about comments made by former Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe about an apparent discussion of the possibility of using the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office.
 

In an interview with "60 Minutes" set to air Sunday evening, McCabe said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein raised the issue shortly after the firing of FBI Director James Comey in 2017. The 25th Amendment provides a process for removing a president who is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office."
 

</snip>

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

I believe this is the first time in the history of this board that someone other than me has been accused of being the leader here.  :lol:

Wow, you really love yourself. Nobody thinks of you as a leader. You might use the most tampons, but still. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OIG Summary Report: Stunning Implications

 

...While confusing in its wording, using publicly available information we can deduce what this letter charges, and it is quite stunning. First, the complicated statement:

 

“The OIG found that as a result of conduct by two current senior FBI officials, and one retired FBI official, the FBI contractor engaged in certain inherent governmental activities in contravention of Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR). Additionally, the OIG found that these three FBI officials did not adhere to Office of Management and Budget policy while managing the contractor. Further, the OIG found that the FBI contractor failed to adhere to personal conflict of interest rules under the FAR”

 

Let’s take this in parts. First- the IG states that as a RESULT of conduct by two current senior FBI officials, and one retired, the FBI contractor engaged in inherent governmental activities. Well, what is an inherent government activity?

 

As per the Office of Management and Budget, in clarifying the FAR (Federal Acquisiton Regulations) an inherent government activity is defined as the following: “The direction and control of intelligence and counterintelligence operations” (page 66)

 

As Jeff Carlson reports: On April 18, 2016, Rogers shut down all outside contractor access to raw FISA information – specifically outside contractors working for the FBI. The discovery that outside contractors were accessing raw FISA data is probably the event that precipitated Rogers ordering a full compliance review (Page 84 of Court Ruling). It is revealed throughout this investigation and in a report issued in April 2017 by the FISC, that outside agencies, specifically the FBI Counterintelligence Division were routinely violating Section 702 procedure. As Jeff Carlson also reports in the detailed article referenced herein, Bill Priestap was the head of the FBI Counterintelligence Division during this time.

 

From Jeff’s stunning piece, the timeline looks like this:

 

  • On October 15, 2016 Carlin formally left the NSD
  • On October 20 2016, Rogers was briefed by the NSA compliance officer on findings from the 702 NSA compliance audit. The audit had uncovered numerous “About” Query violations (Senate testimony).
  • On October 21, 2016, Rogers shut down all “About Query” activity. He reported his findings to the DOJ (Senate testimony & inferences from Court Ruling).
  • On October 21 2016, the DOJ & FBI seek and receive a Title I FISA probable cause order authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISA Court. At this point, the FISA Court is unaware of the Section 702 violations.

 

As an aside, an interesting text message appears in the releases of the Strzok/Page texts. As the contractor queries are halted, I had found a text message sent on 4/30/16 between the two which states “And now we’ve switched from the Patriot Act to a wire carrying current” – a reference to the inability to continue to use NSA surveillance in their investigations. ...

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Foxx said:

 

From Jeff’s stunning piece, the timeline looks like this:

 

  • On October 15, 2016 Carlin formally left the NSD
  • On October 20 2016, Rogers was briefed by the NSA compliance officer on findings from the 702 NSA compliance audit. The audit had uncovered numerous “About” Query violations (Senate testimony).
  • On October 21, 2016, Rogers shut down all “About Query” activity. He reported his findings to the DOJ (Senate testimony & inferences from Court Ruling).
  • On October 21 2016, the DOJ & FBI seek and receive a Title I FISA probable cause order authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISA Court. At this point, the FISA Court is unaware of the Section 702 violations.

 

As an aside, an interesting text message appears in the releases of the Strzok/Page texts. As the contractor queries are halted, I had found a text message sent on 4/30/16 between the two which states “And now we’ve switched from the Patriot Act to a wire carrying current” – a reference to the inability to continue to use NSA surveillance in their investigations. ...

 

Well, that's interesting.  As though they had forewarning.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

We cannot dismiss the campaign to legalize pedophilia as fringy stuff that will get nowhere.

 

It’s real and it’s here and it’s gaining strength.

 

 

 

.The Pedophile Project: Your 7-Year-Old Is Next On The Sexual Revolution’s Hit Parade

by Stella Morabito

 

Activists for normalizing pedophilia are on the move. Public acceptance of adult sex with children is the next domino poised to fall in identity politics. It’s being sustained, among other things, by the rapid sexualization of children in the media and in K-12 education.

 

We cannot dismiss the campaign to legalize pedophilia as fringy stuff that will get nowhere. It’s real and it’s here and it’s gaining strength. It’s a very logical outgrowth of the nihilism inherent in the sexual revolution.

 

If you doubt this, just consider, for example, how unthinkable to many Americans was the recent celebration of infanticide (in the guise of abortion rights) by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Likewise, Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam—supposedly a pediatrician—spoke cavalierly about whether to dispose of a living infant who survives abortion.

 

They and governors of many other states are betting that your shock will simply wear off and we’ll all eventually get with the infanticide program. People do tend to settle into such shifts, believing it won’t affect them. But the selective dehumanization of children has been going on for a long time now. Why should we think it’ll be any different when the time comes for legalizing pedophilia?

 

As with any propaganda campaign that pushes outrageous changes on an unwary public, it’s all about timing. Academics might refer to timing as the Overton Window or the Availability Cascade. But we should all be able to understand the process of conditioning the public to accept the unacceptable.

 

First, the groundwork is laid through carefully planned propaganda. There are various types of messaging for various audiences: the medical establishment, the education establishment, legislators, judges, the general public, and so forth. Then the agitation begins with poster people who are “just like you.” And before you know it, it’s all over.

 

Unveiling pedophilia as “just fine” will likely be an ambush if we aren’t prepared. It promises to be as swift as the “transgender tipping point” campaign that shrewdly coincided with the Supreme Court’s Obergefell decision in 2015. It will be accompanied by a defiant campaign to paint any resistance as a relic of outdated morality that oppresses the rights of an identity group and the civil rights of any children caught in it.

 

So, when that inevitable time comes, will we just sit back and cower in confusion? Or will ample voices be able to break through the pressures of political correctness beforehand and shout “Enough!” Be prepared to make that happen, because the pitcher is full and they are mixing the Kool-Aid.

 

{snip}

 

There are two main avenues to legalizing adult sexual relations with pre-pubescent children: 1) to designate it as a sexual orientation; and 2) to lower—or abolish—the age of consent for sexual activity. Both efforts are on track by pedophilia advocates, especially in academia and in the mass media. Take a look at this TED Talk released last year, in which the speaker chides us: “Let’s be mature about pedophilia.”

 

More at the link:

  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...