Jump to content

Refugee Crisis in the U. S. (?)


B-Man

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Boyst62 said:

^^^

And this is what Clarence Thomas wants to address. A district judge holding the entire country hostage over their snowflake bull####. Only a retard would agree with the judge that the question shouldn't be asked.

Guess what Gleeful Gator thinks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm kind of surprised that I have never seen it mentioned, but if you live in Los Angeles you have certainly noticed these EYESORE gates that line the streets of every crappy Latino neighborhood. They are EVERYWHERE! On many streets they run continuously down both sides of the street.  These were all built by Mexican homeowners to keep each other out.

 

NO ONE LOVES A ***** GATE AROUND THEIR HOME MORE THAN A MEXICAN HOMEOWNER!

 

 

Just plop down into Norwalk on Google Street View....

 

 

 

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9066416,-118.1537654,3a,75y,97.29h,82.68t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sb0yo4YxQuFlWzAvQ-hKiZw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

 

 

 

genMid.R1107676_1.jpg

Edited by OJ Tom
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As new U.S.-bound caravan grows to more than 2,000, Mexicans lash out
by Elizabeth Llorente

 

Original Article

 

As a new caravan that began in Honduras and quickly swelled to an estimated 2,000 people made its way toward Mexico on Tuesday, Mexicans who live along the border towns that will likely be most affected took to the Internet to lash out against another wave of migrants. 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, B-Man said:
As new U.S.-bound caravan grows to more than 2,000, Mexicans lash out
by Elizabeth Llorente

 

Original Article

 

As a new caravan that began in Honduras and quickly swelled to an estimated 2,000 people made its way toward Mexico on Tuesday, Mexicans who live along the border towns that will likely be most affected took to the Internet to lash out against another wave of migrants. 

 

 

 

.

 

Maybe they should build a wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s downright amazing how hypocritical the Democrats are on this issue (amongst just about every other issue).

 

It was a crisis when other administrations were in office, but because it’s Trump, it’s a manufactured crisis.

 

Truly pathetic on the left’s part only to shut down Trump and for cheap political gain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why Violence Is Better

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/nearly-250-illegal-immigrants-arrested-in-new-mexico-after-crossing-border-seeking-medical-care-border-patrol-says.amp

 

Imagine if we had armed border guards who shot 12-20 of these people as they were crossing and denied them aid. That would have dispersed the other 230 and they would have flown back south, tail tucked, as quickly as their crappy shoes can carry them. But this option makes people cry. 

 

So instead were on the hook for providing them shelter, court dates, food, and medical care. What’s that going to cost us? Millions? And clearly our resistance to properly protect our frontiers is encouraging more migrant groups to come. That is going to result in the millions turning to billions. 

 

And what are the effects on these caravans? They cause crime and issues all through Mexico and everywhere else they go. They’re literally disrupting the global economy. 

 

How many future migrants will die on their trek to our border?

 

Start calculating these costs and then ask what would be better, 10-20 shot future drywallers / hotel maids that would be a strain on our infrastructure and schools.....or the continuation of the status quo which is good for nobody and the billions that it’s costing us? Cause it could all be avoided with a $10 box of ammo. 

 

If you look at the long term I’d argue deadly force against invaders is the most benevolent action. 

 

But I find most people consider what I say to be a “not nice” and so they won’t even hear out the merits of my argument which aren’t wrong. 

 

I say these people have no right to inflict the financial burden on us that they are and that is enough of a casus belli in itself. 

 

 

Edited by The_Dude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The_Dude said:

Why Violence Is Better

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/nearly-250-illegal-immigrants-arrested-in-new-mexico-after-crossing-border-seeking-medical-care-border-patrol-says.amp

 

Imagine if we had armed border guards who shot 12-20 of these people as they were crossing and denied them aid. That would have dispersed the other 230 and they would have flown back south, tail tucked, as quickly as their crappy shoes can carry them. But this option makes people cry. 

 

So instead were on the hook for providing them shelter, court dates, food, and medical care. What’s that going to cost us? Millions? And clearly our resistance to properly protect our frontiers is encouraging more migrant groups to come. That is going to result in the millions turning to billions. 

 

And what are the effects on these caravans? They cause crime and issues all through Mexico and everywhere else they go. They’re literally disrupting the global economy. 

 

How many future migrants will die on their trek to our border?

 

Start calculating these costs and then ask what would be better, 10-20 shot future drywallers / hotel maids that would be a strain on our infrastructure and schools.....or the continuation of the status quo which is good for nobody and the billions that it’s costing us? Cause it could all be avoided with a $10 box of ammo. 

 

If you look at the long term I’d argue deadly force against invaders is the most benevolent action. 

 

But I find most people consider what I say to be a “not nice” and so they won’t even hear out the merits of my argument which aren’t wrong. 

 

I say these people have no right to inflict the financial burden on us that they are and that is enough of a casus belli in itself. 

 

 

You clearly were born in the wrong time. I think you would fit into this picture nicely:

guillotine-robespierre-french-revolution.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

You clearly were born in the wrong time. I think you would fit into this picture nicely:

guillotine-robespierre-french-revolution.jpg

 

I do NOT appreciate that one bit. 

The very thought of France is unsettling to me. Unless of course I'm marching with the 10th Legion and killing the ***** out of some Gauls -- because that'd be cool. 

But I'm not wrong. It'd be kinder to the thousands, and thousands, of future "refugees" if we just shot a handful of people right now we'd save thousands in the future the misery of fruitless trek. What I'm advocating for is just ripping the bandaid off, but this country always wants to pull it slowly which only increases the pain and cost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

I do NOT appreciate that one bit. 

The very thought of France is unsettling to me. Unless of course I'm marching with the 10th Legion and killing the ***** out of some Gauls -- because that'd be cool. 

But I'm not wrong. It'd be kinder to the thousands, and thousands, of future "refugees" if we just shot a handful of people right now we'd save thousands in the future the misery of fruitless trek. What I'm advocating for is just ripping the bandaid off, but this country always wants to pull it slowly which only increases the pain and cost. 

Listen, if you want to scare them enough to not come to our border then do it right. They can get shot in their own country, but the guillotine would really make them think twice. Piker.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

I do NOT appreciate that one bit. 

The very thought of France is unsettling to me. Unless of course I'm marching with the 10th Legion and killing the ***** out of some Gauls -- because that'd be cool. 

But I'm not wrong. It'd be kinder to the thousands, and thousands, of future "refugees" if we just shot a handful of people right now we'd save thousands in the future the misery of fruitless trek. What I'm advocating for is just ripping the bandaid off, but this country always wants to pull it slowly which only increases the pain and cost. 

i wonder when your book reading adventures will get to, 'Mary Poppins' so that we might all benefit from diatribes from that perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

I think of you as a good candidate to join the queue for the guillotine above but then again it hit me that, what difference would it make?

You are losing, you don't get to send good people like me to--and no way you get this reference--"a far, far better place" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Frankly speaking, dead or alive, you are still slightly dumber than a cabbage.

i dunno, i've spent many a Fall harvesting cabbage and an equally many Winters trimming those cabbage. do you have something against cabbage to defame it so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Foxx said:

i dunno, i've spent many a Fall harvesting cabbage and an equally many Winters trimming those cabbage. do you have something against cabbage to defame it so?

You sound like a Sour *****.:bag: You gotta be kidding me. K R A U T is censored?

Edited by 3rdnlng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

You sound like a Sour *****.:bag: You gotta be kidding me. K R A U T is censored?

 

It wasn’t till like a couple weeks ago. I had the same reaction. 

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

White nationalist are losing the demographic war

 

White bros NEVER lose unless it’s to white bro’s. 

 

Were the most successful, inspiring, and influential demographic. Aren’t we, Tiberius (white guy)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

It wasn’t till like a couple weeks ago. I had the same reaction. 

 

White bros NEVER lose unless it’s to white bro’s. 

 

Were the most successful, inspiring, and influential demographic. Aren’t we, Tiberius (white guy)?

Lost in Vietnam ;) 

 

So GI, you wrong, tee hee 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Lost in Vietnam ;) 

 

So GI, you wrong, tee hee 

 

No, the United States did NOT lose in Vietnam. 

 

There's absolutely no proof to support that lie. 

 

Look at the battle statistics. Look at the battles. Look at the death counts. The United States did NOT lose. 

 

What happened is a bunch of pussies like you who didn't want to do man-things like me destabilized the nation at home and demanded an end. The United States did NOT lose that war. 

 

Further, if you're black (I'm not 100% you are) why don't you use another screen name because that's cultural appropriation.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

So pussies isn't censored, but K-r-a-u-t is??

Edited by The_Dude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ha ha, so you have no clue over the very basic cultural reference. 

 

Honest question, have you ever even read a book? 

 

Book, my ass.  You stole that from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.  No ***** way you've read Dickens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Book, my ass.  You stole that from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.  No ***** way you've read Dickens.

A Trumptard claiming someone else isn't a book reader. Ok! 

 

This from a guy who would dogfight in a P-38. Idiot 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

A Trumptard claiming someone else isn't a book reader. Ok! 

 

This from a guy who would dogfight in a P-38. Idiot 

 

Tom is a bag of wind, but homey has read books. 

 

Probably not the right ones, but he's most def booked out. He knows too much to not be a reader. And I'd also wager he's more read than I. However, it hasn't done him much good. But homey has booked and of that there is no doubt. 

 

And plane war while vital and necessary is stupid. 

Edited by The_Dude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

No, the United States did NOT lose in Vietnam. 

 

There's absolutely no proof to support that lie. 

 

Look at the battle statistics. Look at the battles. Look at the death counts. The United States did NOT lose. 

 

What happened is a bunch of pussies like you who didn't want to do man-things like me destabilized the nation at home and demanded an end. The United States did NOT lose that war. 

 

Further, if you're black (I'm not 100% you are) why don't you use another screen name because that's cultural appropriation.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

So pussies isn't censored, but K-r-a-u-t is??

Oh ya, so you going to visit the Republic of South Vietnam soon? Or was that wiped off the map? 

 

White men with massive fire power could not save it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Oh ya, so you going to visit the Republic of South Vietnam soon? Or was that wiped off the map? 

 

White men with massive fire power could not save it...

 

You're such an idiot. Like a HUGE idiot. American soldiers, did their job...liberals stabbed them in the back. And then that effected guys like me. How? Why? Because Haj thought they could fight/wait us out because of liberal cowards and Reagan. Good thing for white bros like me. 

We did NOT lose that war. We didn't lose. We left. We lost 50,000, and they lost over a million. 

14 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Running away 

 

Image result for last helicopter saigon
 

 

Yes, we know, Saigon fell to the NVA and stuff. We know. We're all smarter than you. We know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

You're such an idiot. Like a HUGE idiot. American soldiers, did their job...liberals stabbed them in the back. And then that effected guys like me. How? Why? Because Haj thought they could fight/wait us out because of liberal cowards and Reagan. Good thing for white bros like me. 

We did NOT lose that war. We didn't lose. We left. We lost 50,000, and they lost over a million. 

 

Yes, we know, Saigon fell to the NVA and stuff. We know. We're all smarter than you. We know.

Liberals did what? How so? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...