BackInDaDay Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 (edited) it's very important to have offensive playmakers that can get you big chunks of yardage when the opportunities present themselves.. we're loading up the O with as many of these guys we can get. we currently don't have one at the TE /H-Back position. Clay fits that need. Edited March 13, 2015 by BackInDaDay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBRMEASAP Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 T-Money @TheRealPegula 26s27 seconds ago Don't worry y'all..Daddy's gotcha#DrillBabyDrill We got this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BackInDaDay Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 damn.. looks like the lights came on for last call.. fun thread while it lasted.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 F5 this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 I have a feeling this is some Tannenbaum vs Rex Ryan drama. Trying to hold up our other moves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 can't we get the 2 or 3 Clay threads combined ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 13, 2015 Author Share Posted March 13, 2015 can't we get the 2 or 3 Clay threads combined ???i think the point of many wanting the new thread was to make it shorter, not longer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 i think the point of many wanting the new thread was to make it shorter, not longer Until it gets longer the way this thing is playing out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Bills Fan Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 ground up and in the freezer CBF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaryl Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 can't we get the 2 or 3 Clay threads combined ??? why do people insist on packing everything into 1 - 60 page thread. that's the worst Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 why do people insist on packing everything into 1 - 60 page thread. that's the worst because it's easier to follow, and you wouldn't need to post the same stuff over and over? Do you think it is easier to follow 3 threads of 20 pages or 1 of 60? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 Guys, I prefer this Clay thread. The guys who post in the other one don't know what they are talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 (edited) because it's easier to follow, and you wouldn't need to post the same stuff over and over? Do you think it is easier to follow 3 threads of 20 pages or 1 of 60? bingo. if you are following closely the long one is easier. if you are following loosely your just going to the last page or two of any of them anyway, so its the same. i think the only people to complain are the people on mobile, and its the same problems once this one gets to be 12 hours old... edit: ooooops.... i posted in this one without realizing its the old one.... count the comment above as "once the new one gets to be 12 hours old" that said, i think we see a deal today. a nice note to end the week on. fingers crossed. Edited March 13, 2015 by NoSaint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt in KC Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 The obvious answer is to lock this older longer thread and leave just one thread, and a shorter one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichVP Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 The obvious answer is to lock this older longer thread and leave just one thread, and a shorter one. This. It's been done before for longer threads. Multiple threads only matter if they are all open. This one should be locked if the newer one is meant to replace it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 i think the point of many wanting the new thread was to make it shorter, not longer Until it gets longer the way this thing is playing out ^ That Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 can we lock this one? i'm not sure which one to check for the latest info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 sheesh I am almost sorry I brought up the subject Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 13, 2015 Author Share Posted March 13, 2015 The obvious answer is to lock this older longer thread and leave just one thread, and a shorter one.i tried but can't on my phone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaryl Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 because it's easier to follow, and you wouldn't need to post the same stuff over and over? Do you think it is easier to follow 3 threads of 20 pages or 1 of 60? yes.. I like multiple threads and I like them shorter and easier to browse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts