unbillievable Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 https://www.yahoo.com/news/early-takers-sat-wasnt-bad-not-tricky-083900976.html Guessing will no longer be penalized. No more remembering math formulas or english vocabulary. Essay is now optional. Less questions so you have more time. "The sum of the redesign of the test is to make it much more like the work that kids are already doing in high school," said David Coleman, president and chief executive officer of the board. It was retooled, he said, "so that all kids could feel that they had a shot." Every kid deserves to go to college! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Thank God! We need to give every child an even playing field; the only way to do that is to bring the standard down to the level of the least intelligent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Thank God! We need to give every child an even playing field; the only way to do that is to bring the standard down to the level of the least intelligent. Isn't that what your college admissions board did for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 I occasionally play in a poker game that includes one of the senior guys at the College Board. Will have to ask him about this next game. Minor changes to the math and vocab don't sound like a big deal but eliminating the essay is a questionable move. I wonder if that was motivated by the cost involved in grading the essays. Can't do that with a scanner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Isn't that what your college admissions board did for you? Looking back at my SAT scores, I'm surprised I was accepted at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 What a freaking duopoly these two companies have...this testing crap has gotten out of hand. 2 sections, 3 sections, now 2 sections...some colleges only accepting new, super scores...some schools last year needing subject tests, this year say they dont mattter....AP tests....throw it all in and just a huge revenue generating machine for these companies. And yes, they should make it an even playing field for all kids..from the test being biased to all kids having equal opportunity to take the test multiple time...this is not a PC rant...it is just fact these tests are biased and exclude kids based on quality of education, not ability to learn and be successful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marv's Neighbor Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life son! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Should education be a "status symbol?" Of course we all know the answer to that question. No. So, What's the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 I don't see why it matters how it is scored. Ultimately, these kids' scores will be judged relative to others who took the same test, graded the same way. They're not going to compare a new 1400 to your 1400 20 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullpen Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Well Beerball, you finally have a chance to strive for that 740 you really wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life son! I can't believe I threw up in front of Dean Wormer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 I don't see why it matters how it is scored. Ultimately, these kids' scores will be judged relative to others who took the same test, graded the same way. They're not going to compare a new 1400 to your 1400 20 years ago. Shhhhh... BUT some want to compare!! Mario Lemieux could never even carry Stan Mikita's jock type of thing. Or, facemasks? Real goaltenders don't wear facemasks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted March 4, 2016 Author Share Posted March 4, 2016 I don't see why it matters how it is scored. Ultimately, these kids' scores will be judged relative to others who took the same test, graded the same way. They're not going to compare a new 1400 to your 1400 20 years ago. The point of the change is to make it more inclusive, by making it easier, so the kids who don't like prepping (or learning) will give it a shot. -which was the point of eliminating vocabulary, formula memorization, and allowing calculators. They want more kids to take the test, so they can make more money. It's ridiculous that the justification they're using is that they want students to feel better about themselves. "We all got 1600's! We're all smart!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life son!i know you were attempting to quote Fergy here. If you need any pointers just let me know. Well Beerball, you finally have a chance to strive for that 740 you really wanted. cant't you go back into your self imposed exile? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 4.35 seconds in the 40 yard dash trumps the S.A.T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Back in the day wasn't it the SAT that was viewed as better than the ACT? ACT was the lower of the two. My son finished taking both last year... Wasn't that unheard of before... You either took one or the other, right? I thought the ACT was for the burnouts that couldn't handle the SAT... LoL! cant't you go back into your self imposed exile? Wrong dude... That was me. Wow, even missed that question! :-P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Wrong dude... That was me. Wow, even missed that question! :-PPenny was gone for years until some idiot lured him back a few weeks ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Looking back at my SAT scores, I'm surprised I was accepted at all. You don't need to go back that far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 You don't need to go back that far.LOL. I got over a 200. I did sign my name....and I knew what the " 2/5ths Compromise " was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Kids take all kinds of prep classes now... Multiple tests... It's kinda like Brady cheating, wearing a green dot on helmet and not having the headset shut off. Just saying... So what's the point... Game bigger, more competitive, scores higher amongst the elite students... But is it better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts