26CornerBlitz Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 He's talking about Lorax, not Shaq. Okay. That makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuSeYiN_NYC Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 In this day and age anytime I see an "athletic freak" I immediately wonder what they are on. Especially if they are performing beyond their years. (Like a certain 39 year old QB who likes his balls soft.) That said, it might be time to just say f##k it and allow all PEDs in the pros. I mean when you get right down to it we want our freaks, don't we? Athletes already mash their brains into pudding for our entertainment. Why not let them juice? No need for you to ponder on that guy. It's an easy one to solve. He's on a gay diet. It's a common and perfectly legal treatment some people use. He gives examples of the diet to referees during pregame and sometimes at halftime. They say the diet helps you out in protection. Sometimes the defense can get called for roughing the passer even if nobody was within 3 yards of the QB. They say it's like a miracle drug of sorts but i say it's still cheating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty McFly Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Hes gonna get eased in on pash rushing downs to get used to beating NFL linemen. Those guys are roid strong, not your regular college hokies. Coming off a shoulder, yeah, gonna get eased in. 20-30% snaps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigK14094 Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Never an NFL down of football. Some learning curve stuff ahead. Not a starter this season....but, next year likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 (edited) Never an NFL down of football. Some learning curve stuff ahead. Not a starter this season....but, next year likely. C'mon. If he was QB, yes. But a pass rusher? See QB, get QB. Keeping a top 15 pick out of the line up because a sub is playing well sounds like a great strategy. It's also bad strategy to play a guy just because you drafted him high. Top pick or UDFA, it's all the same...you earn your minutes. But Lawson will see snaps as part of a rotation. Right now he's depth. Edited October 5, 2016 by PromoTheRobot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 I'm just glad we have depth and options. That beats the heck out of wondering if we have ONE guy who can do the job! Break him in slowly and let them compete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 (edited) he can be worked into the rotation..probably starting on obvious passing downs, no need to rush him in...Lorax has earned his playing time and has been playing very well, he just isn't going to be handed a job---he hasn't even had one day of practice yet!! Edited October 5, 2016 by matter2003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 You rotate him in. Keeps Alexander and Hughes fresh. Exactly. 30% sounds about right. Hughes and Alexander stay fresh, and he gets experience and confidence. Sees NFL game time experience. Alexander would be a good mentor with his years of experience. Light play in the Dolphins and if he looks good, put a wrinkle in for the Pats game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 he can be worked into the rotation..probably starting on obvious passing downs, no need to rush him in...Lorax has earned his playing time and has been playing very well, he just isn't going to be handed a job---he hasn't even had one day of practice yet!! That all makes sense, but it's hard to disregard that LoRax is tied for the team lead in sacks (who saw THAT coming?), so maybe a mix of all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan89 Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 (edited) Shaq can easily slide into a situational role. Lorenzo Alexander is playing well but at 33 he could wear down as the season goes so having Shaq take some snaps in particular situations (maybe early downs and some running situations) can help preserve Alexander for the long haul. A lot of times you see these vets come out to strong starts 4-6 games into the season and then they either get hurt of slow down over the long haul. Shaq can't be rushed in but he certainly can play 30ish snaps a game which lessens the load on Alexander which could make him more effective as the season goes. Plus in December as Shaq gets stronger and maybe Alexander is falling off you put Shaq into the starting role and then Alexander takes the situational role. Edited October 5, 2016 by billsfan89 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 Why, on the field, of course. Let's not over-think this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 so Bills have to make room for Dareus, luckily Sammy is injured Who do the Bills move for Lawson?. Meeks? Colt? I think Lawson should have to sit all season or till an injury occurs.PS perhaps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 so Bills have to make room for Dareus, luckily Sammy is injured Who do the Bills move for Lawson?. Meeks? Colt? I think Lawson should have to sit all season or till an injury occurs. PS perhaps They only have a limited amount of time to activate him from PUP and he can't go on the PS unless he's waived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 They only have a limited amount of time to activate him from PUP and he can't go on the PS unless he's waived. By all means, let's expose him to waivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 By all means, let's expose him to waivers. I knew you would agree. Its clear to you I am GM material. They only have a limited amount of time to activate him from PUP and he can't go on the PS unless he's waived. If you are still taking me seriously 26 you need your head examined. But i do like your clarity and the way you clean up these details. Excuse my obtuse sense of humor, i do not mean to try to take advantage of others good will here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 I knew you would agree. Its clear to you I am GM material. If you are still taking me seriously 26 you need your head examined. But i do like your clarity and the way you clean up these details. Excuse my obtuse sense of humor, i do not mean to try to take advantage of others good will here. My bad. I should have known you were kidding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 (edited) I knew you would agree. Its clear to you I am GM material. If you are still taking me seriously 26 you need your head examined. But i do like your clarity and the way you clean up these details. Excuse my obtuse sense of humor, i do not mean to try to take advantage of others good will here. You forgot the sarcasm font again. Edited October 6, 2016 by Freddie's Dead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 (edited) He provides depth..IMO you can't take out either Hughes or Lorax...both have been lights out...Lorax leading the NFL in sacks and with any luck could have 2 ir 3 more...Hughes rips off Palmers helmet nullifying one sack and Keenum throws a ball up for grabs while being sacked yesterday that sealed the loss with a pick. Edited October 10, 2016 by matter2003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmotionallyUnstable Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 He provides depth..IMO you can't take out either Hughes or Lorax...both have been lights out...Lorax leading the NFL in sacks and with any luck could have 2 ir 3 more...Hughes rips off Palmers helmet nullifying one sack and Keenum throws a ball up for grabs while being sacked yesterday that sealed the loss with a pick. Rotational depth at DL is crucial in a long season. He provides a fresh set up legs. Not every team will be as porous as the lambs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
re enlightener Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 I'll admit that you could be right. The operative word is could, but your strong assertion that it will definitely be the case lacks any evidence whatsoever. Carry on. this looks like something for the shout box....lol do you two actually hit f5 and wait right after you post? haha. I think he won the argument btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts