FLFan Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 We would receive no compensation as Hogan was an UDFA. Hogan is an RFA, tendered by the Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 10, 2016 Author Share Posted March 10, 2016 Hogan is an RFA, tendered by the Bills.no comp for RFAs who were UDFAs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Well, Tom Brady can make marginal talent look pretty damn good....Except Scott Chandler. I know. It's crazy right? Not good enough for the Bills but he's good enough for the Pats? Personally, I would try to copy things good teams do. If they want a player you have, maybe it's because they think he has talent. But we can give away millions of dollars to Harvin and hope he makes it to game 5 this year. He has crazy talent (on IR). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 10, 2016 Author Share Posted March 10, 2016 I really don't care if he thrives with them or not tbh. Chandler didn't. This is similar. I would like to upgrade at WR in the draft. I think Boykin can take his spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLFan Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 no comp for RFAs who were UDFAs Thanks. Missed that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 10, 2016 Author Share Posted March 10, 2016 (edited) I know. It's crazy right? Not good enough for the Bills but he's good enough for the Pats? Personally, I would try to copy things good teams do. If they want a player you have, maybe it's because they think he has talent. But we can give away millions of dollars to Harvin and hope he makes it to game 5 this year. He has crazy talent (on IR). Harvin isn't on the team. They didn't re-sign him. Hogan is "good enough" for the Billls, seeing as he's made the team every year since they signed him off the scrap heap and have him a RFA tender. I don't know why this has to be a referendum on them if they choose not to match an offer from NE that is higher than where they may value him. He's a #3-4 WR on any team. Except the Browns where he would be the #1 of course. You act like the Bills value Harvin over Hogan. They clearly do not, as it stands today. Edited March 10, 2016 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Hah. Knock yourself out Pats. Wouldn't be concerned in the least if I were the Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 I really don't care if he thrives with them or not tbh. Chandler didn't. This is similar. I would like to upgrade at WR in the draft. I think Boykin can take his spot. I don't disagree with that but I think Hogan is better tha people give him credit for. Re-watch the MNF game. He was open all day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Thanks. Missed that. Yeah, Bills gave him an original round tender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Sadly, if the Pats sign him, Brady will turn him into a star. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 10, 2016 Author Share Posted March 10, 2016 (edited) Sadly, if the Pats sign him, Brady will turn him into a star.good for him, seems like a nice guy. But since we don't have Brady, would like to upgrade to someone in the draft who can be a star with the QB we have. Bills have 11 WR on the roster as it is. Edited March 10, 2016 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 10, 2016 Author Share Posted March 10, 2016 (edited) Agreed. Woods isn't a world-beater, but he's better than many give him credit for. Does anyone see a more pressing need than WR2 if Woods is signed away? It sure looks like the Cheartiots can get him easily with a modest front-loading of his contract - if they want him. That would make Goodwin and Easly the Bills' second and third WRs. Anyone else feeling incredibly uncomfortable with that? Also, it appears to be a terrible draft for WR prospects.it is Hogan, not Woods. I think it will be Watkins, Woods, Boykin. I don't think it's a bad WR draft, it has decent depth just not elite 1st round talent. I don't want them to take one early anyway, and we don't need a wr1 to justify it. Edited March 10, 2016 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 good for him, seems like a nice guy. But since we don't have Brady, would like to upgrade to someone in the draft who can be a star with the QB we have. Bills have 11 WR on the roster as it is. Why do we have to replace the whole receiving core (a lot of people want to replace Woods too)? We have one star receiver and don't throw enough to have another wr put up numbers. Again, Hogan was open for tds that could have beat the Pats but he was missed. Also if we want a franchise qb, shouldn't the definition be he turns average guys into stars? We need to surround a franchise qb with 1st round picks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsForever Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Sadly, if the Pats sign him, Brady will turn him into a star. Who cares. What really matters is what Chris Hogan can do for this team and his body of work suggests he is a replacement level WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 (edited) it is Hogan, not Woods. Wow. Huge brain fart on my part. Previous post is deleted. Edited March 10, 2016 by BarleyNY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 10, 2016 Author Share Posted March 10, 2016 Why do we have to replace the whole receiving core (a lot of people want to replace Woods too)? We have one star receiver and don't throw enough to have another wr put up numbers. Again, Hogan was open for tds that could have beat the Pats but he was missed. Also if we want a franchise qb, shouldn't the definition be he turns average guys into stars? We need to surround a franchise qb with 1st round picks? quite the leap there tbh. I simply said Chris Hogan is replaceable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 quite the leap there tbh. I simply said Chris Hogan is replaceable. Yeah, he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 They both saw him get wide open all game against them MNF. With a couple better passes, he might have helped us beat them. It's one thing I respect about the Pats. When they go against guys who do well against them, they go after them. That said, D'Rick Rogers would be a much better signing for them. He just needs a 5th chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 @adamschefter Buffalo RFA WR Chris Hogan visiting NE today, per league source. Pats could sign him to offer sheet that Bills would have 5 days to match. @rapsheet There's been interest for some time. Similar to when Patriots liked Danny Amendola for years Jokes on Belichick. Hogan sucks. We said so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 10, 2016 Author Share Posted March 10, 2016 "replaceable" doesn't equal "sucks" Sigh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts