Magox Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 Hillary needs to pick a different battle that pushing for women to be allowed to abort a fetus after 20 weeks. I recognize that the abortion clinics fund her campaign generously, but still... She can't and she won't. She's beholden to her fringe base much like many of the GOP candidates are beholden to theirs. You can't say ALL LIVES matter without being labeled insensitive and not acceptable. You gotta be against the Key Stone pipeline because that's what the crazy Green's want even though the president's own review of it gave it the ok. You can't go against killing a baby after 20 weeks in the womb because the crazy uber feminists think that a woman can exterminate that baby simply because it is an inconvenience and it's her choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozymandius Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 How come the women who work for Planned Parenthood are always so butt ugly? I'm not sure adult male genitalia have ever been near them. Are all progressive organizations basically just about envy? These ugly chicks obviously just want to kill the babies of women who can attract adult male genitalia. It's sick and sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted July 28, 2015 Share Posted July 28, 2015 Eek! The bulk of the video features an interview withHolly O’Donnell, a former employee of StemExpress, which is one of Planned Parenthood’s partners in fetal donation. O’Donnell claimed to have applied for a job thinking she would just be drawing blood, but fainted on her first day when they brought in an aborted fetus for her to dissect. “For whatever we could procure, they would get a certain percentage,” O’Donnell said. “The main nurse was always trying to make sure we got our specimens. No one else really cared, but the main nurse did because she knew that Planned Parenthood was getting compensated.” But the more disturbing part of the video is towards the end, when an undercover activist posing as a buyer visits one of the Planned Parenthood abortion clinic laboratories, where he watches a technician dig through a pie dish full of fetal remains to find organs. As they review an 11-week fetus’ spinal cord and kidneys with a tweezer, the “buyer” says those are the kind of tissue he’d like to buy. “If I looked at that, I’d be like ‘that’s good to go,'” agrees Ginte. “Five stars!” jokes her medical assistant. “If we were doing like 50 to 75 [dollars] per specimen, that’d be like 200 to 300 and we’d be comfortable with that,” the “buyer” says. “But stuff like this, we don’t want to be like just a flat fee of like 200…“ “No, and I think a per-item thing works a little better, just because we can see how much we can get out of it,” Ginde responds. No bueno! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 28, 2015 Share Posted July 28, 2015 This is according to POLITICO: Planned Parenthood has hired high-profile Washington public relations firm SKDKnickerbocker as it scrambles to deal with the ongoing scandal and release of a third undercover video Tuesday showing a clinic’s staff handling fetal tissue after an abortion. The additional PR firepower reflects the growing pressure on the women’s health organization amid building GOP calls to cut its $540 million in government funding. House Majority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) earlier this week called to halt Planned Parenthood’s federal funding while Congress investigates whether the organization broke a federal ban on profiting from fetal tissue donation. The Senate plans to hold a vote on a defunding amendment from Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) and others that is likely to fail. SKDKnickerbocker is no newbie to working on Planned Parenthood issues. The Democratically aligned firm is run by well-connected operatives, including Anita Dunn and Hilary Rosen. It also worked with the group during the 2012 election cycle, according to SKDKnickerbocker’s website. The claims that the video released by the Center for Medical Progress are “highly edited” have fallen flat, and you can’t really say they’re not in it for profit based on today’s release. So, the only thing left to do is to… try to suppress the video from getting out. The media is all too happy to comply with the release, looking for any reason to not act against their own interests. The group circulated a memo to reporters and producers late Monday that discouraged them from airing the undercover videos, arguing that they were obtained under false identification and violated patient privacy. “Those patients’ privacy should not be further violated by having this footage shared by the media,” the memo reads. Planned Parenthood also has lobbying firms Capitol Counsel on retainer. Glover Park Group has also previously done work for the group. Planned Parenthood spent nearly $1.3 million on lobbying during the first six months of 2015, according to federal disclosures. Such an interesting claim here, that the public relations firm for noted Baby Parts Selling Ghouls to claim. Patients’ privacy would involve patients. The dictionary defines “patient” as “a person receiving or registered to receive medical treatment.” There are no women who have gotten abortions in the videos that have been released so far. The only non-Planned Parenthood people should are… the aborted babies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 28, 2015 Share Posted July 28, 2015 Eek! No bueno! I don't buy it. No reputable fetal marketing organization is going to keep the parts in a pie dish, unsorted, then turn around and claim they're trying to maximize income by selling parts. They'd have some sort of organization scheme better than "throw it in a pie dish." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 28, 2015 Share Posted July 28, 2015 Eek! No bueno! Sad how no one is really reporting about this with any zeal. Perhaps someone could take the baby parts and align them to look like a confederate flag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted July 28, 2015 Share Posted July 28, 2015 Perhaps someone could take the baby parts and align them to look like a confederate flag. Am I aloud to laugh at this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted July 28, 2015 Share Posted July 28, 2015 (edited) Sad how no one is really reporting about this with any zeal. Perhaps someone could take the baby parts and align them to look like a confederate flag. I agree with Magox. May be the "Line Of The Year" award winner on the PPP. It's very funny because in encapsulates the insane contradicting priorities of the PC lunatic left in one line. Good job. Edited July 28, 2015 by Dante Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 One of Planned Parenthood’s — and their supporters’ — most trusty complaints when it comes to being exposed as the baby butchers they are is about how the damning videos were obtained. Secrecy is bad, they cry! We were duped, they sputter! But as tweeter @back_ttys reminds us, it wasn’t so long ago that Planned Parenthood was singing a different tune: BT @back_ttys Planned Parenthood was for illegally-obtained videos before they were against them. https://twitter.com/PPact/status/248514452088049665 … 7:27 PM - 28 Jul 2015 18 18 Retweets Oh, and let’s not forget their angry claims that they’re just victims of “deceptive editing.” Turns out that outrage is, shall we say, selective. Remember this one? Planned Parenthood slams Live Action for ‘edited videotapes,’ slimes Romney in deceptively edited ad; Update: NYT agrees Not only has Planned Parenthood’s butchery been laid bare, but so has their hypocrisy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 Sad how no one is really reporting about this with any zeal. Perhaps someone could take the baby parts and align them to look like a confederate flag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 Sad how no one is really reporting about this with any zeal. Perhaps someone could take the baby parts and align them to look like a confederate flag. #AllFlagsMatter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 At what point do you consider a fetus to be a 'child'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 At what point do you consider a fetus to be a 'child'? Can we just skip to the part where someone defines viable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 At what point do you consider a fetus to be a 'child'? After the first pick up line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 Can we just skip to the part where someone defines viable? I might actually just start a poll to see where people line up here in regards to abortion, I'm genuinely curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 Can we just skip to the part where someone defines viable? I already did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 Can we just skip to the part where someone defines viable? We keep un-viable people alive every day in hospitals. Are people hooked up to feeding tubes, dialisys, and IVs viable? What about when they do heart surgery and take one's heart out. At that point are they still viable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 What about when they do heart surgery and take one's heart out. At that point are they still viable? Really?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 The part that really gets me about the liberal position on abortion is that it's so often accompanied by self-righteous indignation. It seems to me that when you're murdering a baby for the sake of convenience you've kind of lost the moral high ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts